Rifamycin treatment of tuberculosis in a patient receiving atenolol: less interaction with rifabutin than with rifampin

Interactive effect of oral anti-hyperglycaemic or anti-hypertensive drugs on the inhibitory and bactericidal activity of first line anti-TB drugs against M. tuberculosis

Co-existence of life style disorders, like, Diabetes or Hypertension, increases risk of, treatment failure, deaths and developing drug-resistant TB. Concomitant administration of drugs to treat dual/multi-morbidities may alter their effectiveness, in additive/synergistic or adverse/antagonistic manner. We evaluated interactive effect of 7 anti-hyperglycaemic (HG) and 6 anti-hypertensive (HT) drugs on the inhibitory (MICs) and bactericidal (% killing of intracellular bacilli) activities of anti-TB drugs, Isoniazid (INH), Rifampicin (RFM), Ethambutol (EMB) and Streptomycin (STR) against M. tuberculosis. Five anti-HG drugs, namely, Acarbose, Acetohexamide, Glyburide, Repaglinide and Sitagliptin imparted either 'additive' or 'no effect' on the activities (inhibition or % killing) of all the four anti-TB drugs, as evident by their lower FICs (Fractional Inhibitory concentrations) and higher bacterial killing in combination. Metformin and Rosiglitazone, however, exerted adverse effect on the Ethambutol (FICs >2.0). All the six anti-HT drugs, namely, Atenolol, Hydrochlorothiazide, Ramipril, Valsartan, Nifedipine and Verapamil exerted either 'additive'/'synergistic' or 'no effect' on the activities of anti-TB drugs. These findings may help clinicians to select safe and helpful anti-HG or anti-HT drugs for TB patients, if, suffering with diabetes or hypertension like co-morbidities and receiving DOTs (a set regimen for the treatment of TB based on the WHO guidelines).

Predicting Interactions between Rifampin and Antihypertensive Drugs Using the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Lack of blood pressure control is often seen in hypertensive patients concomitantly taking antituberculosis medications due to the complex drug-drug interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, it is of clinical importance to understand the underlying mechanisms of these interactions to help formulate recommendations on the use of antihypertensive drugs in patients taking these medications concomitantly. Our objective was to assess the reliability of the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) to predict potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs and thus provide recommendations on the choice of antihypertensive drugs in patients receiving rifampin.

DESIGN

Evidence-based in vitro and in vivo predictions of drug-drug interactions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We systematically evaluated interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs using the theory of the BDDCS, taking into consideration the role of drug transporters and metabolic enzymes involved in these interactions. We provide recommendations on the selection of antihypertensive drugs for patients with tuberculosis. Antihypertensive drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the China National Medical Products Administration were included in this study. The drugs were classified into four categories under the BDDCS classification. Detailed information on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and drug transporters for each antihypertensive drug was searched in PubMed and other electronic databases. This information was combined with the effects of rifampin on CYP enzymes and drug transporters, and the direction and relative extent of the potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs were predicted. Recommendations were then made using the theory of BDDCS. A thorough systematic literature review was performed, and data from all published human studies and case reports were summarized for the validation of our predictions. Interventional and observational studies published in PubMed and two Chinese databases (CNKI and WanFang) through December 16, 2019, were included, and data were extracted for validation of the predictions. Using the BDDCS theory, class 3 active drugs were predicted to exhibit minimal interactions with rifampin. On reviewing case reports and pre-post studies, the predictions we made were found to be reliable. When antituberculosis medications that include rifampin are started in patients with hypertension, it is recommended that the use of calcium channel blockers and classes 1 and 2 β-blockers be avoided. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, olmesartan, class 3 β-blockers, spironolactone, and hydrochlorothiazide would be preferable because clinically relevant interactions would not be expected.

CONCLUSION

Application of the BDDCS to predict interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs for patients with both tuberculosis and hypertension was found to be reliable. It should be noted, however, that based on the CYP enzyme and drug transporter information we reviewed, the mechanisms of all of the interactions could not be elucidated, and the predictions are only based on theory. The real effects of rifampin on antihypertensive drugs need to be further observed. More studies in both animals and humans are needed in the future.

Rifabutin: where do we stand in 2016?

Rifabutin is a spiro-piperidyl-rifamycin structurally closely related to rifampicin that shares many of its properties. We attempted to address the reasons why this drug, which was recently recognized as a WHO Essential Medicine, still had a far narrower range of indications than rifampicin, 24 years after its launch. In this comprehensive review of the classic and more recent rifabutin experimental and clinical studies, the current state of knowledge about rifabutin is depicted, relying on specific pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial properties, resistance data and side effects compared with rifampicin. There are consistent in vitro data and clinical studies showing that rifabutin has at least equivalent activity/efficacy and acceptable tolerance compared with rifampicin in TB and non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Clinical studies have emphasized the clinical benefits of low rifabutin liver induction in patients with AIDS under PIs, in solid organ transplant patients under immunosuppressive drugs or in patients presenting intolerable side effects related to rifampicin. The contribution of rifabutin for rifampicin-resistant, but rifabutin-susceptible, Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates according to the present breakpoints has been challenged and is now controversial. Compared with rifampicin, rifabutin's lower AUC is balanced by higher intracellular penetration and lower MIC for most pathogens. Clinical studies are lacking in non-mycobacterial infections.

Update on rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Rifampin is a potent inducer of both cytochrome P-450 oxidative enzymes and the P-glycoprotein transport system. Among numerous well documented, clinically significant interactions, examples include warfarin, oral contraceptives, itraconazole, digoxin, verapamil, simvastatin, and human immunodeficiency virus-related protease inhibitors. Rifabutin reduces serum concentrations of antiretroviral agents, but less so than rifampin. Rifapentine is also an inducer of drug metabolism.

METHODS

A literature search of English language journals from 2008 to March 2012 was completed using several databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Search terms included rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine AND drug interactions.

FINDINGS

Examples of clinically relevant interactions with rifampin demonstrated by recent reports include posaconazole, voriconazole, oxycodone, risperidone, mirodenafil, and ebastine.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid a reduced therapeutic response, therapeutic failure, or toxic reactions when rifampin, rifabutin, or rifapentine are added to or discontinued from medication regimens, clinicians need to be aware of these interactions. Recent studies have indicated that other transporter systems play a role in these drug interactions. As reports of rifampin drug interactions continue to grow, this review is a reminder to clinicians to be vigilant.

Update on rifampin and rifabutin drug interactions

Rifampin is a potent inducer of cytochrome P-450 oxidative enzymes as well as the P-glycoprotein transport system. Several examples of well-documented clinically significant interactions include warfarin, oral contraceptives, cyclosporine, itraconazole, digoxin, verapamil, nifedipine, simvastatin, midazolam, and human immunodeficiency virus-related protease inhibitors. Rifabutin reduces serum concentrations of antiretroviral agents, but less so than rifampin. Examples of clinically relevant interactions demonstrated by recent reports include everolimus, atorvastatin, rosiglitazone/pioglitazone, celecoxib, clarithromycin, caspofungin, and lorazepam. To avoid a decreased therapeutic response, therapeutic failure, or toxic reactions when rifampin is added to or discontinued from medication regimens, clinicians need to be cognizant of these interactions. Studies and cases of rifampin drug interactions continue to increase rapidly. This review is a timely reminder to clinicians to be vigilant.

Effect of Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of Atenolol

Also poorly metabolized drugs, including certain beta-blocking agents, can be susceptible to drug interactions caused by transporter inhibitors and inducers. Thus, our aim was to investigate the effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of atenolol in healthy people. In a randomized cross-over study with two phases, nine healthy volunteers received a 5-day pretreatment with rifampicin (600 mg daily) or placebo. On day 6, a single 100 mg dose of atenolol was administered orally. The plasma concentrations of atenolol and its excretion into urine were measured up to 33 hr after dosing. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were recorded in a sitting position before the intake of atenolol and 2, 4, 6, and 10 hr later. During the rifampicin phase, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of atenolol was decreased to 81% and renal clearance increased to 109% of the placebo phase values (P<0.05). Rifampicin pretreatment reduced, albeit not statistically significantly, also the peak plasma concentration (Cmax), AUC(0-33 hr), and amount of atenolol excreted to 85% (P=0.139), 81% (P=0.053), and 86% (P=0.12) of the respective placebo phase values. The average heart rate and diastolic blood pressure were slightly higher during the rifampicin phase compared with the placebo phase (P<0.05). To conclude, although the inducing effect of rifampicin may not have been at its maximum by day 6, rifampicin has only a minor effect on the pharmacokinetics of atenolol evidenced by a slight reduction in its bioavailability.