Mechanical emulsification of lipoaspirate by different Luer-Lok connector changes the viability of adipose derived stem cells in Nanofat

Nanofat Use in Regenerative Medicine: A Systematic Literature Review and Consensus Recommendations from Expert Opinions

Objective: To report in vitro, preclinical, and clinical effectiveness of nanofat in adults undergoing reconstructive or functional surgery and to produce a series of consensus statements about nanofat definition by experts. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed and Web of Science database, retaining studies about nanofat alone. To produce consensus recommendations about nanofat, we invited experts to answer a survey about manufacturing, biological characteristics, and nomenclature of nanofat. Results: A review of 39 articles showed that nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potential. There were 16 studies about the clinical effectiveness of the nanofat in wound healing, aesthetic surgery, and functional disabilities. However, majority of applications lack robust clinical evidence, mainly due to the design of the clinical studies. The experts suggested that nanofat refers to lipoaspirate that benefits from a washing step, followed by emulsification (20-30 passes) with a connector size between 1.2 and 1.6 mm, and a final filtration step (pore size around 300-500 µm). Conclusion: Nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potentials but with a lack of robust clinical evidences. Our experts have suggested the first consensus about a definition of the nanofat that can be used by the academic societies in the coming years.

Advanced methods to mechanically isolate stromal vascular fraction: A concise review

Adipose tissue is a highly attractive reservoir of stem cells due to its accessibility and abundance, and the SVF within it holds great promise for stem cell-based therapies. The use of mechanical methods for SVF isolation from adipose tissue is preferred over enzymatic methods, as it can be readily applied in clinical settings without additional processing steps. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal approach for mechanically isolating SVF. This comprehensive review aims to present and compare the latest mechanical isolation methods for SVF from adipose tissue, including centrifugation, filtration/washing, emulsification, vibration, and mincing/adiponizing. Each of these methods possesses unique advantages and limitations, and yet, no conclusive evidence has emerged demonstrating the superiority of one approach over the others, primarily due to the dearth of well-controlled prospective studies in this field.

Push-Through Filtration of Emulsified Adipose Tissue Over a 500-µm Mesh Significantly Reduces the Amount of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Mesenchymal Stem Cells

BACKGROUND

Mechanical isolation of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) separates the stromal component from the parenchymal cells. Emulsification is currently the most commonly used disaggregation method and is effective in disrupting adipocytes and fragmenting the extracellular matrix (ECM). Subsequent push-through filtration of emulsified adipose tissue removes parts of the ECM that are not sufficiently micronized, thereby further liquifying the tissue.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether filtration over a 500-µm mesh filter might affect the SVF and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) quantity in emulsified lipoaspirate samples by removing ECM fragments.

METHODS

Eleven lipoaspirate samples from healthy nonobese women were harvested and emulsified in 30 passes. One-half of the sample was filtered through a 500-µm mesh filter and the other half was left unfiltered. Paired samples were processed and analyzed by flow cytometry to identify cellular viability, and SVF and MSC yield.

RESULTS

Push-through filtration reduced the number of SVF cells by a mean [standard deviation] of 39.65% [5.67%] (P < .01). It also significantly reduced MSC counts by 48.28% [6.72%] (P < .01). Filtration did not significantly affect viability (P = .118).

CONCLUSIONS

Retention of fibrous remnants by push-through filters removed ECM containing the SVF and MSCs from emulsified lipoaspirates. Processing methods should aim either to further micronize the lipoaspirate before filtering or not to filter the samples at all, to preserve both the cellular component carried within the ECM and the inductive properties of the ECM itself.

A Closed-system Technology for Mechanical Isolation of High Quantities of Stromal Vascular Fraction from Fat for Immediate Clinical Use

Adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is increasingly used in the clinic. SVF separation from fat by enzymatic disruption is currently the gold standard for SVF isolation. However, enzymatic SVF isolation is time-consuming (~1.5 h), costly and significantly increases the regulatory burden of SVF isolation. Mechanical fat disruption is rapid, cheaper, and less regulatory challenging. However, its reported efficacy is insufficient for clinical use. The current study evaluated the efficacy of a novel rotating blades (RBs) mechanical SVF isolation system.

Methods

SVF cells were isolated from the same lipoaspirate sample (n = 30) by enzymatic isolation, massive shaking (wash), or engine-induced RBs mechanical isolation. SVF cells were counted, characterized by flow cytometry and by their ability to form adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs).

Results

The RBs mechanical approach yielded 2 × 10⁵ SVF nucleated cells/mL fat, inferior to enzymatic isolation (4.17 × 10⁵) but superior to cells isolating from fat by the "wash" technique (0.67 × 10⁵). Importantly, RBs SVF isolation yield was similar to reported yields achieved via clinical-grade enzymatic SVF isolation. RBs-isolated SVF cells were found to contain 22.7% CD45^-CD31^-CD34⁺ stem cell progenitor cells (n = 5) yielding quantities of multipotent ASCs similar to enzymatic controls.

Conclusions

The RBs isolation technology provided for rapid (<15 min) isolation of high-quality SVF cells in quantities similar to those obtained by enzymatic digestion. Based on the RBs platform, a closed-system medical device for SVF extraction in a rapid, simple, safe, sterile, reproducible, and cost-effective manner was designed.

Nanofat Cell-Mediated Anti-Aging Therapy: Evidence-Based Analysis of Efficacy and an Update of Stem Cell Facelift

BACKGROUND

Fat grafting has been extensively applied as natural filler and has been very promising in restoring volume loss. Lipografting has also been credited to reduce age-related skin changes due to the regenerative potential of adipose derived stem cells. Cell-mediated therapies in plastic surgery are rapidly evolving with growing applications. Nanofat, a bio-regenerative liquid suspension rich in stromal vascular fraction cells without viable adipocytes, has been described as an efficient cutaneous anti-aging therapy. We have published in 2013 a review entitled "stem cell facelift: between reality and fiction." Available clinical evidence at that time did not substantiate marketing and promotional claims of "stem cell facelift". The same year, the report about nanofat was published demonstrating striking clinical outcome. The current literature search is aimed at reviewing any evidence that has emerged since then regarding clinical efficacy of this modality.

METHODS

A thorough PICO tool-based comprehensive literature search of PubMed database for "the efficacy of nanofat cell-mediated anti-aging therapy" was conducted with a time frame from 2013 till present.

RESULTS

Despite apparent increasing popularity of stem cell rejuvenation, well-controlled clinical studies about this modality are surprisingly very scarce. Only seven papers published after 2013 were identified and were included in this review CONCLUSION: Though considered to be a safe procedure, and despite documented histologic improvement and striking clinical outcome in some reports, available evidence can hardly support clinical improvement of skin quality. Before cell-mediated aesthetic rejuvenation applications can be routinely undertaken, more robust evidence with well-defined primary outcome end points and objective outcome measures is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.