Cerebral morbidity in preterm twins

Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm twins less than 32 weeks of gestation or birthweight under 1500 g: a systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

The mode of delivery for twins born before 32 weeks of gestation remains controversial. Our purpose is to conduct a meta-analysis of twin pregnancies less than 32 weeks or twin weight less than 1500 g, so as to find a suitable delivery mode.

METHODS

We searched PubMed database, Cochrane Library database, and EMBASE database through December 2022. This protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023386946) prior to initiation. Studies that compared vaginal delivery to cesarean section for newborns less than 32 weeks of gestation or birthweight under 1500 g were included. The primary result was neonatal mortality rate. Secondary result was neonatal morbidity. The quality of literatures included in the research was evaluated in accordance with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) literature quality evaluation scale. We use odds ratio (OR) as the effect index for binary variables. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. P < 0. 05 indicated statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

Our search generated 5310 articles, and a total of 8 articles comprising a total of 14,703 newborns were included in the analysis. The odds ratios of neonatal mortality rate were for twins delivered by vaginal delivery compared to cesarean section were 0.84 (95% CI 0.57-1.24, P = 0.38). The 5-min Apgar score < 7 (95% CI 0.44-1.75, P = 0.72), necrotizing enterocolitis (95% CI 0.81-1.19, P = 0.82), intraventricular hemorrhage (95% CI 0.41-1.86, P = 0.71), periventricular leukomalacia (95% CI 0.16-4.52, P = 0.84), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (95% CI 0.88-1.36, P = 0.42), and respiratory distress syndrome (95% CI 0.23-2.01, P = 0.48) were not statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We have observed that vaginal delivery does not confer an increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality in twins born before 32 weeks of gestation. However, the current results are affected by substantial heterogeneity and confounding factors. We still need high-quality randomized-controlled studies require to address this important question.

Vanquishing multiple pregnancy in in vitro fertilization in the United States-a 25-year endeavor

The practice of in vitro fertilization has changed tremendously since the birth of the first in vitro fertilization infant in 1978. With the success of early in vitro fertilization programs in the United States, there was a substantial rise in twin births nationwide. In the mid-1990s, more than 30% of in vitro fertilization cycles resulted in twin or higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Since that time, we not only have witnessed improvements in laboratory and treatment efficacy but also have seen a dramatic impact on pregnancy outcomes, specifically regarding twin pregnancies. Because the field evolved and the risks of multifetal pregnancies became more salient, in 2019, the rate of twin pregnancies had dropped to <7% of cycles. This improvement was largely because of technical advancements and revised professional guidance: culturing embryos longer before transfer, improved freezing technology, embryo preimplantation genetic testing, and revised professional guidance regarding the number of embryos to transfer. These developments have led to single-embryo transfer becoming the standard of care in most scenarios. We used national in vitro fertilization surveillance data of all autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from 1996 to 2019 to illustrate trends in the following improved outcomes: autologous embryo transfer cycles involving blastocyst-stage embryos, vitrified embryos, preimplantation genetic testing cycles, total number of embryos being transferred per cycle, and single-embryo transfer usage over time. Among deliveries from autologous embryo transfers, we highlighted trends in singleton births over time and proportion of deliveries involving twins, triplets, quadruplets, or greater. The notable progress in reducing the rate of multifetal pregnancies with in vitro fertilization was largely attributed to a series of technical and clinical actions, culminating in an 80% reduction in the incidence of multiple births without a loss in overall treatment effectiveness.

Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231

The incidence of multifetal gestations in the United States has increased dramatically over the past several decades. For example, the rate of twin births increased 76% between 1980 and 2009, from 18.9 to 33.3 per 1,000 births (1). However, after more than three decades of increases, the twin birth rate declined 4% during 2014-2018 to 32.6 twins per 1,000 total births in 2018 (2). The rate of triplet and higher-order multifetal gestations increased more than 400% during the 1980s and 1990s, peaking at 193.5 per 100,000 births in 1998, followed by a modest decrease to 153.4 per 100,000 births by 2009 (3). The triplet and higher-order multiple birth rate was 93.0 per 100,000 births for 2018, an 8% decline from 2017 (101.6) and a 52% decline from the 1998 peak (193.5) (4). The long-term changes in the incidence of multifetal gestations has been attributed to two main factors: 1) a shift toward an older maternal age at conception, when multifetal gestations are more likely to occur naturally, and 2) an increased use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), which is more likely to result in a multifetal gestation (5). A number of perinatal complications are increased with multiple gestations, including fetal anomalies, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes. One of the most consequential complications encountered with multifetal gestations is preterm birth and the resultant infant morbidity and mortality. Although multiple interventions have been evaluated in the hope of prolonging these gestations and improving outcomes, none has had a substantial effect. The purpose of this document is to review the issues and complications associated with twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal gestations and present an evidence-based approach to management.

Development and external validation of a nomogram for predicting preterm birth at < 32 weeks in twin pregnancy

The purpose of this study was to develop a dynamic model to predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth at < 32 weeks in twin pregnancy. A retrospective clinical study of consecutively asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies from January 2017 to December 2019 in two tertiary medical centres was performed. Data from one centre were used to construct the model, and data from the other were used to evaluate the model. Data on maternal demographic characteristics, transvaginal cervical length and funnelling during 20-24 weeks were extracted. The prediction model was constructed with independent variables determined by multivariate logistic regression analyses. After applying specified exclusion criteria, an algorithm with maternal and biophysical factors was developed based on 88 twin pregnancies with a preterm birth < 32 weeks and 639 twin pregnancies with a delivery ≥ 32 weeks. It was then evaluated among 34 pregnancies with a preterm birth < 32 weeks and 252 pregnancies with a delivery ≥ 32 weeks in a second tertiary centre without specific training. The model reached a sensitivity of 80.00%, specificity of 88.17%, positive predictive value of 50.33% and negative predictive value of 96.71%; ROC characteristics proved that the model was superior to any single parameter with an AUC of 0.848 (all P < 0.005). We developed and validated a dynamic nomogram model to predict the individual probability of early preterm birth to better represent the complex aetiology of twin pregnancies and hopefully improve the prediction and indication of interventions.

Management of Twin Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of National and International Guidelines

Importance

Twin pregnancies are associated with a higher risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity compared with singleton and require more intensive prenatal care.

Objective

The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from published guidelines on twin pregnancies.

Evidence Acquisition

A descriptive review of guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on the management of twin pregnancies was conducted.

Results

All the guidelines highlight the importance of an accurate assessment of chorionicity, amnionicity, and gestational age in the first trimester. They also recommend the performance of nuchal translucency and a detailed anomaly scan. The ultrasound surveillance protocol is similar in all guidelines, that is, every 2 weeks for monochorionic and every 4 weeks for dichorionic twins. On the other hand, there are differences regarding the timing and mode of delivery, especially in monochorionic diamniotic twins, in the definition and management of fetal growth discordance, the use of cervical length to screen for preterm birth, and the timing of corticosteroids' administration.

Conclusions

The differences in the reviewed guidelines on the management of twin pregnancies highlight the need for an adoption of an international consensus, in order to improve perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies.

Bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and development trends in selective fetal reduction

AIM

To evaluate the theme trends and knowledge structure of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR)-related literature by using bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

Published scientific papers regarding MPR were retrieved from the PubMed database. Data extraction and statistics were conducted using Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB). Furthermore, gCLUTO software was used in the study for bi-clustering analysis and strategic diagram analysis.

RESULTS

According to the search strategy, 906 total papers were included. Among all the extracted MeSH terms, 41 high frequency ones were identified and hotspots were clustered into four categories. In the strategic diagram, research on intrauterine treatment of MPR was most well developed. In contrast, statistical data on the sequelae of fetal reduction surgery and applications of MPR in assisted reproductive technologies were relatively immature.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of common terms among the high-frequency network terms in multiparous pregnancy reduction can help researchers and clinicians understand the hotspots, key topics, and issues to be discovered on MPR. Research on intrauterine treatment of MPR was most well developed.

Spontaneous septostomy in a monochorionic-diamniotic twin gestation

Monochorionic twin gestations are associated with a greater incidence of neonatal morbidity and mortality when compared with their dichorionic counterparts. In turn, monochorionic-monoamniotic (MCMA) gestations carry greater risks compared with monochorionic-diamniotic (MCDA) gestations. While the true incidence of spontaneous septostomy of the dividing membranes (SSDM) in MCDA twins is unknown, SSDM has been demonstrated to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality, due to functional transition from a MCDA gestation to a MCMA gestation. We report a case of SSDM in a mid-trimester MCDA gestation, review the literature, and describe how to identify and manage this complication.

Pregnancy outcome following fetal reduction from dichorionic twins to singleton gestation

BACKGROUND

There are still some controversies regarding the risks and benefits of fetal reduction from twins to singletons. We aimed to evaluate if fetal reduction from twins to singleton improves pregnancy outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies, who underwent fetal reduction. Pregnancy outcome was compared to ongoing, non-reduced, dichorionic-diamniotic gestations. Primary outcome was preterm birth prior to 37 gestational weeks. Secondary outcomes included: preterm birth prior to 34 gestational weeks, gestational age at delivery, birthweight, small for gestational age, hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes and stillbirth.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight reduced pregnancies were compared with 222 ongoing twins. Preterm birth < 37 gestational weeks (39.6% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the reduced group compared to the ongoing twins' group. A multivariate analysis, controlling for parity and mode of conception, demonstrated that fetal reduction independently and significantly reduced the risk for prematurity (aOR 0.495, 95% CI -0.299-0.819). Subgroup analysis, similarly adjusted demonstrated lower rates of preterm delivery in those undergoing elective reduction (aOR = 0.206, 95% CI 0.065-0.651), reduction due to fetal anomalies (aOR = 0.522, 95% CI 0.295-0.926) and 1st trimester reduction (aOR = 0.297, 95% Cl 0.131-0.674) all compared to ongoing twins. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed a significant proportion of non-delivered women at each gestational week in the reduced group compared to non-reduced twins, after 29 gestational weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal reduction from twins to singleton reduces the risk of preterm birth < 37 gestational weeks, but not for more severe maternal and perinatal complications.

Maternal morbidity of induction of labor compared to planned cesarean delivery in twin gestations

Objective: To compare maternal morbidity associated with induction of labor (IOL) with planned cesarean delivery (CD) in twin gestations.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of vertex-presenting twin pregnancies ≥24-week gestation delivering at our institution from 2016 to 2017. We compared patients undergoing IOL with patients undergoing planned CD. Demographic and pregnancy outcome data were abstracted from the medical record. Our primary outcome was composite maternal morbidity including severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (EBL >1500 cc), hysterectomy, transfusion, ICU admission, use of ≥2 uterotonic medications or maternal death. These morbidities were also assessed independently. Secondary analyses of maternal morbidity among unplanned CD versus planned CD and successful IOL versus planned CD was also performed. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and multivariate logistic regression were used in statistical analysis.Results: Of 211 twin gestations included, 70.6% were nulliparous, the median age was 35.5 years [32-38], and the median gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks [35-38]. One hundred and five underwent IOL and 106 had a planned CD. Composite morbidity was higher in the IOL group versus planned CD group (30.5 versus 11.3%, p = .001). In the IOL group, 64 (61.0%) achieved a vaginal delivery. Patients in the planned CD group were more likely to be >35 years of age (62.3 versus 48.6%, p = .045), nulliparous (80.2 versus 61.0%, p = .002) and deliver preterm (53.8 versus 38.1%, p = .022). Patients with a planned CD had a significantly lower risk of composite morbidity compared to those who had CD after failed IOL (11.3 versus 48.8%, p ≤ .001) and there was no significant difference in composite morbidity in the successful IOL compared to the planned CD group (18.8 versus 11.3%, p = .18). There were four peri-partum hysterectomies, all within the IOL group.Conclusion: Labor induction in twins was associated with increased maternal morbidity compared to planned CD. The increase in adverse maternal outcomes was due to those who underwent an IOL and ultimately required CD.

Controversies in antenatal corticosteroids

Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) successfully reduce the rates of neonatal mortality and morbidity after preterm birth. However, this translational success story is not without controversies. This chapter explores some contemporary controversies with ACS, including the choice of corticosteroid, use in threatened preterm birth less than 24 weeks' gestation, use in late preterm birth, use at term before cesarean delivery, and issues surrounding repeated and rescue dosing of antenatal corticosteroids. The use of ACS in special populations is also discussed. Finally, areas of future research in ACS are presented, focusing on the ability to individualize therapy.

Do very preterm twins and singletons differ in their neurodevelopment at 5 years of age?

OBJECTIVE

Twins have inconsistently shown poorer outcomes than singletons. Although a high proportion of twins are born very preterm, data are sparse on the long-term outcomes in very preterm twins. The objective of this study was to compare mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm singletons and twins and to study outcomes in relation to factors specific to twins.

DESIGN

Birth cohort study Etude Epidemiologique sur les Petits Ages Gestationnels (EPIPAGE).

SETTING

Nine regions in France.

PATIENTS

All very preterm live births occurring from 22 to 32 weeks of gestation in all maternity wards of nine French regions in 1997 (n=2773).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Neurodevelopmental status, including cerebral palsy, and a cognitive assessment with the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, with scores on the Mental Processing Composite (MPC) scale, was available for 1732 and 1473 children at 5 years of age, respectively.

RESULTS

Among live births, twins had higher hospital mortality than singletons (adjusted (a)OR: 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9)). Among survivors, there was no crude difference at 5 years between twins and singletons in the prevalence of cerebral palsy (8.0% vs 9.1%, respectively), MPC <70 (9.5% vs 11.1%) and mean MPC (94.6 vs 94.4). However, after adjustment for sex, gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction and social factors, twins were more likely to have lower MPC scores (mean difference: -2.4 (95% CI-4.8 to 0.01)). Live born twins had a higher risk of mortality when birth weight discordance was present (aOR:2.9 (95% CI 1.7 to 4.8)), but there were no differences in long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with very preterm singletons, twins had higher mortality, no difference with respect to severe deficiencies, but slightly lower MPC scores at 5 years.

Twin gestation and neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to compare the risk-adjusted incidence of death or neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months' corrected age between twin and singleton extremely low birth weight infants. We hypothesized that twin gestation is independently associated with increased risk of death or adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age in these infants.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of inborn extremely low birth weight infants admitted to Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network units between 1997 and 2005, who either died or had follow-up data available at 18 to 22 months' corrected age. Neurodevelopmental impairment, the primary outcome variable, was defined as the presence of any 1 of the following: moderate or severe cerebral palsy, severe bilateral hearing loss, bilateral blindness, Bayley Mental Developmental Index or Psychomotor Developmental Index of <70. Death was included with neurodevelopmental impairment as a composite outcome. Results were compared for both twins, twin A, twin B, same-gender twins, unlike-gender twins, and singleton infants. Logistic regression analysis was performed to control for demographic and clinical factors that were different among the groups.

RESULTS

The cohort of infants who either died or were assessed for neurodevelopmental impairment consisted of 7630 singleton infants and 1376 twins. Logistic regression adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic risk factors showed an increased risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment for twins as a group when compared with the singletons. On analyzing twin A and B separately as well, risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment was increased in both twin A and twin B.

CONCLUSIONS

Twin gestation in extremely low birth weight infants is associated with an independent increased risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months' corrected age compared with singleton-gestation infants. Both first- and second-born twins are at increased risk.

Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth among women at increased risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine whether progestational agents, initiated in the second trimester of pregnancy, reduce the risk of delivery less than 37 weeks, among women at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth.

STUDY DESIGN

Medline, pre-Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Randomized controlled trials with less than 20% lost to follow-up were included.

RESULTS

Three trials were eligible for inclusion. There was a significant reduction in risk of delivery less than 37 weeks with progestational agents (relative risk [95% CI] = 0.57 [0.36-0.90]). There was no significant effect on perinatal mortality or serious neonatal morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Progestational agents, initiated in the second trimester of pregnancy, may reduce the risk of delivery less than 37 weeks' gestation, among women at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth, but the effect on neonatal outcome is uncertain. Larger randomized controlled trials are required to determine whether this treatment reduces perinatal mortality or serious neonatal morbidity.

Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome

In industrialized countries, 5-11% of infants are born preterm (<37 weeks' gestation), and the rate has been increasing since the early 1980s. Preterm births account for 70% of neonatal deaths and up to 75% of neonatal morbidity, and contribute to long-term neurocognitive deficits, pulmonary dysfunction and ophthalmologic disorders. In the past several decades, major progress has been made in improving the survival of extremely premature newborns, mostly attributable to timely access to effective interventions that ameliorate prematurity-associated mortality and morbidity such as antenatal administration of corticosteroids and exogenous surfactant therapy, rather than preventing preterm births. However, the societal and healthcare costs to care for survivors with severe morbidity and neurological handicaps remain substantial. Future research should concentrate on the ways to reduce long-term health sequelae and developmental handicaps among survivors of infants born preterm, as well as elucidating the mechanisms and aetiology of preterm births.