Treatment of First Recurrences of Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease: Waiting for New Treatment Options

Clostridium difficile recurrences in Stockholm

Sixty-eight hospital-admitted patients with a first episode of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) were included and followed up during 1 year. Faeces samples were collected at 1, 2, 6 and 12 months after inclusion and analyzed for the presence of C. difficile toxin B, genes for toxin A, toxin B, binary toxin and TcdC deletion by PCR. All strains were also PCR-ribotyped and the MICs of the isolates were determined against eight antimicrobial agents. In 68 patients initially included, antibiotics, clinical signs and co-morbidities were analyzed and 56 were evaluable for recurrences. The mean number of different antibiotics given during 3 months prior to inclusion was 2.6 (range 0-6). Six patients had not received any antibiotics and three of them had diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease. Thirty-two patients (57%) had either a microbiological or clinical recurrence, 16 of whom had clinical recurrences that were confirmed microbiologically (13, 23%) or unconfirmed by culture (3, 5%). Twenty-nine patients were positive in at least one of the follow-up tests, 16 had the same ribotype in follow-up tests, i.e. relapse, and 13 a different ribotype, i.e., reinfection. Most common ribotypes were 078/126, 020, 023, 026, 014/077, 001 and 005. No strain of ribotype 027 was found. Strains ribotype 078/126 and 023 were positive for binary toxin and were the strains most prone to cause recurrence. All strains were sensitive to vancomycin and metronidazole. Patients with recurrences were significantly older (p = 0.02) and all patients had a high burden of comorbidities, which could explain the high fatality rate, 26 (38%) patients died during the 1-year follow-up.

Fecal transplantation, through colonoscopy, is effective therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with antibiotics leads to recurrences in up to 50% of patients. We investigated the efficacy of fecal transplantation in treatment of recurrent CDI.

METHODS

We reviewed records from 70 patients with recurrent CDI who had undergone fecal transplantation. Fecal transplantation was performed at colonoscopy by infusing fresh donor feces into cecum. Before transplantation, the patients had whole-bowel lavage with polyethylene glycol solution. Clinical failure was defined as persistent or recurrent symptoms and signs, and a need for new therapy.

RESULTS

During the first 12 weeks after fecal transplantation, symptoms resolved in all patients who did not have strain 027 C difficile infections. Of 36 patients with 027 C difficile infection, 32 (89%) had a favorable response; all 4 nonresponders had a pre-existing serious condition, caused by a long-lasting diarrheal disease or comorbidity and subsequently died of colitis. During the first year after transplantation, 4 patients with an initial favorable response had a relapse after receiving antibiotics for unrelated causes; 2 were treated successfully with another fecal transplantation and 2 with antibiotics for CDI. Ten patients died of unrelated illnesses within 1 year after transplantation. No immediate complications of fecal transplantation were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal transplantation through colonoscopy seems to be an effective treatment for recurrent CDI and also for recurrent CDI caused by the virulent C difficile 027 strain.

Clostridium difficile infection: a critical overview

Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, spore-forming, toxin-producing anaerobic bacillus identified as the causal agent of a variety of manifestations typically isolated to the colon, but in its severe form, it can lead to sepsis and death. C. difficile infection due to a toxin gene variant strain (BI/NAP1) has been identified at the center of outbreaks and has resulted in increased mortality. Many questions remain as to how this strain appeared so quickly and has harmed or killed so many patients. We present a review of C. difficile infection, discussing its clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention.

Clostridium difficile-associated disease: changing epidemiology and implications for management

Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is increasingly being reported in many regions throughout the world. The reasons for this are unknown, are likely to be multifactorial, and are the subject of several current investigations. In addition to the upsurge in frequency of CDAD, an increased rate of relapse/recurrence, disease severity and refractoriness to traditional treatment have also been noted. Moreover, severe disease has been reported in non-traditional hosts (e.g. younger age, seemingly healthy, non-institutionalised individuals residing in the community, and some without apparent antimicrobial exposure). A previously uncommon and more virulent strain of C. difficile has been reported at the centre of multiple transcontinental outbreaks. The appearance of this more virulent strain, in association with certain environmental and antimicrobial exposure factors, may be combining to create the 'perfect storm'. It is human nature to be reactive; however, the successful control of C. difficile will require healthcare systems (including administrators, and leadership within several departments such as environmental services, infection control, infectious diseases, gastroenterology, surgery, microbiology and nursing), clinicians, long-term care and rehabilitation facilities, and patients themselves to be proactive in a collaborative effort. Guidelines for the management of CDAD were last published over a decade ago, with the next iteration due in the fall (autumn) of 2007. Several newer therapies are under investigation but it is unclear whether they will be superior to current treatment options.

Clostridium difficile colitis that fails conventional metronidazole therapy: response to nitazoxanide

OBJECTIVES

Clostridium difficile-associated disease has increased in incidence and severity. Recommended treatments include metronidazole and vancomycin. Recent investigations, however, document the failure of metronidazole to cure a substantial proportion of patients with Clostridium difficile colitis, but oral administration of vancomycin raises concerns over selection of antibiotic-resistant organisms in the hospital environment. We have recently shown that nitazoxanide is as effective as metronidazole in initial therapy for C. difficile colitis. We hypothesized that this drug might be effective in treating patients who fail therapy with metronidazole.

METHODS

In the present study, we identified 35 patients who failed treatment with metronidazole for C. difficile colitis; failure was defined as either no improvement in symptoms or signs of disease (28 patients) after >or= 14 days of treatment with metronidazole or prompt recurrence on at least two occasions after initially responding to such treatment (seven patients). These patients were ill with numerous co-morbidities. Nitazoxanide, 500 mg twice daily, was given for 10 days; results from all patients are included.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (74%) of 35 patients responded to nitazoxanide, of whom seven later had recurrent disease, yielding a cure rate of 19 of 35 (54%) from initial therapy. Three who initially failed and one who had recurrent disease were re-treated with, and responded to, nitazoxanide. Thus, the aggregate cure with nitazoxanide in this difficult-to-treat population was 23 of 35 (66%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nitazoxanide appears to provide effective therapy for patients with C. difficile colitis who fail treatment with metronidazole.