Exploring patient choice in India: A study on hospital selection

Effects of and Prospects for the Hierarchical Medical Policy in Beijing, China

Hierarchical medical policies are widely used worldwide to reduce healthcare costs, rationalize the use of healthcare resources, and improve accessibility and fairness of healthcare services. However, few case studies have evaluated the effects and prospects of such policies. Medical reform efforts in China have distinct goals and characteristics. Therefore, we investigated the effects of a hierarchical medical policy in Beijing and assessed the future potential of the policy to yield insights for other countries, especially developing countries. Different methods were used to analyze multidimensional data from official statistics, a questionnaire survey of 595 healthcare workers from 8 representative public hospitals in Beijing, a questionnaire survey of 536 patients, and 8 semi-structured interview records. The hierarchical medical policy had strong positive effects on improving access to healthcare services, balancing the workload of healthcare workers in various levels of public hospitals, and improving the management of public hospitals. The remaining obstacles include severe job stress among healthcare workers, the high cost of some healthcare services, and the need for improvement in the development level and service capacity of primary hospitals. This study provides useful policy recommendations regarding the implementation and extension of the hierarchical medical policy, including the need for governments to improve the hospital assessment system and for hospitals to actively participate in developing medical partnerships.

Healthcare provider selection for elderly patients suffering from NCD's: an analysis with the combined approach of DEMATEL and AHP

Purpose

Elderly patients suffering from non-communicable disease face a dilemma in the selection of healthcare providers. This study attempts to identify the key variables playing a crucial role and identify the appropriate healthcare destination with the help of a combination of Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques. The primary objective is to introduce the DEMATEL and AHP as efficient decision-making methods to choose the right healthcare provider for elderly patients suffering from non-communicable diseases.

Design/methodology/approach

An integrative approach utilizing DEMATEL and AHP is used to reach the ideal solution for healthcare provider selection decisions. The DEMATEL approach is used to segregate the cause and effect variables. Similarly, the AHP is used to identify the weights of the top five cause-inducing variables, and the paired comparison method is used to select the healthcare provider.

Findings

The variables such as dependency on family members, easily accessible services, and patient autonomy play a vital role in the selection decision of healthcare providers in elderly patients suffering from non-communicable diseases.

Practical implications

In terms of priority, home healthcare should be considered the preferred provider for elderly patients suffering from non-communicable diseases followed by neighbourhood registered medical practitioners and hospitals.

Originality/value

This is the first of its kind study which has attempted to solve the healthcare provider selection decision with the combined approach of DEMATEL and AHP.

Predictors of patients' choice of hospitals under universal health coverage: a case study of the Nicaraguan capital

BACKGROUND

This study looks at the factors that can shape patients' choice of healthcare providers. Understanding this process can help with making high quality healthcare more accessible for all. We focus on distance, patient's health status, (perceived) quality of healthcare facility, and referrals to investigate how these factors compete in shaping patients' choice of hospitals.

METHODS

This study was carried out in Managua, the capital of Nicaragua. Utilizing an exit-survey, patients were interviewed across five public hospitals in 2017 and then six in 2019 when a new highly-equipped hospital was added to the system. We used a multinomial logit model to investigate patients' preference of a specific hospital over the rest within each wave.

RESULTS

Our results show that being referred to a hospital is the strongest predictor and in some cases, it can increase the relative risk ratio of choosing a facility by a factor of 49 (p < 0.01; 95% CI: 27.39-87.17). For the remaining factors, the hierarchy of importance was less clear-cut yet all these factors remained significantly important at various levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results highlight the importance of referral systems in making quality healthcare more equitable. Moreover, with distance also being a key predictor and in the absence of an organized referral system, those with low-income would either be further deprived by having to settle with locally available healthcare (regardless of its quality) or face high amounts of out-of-pocket expenditure when seeking help from the private sector.