PREHOSPITALRAPID-SEQUENCEINTUBATION-WHATDOES THEEVIDENCESHOW?

Comparative evaluation of first-attempt intubation success rate using direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blade and video laryngoscope during rapid sequence induction in patients undergoing emergency surgery: A prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Airway management skills form the cornerstone of routine anaesthesia practice. Its role becomes more significant in emergency areas where time is of the essence. Patients presenting for emergency surgery require definitive airway management with endotracheal intubation. Rapid sequence induction with direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade has been used consistently with varying success. With the advent of video laryngoscopes, their utility is being explored in emergency areas. We aimed to assess the role of a video laryngoscope (Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany) in rapid sequence induction and intubation during emergency surgeries.

AIM

We hypothesised that video laryngoscope would improve the first-attempt intubation success rate in patients undergoing emergency surgery.

METHODOLOGY

In total, 76 patients presenting for emergency surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups (38 each), who were intubated with either a video laryngoscope or Macintosh blade during rapid sequence induction. This study aimed to compare and evaluate direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade and a video laryngoscope during rapid sequence induction.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in the type and indication for surgery. Airway characteristics were also compared, and there were no significant differences in all airway parameters, including mouth opening, thyromental distance, Mallampati grading and neck circumference. The first-attempt intubation success rate was significantly higher in the video laryngoscope group (p = 0.017, χ2 = 5.684). The Cormack-Lehane grade distribution was compared in both groups, with better glottis visualisation in group video laryngoscope (p = 0.028, χ2 = 9.123).

CONCLUSION

This prospective, randomised, controlled study aimed to compare the first-attempt intubation success rate using direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade and a video laryngoscope during rapid sequence induction in patients undergoing emergency surgeries and observed that first-attempt intubation success rate was significantly higher in group video laryngoscope (86.8%) than in group direct laryngoscopy (63.2%). Therefore, video laryngoscopy offers an attractive alternative to conventional laryngoscopy while securing the airway in patients presenting for emergency surgery.

Prehospital advanced airway management for trauma in the United Kingdom: how, when and by whom?

Advanced airway management in the prehospital arena remains controversial. This paper aims to explore some of the evidence and options available and propose a way forward. Options for provision of, and training in, pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia are explored and alternative strategies are discussed. Where classical rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia proves impractical for operational reasons or due to lack of facilities, training opportunities or skills maintenance, a potential ‘silver standard’ is suggested as an alternative.

Prehospital rapid sequence intubation in an emergency medical services system with two advanced life support providers

OBJECTIVE

A rapid sequence intubation (RSI) method was introduced to a university-based emergency medical services (EMS) system. This is a report of the initial experience with the first 50 patients in a unique, two-tiered, two advanced life support (ALS) providers system.

METHODS

The data were evaluated prospectively after an extensive RSI training period, consisting of didactic information and skills performance. Fifty consecutive patient records that documented the procedure were abstracted. Data abstracted included end-tidal CO2, heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry at various time intervals. Intubation success rates and number of attempts were documented. The consistency of proper documentation also was noted on patient care records.

RESULTS

No differences were noted in heart rate prior to RSI and one and five minutes after the RSI procedure was begun. No differences in blood pressure at one and five minutes were noted. Statistically significant improvements were found in pulse oximetry comparing prior to RSI and one minute after (p<0.001; 95% CI: 3.15-11.41) as well as prior to RSI and five minutes after RSI was started (p<0.0002; 95% CI=4.60-13.33). No differences were observed in end-tidal CO2 at one and five minutes. Overall intubation success rate was 96%, with 82% on first attempt and 92% on two or less attempts. Documentation for individual vitals was consistently <75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients had no significant worsening of vital signs during the RSI procedure and mild improvement in pulse oximetry. Intubation success rates were consistent with national averages. Proper documentation was lacking in more than one quarter of the charts. These data add to a body of literature that raises further concerns regarding prehospital RSI.