Partial trapeziectomy and pyrocarbon interpositional implant (Pyrodisk) for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in the active working population: outcomes of a 10 years-experience

Treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with a pyrocarbon implant: Long-term results

OBJECTIVE

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is the second most common degenerative articular disease. Although initial therapy should be conservative, surgical treatment is often required. Several surgical techniques have been described, but none has proved to be a gold-standard. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological results of trapeziometacarpal interposition arthroplasty with the PyroDisk implant (Integra LifeSciences).

METHODS

A retrospective long-term study of all patients who underwent trapeziometacarpal interposition arthroplasty with a pyrocarbon implant at our institution was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients who underwent PyroDisk (Integra LifeSciences). arthroplasty at our institution were identified; 7 were lost to follow-up; 17 patients were evaluated, for 20 arthroplasties. Mean follow-up was 13.5 years (range: 12-15 years). Disability in daily living activities was low (mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 29.6), with a mean pain score of 0.22. Mean Kapandji score at 13.5 years was 8.63. Mean grip strength was 18.5 kg and key-pinch strength 2.84 kg. Two patients had implant dislocation, needing revision surgery for implant removal. Implant survival rate was 88.9% at 13.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that good clinical results can be expected after interposition arthroplasty with PyroDisk (Integra LifeSciences). Regarding radiological findings, peri-implant osteolysis was present in 12 of the patients, but had no influence on the clinical outcome.

[Hemitrapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb]

BACKGROUND

Hemiresection arthoplasty or partial trapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is a surgical option in stages 1-3 according to Eaton-Littler classification. Preservation of the intact scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint and maintenance of the length of the thumb is the advantage of this technique.

TECHNIQUE

Technically, partial trapeziectomy is only slightly more complex compared to trapeziectomy with or without suspension. An interposition of autologous or allogeneic material is recommended; suspension arthroplasty is also possible in almost all common variants. Despite these theoretical advantages, this technique has not proven advantageous in practice, neither in terms of function nor in terms of time, compared to other techniques. The great advantage of partial trapeziectomy, however, is the wide range of options for revision surgery in the case of persistent complaints.

RESULTS

The risk of proximalization of the thumb due to an inadequate interposition is generally minor and is usually caused by implant sintering. This can easily be compensated for by implanting a larger graft. Persistent instabilities are the most common cause of persistence of symptoms and can usually be remedied by autologous or allogeneic suspension arthroplasty. In addition, the entire range of endoprosthetics is also possible with a previous spare resection of the trapezium and the possibility of a complete trapeziectomy remains in any case. The obvious theoretical advantages of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy need to be confirmed in practice in future.