A cytoplasmically anchored nuclear protein interferes specifically with the import of nuclear proteins but not U1 snRNA

Rev-ing up post-transcriptional HIV-1 RNA expression

The post-transcriptional export of spliced and unspliced HIV-1 (human immunodeficiency virus type 1) RNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is a complex process. Part of the complexity arises from the fact that eukaryotic cells normally retain unspliced RNAs in the nucleus preventing their exit into the cytoplasm. HIV-1 has evolved a protein, Rev, that participates in the export of unspliced / partially spliced viral RNAs from the nucleus. It has been documented that several cellular factors cooperate in trans with Rev, and certain cis-RNA motifs / features are important for transcripts to be recognized by Rev and its co-factors. Here, the post-transcriptional activities of Rev are discussed in the context of a recent finding that an RNA cap methyltransferase contributes to the expression of unspliced / partially spliced HIV-1 transcripts.

Targeting of proteins derived from self-processing polyproteins containing multiple signal sequences

The 18aa 2A self-cleaving oligopeptide from foot-and-mouth disease virus can be used for co-expression of multiple, discrete proteins from a single ORF. 2A mediates a co-translational cleavage at its own C-terminus and is proposed to manipulate the ribosome into skipping the synthesis of a specific peptide bond (producing a discontinuity in the peptide backbone), rather than being involved in proteolysis. To explore the utility of the system to target discrete processing products, self-processing polyproteins comprising fluorescent proteins flanking 2A were constructed, permutating both the type of signal sequence and the location within the polyprotein. A polyprotein comprising a protein bearing an N-terminal signal sequence, 2A, then a protein lacking any signal sequence, was constructed. Interestingly, both proteins were translocated into the endoplasmic reticulum. Despite the discontinuity in the peptide backbone, the mammalian ribosome:translocon complex did not disassemble--the second protein (lacking any signal) 'slipstreamed' through the translocon formed by the first (signal-bearing) protein. These polyprotein systems provide a novel method of targeting proteins to different subcellular sites by transfection with a plasmid encoding a single ORF. The inclusion of a fluorescent reporter enables visualisation of expression levels, whilst inclusion of a selectable marker enables stable cell-lines to be established rapidly.

A role for the M9 transport signal of hnRNP A1 in mRNA nuclear export

Among the nuclear proteins associated with mRNAs before their export to the cytoplasm are the abundant heterogeneous nuclear (hn) RNPs. Several of these contain the M9 signal that, in the case of hnRNP A1, has been shown to be sufficient to signal both nuclear export and nuclear import in cultured somatic cells. Kinetic competition experiments are used here to demonstrate that M9-directed nuclear import in Xenopus oocytes is a saturable process. Saturating levels of M9 have, however, no effect on the import of either U snRNPs or proteins carrying a classical basic NLS. Previous work demonstrated the existence of nuclear export factors specific for particular classes of RNA. Injection of hnRNP A1 but not of a mutant protein lacking the M9 domain inhibited export of mRNA but not of other classes of RNA. This suggests that hnRNP A1 or other proteins containing an M9 domain play a role in mRNA export from the nucleus. However, the requirement for M9 function in mRNA export is not identical to that in hnRNP A1 protein transport.

RNA transport

RNA molecules synthesized in the nucleus are transported to their sites of function throughout the eukaryotic cell by specific transport pathways. This review focuses on transport of messenger RNA, small nuclear RNA, ribosomal RNA, and transfer RNA between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The general molecular mechanisms involved in nucleocytoplasmic transport of RNA are only beginning to be understood. However, during the past few years, substantial progress has been made. A major theme that emerges from recent studies of RNA transport is that specific signals mediate the transport of each class of RNA, and these signals are provided largely by the specific proteins with which each RNA is associated.

The thermolability of nuclear protein import in tsBN2 cells is suppressed by microinjected Ran-GTP or Ran-GDP, but not by RanQ69L or RanT24N

The nuclear protein regulator of chromosome condensation 1 (RCC1) stimulates guanine nucleotide exchange on a protein, Ran, that is required for nuclear protein import. In the present report, we confirm that RCC1 is also required for nuclear protein import in tsBN2 hamster cells in vivo. The thermolability of nuclear protein import in tsBN2 cells was suppressed by microinjection of purified Ran-GTP into the cytoplasm, but Ran-GDP also relieved the import deficiency, suggesting either that both forms of Ran are active in import in vivo or that tsBN2 cells at restrictive temperature retain a mechanism to convert Ran-GDP to Ran-GTP. To distinguish between these possibilities, nuclear protein import in tsBN2 cells was tested in the presence of Ran mutants, one deficient in GTP hydrolysis (RanQ69L), and one with weak binding to GDP and little or no binding to GTP (RanT24N). Microinjection of the mutant RanQ69L inhibited import in vivo in either the GTP- or GDP-bound form at both the permissive and nonpermissive temperatures. RanT24N-GDP inhibited import in vivo at the permissive temperature and failed to stimulate nuclear protein import at the nonpermissive temperature. The implications of these results for the roles of RCC1 and Ran in nuclear protein import in vivo are discussed.

In vitro and in vivo evidence that protein and U1 snRNP nuclear import in somatic cells differ in their requirement for GTP-hydrolysis, Ran/TC4 and RCC1

GTP-hydrolysis, the small ras-related GTP-binding protein Ran and its cognate guanosine nucleotide exchange factor, the RCC1 gene product, have recently been identified as essential components of the protein nuclear import pathway. In this report we use three independent approaches to investigate the role of these components in U1 snRNP nuclear import in somatic cells. (i) Using a somatic cell based in vitro nuclear import system we show that U1 snRNP nuclear import, in marked contrast to protein transport, is not significantly inhibited by non-hydrolyzable GTP-analogs and is therefore unlikely to require GTP-hydrolysis. (ii) Using the dominant negative Ran mutant RanQ69L, which is defective in GTP-hydrolysis, we show that Ran-mediated GTP-hydrolysis is not essential for the nuclear import of U1 snRNP in microinjected cultured cells. (iii) Using a cell line expressing a thermolabile RCC1 gene product, we show that the nuclear accumulation of microinjected U1 snRNP is not significantly affected by RCC1 depletion at the non-permissive temperature, indicating that RCC1 function is not essential for U-snRNP nuclear import. Based on these observations we conclude that protein and U-snRNP nuclear import in somatic cells differ in their requirements for GTP-hydrolysis, and Ran or RCC1 function. Based on these results, the substrates for nucleocytoplasmic exchange across the NPC can be divided into two classes, those absolutely requiring Ran, including protein import and mRNA export, and those for which Ran is not essential, including U-snRNP nuclear import, together with tRNA and U1 snRNA nuclear export.

RAN/TC4 mutants identify a common requirement for snRNP and protein import into the nucleus

Kinetic competition experiments have demonstrated that at least some factors required for the nuclear import of proteins and U snRNPs are distinct. Both import processes require energy, and in the case of protein import, the energy requirement is known to be at least partly met by GTP hydrolysis by the Ran GTPase. We have compared the effects of nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues and two mutant Ran proteins on the nuclear import of proteins and U snRNPs in vitro. The mutant Ran proteins have different defects; Q69L (glutamine 69 changed to leucine) is defective in GTP hydrolysis while T24N (threonine 24 changed to asparagine) is defective in binding GTP. Both protein and snRNP import are sensitive either to the presence of the two mutant Ran proteins, which act as dominant negative inhibitors of nuclear import, or to incubation with nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues. This demonstrates that there is a requirement for a GTPase activity for the import of U snRNPs, as well as proteins, into the nucleus. The dominant negative effects of the two mutant Ran proteins indicate that the pathways of protein and snRNP import share at lease one common component.

Splinkerettes--improved vectorettes for greater efficiency in PCR walking

Images

Nuclear transport of U1 snRNP in somatic cells: differences in signal requirement compared with Xenopus laevis oocytes

The signal requirement for the nuclear import of U1 RNA in somatic cells from different species was investigated by microinjection of both digoxygenin-labeled wild type and mutant U1 RNA molecules and in vitro reconstituted U1 snRNPs. U1 RNA was shown to be targeted to the nucleus by a temperature-dependent process that requires the prior assembly of RNPs from the common proteins and the microinjected RNA. Competition in the cell between immunoaffinity-purified U1 snRNPs and digoxygenin-labeled U1 snRNPs reconstituted in vitro showed that the transport is saturable and should therefore be a mediated process. The transport of a karyophilic protein under the same conditions was not affected, indicating the existence of a U snRNP-specific transport pathway in somatic cells, as already seen in the Xenopus laevis oocyte system. Surprisingly, the signal requirement for nuclear transport of U1 snRNP was found to differ between oocytes and somatic cells from mouse, monkey and Xenopus, in that the m3GGpppG-cap is no longer an essential signaling component in somatic cells. However, as shown by investigation of the transport kinetics of m3GpppG- and ApppG-capped U1 snRNPs, the m3GpppG-cap accelerates the rate of U1 snRNP import significantly indicating that it has retained a signaling role for nuclear targeting of U1 snRNP in somatic cells. Moreover, our data strongly suggest that cell specific rather than species specific differences account for the differential m3G-cap requirement in nuclear import of U1 snRNPs.