Systematic Review of the Main Motor Scales for Clinical Assessment of Individuals with down Syndrome

Family-professional collaborative intervention via telehealth with an infant with Down syndrome and visual impairment: a case report

BACKGROUND

Collaborative interventions, involving partnerships between professionals and families, make it possible to actively engage families in the rehabilitation process. However, no study was found that used a physiotherapy intervention via telehealth for infants with Down syndrome (DS).

OBJECTIVE

Describe the case report of a family-professional collaborative intervention via telehealth for an infant with Down syndrome and visual impairment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A male infant five months old participated in a collaborative intervention for a period of eight weeks. Three goals were set with the family, and a goal-oriented home program, involving visual stimulation strategies, was organized.

OUTCOMES

Two goals were achieved. The family scored changes in performance and satisfaction with the infant's performance according to the adapted Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Improvement of motor skills was verified by Alberta Infant Motor Scale and changes in mobility and daily activities performance were measured by the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Computer Adaptive Test.

CONCLUSION

The use of family-professional collaborative intervention via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic shows promising results for achieving the goals established by the family collaboratively with the physical therapists.

Relationship between sensory processing patterns and gross motor function of children and adolescents with Down syndrome and typical development: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS) may experience impairments in sensory and motor skills that can be interrelated. The purposes of this study were (i) to compare the sensory processing patterns and gross motor function between children and adolescents with DS and with typical development (TD) and (ii) to explore associations between these areas in both DS and TD groups.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study involved a sample size of 25 participants with DS (mean age 10.24 ± 2.04 years) and 25 participants with TD (mean age 10.04 ± 2.82 years). The sensory processing patterns were assessed using the Sensory Profile Second Version questionnaire, and the gross motor function was measured with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) dimensions (D) standing, and (E) walking, running, and jumping. Differences between groups were tested using the Mann-Whitney test, and the relationship between the variables was examined using Spearman's correlation tests, with a significance level set at 5%.

RESULTS

Children with DS showed greater difficulties with sensory processing than TD children in Seeker (P < 0.001), Avoider (P < 0.001), Sensitivity (P < 0.001), Registration (P < 0.001), Auditory (P < 0.001), Touch (P = 0.001), Movements (P = 0.001), Oral (P = 0.028), Conduct (P = 0.005), Socioemotional (P < 0.001), and Attentional (P < 0.001) domains. Additionally, children with DS presented lower gross motor function than TD in GMFM-88, standing (P < 0.001) and walking, running, and jumping (P < 0.001). Correlations were found between greater difficulties with sensory processing in Touch and lower gross motor function in walking, running, and jumping for the DS group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest there are more difficulties in sensory processing patterns and gross motor function in children with DS than in TD. Also, there is a single association between more difficulties in sensory processing and less well-developed motor function in the DS group. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of all these aspects should be performed in children and adolescents with DS, along with the provision of relevant interventions addressing specific needs.

Scoliosis in Adolescent Patients With Down Syndrome: Correlation Between Curve Magnitude and Functional Level

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, observational comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine whether a relationship exists between the functional level and spinal deformity in patients with Down syndrome (DS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients with DS have a higher incidence of scoliosis than the general population; however, it is unknown whether functional level influences the characteristics and severity of the deformity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 649 patients with DS included in a pediatric referral center database, we identified 59 with a diagnosis of scoliosis (59.32% female; mean age, 14.19±1.82 y); the 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised the study cohort. According to their functional gait skills and gross motor skills, they were classified into 2 levels. Different coronal and sagittal parameters were measured using full-spine standing radiographs. The need for surgical treatment and history of thoracotomy were recorded as well. Finally, a multivariate association analysis was performed between radiologic parameters and functional level.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients had a functional level consistent with level I and 24 with level II. Twelve curves were thoracic, 10 thoracolumbar, and 24 lumbar. A statistically significant relationship was found between functional level I and II and curve magnitude: 18.9 degrees (6.8) versus 36.9 degrees (20.3) ( P =0.001) with a cutoff point at 22.3 degrees (area under the curve=0.919, P <0.005, sensitivity=0.917 and specificity=0.818). The relationship between patients who required surgery and level II was also significant ( P =0.016). No relationship was found between functional level and coronal and sagittal balance, nor with other radiologic parameters or with curve location, or between the history of thoracotomy and thoracic curves.

CONCLUSIONS

DS adolescents with poorer functional level were associated with larger curves and greater risk for surgery. These findings may provide valuable guidance for the follow-up of scoliosis in patients with DS based on their functional level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Is There a Relationship Between the Functional Level of Juvenile and Adolescent Patients With Down Syndrome and Hip Dysplasia?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of hip dysplasia among patients with Down syndrome (DS) is higher than in the general population. We hypothesize that a relationship may exist between functional level and hip dysplasia in DS, but this has not been studied to date. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether there is a relationship between functional level and radiographic parameters of hip dysplasia or other measures.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study of 652 patients with DS from a pediatric referral center database. Patients over 8 years of age with an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph and with no exclusion criteria were selected, totaling 132 patients (264 hips; 54.55% females; mean age 12.96 ± 2.87 y). Several radiographic parameters of the acetabulum [Sharp angle (SA), Tönnis angle (TA), Wiberg center-edge angle (W-CEA), extrusion index (EI), and acetabular retroversion signs], the proximal femur [neck shaft angle (NSA)], and joint congruence [Shenton line (SL)] were assessed. Patients were classified into 2 levels based on functional skills. A multivariate association analysis was performed between radiographic parameters and functional level.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were compatible with a functional level I and 71 with a level II. Forty-six hips were dysplastic and 60 were borderline according to the W-CEA. A statistically significant relationship was found between the categorical distribution of certain radiographic measurements of hip dysplasia (EI, SA, TA, W-CEA, SL, and classification by functional level ( P < 0.0005). A significant receiver operating characteristic curve was obtained for W-CEA with a cutt-off point at 26.4 degrees for level I (area under the curve = 0.763; P < 0.005; sensitivity = 0.800 and specificity = 0.644). There was a fairly high correlation between EI and TA (0.749; P < 0.0005), EI and W-CEA (-0.817; P < 0.0005), and TA and W-CEA (-0.748; P < 0.0005). Numerous hips showed signs of acetabular retroversion, with no significant differences found between functional levels or association with hip dysplasia measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reveals a relationship between an increased risk of hip dysplasia and reduced functional levels in DS children older than 8 years. These findings may guide individualized clinical follow-up of hip development in DS children considering their functional level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The Use of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) as a Diagnostic Scale for Infants with Autism

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of developmental disabilities presenting difficulties in social interaction and language and an increased occurrence of cognitive, sensory, and motor gaps. Early intervention has been reported to improve the function of children with ASD. However, motor screening for children with ASD is difficult, as there are no specific tools for identifying this specific population. This study reports the results of using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), which assesses gross infant motor skills from ages 0 to 18 months, as a screening tool for detecting motor developmental delay (MDD) in small children with ASD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all children registered at one health care organization in Israel born between 2011 and 2017 (N = 240,299). Early childhood MDD was defined as having at least one recorded developmental physiotherapy (DPT) visit before the age of 2 years. Reasons for referral to DPT and the results of using AIMS as an appropriate tool for revealing developmental delays in infants with ASD are presented. Results: ASD diagnosis was reported in 1821 children (prevalence rate 0.75%). Of those, 388 (odds ratio 4.1, 95% CI 3.6–4.6) children were referred to DPT. Children with ASD mostly received DPT for motor delays (46.19%), torticollis (19.52%), developmental delay (15.48%), and preterm birth (7.38%). The use of AIMS as an early detection tool suggests that more than 87% of children with ASD and MDD present with a developmental delay or risk for one when using this scale. Conclusions: The prevalence of ASD among children referred to DPT for MDD is higher than its prevalence within the general population. The most common reasons for a child with ASD to be referred for DPT services are MMDs. AIMS was found to be a sensitive tool to pinpoint relevant candidates for ASD screening among children treated in DPT. Possible effects of the study: The use of AIMS as a relevant assessment scale for this group of clients is recommended. Training DPTs in identifying initial ASD signs and developing their clinical reasoning abilities will increase the chance of implementing early intervention with this group of clients.

Impact of Neonatal Body (Dis)Proportionality Determined by the Cephalization Index (CI) on Gross Motor Development in Children with Down Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Children with Down syndrome (DS) lag behind typical children in the acquisition of developmental milestones, which could differ depending on body proportionality. We aimed to determine the difference in the acquisition of developmental milestones in children with DS with a disproportionate cephalization index (CI) compared to a proportionate CI. We created a motor development model that predicted milestone acquisition times. Methods: In this 20-year prospective cohort study, 47 children with DS aged 3 months to 5 years, followed up to 2020, were grouped according to the ratio of head circumference to birth weight (HC/BW) or CI into proportionate (CI < 1.1) and disproportionate (CI ≥ 1.1). We used a modified Munich Functional Developmental Diagnostic Scale that was assessed for reliability and content validity (Levene’s test and discriminant analysis) to determine 28 motor milestones. Linear regression was used to predict time to milestone acquisition, controlling for sex, maternal age, and birth weight. Results: Compared to proportionate CI, children with disproportionate CI were delayed in the milestone acquisition of a prone position by 2.81 months, standing before walking by 1.29 months, and a supine position by 1.61 months. Both groups required more time to reach standing after the acquisition of independent walking, but children with disproportionate CI reached those milestones later (4.50 vs. 4.09 months, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Children with disproportionate CI acquired milestones in a predictable order but slower than those with a proportionate CI. Our findings support the need to classify the degree of motor developmental delay in children with DS into unique functional groups rather than rely on clinicians’ arbitrary descriptions of the timing of developmental delays in children with DS.

The Alberta Infant Motor Scale: A tool for the assessment of motor aspects of neurodevelopment in infancy and early childhood

According to the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the surveillance of motor development should accompany systematic appointments with medical professionals in infancy and early childhood. One of the standardized tools for evaluating motor development is the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). This paper aims to present assumptions and psychometric properties of the AIMS, the methodology of assessment of an infant's performance with the AIMS, and research on the validation and standardization of the AIMS as well as the use of the scale as an outcome measure. We conducted a non-systematic literature review using three electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (from June 1992 to February 2022). We included original research with a full-text manuscript in English. No geographical restrictions were applied. The search terms “alberta infant motor scale” AND “reliability” OR “validity” and “alberta infant motor scale” AND “norms” OR “reference” OR “standardization” were used for literature review on the validation and standardization of the AIMS in other non-Canadian populations. This narrative review also focuses on how the AIMS is applied as an outcome measure in research by presenting studies on the AIMS conducted over the last decade. Our review found that the AIMS is widely used for both research and clinical purposes. The AIMS has been used as an outcome measure in both interventional and observational studies conducted on both neurotypical infants and those with conditions affecting motor development. The advantages of the scale are its infant-friendliness, time duration of the examination, and relative ease of application for an examiner. The scale has been validated and standardized in many countries.

Associations of Motor Performance and Executive Functions: Comparing Children with Down Syndrome to Chronological and Mental Age-Matched Controls

Background. Children with Down syndrome (DS) exhibit lower motor and cognitive performance than typically developing children (TD). Although there is a relationship between these two developmental domains, only a few studies have addressed this association in children with DS compared to groups of the same chronological age (CA) or mental age (MA) within one study. This study aimed to fill this research gap. Method and Procedures. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 and the Trail-Making Test was used to assess motor and cognitive performances in 12 children (M = 10.5 ± 10.08) with DS, 12 CA-matched, and 12 MA-matched controls. Results. There are significant group differences in the motor dimension (total test score; p < 0.001, η²_p = 0.734), for processing speed (p < 0.001, η²_p = 0.396), and cognitive flexibility (p < 0.001, η²_p = 0.498). Between TD-CA and both other groups, the differences in the magnitude of correlations for the motor dimension balance are also significant (compared to DS: z = −2.489; p = 0.006, and to TD-MA: z = −3.12; p < 0.001). Conclusions. Our results suggest that the relationships depend on the studied cognitive and motor skills. It seems crucial to select a wide range of tasks for both domains that are as isolated as possible for future studies, to better understand the relationships between cognitive and motor skills in children with DS.