Ethical issues in the prevention of suicide in prison

Jailing is failing: psychiatry can help

There is accumulating evidence that imprisonment is expensive but does little to address the underlying drivers of offending. At the same time, it is now recognised that a large proportion of prisoners are diagnosable with significant psychiatric disorders. In this piece we explore the potential role of psychiatry in addressing the societal challenge of a failing prison system. We argue that core psychiatric skills of engaging in balanced, values-based thinking and implementing sound clinical processes can play an important role in reducing reoffending risk. We briefly discuss some of the key challenges involved and outline several relevant service models.

Ethical challenges faced by healthcare professionals who care for suicidal patients: a scoping review

For each one of the approximately 800,000 people who die from suicide every year, an additional twenty people attempt suicide. Many of these attempts result in hospitalization or in contact with other healthcare services. However, many personal, educational, and institutional barriers make it difficult for healthcare professionals to care for suicidal individuals. We reviewed literature that discusses suicidal patients in healthcare settings in order to highlight common ethical issues and to identify knowledge gaps. A sample was generated via PubMed using keywords "[(ethics OR *ethic*) AND suicid*] AND [English (Language) OR French (Language)]" (final N = 52), ethics content was extracted according to scoping review methodology, and categorized thematically. We identified three main areas posing ethical challenges for health professionals caring for suicidal individuals and their families. These were: (1) making clinical decisions for patients in acute care or when presented with specific circumstances; (2) issues arising from therapeutic relationships in chronic care, and (3) organizational factors. There is considerable uncertainty about how to resolve ethical issues when caring for someone who is suicidal. The stigma associated with suicide and mental illness, problems associated with risk-benefit assessments, and the fear of being held liable for malpractice should a patient die by suicide were overarching themes present across these three categories. Caring for suicidal patients is clinically and ethically challenging. The current literature highlights the complexity and range of decisions that need to be made. More attention should be paid to the difficulties faced by healthcare professionals and the development of solutions.

How to make good-enough risk decisions

Making decisions in the context of risk is an integral part of psychiatric work. Despite this, decision-making skills are rarely systematically taught and the processes behind decisions are rarely made explicit. This article attempts to apply contemporary evidence from cognitive and social psychology to common dilemmas faced by psychiatrists when assessing and managing risk. It argues that clinical decision-making should acknowledge both the value and limitations of intuitive approaches in dealing with complex dilemmas. After discussing the various ways in which clinical decision-making is commonly derailed, the article outlines a framework that accommodates both rational and intuitive modes of thinking, with the aim of optimising decision-making in high-risk situations.

Attendance at Psychological Consultations following Non-Fatal Suicidal Behaviour: An Ethical Dilemma

Rates of out-patient psychotherapy follow-up after hospitalisation for non-fatal suicidal behaviour (NFSB) are reported to be poor internationally. A study at a South African general hospital revealed that over a 12-month period 201 patients were admitted and referred for psychological consultation following NFSB. All first appointments were kept. However, only 43.5% of the 191 patients given subsequent out-patient appointments attended. No significant gender or age effects were noted. The results are discussed in the context of possible explanations for the high rate of non-attendance and the clinical value of the first in-patient psychological session. The authors also discuss some of the circumstances surrounding the first consultation and the ethical issues associated with the in-patient management of NFSB. We argue that the benefits of a first in-patient psychological consultation without explicit informed consent appear to outweigh the risks and harms, based on the ethical obligation of responsible caring.