1
|
Vilchez G, Meislin R, Lin L, Gonzalez K, McKinney J, Kaunitz A, Stone J, Sanchez-Ramos L. Outpatient cervical ripening and labor induction with low-dose vaginal misoprostol reduces the interval to delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:S716-S728.e61. [PMID: 38462254 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized the evidence on the efficacy and safety of various outpatient cervical ripening methods. However, the method with the highest efficacy and safety profile has not been determined conclusively. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening methods currently employed in the outpatient setting. DATA SOURCES With the assistance of an experienced medical librarian, we performed a systematic search of the literature using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to January 14, 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We considered randomized controlled trials comparing a variety of methods for outpatient cervical ripening. METHODS We conducted a frequentist random effects network meta-analysis employing data from randomized controlled trials. We performed a direct, pairwise meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various outpatient cervical ripening methods, including placebo. We employed ranking strategies to determine the most efficacious method using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve; a higher surface under the cumulative ranking curve value implied a more efficacious method. We assessed the following outcomes: time from intervention to delivery, cesarean delivery rates, changes in the Bishop score, need for additional ripening methods, incidence of Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, and uterine hyperstimulation. RESULTS We included data from 42 randomized controlled trials including 6093 participants. When assessing the efficacy of all methods, 25 μg vaginal misoprostol was the most efficacious in reducing the time from intervention to delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 1.0) without increasing the odds of cesarean delivery, the need for additional ripening methods, the incidence of a low Apgar score, or uterine hyperstimulation. Acupressure (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.3) and primrose oil (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.2) were the least effective methods in reducing the time to delivery interval. Among effective methods, 50 mg oral mifepristone was associated with the lowest odds of cesarean delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9). CONCLUSION When balancing efficacy and safety, vaginal misoprostol 25 μg represents the best method for outpatient cervical ripening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Vilchez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO.
| | - Rachel Meislin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Lifeng Lin
- Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
| | - Katherine Gonzalez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Jordan McKinney
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Andrew Kaunitz
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Joanne Stone
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Luis Sanchez-Ramos
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McDonagh M, Skelly AC, Tilden E, Brodt ED, Dana T, Hart E, Kantner SN, Fu R, Hermesch AC. Outpatient Cervical Ripening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:1091-1101. [PMID: 33752219 PMCID: PMC8011513 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and potential harms of cervical ripening in the outpatient compared with the inpatient setting, or different methods of ripening in the outpatient setting alone. DATA SOURCES Searches for articles in English included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists (up to August 2020). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Using predefined criteria and DistillerSR software, 10,853 citations were dual-reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies of outpatient cervical ripening using prostaglandins and mechanical methods in pregnant women at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Using prespecified criteria, study data abstraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two reviewers, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted and strength of evidence was assessed. We included 30 RCTs and 10 cohort studies (N=9,618) most generalizable to women aged 25-30 years with low-risk pregnancies. All findings were low or insufficient strength of evidence and not statistically significant. Incidence of cesarean delivery was not different for any comparison of inpatient and outpatient settings, or comparisons of different methods in the outpatient setting (most evidence available for single-balloon catheters and dinoprostone). Harms were inconsistently reported or inadequately defined. Differences were not found for neonatal infection (eg, sepsis) with outpatient compared with inpatient dinoprostone, birth trauma (eg, cephalohematoma) with outpatient compared with inpatient single-balloon catheter, shoulder dystocia with outpatient dinoprostone compared with placebo, maternal infection (eg, chorioamnionitis) with outpatient compared with inpatient single-balloon catheters or outpatient prostaglandins compared with placebo, and postpartum hemorrhage with outpatient catheter compared with inpatient dinoprostone. Evidence on misoprostol, hygroscopic dilators, and other outcomes (eg, perinatal mortality and time to vaginal birth) was insufficient. CONCLUSION In women with low-risk pregnancies, outpatient cervical ripening with dinoprostone or single-balloon catheters did not increase cesarean deliveries. Although there were no clear differences in harms when comparing outpatient with inpatient cervical ripening, the certainty of evidence is low or insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42020167406.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian McDonagh
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, the Department of Nurse-Midwifery, School of Nursing, the School of Public Health, Portland State University, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and Aggregate Analytics, Fircrest, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
A Tribute to Nancy C. Chescheir, MD. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:1-2. [PMID: 33278282 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
4
|
Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Medley N, Dias S, Jones LV, Gyte G, Caldwell DM. Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-584. [PMID: 27587290 DOI: 10.3310/hta20650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 150,000 pregnant women in England and Wales have their labour induced each year. Multiple pharmacological, mechanical and complementary methods are available to induce labour. OBJECTIVE To assess the relative effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of labour induction methods and, data permitting, effects in different clinical subgroups. METHODS We carried out a systematic review using Cochrane methods. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register was searched (March 2014). This contains over 22,000 reports of controlled trials (published from 1923 onwards) retrieved from weekly searches of OVID MEDLINE (1966 to current); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library); EMBASE (1982 to current); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1984 to current); ClinicalTrials.gov; the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Portal; and hand-searching of relevant conference proceedings and journals. We included randomised controlled trials examining interventions to induce labour compared with placebo, no treatment or other interventions in women eligible for third-trimester induction. We included outcomes relating to efficacy, safety and acceptability to women. In addition, for the economic analysis we searched the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Economic Evaluations Databases, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and the Health Technology Assessment database. We carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using all of the available evidence, both direct and indirect, to produce estimates of the relative effects of each treatment compared with others in a network. We developed a de novo decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of various methods. The costs included were the intervention and other hospital costs incurred (price year 2012-13). We reviewed the literature to identify preference-based utilities for the health-related outcomes in the model. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, expected costs, utilities and net benefit. We represent uncertainty in the optimal intervention using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS We identified 1190 studies; 611 were eligible for inclusion. The interventions most likely to achieve vaginal delivery (VD) within 24 hours were intravenous oxytocin with amniotomy [posterior rank 2; 95% credible intervals (CrIs) 1 to 9] and higher-dose (≥ 50 µg) vaginal misoprostol (rank 3; 95% CrI 1 to 6). Compared with placebo, several treatments reduced the odds of caesarean section, but we observed considerable uncertainty in treatment rankings. For uterine hyperstimulation, double-balloon catheter had the highest probability of being among the best three treatments, whereas vaginal misoprostol (≥ 50 µg) was most likely to increase the odds of excessive uterine activity. For other safety outcomes there were insufficient data or there was too much uncertainty to identify which treatments performed 'best'. Few studies collected information on women's views. Owing to incomplete reporting of the VD within 24 hours outcome, the cost-effectiveness analysis could compare only 20 interventions. The analysis suggested that most interventions have similar utility and differ mainly in cost. With a caveat of considerable uncertainty, titrated (low-dose) misoprostol solution and buccal/sublingual misoprostol had the highest likelihood of being cost-effective. LIMITATIONS There was considerable uncertainty in findings and there were insufficient data for some planned subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS Overall, misoprostol and oxytocin with amniotomy (for women with favourable cervix) is more successful than other agents in achieving VD within 24 hours. The ranking according to safety of different methods was less clear. The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that titrated (low-dose) oral misoprostol solution resulted in the highest utility, whereas buccal/sublingual misoprostol had the lowest cost. There was a high degree of uncertainty as to the most cost-effective intervention. FUTURE WORK Future trials should be powered to detect a method that is more cost-effective than misoprostol solution and report outcomes included in this NMA. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005116. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zarko Alfirevic
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Edna Keeney
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Therese Dowswell
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicky J Welton
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nancy Medley
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sofia Dias
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leanne V Jones
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gillian Gyte
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Deborah M Caldwell
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vogel JP, Osoti AO, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD007701. [PMID: 28901007 PMCID: PMC6483740 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007701.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction of labour is carried out for a variety of indications and using a range of methods. For women at low risk of pregnancy complications, some methods of induction of labour or cervical ripening may be suitable for use in outpatient settings. OBJECTIVES To examine pharmacological and mechanical interventions to induce labour or ripen the cervix in outpatient settings in terms of effectiveness, maternal satisfaction, healthcare costs and, where information is available, safety. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 November 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials examining outpatient cervical ripening or induction of labour with pharmacological agents or mechanical methods. Cluster trials were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We assessed evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS This updated review included 34 studies of 11 different methods for labour induction with 5003 randomised women, where women received treatment at home or were sent home after initial treatment and monitoring in hospital.Studies examined vaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), vaginal and oral misoprostol, isosorbide mononitrate, mifepristone, oestrogens, amniotomy and acupuncture, compared with placebo, no treatment, or routine care. Trials generally recruited healthy women with a term pregnancy. The risk of bias was mostly low or unclear, however, in 16 trials blinding was unclear or not attempted. In general, limited data were available on the review's main and additional outcomes. Evidence was graded low to moderate quality. 1. Vaginal PGE₂ versus expectant management or placebo (5 studies)Fewer women in the vaginal PGE₂ group needed additional induction agents to induce labour, however, confidence intervals were wide (risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.99; 150 women; 2 trials). There were no clear differences between groups in uterine hyperstimulation (with or without fetal heart rate (FHR) changes) (RR 3.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 22.24; 244 women; 4 studies; low-quality evidence), caesarean section (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.31; 288 women; 4 studies; low-quality evidence), or admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.03; 230 infants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence).There was no information on vaginal birth within 24, 48 or 72 hours, length of hospital stay, use of emergency services or maternal or caregiver satisfaction. Serious maternal and neonatal morbidity or deaths were not reported. 2. Intracervical PGE₂ versus expectant management or placebo (7 studies) There was no clear difference between women receiving intracervical PGE₂ and no treatment or placebo in terms of need for additional induction agents (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.32; 445 women; 3 studies), vaginal birth not achieved within 48 to 72 hours (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.02; 43 women; 1 study; low-quality evidence), uterine hyperstimulation (with FHR changes) (RR 2.66, 95% CI 0.63 to 11.25; 488 women; 4 studies; low-quality evidence), caesarean section (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.12; 674 women; 7 studies; moderate-quality evidence), or babies admitted to NICU (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 6.05; 215 infants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence). There were no uterine ruptures in either the PGE₂ group or placebo group.There was no information on vaginal birth not achieved within 24 hours, length of hospital stay, use of emergency services, mother or caregiver satisfaction, or serious morbidity or neonatal morbidity or perinatal death. 3. Vaginal misoprostol versus placebo (4 studies)One small study reported on the rate of perinatal death with no clear differences between groups; there were no deaths in the treatment group compared with one stillbirth (reason not reported) in the control group (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.14; 77 infants; 1 study; low-quality evidence).There was no clear difference between groups in rates of uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes (RR 1.97, 95% CI 0.43 to 9.00; 265 women; 3 studies; low-quality evidence), caesarean section (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.46; 325 women; 4 studies; low-quality evidence), and babies admitted to NICU (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.47; 325 infants; 4 studies; low-quality evidence).There was no information on vaginal birth not achieved within 24, 48 or 72 hours, additional induction agents required, length of hospital stay, use of emergency services, mother or caregiver satisfaction, serious maternal, and other neonatal, morbidity or death.No substantive differences were found for other comparisons. One small study found that women who received oral misoprostol were more likely to give birth within 24 hours (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86; 87 women; 1 study) and were less likely to require additional induction agents (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.97; 127 women; 2 studies). Women who received mifepristone were also less likely to require additional induction agents (average RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.95; 311 women; 4 studies; I² = 74%); however, this result should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity. One trial each of acupuncture and outpatient amniotomy were included, but few review outcomes were reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Induction of labour in outpatient settings appears feasible and important adverse events seem rare, however, in general there is insufficient evidence to detect differences. There was no strong evidence that agents used to induce labour in outpatient settings had an impact (positive or negative) on maternal or neonatal health. There was some evidence that compared to placebo or no treatment, induction agents administered on an outpatient basis reduced the need for further interventions to induce labour, and shortened the interval from intervention to birth.We do not have sufficient evidence to know which induction methods are preferred by women, the interventions that are most effective and safe to use in outpatient settings, or their cost effectiveness. Further studies where various women-friendly outpatient protocols are compared head-to-head are required. As part of such work, women should be consulted on what sort of management they would prefer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua P Vogel
- World Health OrganizationUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and ResearchAvenue Appia 20GenevaSwitzerlandCH‐1211
| | - Alfred O Osoti
- University of NairobiDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyP.O. Box 19676NairobiKenya00202
| | - Anthony J Kelly
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS TrustDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRoyal Sussex County HospitalEastern RoadBrightonUKBN2 5BE
| | - Stefania Livio
- University of Milan, Children's Hospital "V. Buzzi"Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyVia Castelvetro 32MilanoItaly20154
| | - Jane E Norman
- University of Edinburgh Queen's Medical Research CentreMRC Centre for Reproductive HealthEdinburghUKEH16 4TJ
| | - Zarko Alfirevic
- The University of LiverpoolDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong JS, Romero R, Lee DC, Than NG, Yeo L, Chaemsaithong P, Ahn S, Kim JS, Kim CJ, Kim YM. Umbilical cord prostaglandins in term and preterm parturition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 29:523-31. [PMID: 25758616 DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1011120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prostaglandins (PGs) are considered the universal mediators of parturition. Amniotic fluid PGE2 and PGF2α concentrations increase before the onset of spontaneous labor at term, as well as during labor. This study was conducted to determine if the concentrations of umbilical cord PGE2 and PGF2α change with advancing gestational age, spontaneous labor at term, and preterm labor (with and without funisitis). METHODS Umbilical cord (UC) tissue samples were obtained from women (N = 158) with singleton pregnancies in the following groups: (1) term deliveries without labor (TNL; n = 20); (2) term deliveries with labor (TIL; n = 20); (3) spontaneous preterm deliveries (sPTD) with (n = 20) and without acute funisitis (n = 20); and (4) preeclampsia without labor (n = 78). The concentrations of PGs were determined in different locations of the UC. PGE2 and PGF2α were measured by specific immunoassays. Non-parametric statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS (1) In spontaneous preterm deliveries, the median UC PGE2 concentration was higher in cases with funisitis than in those without funisitis (233.7 pg/µg versus 87.4 pg/µg of total protein, p = 0.001); (2) the median UC PGE2 concentration in sPTD with funisitis was also higher than that obtained from samples who had undergone labor at term (233.7 pg/µg versus 116.1 pg/µg of total protein, p = 0.03); (3) the UC PGE2 and PGF2α concentration increased as a function of advancing gestational age before 36 weeks (PGE2: ρ = 0.59, p < 0.001; PGF2α: ρ = 0.39, p = 0.01), but not after 36 weeks (PGE2: ρ = -0.1, p = 0.5; PGF2α: ρ = -0.2, p = 0.2); (4) the median UC concentrations of PGE2 and PGF2α at term was similar in samples obtained from women with and without labor (PGE2: TNL 133.7 pg/µg versus TIL 116.1 pg/µg of total protein, p = 0.9; PGF2α: TNL 8.4 pg/µg versus TIL 8.1 pg/µg of total protein, p = 0.7); and (5) there was no correlation between UC PG concentration and gestational age at term pregnancy (PGE2: ρ = 0.01, p = 0.9; PGF2α: ρ = 0.07, p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS (1) PGE2 concentrations in the UC are higher in the presence of acute funisitis than in the absence of this lesion; (2) spontaneous labor at term was not associated with a change in the UC concentration of PGE2 and PGF2α; and (3) the UC concentrations of PGE2 and PGF2α increased as a function of gestational age. We propose that UC PGs act as inflammatory mediators generated in the context of fetal systemic inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon-Seok Hong
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Seoul National University Bundang Hospital , Gyeonggi-do , Republic of Korea
| | - Roberto Romero
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA .,d Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Michigan State University , East Lansing , MI , USA
| | - Deug-Chan Lee
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,e College of Biomedical Science, Kangwon National University , Chuncheon , Republic of Korea
| | - Nandor Gabor Than
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit , MI , USA
| | - Lami Yeo
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit , MI , USA
| | - Piya Chaemsaithong
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit , MI , USA
| | - Soyeon Ahn
- g Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital , Gyeonggi-do , Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Sun Kim
- h Department of Pathology , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea
| | - Chong Jai Kim
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,i Department of Pathology , Asan Medical, Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea , and
| | - Yeon Mee Kim
- a Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS , Bethesda, MD, and Detroit , MI , USA .,j Department of Pathology , Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine , Busan , Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mishanina E, Rogozinska E, Thatthi T, Uddin-Khan R, Khan KS, Meads C. Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2014; 186:665-73. [PMID: 24778358 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction of labour is common, and cesarean delivery is regarded as its major complication. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether the risk of cesarean delivery is higher or lower following labour induction compared with expectant management. METHODS We searched 6 electronic databases for relevant articles published through April 2012 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which labour induction was compared with placebo or expectant management among women with a viable singleton pregnancy. We assessed risk of bias and obtained data on rates of cesarean delivery. We used regression analysis techniques to explore the effect of patient characteristics, induction methods and study quality on risk of cesarean delivery. RESULTS We identified 157 eligible RCTs (n = 31,085). Overall, the risk of cesarean delivery was 12% lower with labour induction than with expectant management (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.93; I(2) = 0%). The effect was significant in term and post-term gestations but not in preterm gestations. Meta-regression analysis showed that initial cervical score, indication for induction and method of induction did not alter the main result. There was a reduced risk of fetal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-0.99; I(2) = 0%) and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94), and no impact on maternal death (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.10-9.57; I(2) = 0%) with labour induction. INTERPRETATION The risk of cesarean delivery was lower among women whose labour was induced than among those managed expectantly in term and post-term gestations. There were benefits for the fetus and no increased risk of maternal death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Mishanina
- Homerton Hospital University Trust (Mishanina); Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Rogozinska, Khan), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; School of Medicine (Thatthi), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Barts Health NHS Trust (Uddin-Khan), London, UK; Health Economics Research Group (Meads), Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Ewelina Rogozinska
- Homerton Hospital University Trust (Mishanina); Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Rogozinska, Khan), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; School of Medicine (Thatthi), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Barts Health NHS Trust (Uddin-Khan), London, UK; Health Economics Research Group (Meads), Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Tej Thatthi
- Homerton Hospital University Trust (Mishanina); Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Rogozinska, Khan), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; School of Medicine (Thatthi), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Barts Health NHS Trust (Uddin-Khan), London, UK; Health Economics Research Group (Meads), Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Rehan Uddin-Khan
- Homerton Hospital University Trust (Mishanina); Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Rogozinska, Khan), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; School of Medicine (Thatthi), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Barts Health NHS Trust (Uddin-Khan), London, UK; Health Economics Research Group (Meads), Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Khalid S Khan
- Homerton Hospital University Trust (Mishanina); Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Rogozinska, Khan), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; School of Medicine (Thatthi), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Barts Health NHS Trust (Uddin-Khan), London, UK; Health Economics Research Group (Meads), Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Catherine Meads
- Homerton Hospital University Trust (Mishanina); Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Rogozinska, Khan), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; School of Medicine (Thatthi), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Barts Health NHS Trust (Uddin-Khan), London, UK; Health Economics Research Group (Meads), Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the physiology of pregnancy enables effective management of pregnancy complications that could otherwise be life threatening for both mother and fetus. A functional uterus (i) retains the fetus in utero during pregnancy without initiating stretch-induced contractions and (ii) is able to dilate the cervix and contract the myometrium at term to deliver the fetus. The onset of labour is associated with successful cervical remodelling and contraction of myometrium, arising from concomitant activation of uterine immune and endocrine systems. A large body of evidence suggests that actions of local steroid hormones may drive changes occurring in the uterine microenvironment at term. Although there have been a number of studies considering the potential role(s) played by progesterone and estrogen at the time of parturition, the bio-availability and effects of androgens during pregnancy have received less scrutiny. The aim of this review is to highlight potential roles of androgens in the biology of pregnancy and parturition. METHODS A review of published literature was performed to address (i) androgen concentrations, including biosynthesis and clearance, in maternal and fetal compartments throughout gestation, (ii) associations of androgen concentrations with adverse pregnancy outcomes, (iii) the role of androgens in the physiology of cervical remodelling and finally (iv) the role of androgens in the physiology of myometrial function including any impact on contractility. RESULTS Some, but not all, androgens increase throughout gestation in maternal circulation. The effects of this increase are not fully understood; however, evidence suggests that increased androgens might regulate key processes during pregnancy and parturition. For example, androgens are believed to be critical for cervical remodelling at term, in particular cervical ripening, via regulation of cervical collagen fibril organization. Additionally, a number of studies highlight potential roles for androgens in myometrial relaxation via non-genomic, AR-independent pathways critical for the pregnancy reaching term. Understanding of the molecular events leading to myometrial relaxation is an important step towards development of novel targeted tocolytic drugs. CONCLUSIONS The increase in androgen levels throughout gestation is likely to be important for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy and initiation of parturition. Further investigation of the underlying mechanisms of androgen action on cervical remodelling and myometrial contractility is needed. The insights gained may facilitate the development of new therapeutic approaches to manage pregnancy complications such as preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Makieva
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom and Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom
| | - Philippa T K Saunders
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom and
| | - Jane E Norman
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom and Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dowswell T, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD007701. [PMID: 20687092 PMCID: PMC4241469 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007701.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction of labour is carried out for a variety of indications and using a range of pharmacological, mechanical and other methods. For women at low risk, some methods of induction of labour may be suitable for use in outpatient settings. OBJECTIVES To examine pharmacological and mechanical interventions to induce labour in outpatient settings in terms of feasibility, effectiveness, maternal satisfaction, healthcare costs and, where information is available, safety. The review complements existing reviews on labour induction examining effectiveness and safety. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (December 2009) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials examining outpatient cervical ripening or induction of labour with pharmacological agents or mechanical methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently extracted data and assessed eligible papers for risk of bias. We checked all data after entry into review manager software. MAIN RESULTS We included 28 studies with 2616 women examining different methods of induction of labour where women received treatment at home or were sent home after initial treatment and monitoring in hospital.Studies examined vaginal and intracervical PGE(2), vaginal and oral misoprostol, isosorbide mononitrate, mifepristone, oestrogens, and acupuncture. Overall, the results demonstrate that outpatient induction of labour is feasible and that important adverse events are rare. There was no strong evidence that agents used to induce labour in outpatient settings had an impact (positive or negative) on maternal or neonatal health. There was some evidence that, compared to placebo or no treatment, induction agents reduced the need for further interventions to induce labour, and shortened the interval from intervention to birth. We were unable to pool results on outcomes relating to progress in labour as studies tended to measure a very broad range of outcomes.There was no evidence that induction agents increased interventions in labour such as operative deliveries. Only two studies provided information on women's views about the induction process, and overall there was very little information on the costs to health service providers of different methods of labour induction in outpatient settings. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Induction of labour in outpatient settings appears feasible. We do not have sufficient evidence to know which induction methods are preferred by women, or the interventions that are most effective and safe to use in outpatient settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Dowswell
- Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anthony J Kelly
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Stefania Livio
- School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jane E Norman
- University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Biology, The Queens Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Zarko Alfirevic
- School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostaglandins have been used for cervical ripening and induction of labour since the 1970s. The goal of the administration of prostaglandins in the process of induction of labour is to achieve cervical ripening before the onset of contractions. One of the routes of administration that was proposed is intracervical. Using this route, prostaglandins are less easy to administer and the need for exposing the cervix may cause discomfort to the woman. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of intracervical prostaglandins for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour compared with placebo/no treatment and with vaginal prostaglandins (except misoprostol). SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (August 2007) and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA Clinical trials comparing intracervical prostaglandins used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods (vaginal prostaglandins, except misoprostol). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS A strategy was developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two-stage method of data extraction. MAIN RESULTS Fifty-six trials (7738 women) are included. INTRACERVICAL PGE2 WITH PLACEBO/NO TREATMENT: 28 TRIALS, 3764 WOMEN: Four studies reported the number of women who did not achieve vaginal delivery within 24 hours, showing a decreased risk with PGE2 (relative risk (RR) 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 0.79). There was a small, and statistically non-significant, reduction of the risk of caesarean section when PGE2 was used (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00). The finding was statistically significant in a subgroup of women with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix only (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98). The risk of hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate (FHR) changes was not significantly increased (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.72 to 2.05). However, the risk of hyperstimulation without FHR changes was significantly increased (RR 1.59; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.33. INTRACERVICAL PGE2 WITH INTRAVAGINAL PGE2: 29 TRIALS, 3881 WOMEN: The risk of not achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours was increased with intracervical PGE2 (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.41). There was no change in the risk of caesarean section (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.22). The risks of hyperstimulation with FHR changes (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.49) and without FHR changes (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.15) were non-significantly different with the two methods of PGE2 administration. Only one trial with small sample size reported on women's views, with no difference between groups. INTRACERVICAL PGE2 LOW DOSE WITH INTRACERVICAL PGE2 HIGH DOSE: TWO TRIALS, 102 WOMEN: The trials are too small to provide any useful information. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Intracervical prostaglandins are effective compared to placebo, but appear inferior when compared to intravaginal prostaglandins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Boulvain
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Unite de Developpement en Obstetrique, CH-1211, Genève 14, Switzerland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bollapragada S, Mackenzie F, Norrie J, Petrou S, Reid M, Greer I, Osman I, Norman JE. IMOP: randomised placebo controlled trial of outpatient cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour - clinical trial with analyses of efficacy, cost effectiveness and acceptability. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2006; 6:25. [PMID: 16869966 PMCID: PMC1569865 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2006] [Accepted: 07/25/2006] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is increasing interest in carrying out pre-induction cervical ripening on an outpatient basis. However, there are concerns about the use of prostaglandins, the agents commonly used in hospital settings for this indication, because prostaglandins induce uterine contractions that may lead to fetal hypoxia. Indeed, in a recent study we demonstrated abnormalities in 9% of fetal heart rate tracings performed following prostaglandin induced cervical ripening at term. In contrast, we confirmed in the same study that isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) (administered on an inpatient basis) was both effective in inducing cervical ripening at term, and was associated with no associated fetal heart rate abnormalities. Methods/design The aim of this study is to determine whether IMN self administered by women on an outpatient basis improves the process of induction of labour. Specifically, we hypothesise that the use of outpatient IMN will result in a shorter inpatient stay before delivery, decreased costs to the health service and greater maternal satisfaction with ripening and induction of labour, compared with placebo treatment. In the study described here (the "IMOP" study), women scheduled for induction of labour at term, and who require pre-induction cervical ripening will be randomised to self-administer at home either IMN 40 mg, or a placebo, each vaginally, at 48 hours, 32 hours and 16 hours before scheduled hospital admission. After admission to hospital, treatment will revert to the usual induction of labour protocol. We will compare the primary outcomes of the elapsed time interval from hospital admission to vaginal delivery, the costs to the health service of induction of labour, and women's experience of induction of labour in the two groups. Discussion This trial will provide evidence on the efficacy of outpatient IMN for pre-induction cervical ripening at term. We will study a formulation of IMN which is cheap and widely available. If the treatment is effective, acceptable to women, and cost effective, it could be implemented into obstetric practice worldwide. Trial registration The trial has been registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN) and given the registration number ISRTN39772441.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shrikant Bollapragada
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Queen Elizabeth Building, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
| | - Fiona Mackenzie
- Princess Royal Maternity Hospital, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen University, Applicant and Trial Statistician CHaRT, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Margaret Reid
- Public Health, University of Glasgow, Public Health and Health Policy, Division of Community Based Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
| | - Ian Greer
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Queen Elizabeth Building, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
| | - Inass Osman
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Queen Elizabeth Building, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
| | - Jane E Norman
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Queen Elizabeth Building, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thomas J, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J. Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 2001:CD003393. [PMID: 11687200 PMCID: PMC6991160 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies in sheep showed that there is a pre-labour rise in oestrogen and a decrease in progesterone, both of these changes stimulate prostaglandin production and may help initiate labour. Though oestrogen has been suggested as an effective cervical ripening or induction agent, research in humans have failed to demonstrate a similar physiological mechanism. The use of oestrogen as an induction agent is not currently common practice, as such this systematic review should be regarded as an historical review. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using a standardised methodology. OBJECTIVES To determine, from the best available evidence, the effectiveness and safety of oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for third trimester cervical ripening and induction of labour in comparison with other methods of induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and bibliographies of relevant papers. Last searched: April 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA (1) randomised controlled trials comparing oestrogens alone used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods; (2) random allocation to the treatment or control group; (3) adequate allocation concealment; (4) violations of allocated management not sufficient to materially affect conclusions; (5) clinically meaningful outcome measures reported; (6) data available for analysis according to the random allocation; (7) missing data insufficient to materially affect the conclusions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS A generic strategy has been developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two-stage method of data extraction. The initial data extraction was done centrally. MAIN RESULTS When comparing oestrogen with placebo there was no difference between the rate of caesarean section (7.1% versus 10.3%, relative risk (RR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30,1.62). There were no differences between rates of uterine hyperstimulation with or without fetal heart rate changes or instrumental vaginal delivery. None of the studies reported the rates of either vaginal delivery not achieved in 24 hours, or cervix unfavourable/unchanged after 12-24 hours. There were insufficient data to make any meaningful conclusions when comparing oestrogen with vaginal PGE2, intracervical PGE2, oxytocin alone or extra amniotic PGF2a, as to whether oestrogen is effective in inducing labour. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS There were insufficient data to draw any conclusions regarding the efficacy of oestrogen as an induction agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Thomas
- Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 27 Sussex Place, Regent's Park, London, UK, NW1 4RG.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|