Improving quality by involving patient. The role of health literacy in influencing patients’ behaviors

From experts' perspective, factors affecting the effectiveness of online educational programs in promoting the health literacy of MS patients: A grounded theory approach

BACKGROUND

Online educational programs have emerged as a promising tool for promoting health literacy (HL) among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, identifying influencing factors is crucial for maximizing their effectiveness.

AIM

This study aimed to explain the factors affecting the effectiveness of online educational programs in promoting HL among MS patients in Iran.

METHODS

A qualitative methodology based on Grounded Theory (GT) was employed and participants were recruited using snowball sampling. A total of 17 experts, including patient educators and HL experts, were interviewed until theoretical saturation was achieved. Participants were selected from patient rehabilitation centers in Tehran and members of the Iran MS Society.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interview data revealed six contextual factors. These factors included socioeconomic status, healthcare infrastructure, technological accessibility and literacy, cultural and linguistic diversity, support networks and caregiver involvement, and health policy and regulatory environment.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing socioeconomic disparities, improving technological access and literacy and fostering cultural sensitivity are essential steps to enhance the effectiveness and accessibility of these programs. Moreover, collaboration with caregivers and policymakers is crucial for creating an enabling environment that supports the successful integration of online health education initiatives into MS care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Findings from this study can enhance the efficacy and productivity of online programs aimed at boosting HL among patients with specific conditions like MS.

Health Literacy in Fall-Prevention Strategy: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Although the significance of health literacy (HL) in fall-prevention strategies is growing, limited knowledge is available regarding the relationship, impact, and role of HL in falls. This scoping review aimed to explore and synthesize the current evidence regarding the role of HL in enhancing fall prevention in hospital and community settings.

METHODS

We adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews. PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched until November 2023 using Medical Subject Headings and text words. Studies related to HL and falls, regardless of study design, were considered eligible.

RESULTS

We screened 99,249 records, of which 27 were included: 12 interventional studies, seven observational studies, four qualitative studies, and four mixed-methods studies. Two-thirds of the studies were conducted in community-based settings. Four observational studies reported that HL was associated with fall-related outcome including fall incidence. Although intervention studies did not encompass all elements of HL based on the Health Literacy Framework, eight out of 12 intervention studies reported the effect of HL-embedded fall-prevention interventions, and HL was effective in fall-related outcomes including fall incidence in six studies. Three of 14 studies reported the measurement properties of fall-related HL. While HL can be increased through tailored information, verbal debriefing, interactive communication, and culturally adapted interventions, low HL impedes the understanding of education, engaging interventions, and using technological devices in implementing fall-prevention interventions in qualitative and mixed-methods studies.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review suggests that nurses need to recognize and assess patients' HL as a potential risk factor for falls and implement fall-prevention interventions based on the HL level of participants. Further research is required to develop culturally adapted and fall-relevant HL measures applicable to various vulnerable populations and settings.

Epidemiology, mortality, and health service use of local-level multimorbidity patterns in South Spain

Multimorbidity -understood as the occurrence of chronic diseases together- represents a major challenge for healthcare systems due to its impact on disability, quality of life, increased use of services and mortality. However, despite the global need to address this health problem, evidence is still needed to advance our understanding of its clinical and social implications. Our study aims to characterise multimorbidity patterns in a dataset of 1,375,068 patients residing in southern Spain. Combining LCA techniques and geographic information, together with service use, mortality, and socioeconomic data, 25 chronicity profiles were identified and subsequently characterised by sex and age. The present study has led us to several findings that take a step forward in this field of knowledge. Specifically, we contribute to the identification of an extensive range of at-risk groups. Moreover, our study reveals that the complexity of multimorbidity patterns escalates at a faster rate and is associated with a poorer prognosis in local areas characterised by lower socioeconomic status. These results emphasize the persistence of social inequalities in multimorbidity, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to mitigate the impact on patients' quality of life, healthcare utilisation, and mortality rates.

Positioning patients to partner: exploring ways to better integrate patient involvement in the learning health systems

Globally, health systems are increasingly striving to deliver evidence based care that improves patients', caregivers' and communities' health outcomes. To deliver this care, more systems are engaging these groups to help inform healthcare service design and delivery. Their lived experiences-experiences accessing and/or supporting someone who accesses healthcare services-are now viewed by many systems as expertise and an important part of understanding and improving care quality. Patients', caregivers' and communities' participation in health systems can range from healthcare organizational design to being members of research teams. Unfortunately, this involvement greatly varies and these groups are often sidelined to the start of research projects, with little to no role in later project stages. Additionally, some systems may forgo direct engagement, focusing solely on patient data collection and analysis. Given the benefits of active patient, caregiver and community participation in health systems on patient health outcomes, systems have begun identifying different approaches to studying and applying findings of patient, caregiver and community informed care initiatives in a rapid and consistent fashion. The learning health system (LHS) is one approach that can foster deeper and continuous engagement of these groups in health systems change. This approach embeds research into health systems, continuously learning from data and translating findings into healthcare practices in real time. Here, ongoing patient, caregiver and community involvement is considered vital for a well functioning LHS. Despite their importance, great variability exists as to what their involvement means in practice. This commentary examines the current state of patient, caregiver and community participation in the LHS. In particular, gaps in and need for resources to support their knowledge of the LHS are discussed. We conclude by recommending several factors health systems must consider in order to increase participation in their LHS. Systems must: (1) assess patients', caregivers and community understanding of how their feedback are used in the LHS and how collected data are used to inform patient care; (2) review the level and extent of these groups' participation in health system improvement activities; and (3) examine whether health systems have the workforce, capacity and infrastructure to nurture continuous and impactful engagement.

Effect of Educational Intervention on Knowledge and Level of Adherence among Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of an educational intervention on the level of knowledge and adherence to the treatment regimen among hemodialysis (HD) patients as well as to describe the association between these variables. Methods. In this randomized controlled trial, 160 HD patients at an HD centre of a 2030-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Southern India were randomly assigned into intervention (N = 80, received education and a booklet) and control (N = 80, received standard care) groups. Knowledge and adherence were measured preintervention and postintervention using a validated questionnaire for knowledge and the ESRD-AQ (End-Stage Renal Disease Questionnaire) for the level of adherence. The statistical analysis of the data was performed with the help of the Statistical Program SPSS version 19.0. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05. Results. The increase in knowledge on disease management, fluid adherence, and dietary adherence in the intervention group was significantly higher compared to the control group. There was no significant correlation between knowledge and adherence. Adherence improved for all the domains, i.e., dialysis attendance, episodes of shortening, adherence to medication, fluid restriction, and dietary restriction. Adherence to fluid and dietary restriction was statistically significant. This trail is registered with https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/CTRI/2018/05/014166.

What determines Hong Kong South Asians' perceptions on COVID-19 vaccine? Implications on culturally appropriate vaccine messages for ethnic minority community

Guided by the behavioral model of health service use, this study examined the effect of South Asians' perceptions of healthcare, religious belief, and socioeconomic status on their perceived benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccines (N = 245). Cross-sectional survey was used. Logistic regressions results showed that higher levels of perceived involvement in South Asian community health and trust in the healthcare system were associated with higher odds of reporting perceived vaccine benefits. Permanent residents, students (vs. unemployed), and Pakistani (vs. Indians) also perceived the vaccine as beneficial. On the other hand, believing that the body was sacred and being Buddhist (vs. Hindu) were associated with higher odds of perceiving severe vaccination risk. Those who believed that God would cure COVID-19 and those with higher education tended to perceive the vaccine as having a limited effect. Implications on designing culturally appropriate COVID-19 vaccines messages in interethnic settings are discussed.

Where are we in shared decision-making in Italy? A brief updated review

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of the art concerning patient-centred care (PCC), shared decision-making (SDM), and patient involvement in health care in Italy, by updating the previous versions of the review. In the past 5 years some progress has been made towards a higher involvement of patients in their health care and patient-centredness into the national health care system. The updated scoping literature search focused on articles reporting primary data collected in Italy and showed a great increase in the number of publications. Nonetheless, the research efforts are still relatively sporadic compared to other countries especially as for evaluations of interventions and, most notably, they are not driven by a consistent effort to promote SDM and PCC in clinical practice.

Improving Health for People Living With Heart Failure: Focus Group Study of Preconditions for Co-Production of Health and Care

Background

Co-production of health and care involving patients, families of patients, and professionals in care processes can create joint learning about how to meet patients’ needs. Although barriers and facilitators to co-production have been examined previously in various health care contexts, the preconditions in Swedish chronic cardiac care contexts are yet to be explored. This study is set in the health system of the Swedish region of Jönköping County and is part of system-wide efforts to promote better health for persons with heart failure (HF).

Objective

The objective of this study was to test the usefulness of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behavior (COM-B) model when assessing the barriers to and facilitators of co-production of health and care perceived by patients with HF, family members of patients with HF, and professionals in a Swedish chronic cardiac care context as a guide for subsequent initiatives.

Methods

Data collection involved 1 focus group interview (FGI) with patients with HF (n=5), 1 FGI with family members of patients with HF (n=5), 1 FGI with professionals in primary care (n=7), and 1 FGI with professionals in cardiac care (n=4). In addition, patients with HF kept diaries of their thoughts regarding co-production. Using a deductive approach to content analysis, underpinned by the COM-B model, barriers and facilitators were categorized into capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to co-produce health and care.

Results

The participants showed limited understanding of co-production as a practice. They appeared to view it as a privilege to be offered to patients on top of traditional care and rarely as an approach for improving health care processes. The interviews revealed the limited health literacy among patients and the struggle of professionals to convey health information to these patients. Co-production was considered to be more resource-intensive than traditional care. Different expectations of stakeholders’ roles were revealed: professionals expected older patients not to want to co-produce health and care, and all participants expected professionals to be in charge of health care services. The family members’ position involved trying to balance their desire to support their relatives with understanding when, how, and with whom to co-produce. Presumed benefits motivated stakeholders: co-production was recognized to motivate patients to improve self-care. However, the participants recognized that motivation to get involved in health and care decisions varies over time among stakeholders.

Conclusions

Co-production can be facilitated by the stakeholders’ motivation. However, varying levels of understanding of co-production, patients’ limited health literacy, unease with power sharing between patients and professionals, and resource constraints are barriers that need to be managed to promote co-produced care and better health for persons living with HF. Further research is warranted to explore how to co-produce health care services with patients with HF and how leaders can facilitate the inevitable cultural change it requires and represents.

Leveraging Organizational Health Literacy to Enhance Health Promotion and Risk Prevention: A Narrative and Interpretive Literature Review

Organizational health literacy involves the health care organizations' ability to establish an empowering and co-creating relationship with patients, engaging them in the design and delivery of health services in collaboration with health professionals. Although scholars agree that organizational health literacy contributes to health promotion and risk prevention via patient empowerment, literature is not consistent in depicting the interplay between organizational health literacy and preventive medicine. The article intends to shed light into this issue, summarizing current knowledge about this topic and advancing avenues for further development. A narrative literature review was performed through a systematic search on PubMed^®, Scopus^®, and Web of Science^™. The review focused on 50 relevant contributions. Organizational health literacy triggers the transition towards a patient-centered approach to care. It complements individual health literacy, enabling patients to actively participate in health promotion and risk prevention as co-producers of health services and co-creators of value. However, many obstacles - including lack of time and limited resources available - prevent the transition towards health literate health care organizations. Two initiatives are required to overcome extant barriers. On the one hand, a health literate workforce should be prepared to increase the institutional ability of health care organizations to empower and engage patients in health co-creation. On the other hand, increased efforts should be made to assess organizational health literacy and to make its contribution to preventive medicine explicit.

A conceptual model of functional health literacy to improve chronic airway disease outcomes

Background

Current conceptual models of health literacy (HL) illustrate the link between HL and health outcomes. However, these models fail to recognize and integrate certain elements of disease management, health system factors, and socio-demographic factors into their framework. This article outlines the development of Chronic Airway Disease (CAD) Management and Health Literacy (CADMaHL) conceptual model that integrates the aforementioned elements and factors into a single framework.

Methods

Information obtained during the following stages informed the development of our model: (1) a systematic review of existing CAD HL measurement tools that apply core HL domains; (2) patient-oriented focus group sessions to understand HL barriers to CAD self-management practices; (3) key-informant interviews to obtain potential strategies to mitigate CAD management barriers, and validate disease self-management topics; (4) elicited the perspectives of Canadian respirologist’s on the ideal functional HL skills for asthma and COPD patients.

Results

Throughout the study process many stakeholders (i.e., patients, key-informants, and an international HL advisory panel) contributed to and reviewed the model. The process enabled us to organize the CADMaHL model into 6 primary modules, including: INPUT, consisting of four HL core components (access, understand, communicate, evaluate,) and numeracy skills; OUTPUT, including application of the obtained information; OUTCOME, covering patient empowerment in performing self-management practices by applying HL skills; ASSESSMENT, consisting of information about functionality and relevancy of CADMaHL; IMPACT, including mediators between HL and health outcomes; CROSSCUTTING FACTORS, consisting of diverse socio-demographics and health-system factors with applicability across the HL domains.

Conclusions

We developed the CADMaHL model, with input from key-stakeholders, which addresses a knowledge gap by integrating various disease management, health-system and socio-demographic factors absent from previous published frameworks. We anticipate that our model will serve as the backbone for the development of a comprehensive HL measurement tool, which may be utilized for future HL interventions for CAD patients.

Trial registration

NCT01474928- Date of registration: 11/26/2017.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10313-x.