Political Versus Epidemiological Correctness

Infection Prevention in the Hospital from Past to Present: Evolving Roles and Shifting Priorities

Hospital epidemiologists are vital components of integrated health centers. This central place in the healthcare landscape has rapidly evolved over a half century. Early hospital epidemiologists possessed a visionary focus on patient safety many decades prior to the quality revolution of the 1990s. A systematic and scientific approach to infection prevention has facilitated the evolution of hospital epidemiology, along with advances in technology, and increasing public attention to infectious complications in the hospital. Currently, the growing expansion of tasks and moving regulatory targets strain existing resources. These challenges threaten to limit the effectiveness of some infection-prevention activities, while also providing important opportunities for improving care. It will be increasingly important to advocate for appropriate resources to address a diverse set of changing infection prevention priorities.

Hospital Staff Perceptions of a Legislative Mandate for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening

Objective.

In August 2007, Illinois passed legislation mandating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) admission screening for intensive care unit patients. We assessed hospital staff perceptions of the implementation of this law.

Design.

Mixed-methods evaluation using structured focus groups and questionnaires.

Setting.

Eight Chicago-area hospitals.

Participants.

Three strata of staff (leadership, midlevel, and frontline) at each hospital.

Methods.

All participants completed a questionnaire and participated in a focus group. Focus group transcripts were thematically coded and analyzed. The proportion of staff agreeing with statements about MRSA and the legislation was compared across staff types.

Results.

Overall, 126 hospital staff participated in 23 focus groups. Fifty-six percent of participants agreed that the legislation had a positive effect at their facility; frontline staff were more likely to agree than midlevel and leadership staff (P < .01). Perceived benefits of the legislation included increased awareness of MRSA among staff and better knowledge of the epidemiology of MRSA colonization. Perceived negative consequences included the psychosocial effect of screening and contact precautions on patients and increased use of resources. Most participants (59%) would choose to continue the activities associated with the legislation but advised facilities in states considering similar legislation to educate staff and patients about MRSA screening and to draft clear implementation plans.

Conclusion.

Staff from Chicago-area hospitals perceived that mandatory MRSA screening legislation resulted in some benefits but highlighted implementation challenges. States considering similar initiatives might minimize these challenges by optimizing messaging to patients and healthcare staff, drafting implementation plans, and developing program evaluation strategies.

Politically Incorrect: Legislation Must Not Mandate Specific Healthcare Epidemiology and Infection Prevention and Control Practices

In this issue of the journal, Dr. Farr offers his perspective on the recent position statement from the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force regarding legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The position statement specifically addresses the issue of whether the use of MRSA and VRE surveillance cultures in healthcare settings should be mandated by legislation. It does not attempt to address whether or not, when, or for whom active surveillance cultures should be performed. A broad range of experts and the Boards of Directors of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology (SHEA) and the Association of Professionals in Infection Control (APIC) reviewed this position statement, which summarizes the effectiveness of active surveillance culturing as it pertains to potential legislation. Both Boards agree the position statement represents a well-reasoned, systematic, and fair review of the literature. Of course, no single document, group, or individual should ever be viewed as having the final word on this or any subject. Thoughtful debate regarding the scientific evidence, when conducted in a professional and constructive manner, is a critical and necessary step in the translation of research and clinical observations into bedside practices. Such debate should also lead to a research agenda that will help fill gaps in knowledge that become apparent in the discussion.

Incidence of healthcare associated infection in the surgical ICU of a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Healthcare associated infections (HAI) have taken on a new dimension with outbreaks of increasingly resistant organisms becoming common. Protocol-based infection control practices in the intensive care unit (ICU) are extremely important. Moreover, baseline information of the incidence of HAI helps in planning-specific interventions at infection control.

METHODS

This hospital-based observational study was carried out from Dec 2009 to May 2010 in the 10-bedded surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. CDC HAI definitions were used to diagnose HAI.

RESULTS

A total of 293 patients were admitted in the ICU. 204 of these were included in the study. 36 of these patients developed HAI with a frequency of 17.6%. The incidence rate (IR) of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI) was 16/1000 Central Venous Catheter (CVC) days [95% C.I. 9-26]. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) 9/1000 urinary catheter days [95% C.I. 4-18] and ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP) 32/1000 ventilator days [95% confidence interval 22-45].

CONCLUSION

The HAI rates in our ICU are less than other hospitals in developing countries. The incidence of VAP is comparable to other studies. Institution of an independent formal infection control monitoring and surveillance team to monitor & undertake infection control practices is an inescapable need in service hospitals.

Cost and health outcomes associated with mandatory MRSA screening in a special care nursery

PURPOSE

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) rates continue to rise and pose a threat to patient health and limited hospital resources. In 2007, Illinois passed a legislative mandate requiring active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA in all patients in hospital intensive care units. However, professional guidelines do not support mandated universal surveillance cultures, and funding to cover screening costs was not included. The purpose of the study was to examine the costs (personnel, screening test, and supply) associated with the mandated universal MRSA screening and to examine the infant health-related outcomes and costs associated with implementing MRSA screening in a special care nursery.

SUBJECTS

Personnel-54 observations of staff members in a community-based hospital in a large midwestern city. Infants-445 infants admitted from January 2008 through January 2009.

METHODS

Time and motion (related to screening activities by registered nurses) based on observations of staff during MRSA screenings, and abstraction of health and cost data from the infant log, infant medical records, and financial reports.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs (laboratory tests, personnel, and supplies) and infant health outcomes.

DESIGN

A prospective descriptive study.

RESULTS

Mandatory screening leads to increased costs, problems related to false-positives, and unintended consequences (eg, decision whether to treat non-MRSA organisms identified on screening cultures, possibility of legal implications, adverse family psychosocial affects, and questionable validity of the polymerase chain reaction test). The average total costs of laboratory, supply, and personnel were $15,270.12 ($34.31 per infant or $19.58 per screen).

CONCLUSIONS

A screening test for MRSA with a high positive predictive value, low cost, and quick turnaround (<24 hours) is greatly needed for neonates. Our findings indicate that mandatory universal MRSA screening is not warranted when the incidence of MRSA is low. Just as health care providers require evidence when determining best practices, legislators should require adequate evidence before passing policy.

Isolation precautions for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in healthcare settings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Emergence of drug-resistant bacteria and new or changing infectious pathogens is an important public health problem. Transmission of these pathogens in an acute care setting may occur frequently if proper precautions are not taken. Despite several guidelines and an abundance of literature on the prevention of transmission of epidemiologically important organisms in the healthcare setting, substantial controversy exists. This review focuses on recent data regarding the use of infection control and isolation precautions.

RECENT FINDINGS

New data are available, but the conflict surrounding the use of active surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has not been resolved. The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria has prompted a greater interest in infection control strategies for prevention of their spread. Outbreaks of Clostridium difficile have responded to broad infection control initiatives, but further research is required to determine whether the best infection control precautions are being utilized.

SUMMARY

Effective prevention of the transmission of pathogens within the healthcare system requires a multifaceted approach. Existing guidelines should be used to create institutional policies specific to individual patient populations, problem pathogens and the ability to practically implement various infection control procedures. Despite ongoing study, the use of active surveillance to prevent transmission of MRSA continues to be a complex, controversial and challenging issue.

Interventions to prevent transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Healthcare-associated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and multidrug resistant Gram negative bacilli are a serious problem in ICUs. This review analyzes recent reports of interventions to prevent transmission of these organisms in the ICU.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two multicenter retrospective cohort studies demonstrated that surveillance cultures are necessary to identify the full reservoir of patients colonized with MRSA or VRE. A single center, interrupted time series study found that the incidence of healthcare-associated MRSA bacteremia was reduced after initiation of MRSA surveillance cultures. Other studies with various designs describe the effect of active surveillance on the use of isolation precautions, sustained improvements in compliance with hand hygiene and glove use associated with a multimodal intervention, reduced transmission of VRE associated with chlorhexidine bathing and improved environmental cleaning, and the efficacy of a MRSA decolonization regimen.

SUMMARY

Progress is being made in identifying interventions to prevent transmission of antimicrobial resistant bacteria in ICUs, although the strength of the evidence is limited compared with many therapeutic interventions. Large MRSA control initiatives launched during 2006 and 2007 may build on this work; their effects should be evaluated using proper study designs and analyses.