Desempenho dos programas de prevenção e controle de infecções em pequenos hospitais

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a conformidade de estrutura e processo dos programas de prevenção e controle de infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde. Método Estudo prospectivo, transversal, realizado de 2015 a 2016, em pequenos hospitais de até 70 leitos de uma região do estado de São Paulo. Foram avaliados 4 indicadores previamente validados, expressos em índice de conformidade (porcentagem em relação aos itens avaliados). Resultados Dentre os 27 hospitais recrutados, 14 consentiram em participar. Os valores médios de conformidade para cada indicador foram: Estrutura dos programas 61,0%; Diretrizes operacionais 84,5%; Vigilância epidemiológica 57,9%; Atividades de prevenção 74,5%. Maior conformidade foi observada em hospitais privados (73,9%) e com presença de unidade de terapia intensiva (90,3%). Os hospitais possuíam enfermeiros designados para o programa (92,9%), mas somente 23,1% das instituições privadas atuavam com dedicação exclusiva de seis horas. Conclusão Apenas o indicador referente às Diretrizes Operacionais dos programas avaliados esteve acima de 90% de conformidade na mediana dos hospitais. A maior dispersão dos resultados de conformidade entre os hospitais estudados foi referente ao indicador de Vigilância Epidemiológica.

Antibiotic Stewardship in Small Hospitals: Barriers and Potential Solutions

Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) improve antibiotic prescribing. Seventy-three percent of US hospitals have <200 beds. Small hospitals (<200 beds) have similar rates of antibiotic prescribing compared to large hospitals, but the majority of small hospitals lack ASPs that satisfy the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's core elements. All hospitals, regardless of size, are now required to have ASPs by The Joint Commission, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has proposed a similar requirement. Very few studies have described the successful implementation of ASPs in small hospitals. We describe barriers commonly encountered in small hospitals when constructing an antibiotic stewardship team, obtaining appropriate metrics of antibiotic prescribing, implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions, obtaining financial resources, and utilizing the microbiology laboratory. We propose potential solutions that tailor stewardship activities to the needs of the facility and the resources typically available.

Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection in rural hospitals

BACKGROUND

Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains challenging across the spectrum of health care. There are limited data on prevention practices for CDI in the rural health care setting.

METHODS

An electronic survey was administered to 21 rural facilities in Wisconsin, part of the Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative. Data were collected on hospital characteristics and practices to prevent endemic CDI.

RESULTS

Fifteen facilities responded (71%). Nearly all respondent facilities reported regular use of dedicated patient care items, use of gown and gloves, private patient rooms, hand hygiene, and room cleaning. Facilities in which the infection preventionist thought the support of his/her leadership to be "Very good" or "Excellent" employed significantly more CDI practices (13.3 ± 2.4 [standard deviation]) compared with infection preventionists who thought there was less support from leadership (9.8 ± 3.0, P = .033). Surveillance for CDI was highly variable. The most frequent barriers to implementation of CDI prevention practices included lack of adequate resources, lack of a physician champion, and difficulty keeping up with new recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Although most rural facilities in our survey reported using evidence-based practices for prevention of CDI, surveillance practices were highly variable, and data regarding the impact of these practices on CDI rates were limited. Future efforts that correlate CDI prevention initiatives and CDI incidence will help develop evidence-based practices in these resource-limited settings.

Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program on the medical-surgical service of a 100-bed community hospital

Background

Antimicrobial stewardship has been promoted as a key strategy for coping with the problems of antimicrobial resistance and Clostridium difficile. Despite the current call for stewardship in community hospitals, including smaller community hospitals, practical examples of stewardship programs are scarce in the reported literature. The purpose of the current report is to describe the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program on the medical-surgical service of a 100-bed community hospital employing a core strategy of post-prescriptive audit with intervention and feedback.

Methods

For one hour twice weekly, an infectious diseases physician and a clinical pharmacist audited medical records of inpatients receiving systemic antimicrobial therapy and made non-binding, written recommendations that were subsequently scored for implementation. Defined daily doses (DDDs; World Health Organization Center for Drug Statistics Methodology) and acquisition costs per admission and per patient-day were calculated monthly for all administered antimicrobial agents.

Results

The antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) made one or more recommendations for 313 of 367 audits during a 16-month intervention period (September 2009 – December 2010). Physicians implemented recommendation(s) from each of 234 (75%) audits, including from 85 of 115 for which discontinuation of all antimicrobial therapy was recommended. In comparison to an 8-month baseline period (January 2009 – August 2009), there was a 22% decrease in defined daily doses per 100 admissions (P = .006) and a 16% reduction per 1000 patient-days (P = .013). There was a 32% reduction in antimicrobial acquisition cost per admission (P = .013) and a 25% acquisition cost reduction per patient-day (P = .022).

Conclusions

An effective antimicrobial stewardship program was implemented with limited resources on the medical-surgical service of a 100-bed community hospital.

Improving antimicrobial stewardship: the evolution of programmatic strategies and barriers

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence and characteristics of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in hospitals across the United States and to describe financial support provided for these programs.

DESIGN

Electronic and paper 14-question survey of infectious diseases physician members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network (IDSA EIN).

PARTICIPANTS

All 1,044 IDSA EIN members who care for adult patients were invited to participate.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-two (50%) members responded. Seventy-three percent of respondents reported that their institutions had or were planning an ASP, compared with 50% reporting the same thing in an EIN survey 10 years before. A shift was noted from formulary restriction alone to use of a set of tailored strategies designed to provide information and feedback to prescribers, particularly in community hospitals. Lack of funding and lack of personnel were reported as major barriers to implementing a program. Fifty-two percent of respondents with an ASP reported that infectious diseases physicians do not receive direct compensation for their participation in the ASP, compared with 18% 10 years ago.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of institutions reporting ASPs has increased over the last decade, although small community hospitals were least likely to have these programs. In addition, ASP strategies have shifted dramatically. Lack of funding remains a key barrier for ASPs, and administrators need additional cost savings data in order to support ASPs. Interestingly, while guidelines and editorials regard compensated participation by an infectious diseases physician in these programs as critical, we found that more than half of the respondents reported no direct compensation for ASP activities.