Attenuation of porcine deltacoronavirus disease severity by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus coinfection in a weaning pig model

Infection of PRRSV inhibits CSFV C-strain replication by inducing macrophages polarization to M1

It is a common sense that porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection could cause immune failure of classical swine fever (CSF) vaccine, and porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) are the target cells of both. To elucidate the role of macrophage polarization in PRRSV infection induced CSF vaccine failure, an immortal porcine alveolar macrophage line PAM39 cell line was used to investigate the effect of PRRSV or/and CSFV C-strain (CSFV-C) infection on macrophage polarization in vitro. Interestingly, PRRSV single infection or PRRSV co-infection with CSFV-C promoted PAM39 cells to M1, while CSFV-C single infection induced PAM39 cells to M2. After the construction of M1 and M2 PAM39 cells polarization models, M1 polarized PAM39 cells were found to inhibit the replication of CSFV-C, and Chinese medicine such as matrine, ginsenosides and astragalus polysaccharides could alleviate the polarization of PAM39 cells and the replication of CSFV-C. Furthermore, interferon (IFN)-γ and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) co-stimulation induced NF-κB activation while matrine treatment blocked M1 polarization-induced NF-κB pathway activation. These findings provided a theoretical basis for designing a new strategy to improve the immune effect of CSFV-C based on porcine alveolar macrophage polarization subtypes.

PRRSV inhibited the proliferation of CSFV by inducing IL-1β maturation via NLRP3 inflammasome activation

PRRSV and CSFV are both common infectious pathogens in porcine populations, posing significant threats to the healthy development of the porcine industry. Vaccine immunization is the main way to prevent and control these two diseases. Increasing studies have demonstrated that there is an interaction between PRRSV co-infection and CSFV vaccine immune failure. To investigate the effect of PRRSV infection on CSFV proliferation and its molecular mechanism, the proliferation dynamics of PRRSV/CSFV, the NLRP3 inflammasome components, and IL-1β expression levels were detected in PRRSV/CSFV alone- or co-infection. Subsequently, the relationship between inflammasome activation, IL-1β expression, and CSFV proliferation was analyzed through the construction of an inflammasome activation model, specific siRNA interference, and specific inhibitor treatment. The results showed that CSFV infection had a poor regulatory effect on NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β maturation, but PRRSV and CSFV co-infection could significantly up-regulate the expression of NLRP3 and ASC, induce Caspase-1 activation, and promote IL-1β maturation. It was further determined that NLRP3 inflammasome components played important roles in IL-1β maturation and inhibiting CSFV proliferation by PRRSV. Additional experiments indicated that PRRSV replication is essential for NLRP3 inflammasome activation, IL-1β maturation, and CSFV proliferation inhibition. More importantly, NLRP3 inflammasome activation is regulated by the TLR4-MyD88-NF-κB pathways. In conclusion, PRRSV infection induced IL-1β maturation by activating the NLRP3 inflammasome through the TLR4-MyD88-NF-κB pathways and then inhibited the proliferation of CSFV. These data further improved the theoretical basis for PRRSV inducing inflammatory factors and leading to the failure of CSFV immunization.

Streptococcus suis contributes to inguinal lymph node lesions in piglets after highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection

The swine pathogens porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and Streptococcus suis have both been reported to cause damage to the immune organs. Inguinal lymph node (ILN) injury has been reported in PRRSV-infected pigs with secondary S. suis infection, but not much is known about the mechanism. In this study, secondary S. suis infection after highly pathogenic (HP)-PRRSV infection caused more severe clinical symptoms, mortality, and ILN lesions. Histopathological lesions were seen in ILNs with a marked decrease in lymphocyte numbers. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated de-oxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP)-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assays revealed that HP-PRRSV strain HuN4 alone induced ILN apoptosis, but dual-infection with S. suis strain BM0806 induced greater levels of apoptosis. Besides, we found that some HP-PRRSV-infected cells underwent apoptosis. Furthermore, anti-caspase-3 antibody staining confirmed that ILN apoptosis was mainly induced by a caspase-dependent pathway. Pyroptosis was also observed in HP-PRRSV-infected cells, and there was more pyroptosis in piglets infected with HP-PRRSV alone compared with those with secondary S. suis infection, and HP-PRRSV-infected cells underwent pyroptosis. Altogether, this is the first report to identify pyroptosis in ILNs and which signaling pathway is related to ILN apoptosis in single or dual-infected piglets. These results contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms during secondary S. suis infection.

HSP90 inhibitors 17-AAG and VER-82576 inhibit porcine deltacoronavirus replication in vitro

Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) is highly pathogenic to piglets, and no specific drugs or vaccines are available for the prevention and treatment of PDCoV infection, the need for antiviral therapies is pressing. HSP90 inhibitors have potent inhibitory effects against the replication of numerous viruses, hence we evaluated three HSP90 inhibitors, 17-AAG, VER-82576, and KW-2478, for their effects on PDCoV infection in vitro. We evaluated their effectivenesses at suppressing PDCoV by qRT-PCR, western blot, and TCID₅₀ assay, and found that 17-AAG and VER-82576 inhibited PDCoV at the early stage of replication, while KW-2478 showed no significant antiviral activity at any stage of infection. These results indicated that the PDCoV-inhibitory effects of 17-AAG and VER-82576 might be exerted by targeting host cell factor HSP90AB1 but not HSP90AA1. Further study showed that HSP90AB1 mRNA and protein levels were not significantly different in 17-AAG and VER-82576-treated cells versus control cells. 17-AAG and VER-82576 were also evaluated for their effects on the expressions of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12, which are PDCoV-induced proinflammatory cytokines. We found that both 17-AAG and VER-82576 inhibited the expressions of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12 to varying degrees, but in a dose dependent manner. From our data we can conclude that the HSP90 inhibitors 17-AAG and VER-82576 are promising candidates for the treatment of PDCoV infection.