A meta-analysis of union rate after proximal scaphoid fractures: terminology matters

Surgical Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures: Recommendations for Management

Background: Several operative treatments exist for scaphoid fractures, varying by approach (e.g., ercutaneous, volar, or dorsal), implant type (e.g., screw or Kirschner wire), and bone raft choice (e.g., none, nonvascularized, or vascularized). Many previous systematic eviews and meta-analyses have investigated outcomes following different surgicalÚpproaches, the use of vascularized versus nonvascularized bone graft for scaphoidßracture nonunions, and treatment for specific fracture patterns. However, given the advancements n scaphoid fracture treatment in recent years, there is a need for updated treatment recommendations hat would be beneficial to hand surgeons. Purpose: We present a comprehensive review of the operative treatment of scaphoid fractures based on recent literature and propose a unified treatment algorithm for managing these fractures. Methods: The English-language literature was searched from 2002 to 2023 for high evidence level (e.g., randomized trials), review, and meta-analysis articles with the following search terms: "scaphoid, "u8220"scaphoid" AND "nonunion, " and "scaphoid" AND "malunion. " Each article was creened by the authors to determine the scaphoid fracture scenario addressed and ubsequent treatment recommendations. The findings from article reviews were then rganized by scaphoid fracture types in this manuscript. Results: A total of 95 pertinent articles were ultimately selected and used as the basis for reviewing different scaphoid fracture scenarios. A treatment algorithm was then proposed based on literature review. Conclusion: This summary of the recent literature can guide hand surgeons in addressing scaphoidßractures. Future research in scaphoid fracture treatment, particularly for nonunions, would be most beneficial n the form of systematic review, meta-analysis, or multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials. Level of Evidence: IV.

Reasons for scaphoid non-union: Analysis of behavior of health care providers and patients

To assess factors related to health-system and patient behavior in scaphoid fracture non-union, a retrospective analysis of 134 patients treated by scaphoid reconstruction was performed. Mean age at the accident was 26 years (range, 9-75 years), and the mean age at surgery was 28 years (range, 13-75 years). Mean time to first consultation was 233 days (range, 0-12,136 days), and time to surgery 740 days (range, 19-12,362 days). The physician was mainly a general practitioner (52.2%), or an orthopedist/traumatologist (17.9%), general surgeon (12.7%), or hand surgeon (17.2%). The initial diagnostic procedure was X-ray in 76.9% of cases, computed tomography (CT) in 20.9%, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 13.4%, and none in 11.2%. A fracture was diagnosed in 32.8% of cases, and non-union in 14.9%. Patients mainly presented late: 63% within 3 weeks, and a minority on the day of the accident (39%). In 11% of cases, healthcare providers performed either no or inadequate imaging (77%) and missed correct diagnosis in 52% of cases. 128 patients had a second consultation, and 77 a third, with the same or different physicians, before surgery, leading to increased healthcare costs due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Delayed presentation and lack of suspicion by attending physicians were the main reasons. Speeding up diagnosis and improving physician training are vital and could significantly reduce health care costs. CT or MRI should be performed if scaphoid fracture is suspected.

Traditional Bone Grafting in Scaphoid Nonunion

Management of scaphoid nonunion remains challenging despite modern fixation techniques. Nonvascularized bone graft may be used to achieve union in waist and proximal pole fractures with good success rates. Technical aspects, such as adequate debridement and restoration of scaphoid length, and stable fixation are critical in achieving union and functional wrist usage. Rigid fixation can be achieved with compression screws, K-wires, and plate constructs. The surgeon has a choice of various bone graft options including corticocancellous, cancellous, and strut grafts to promote healing and correct the humpback deformity.

Arthroscopic bone graft and fixation for proximal scaphoid nonunions

AIMS

This study aims to report the outcomes in the treatment of unstable proximal third scaphoid nonunions with arthroscopic curettage, non-vascularized bone grafting, and percutaneous fixation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 20 patients. All cases were delayed presentations (n = 15) or failed nonoperatively managed scaphoid fractures (n = 5). Surgery was performed at a mean duration of 27 months (7 to 120) following injury with arthroscopic debridement and arthroscopic iliac crest autograft. Fracture fixation was performed percutaneously with Kirschner (K)-wires in 12 wrists, a headless screw in six, and a combination of a headless screw and single K-wire in two. Clinical outcomes were assessed using grip strength, patient-reported outcome measures, and wrist range of motion (ROM) measurements.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, established avascular necrosis of the proximal fragment was identified in ten scaphoids. All fractures united within 16 weeks, confirmed by CT. At a mean follow-up of 31 months (12 to 64), there were significant improvements in the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Mayo Wrist Score, abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, wrist ROM, grip strength, and the patients' subjective pain score. No peri- or postoperative complications were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that arthroscopic bone grafting and fixation with cancellous autograft is a viable method in the treatment of proximal third scaphoid nonunions, regardless of the vascularity of the proximal fragment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):946-952.