An insight into the contributions of self-shielding and lamp reflectors to patient exposure in phototherapy units

A model of the UV skin dose distribution in paediatric whole-body phototherapy

The radiance equation is applied in this study to model the ultraviolet (UV) radiation dose distribution over the skin in paediatric and adult patients treated in a whole-body phototherapy cabin. This approach extends a previously published model of UV radiation dose based on thermal radiation exchange between surfaces (Colemanet al2020Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express6055023). The new model makes it feasible to predict the distribution of UV irradiance over the head, trunk and legs in patients of varying height. The modelled irradiance distributions to directly lamp-facing skin surfaces agree to within 10% of those measured in simulated clinical paediatric treatments in a modern narrowband UVB treatment cabin. For a 10 year old (of height 1.36 m), for example, the model and the clinical measurements both show a UV radiation dose to the face that is around 25% more than that in an adult (of height 1.8 m). The dose to the crown of the head of a 10 year old is both predicted and measured to be more than double that of an adult. The automated dosimetry system, incorporated within the treatment cabin, is also predicted to overestimate irradiance to the body by between 10% and 25% in patients aged between 10 and 4 years (height 1.36-1.0 m). The value of the model and its implications for paediatric whole-body UV treatment in adult-size whole-body treatment cabins are considered.

A thermal radiation exchange model of whole-body UV phototherapy

A novel model of the skin dose in whole-body UV phototherapy treatment cabins is presented. The model is based on an analysis of the thermal radiation exchange between two surfaces, in this case the UV source and the patient. It is shown to allow analytical treatment of the multiple internal reflections in a treatment cabin that account for around 40% of the skin irradiance. The model provides predictions of the absolute irradiance at the skin and shielding factors in seven different UVA and NB-UVB cabins that are within 6% of those measured using a calibrated radiometer and within 12% for all nine cabins. The model predicts reducing skin irradiances with increasingly patient size, a trend demonstrated in clinical measurements. The exact sensitivity to patient size in automated cabin dosimetry systems, however, varies with in-built sensor positioning. The potential to extend the use of the model to investigate improved design of automated dosimetry systems is discussed.

System for monitoring UV radiation level in phototherapy cabins in Poland

INTRODUCTION

Ultraviolet phototherapy (UVP) is widely used in dermatological practice for the treatment of various skin diseases. Numerous studies support its beneficial curing effectiveness; however, overexposure to ultraviolet radiation can cause adverse health effects, such as sunburn reaction, erythema response, cataract, skin aging, etc. For these reasons, it is of special importance to monitor performance of UVP cabins using a calibration system to evaluate the UV doses incident upon the patient.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A mechanized cabin control system (CCS) is proposed. It consists of radiometers with a wide and narrow field of view to estimate the body irradiation and to identify malfunctioning cabin tubes. Quality control and quality assurance procedures are developed to keep high accuracy of the calibration procedure. The CCS has been used in the examination of two different types of UVP cabins routinely working in Poland.

RESULTS

It allows precise calculation of UV doses and spatial variability of UV radiance inside the cabin, thus providing uncertainties of the doses assigned by medical staff. The CCS could potentially serve as a primary standard for monitoring various UVP cabins working in Poland.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodology developed to quantify UV doses in UVP cabins may be easily extended to any UV radiation source.

Examples for the importance of radiophysical measurements in clinical phototherapy

BACKGROUND

Optimal UV therapy requires regular surveillance of the variables that influence therapeutic success. In daily practice, phototherapy equipment is often operated with an attitude of "autocontrol." This implies that thorough control measurements of the emission spectra and calibration of UV fluences are not routinely performed. For both quality control and patient safety, it is essential to regularly check whether a UV source is providing the right target spectrum with the correct dose to the skin.

METHODS

We have exemplarily taken three UV sources currently used in clinical practice and performed radiophysical measurements, i. e. determined emission spectra, radiation output and correctness of dose calculation.

RESULTS

All three sources revealed either a largely inhomogeneous distribution pattern of radiation intensity, variation of radiation intensity over time or insufficient filtering of the UV lamp emission spectrum. Furthermore the dose calculation procedures had to be revised because of significant differences between the estimated and the administered UV doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiophysical measurement of all UV-equipment in clinical use is a simple and effective way to improve the safety and reliability of phototherapy. Such measurements help to uncover technical flaws in radiation sources and prevent unnecessary side effects and UV exposure risks for the patient.

The contribution of medical physics to the development of psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA) in the UK: a personal reminiscence

Psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA) is the combined treatment of skin disorders with a photosensitizing drug (Psoralen) and UltraViolet A radiation. The introduction of PUVA therapy has arguably been the most important development in dermatology over the past 30 years and from the first days of the treatment being introduced in the UK, British medical physicists were an integral part of the effort to establish it. Medical physicists have contributed to this development in a number of ways, from designing irradiation units in the early days of the technique, through to collaborating with dermatologists in prosecuting clinical and experimental studies aimed at improving patient outcomes. That the dose of UVA radiation is administered quantitatively, and not qualitatively, has probably been the single most important contribution made by several medical physicists over this period. However, despite concerns that were expressed almost 30 years ago about the accuracy with which UVA doses are administered to patients, the medical physics community still has some way to go before we can be satisfied that statements about UVA irradiance and dose can be made with confidence.

A study of the correction factor for ultraviolet phototherapy dose measurements made by the indirect method

BACKGROUND

Optimization of ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy for treatment of psoriasis and other skin conditions requires accurate dosimetry. One factor involved in whole body treatments is the correction that needs to be applied to radiometer measurements of irradiance made remotely without a person in the phototherapy cabin.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the correction factor for cabins of different design and to consider whether different factors should be used for different phototherapy cabins and radiometers.

METHODS

An automated UV dosimetry system capable of recording irradiances at positions around the circumference of a circle equating to a human trunk has been developed. The system has been combined with a phantom to derive values for the ratio between irradiance measurements made by the direct method with a person in a cabin, and indirect measurements recorded remotely. In addition, values for the ratio in UVA cabins have been derived from comparisons between measurements made directly by persons in a cabin and indirect measurements.

RESULTS

Variations in direct to indirect ratio (DIR) with cabin type were less than between individual sets of measurements. The mean DIR obtained for cabins with TL01 lamps was 0.85 +/- 0.02, while that for UVA cabins was 0.80 +/- 0.05. The DIR for dual lamp (TL01/UVA) cabins, when TL01 lamps were illuminated, was higher (0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The DIR should be applied to any measurements made using radiometers without a person or equivalent phantom in a cabin. It is proposed that standard values are appropriate for groups of cabins with a single type of lamp and similar reflectors.

Guidelines for dosimetry and calibration in ultraviolet radiation therapy: a report of a British Photodermatology Group workshop

This report examines the dosimetry of ultraviolet (UV) radiation applied to dermatological treatments, and considers the definition of the radiation quantities and their measurement. Guidelines are offered for preferred measurement techniques and standard methods of dosimetry. The recommendations have been graded according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification of strength of recommendation and quality of evidence (summarized in Appendix 5).

An automated dosimetry system for testing whole-body ultraviolet phototherapy cabinets

A new technique is described for automated ultraviolet dosimetry within whole-body phototherapy cabinets. A dual-head detector system has been designed, permitting simultaneous assessment of irradiance levels and radiant intensities from individual lamps. One detector is used in combination with a diffuser/filter system for the measurement of irradiance and the other is mounted at the end of a slit collimator to provide a measurement which can be related to the radiant intensities of the individual lamps. These quantities are derived from 800 separate measurements made during rotation of the detector head around a 360 degrees circle at a fixed height and position within the cabinet under remote computer software control. The device has advantages compared with standard techniques, enabling measurements to be made without the need for a person to be present in the cabinet. A full set of measurements is made with minimal switching of the power supply to the lamps. This simplifies the assessment and reduces the uncertainty from variation in output after the lamps are switched on. Variations in irradiance with orientation for the smaller phototherapy cabinets are clearly demonstrated. Plots of data from the collimated detector show peaks corresponding to the lamps and the surrounding reflectors. The plots enable failed lamps to be detected and peak values can be related to radiant intensities of individual lamps.

A study of the directional response of ultraviolet radiometers: II. Implications for ultraviolet phototherapy derived from computer simulations

A theoretical model has been used to simulate irradiances for ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy cabinets and other sources. The accuracy of the simulation results has been checked by comparison with experimental measurements. The simulations have been used to study the influence of different factors on UV phototherapy exposure and to develop recommendations for the operation and calibration of phototherapy cabinets. Many radiometers used in the evaluation of skin doses have input optics with directional responses that are not proportional to the cosine of the angle of incidence for the UV radiation. Data on radiometer directional responses have been incorporated into the simulations, which show that the poor directional responses for some radiometers currently in use will give errors of 20-50% in the assessment of irradiance. The influence of lamp source geometries employed for radiometer calibration has been investigated. UV phototherapy dosimetry commonly uses a spectroradiometer and a radiometer in the transfer of irradiance calibrations from a small standard UV lamp to a large-area source with a different UV spectrum. Recommendations are given on the range of acceptability for radiometer directional responses and a method is described for determining whether these are fulfilled. Recommendations are made on the techniques that should be used for calibration.

Measurement of patient dose in ultraviolet therapy using a phantom

A phantom was developed as a reproducible means of measuring the irradiance in an occupied ultraviolet cabin, by placing the phantom, or replica person, in the cabin, obviating the need for human exposure. The contributions to the patient irradiance measured in the cabin were investigated, looking in particular at the effect of the reflectors. Radiation undergoing single reflection was seen to contribute to a greater extent than multiple reflections. Placing an object in the cabin reduces the measured irradiance due to the blocking of multiple reflections, but variation in the exact shape and size of the object has less effect, which is useful as patients are of all shapes and sizes and a representative phantom was to be developed. The phantom was made of expanded polystyrene blocks with an embedded probe. Measurements were made to verify the equivalence of human and phantom cabin occupancy. It was found that the irradiance measured with the phantom in the cabin lies within the values measured with human occupancy.

Traceable calibration of ultraviolet meters used with broadband, extended sources

A calibration system has been developed to provide increased accuracy in the measurement of the irradiance responsivity appropriate for UV meters used with broadband, extended sources of the type employed in phototherapy. The single wavelength responsivity of the test meter is obtained in the wavelength range 250-400 nm by intercomparison with a transfer standard meter in a narrow, monochromatic beam. Traceability to primary standard irradiance scales is provided via the National Measurement System with a best uncertainty of 7% (at 95% confidence). The effective responsivity of the test meter, when used with broadband extended sources, is calculated using the measured spectral and angular response of the meter and tabulated data on the spectral and spatial characteristics of the source radiance. The uncertainty in the effective responsivity, independent of the source variability, is estimated to be 10% (at 95% confidence). The advantages of this calibration system over existing approaches are discussed.

The importance of radiometer angular response for ultraviolet phototherapy dosimetry

The influence of the angular response of radiometer probes on measurements of irradiance in ultraviolet phototherapy has been studied. Irradiance measurements were made using nine ultraviolet (UV) radiometers employed by phototherapy centres in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and compared with measurements made using two spectroradiometers. The light sources used were UVB TL01 fluorescent lamps, arranged in different geometries. Irradiances within TL01 whole body treatment cabinets were assessed based on a comparison with one of the spectroradiometers. The results show variations of 50% in cabinet irradiance measurements made by different radiometers, even when they were calibrated using the same source geometry and spectroradiometer. Differences in radiometer probe design and construction lead to an under- or over-response at angles of incidence greater than zero. Angular responses of different probes were assessed using banks of fluorescent lamps. The differences found are large enough to account for the variations in measurements of cabinet irradiance. The variations in irradiance measurements are significant in terms of planning and monitoring patient exposure during TL01 phototherapy. Accurate dosimetry can only be achieved if radiometer probes have a good cosine response and recommendations are made for better calibration techniques.