1
|
Osuala U, Goh MH, Mansur A, Smirniotopoulos JB, Scott A, Vassell C, Yousefi B, Jain NK, Sag AA, Lax A, Park KW, Kheradi A, Sapoval M, Golzarian J, Habibollahi P, Ahmed O, Young S, Nezami N. Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis. J Pers Med 2024; 14:970. [PMID: 39338224 PMCID: PMC11432885 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 09/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by articular cartilage degeneration and chronic inflammation, affecting one in five people over 40 years old. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of traditional and novel minimally invasive treatment options and role of artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline the diagnostic process of KOA. This literature review provides insights into the mechanisms of action, efficacy, complications, technical approaches, and recommendations to intra-articular injections (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and plate rich plasma), genicular artery embolization (GAE), and genicular nerve ablation (GNA). Overall, there is mixed evidence to support the efficacy of the intra-articular injections that were covered in this study with varying degrees of supported recommendations through formal medical societies. While GAE and GNA are more novel therapeutic options, preliminary evidence supports their efficacy as a potential minimally invasive therapy for patients with moderate to severe KOA. Furthermore, there is evidentiary support for the use of AI to assist clinicians in the diagnosis and potential selection of treatment options for patients with KOA. In conclusion, there are many exciting advancements within the diagnostic and treatment space of KOA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uchenna Osuala
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (U.O.); (J.B.S.)
| | - Megan H. Goh
- Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Arian Mansur
- Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.G.); (A.M.)
| | - John B. Smirniotopoulos
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (U.O.); (J.B.S.)
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA;
| | - Arielle Scott
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA; (A.S.); (C.V.); (B.Y.)
| | - Christine Vassell
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA; (A.S.); (C.V.); (B.Y.)
| | - Bardia Yousefi
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA; (A.S.); (C.V.); (B.Y.)
| | - Neil K. Jain
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA;
| | - Alan A. Sag
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA;
| | - Allison Lax
- Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA;
| | - Kevin W. Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA;
| | - Alexander Kheradi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA;
| | - Marc Sapoval
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France;
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- North Star Vascular and Interventional Institute, Minnesota, MN 55427, USA;
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Shamar Young
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85712, USA;
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (U.O.); (J.B.S.)
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keefe TH, Minnig MC, Arbeeva L, Niethammer M, Xu Z, Shen Z, Chen B, Nissman DB, Golightly YM, Marron J, Nelson AE. Patterns of variation among baseline femoral and tibial cartilage thickness and clinical features: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2023; 5:100334. [PMID: 36817090 PMCID: PMC9932103 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To employ novel methodologies to identify phenotypes in knee OA based on variation among three baseline data blocks: 1) femoral cartilage thickness, 2) tibial cartilage thickness, and 3) participant characteristics and clinical features. Methods Baseline data were from 3321 Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) participants with available cartilage thickness maps (6265 knees) and 77 clinical features. Cartilage maps were obtained from 3D DESS MR images using a deep-learning based segmentation approach and an atlas-based analysis developed by our group. Angle-based Joint and Individual Variation Explained (AJIVE) was used to capture and quantify variation, both shared among multiple data blocks and individual to each block, and to determine statistical significance. Results Three major modes of variation were shared across the three data blocks. Mode 1 reflected overall thicker cartilage among men, those with higher education, and greater knee forces; Mode 2 showed associations between worsening Kellgren-Lawrence Grade, medial cartilage thinning, and worsening symptoms; and Mode 3 contrasted lateral and medial-predominant cartilage loss associated with BMI and malalignment. Each data block also demonstrated individual, independent modes of variation consistent with the known discordance between symptoms and structure in knee OA and reflecting the importance of features such as physical function, symptoms, and comorbid conditions independent of structural damage. Conclusions This exploratory analysis, combining the rich OAI dataset with novel methods for determining and visualizing cartilage thickness, reinforces known associations in knee OA while providing insights into the potential for data integration in knee OA phenotyping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H. Keefe
- Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill College of Arts and Sciences, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mary Catherine Minnig
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Liubov Arbeeva
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marc Niethammer
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill College of Arts and Sciences, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zhenlin Xu
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill College of Arts and Sciences, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zhengyang Shen
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill College of Arts and Sciences, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Boqi Chen
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill College of Arts and Sciences, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel B. Nissman
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yvonne M. Golightly
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - J.S. Marron
- Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill College of Arts and Sciences, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amanda E. Nelson
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nelson AE, Arbeeva L. Narrative Review of Machine Learning in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases for Clinicians and Researchers: Biases, Goals, and Future Directions. J Rheumatol 2022; 49:1191-1200. [PMID: 35840150 PMCID: PMC9633365 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
There has been rapid growth in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) analytics in medicine in recent years, including in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Such methods represent a challenge to clinicians, patients, and researchers, given the "black box" nature of most algorithms, the unfamiliarity of the terms, and the lack of awareness of potential issues around these analyses. Therefore, this review aims to introduce this subject area in a way that is relevant and meaningful to clinicians and researchers. We hope to provide some insights into relevant strengths and limitations, reporting guidelines, as well as recent examples of such analyses in key areas, with a focus on lessons learned and future directions in diagnosis, phenotyping, prognosis, and precision medicine in RMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Nelson
- A.E. Nelson, MD, MSCR, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;
| | - Liubov Arbeeva
- L. Arbeeva, MS, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nelson AE, Keefe TH, Schwartz TA, Callahan LF, Loeser RF, Golightly YM, Arbeeva L, Marron JS. Biclustering reveals potential knee OA phenotypes in exploratory analyses: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266964. [PMID: 35609053 PMCID: PMC9129051 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To apply biclustering, a methodology originally developed for analysis of gene expression data, to simultaneously cluster observations and clinical features to explore candidate phenotypes of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) for the first time. Methods Data from the baseline Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) visit were cleaned, transformed, and standardized as indicated (leaving 6461 knees with 86 features). Biclustering produced submatrices of the overall data matrix, representing similar observations across a subset of variables. Statistical validation was determined using the novel SigClust procedure. After identifying biclusters, relationships with key outcome measures were assessed, including progression of radiographic KOA, total knee arthroplasty, loss of joint space width, and worsening Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, over 96 months of follow-up. Results The final analytic set included 6461 knees from 3330 individuals (mean age 61 years, mean body mass index 28 kg/m2, 57% women and 86% White). We identified 6 mutually exclusive biclusters characterized by different feature profiles at baseline, particularly related to symptoms and function. Biclusters represented overall better (#1), similar (#2, 3, 6), and poorer (#4, 5) prognosis compared to the overall cohort of knees, respectively. In general, knees in biclusters #4 and 5 had more structural progression (based on Kellgren-Lawrence grade, total knee arthroplasty, and loss of joint space width) but tended to have an improvement in WOMAC pain scores over time. In contrast, knees in bicluster #1 had less incident and progressive KOA, fewer total knee arthroplasties, less loss of joint space width, and stable pain scores compared with the overall cohort. Significance We identified six biclusters within the baseline OAI dataset which have varying relationships with key outcomes in KOA. Such biclusters represent potential phenotypes within the larger cohort and may suggest subgroups at greater or lesser risk of progression over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Nelson
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Thomas H Keefe
- Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Todd A Schwartz
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.,Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Leigh F Callahan
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Richard F Loeser
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Yvonne M Golightly
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.,Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Liubov Arbeeva
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - J S Marron
- Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
AI musculoskeletal clinical applications: how can AI increase my day-to-day efficiency? Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:293-304. [PMID: 34341865 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03876-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to bring greater efficiency in radiology by performing tasks that would otherwise require human intelligence, also at a much faster rate than human performance. In recent years, milestone deep learning models with unprecedented low error rates and high computational efficiency have shown remarkable performance for lesion detection, classification, and segmentation tasks. However, the growing field of AI has significant implications for radiology that are not limited to visual tasks. These are essential applications for optimizing imaging workflows and improving noninterpretive tasks. This article offers an overview of the recent literature on AI, focusing on the musculoskeletal imaging chain, including initial patient scheduling, optimized protocoling, magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction, image enhancement, medical image-to-image translation, and AI-aided image interpretation. The substantial developments of advanced algorithms, the emergence of massive quantities of medical data, and the interest of researchers and clinicians reveal the potential for the growing applications of AI to augment the day-to-day efficiency of musculoskeletal radiologists.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mobasheri A, Trumble TN, Byron CR. Editorial: One Step at a Time: Advances in Osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:727477. [PMID: 34336985 PMCID: PMC8322576 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.727477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Mobasheri
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Departments of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Troy N. Trumble
- Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Christopher R. Byron
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|