1
|
Kosaka T, Takatsu J, Inoue T, Hara N, Mitsuhashi T, Suzuki M, Shikama N. Effective clinical applications of Monte Carlo-based independent secondary dose verification software for helical tomotherapy. Phys Med 2022; 104:112-122. [PMID: 36395639 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the scope of the effective clinical application of Monte Carlo (MC)-based independent dose verification software for helical tomotherapy. METHODS DoseCHECK was selected as the MC-based dose calculation software. First, the dose calculation accuracy of DoseCHECK was evaluated with film and chamber measurements in a water-equivalent phantom. Second, the dose calculation accuracy was examined in several heterogeneous materials. Finally, dosimetric comparisons between DoseCHECK and the treatment planning system (TPS) were performed for clinical patient plans. Prostate IMRT, head and neck IMRT (HN), total body irradiation (TBI), and brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) were evaluated. RESULT The DoseCHECK calculations agreed with the chamber and film measurements in the homogenous phantom. For heterogeneous phantom cases, the dose differences between DoseCHECK and TPS were within 3 %, except in air, in which large dose differences of 20 % were observed. In clinical patient plans, the median dose differences between the lung Dmean in TBI cases and the normal brain Dmean in brain SRT cases were significantly >3 %. For HN and brain SRT cases, the median target dose differences were >3 %. CONCLUSION Our results show that independent dose verification with the MC algorithm can detect systematic errors caused by the lack of heterogeneity correction in the TPS. In particular, MC-based independent dose verification is required for HN, TBI, and brain SRT cases in helical tomotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Kosaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu-shi, Chiba 279-0021, Japan.
| | - Jun Takatsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu-shi, Chiba 279-0021, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
| | - Naoya Hara
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan.
| | - Taira Mitsuhashi
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu-shi, Chiba 279-0021, Japan.
| | - Michimasa Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu-shi, Chiba 279-0021, Japan.
| | - Naoto Shikama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aboulbanine Z, Bahhous K. Elaboration and experimental validation of a Monte Carlo source model for linac 6 MV photon beams with and without Flattening Filter. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
3
|
Zhang H, Wu X, Zhang X, Chang SX, Megooni A, Donnelly ED, Ahmed MM, Griffin RJ, Welsh JS, Simone CB, Mayr NA. Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group. Radiat Res 2021; 194:665-677. [PMID: 33348375 DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00047.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The limits of radiation tolerance, which often deter the use of large doses, have been a major challenge to the treatment of bulky primary and metastatic cancers. A novel technique using spatial modulation of megavoltage therapy beams, commonly referred to as spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) (e.g., GRID radiation therapy), which purposefully maintains a high degree of dose heterogeneity across the treated tumor volume, has shown promise in clinical studies as a method to improve treatment response of advanced, bulky tumors. Compared to conventional uniform-dose radiotherapy, the complexities of megavoltage GRID therapy include its highly heterogeneous dose distribution, very high prescription doses, and the overall lack of experience among physicists and clinicians. Since only a few centers have used GRID radiation therapy in the clinic, wide and effective use of this technique has been hindered. To date, the mechanisms underlying the observed high tumor response and low toxicity are still not well understood. To advance SFRT technology and planning, the Physics Working Group of the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/Lattice, Microbeam and Flash Radiotherapy Working Groups, was established after an RSS-NCI Workshop. One of the goals of the Physics Working Group was to develop consensus recommendations to standardize dose prescription, treatment planning approach, response modeling and dose reporting in GRID therapy. The objective of this report is to present the results of the Physics Working Group's consensus that includes recommendations on GRID therapy as an SFRT technology, field dosimetric properties, techniques for generating GRID fields, the GRID therapy planning methods, documentation metrics and clinical practice recommendations. Such understanding is essential for clinical patient care, effective comparisons of outcome results, and for the design of rigorous clinical trials in the area of SFRT. The results of well-conducted GRID radiation therapy studies have the potential to advance the clinical management of bulky and advanced tumors by providing improved treatment response, and to further develop our current radiobiology models and parameters of radiation therapy design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hualin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60611
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Excecutive Medical Physics Associates and Biophysics Research Institute of America, Miami, Florida 33179
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02118
| | - Sha X Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516
| | - Ali Megooni
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 86169
| | - Eric D Donnelly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60611
| | - Mansoor M Ahmed
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Rockville, Maryland 20892
| | - Robert J Griffin
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - James S Welsh
- Loyola University Chicago, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Maywood, Illinois 60153
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York 10035
| | - Nina A Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98195
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dawod T. Treatment planning validation for symmetric and asymmetric motorized wedged fields. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER THERAPY AND ONCOLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0301.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
5
|
Zhang H, Zhong H, Barth RF, Cao M, Das IJ. Impact of dose size in single fraction spatially fractionated (grid) radiotherapy for melanoma. Med Phys 2014; 41:021727. [PMID: 24506618 DOI: 10.1118/1.4862837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of dose size in single fraction, spatially fractionated (grid) radiotherapy for selectively killing infiltrated melanoma cancer cells of different tumor sizes, using different radiobiological models. METHODS A Monte Carlo technique was employed to calculate the 3D dose distribution of a commercially available megavoltage grid collimator in a 6 MV beam. The linear-quadratic (LQ) and modified linear quadratic (MLQ) models were used separately to evaluate the therapeutic outcome of a series of single fraction regimens that employed grid therapy to treat both acute and late responding melanomas of varying sizes. The dose prescription point was at the center of the tumor volume. Dose sizes ranging from 1 to 30 Gy at 100% dose line were modeled. Tumors were either touching the skin surface or having their centers at a depth of 3 cm. The equivalent uniform dose (EUD) to the melanoma cells and the therapeutic ratio (TR) were defined by comparing grid therapy with the traditional open debulking field. The clinical outcomes from recent reports were used to verify the authors' model. RESULTS Dose profiles at different depths and 3D dose distributions in a series of 3D melanomas treated with grid therapy were obtained. The EUDs and TRs for all sizes of 3D tumors involved at different doses were derived through the LQ and MLQ models, and a practical equation was derived. The EUD was only one fifth of the prescribed dose. The TR was dependent on the prescribed dose and on the LQ parameters of both the interspersed cancer and normal tissue cells. The results from the LQ model were consistent with those of the MLQ model. At 20 Gy, the EUD and TR by the LQ model were 2.8% higher and 1% lower than by the MLQ, while at 10 Gy, the EUD and TR as defined by the LQ model were only 1.4% higher and 0.8% lower, respectively. The dose volume histograms of grid therapy for a 10 cm tumor showed different dosimetric characteristics from those of conventional radiotherapy. A significant portion of the tumor volume received a very large dose in grid therapy, which ensures significant tumor cell killing in these regions. Conversely, some areas received a relatively small dose, thereby sparing interspersed normal cells and increasing radiation tolerance. The radiobiology modeling results indicated that grid therapy could be useful for treating acutely responding melanomas infiltrating radiosensitive normal tissues. The theoretical model predictions were supported by the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Grid therapy functions by selectively killing infiltrating tumor cells and concomitantly sparing interspersed normal cells. The TR depends on the radiosensitivity of the cell population, dose, tumor size, and location. Because the volumes of very high dose regions are small, the LQ model can be used safely to predict the clinical outcomes of grid therapy. When treating melanomas with a dose of 15 Gy or higher, single fraction grid therapy is clearly advantageous for sparing interspersed normal cells. The existence of a threshold fraction dose, which was found in the authors' theoretical simulations, was confirmed by clinical observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hualin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611 and Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
| | - Hualiang Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202
| | - Rolf F Barth
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Su XY, Liu PD, Wu H, Gu N. Enhancement of radiosensitization by metal-based nanoparticles in cancer radiation therapy. Cancer Biol Med 2014; 11:86-91. [PMID: 25009750 PMCID: PMC4069802 DOI: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 03/24/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy performs an important function in cancer treatment. However, resistance of tumor cells to radiation therapy still remains a serious concern, so the study of radiosensitizers has emerged as a persistent hotspot in radiation oncology. Along with the rapid advancement of nanotechnology in recent years, the potential value of nanoparticles as novel radiosensitizers has been discovered. This review summarizes the latest experimental findings both in vitro and in vivo and attempts to highlight the underlying mechanisms of response in nanoparticle radiosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang-Yu Su
- 1 Department of Oncology, Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China ; 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Pei-Dang Liu
- 1 Department of Oncology, Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China ; 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Hao Wu
- 1 Department of Oncology, Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China ; 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Ning Gu
- 1 Department of Oncology, Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China ; 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang R, Fox CJ, Glaser AK, Gladstone DJ, Pogue BW. Superficial dosimetry imaging of Čerenkov emission in electron beam radiotherapy of phantoms. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:5477-93. [PMID: 23880473 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/16/5477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Čerenkov emission is generated from ionizing radiation in tissue above 264 keV energy. This study presents the first examination of this optical emission as a surrogate for the absorbed superficial dose. Čerenkov emission was imaged from the surface of flat tissue phantoms irradiated with electrons, using a range of field sizes from 6 cm × 6 cm to 20 cm × 20 cm, incident angles from 0° to 50°, and energies from 6 to 18 MeV. The Čerenkov images were compared with the estimated superficial dose in phantoms from direct diode measurements, as well as calculations by Monte Carlo and the treatment planning system. Intensity images showed outstanding linear agreement (R(2) = 0.97) with reference data of the known dose for energies from 6 to 18 MeV. When orthogonal delivery was carried out, the in-plane and cross-plane dose distribution comparisons indicated very little difference (± 2-4% differences) between the different methods of estimation as compared to Čerenkov light imaging. For an incident angle 50°, the Čerenkov images and Monte Carlo simulation show excellent agreement with the diode data, but the treatment planning system had a larger error (OPT = ± 1~2%, diode = ± 2~3%, TPS = ± 6-8% differences) as would be expected. The sampling depth of superficial dosimetry based on Čerenkov radiation has been simulated in a layered skin model, showing the potential of sampling depth tuning by spectral filtering. Taken together, these measurements and simulations indicate that Čerenkov emission imaging might provide a valuable method of superficial dosimetry imaging from incident radiotherapy beams of electrons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongxiao Zhang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dosimetric comparison between two MLC systems commonly used for stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo and experimental study. Phys Med 2012; 29:350-6. [PMID: 22658764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2011] [Revised: 04/24/2012] [Accepted: 05/07/2012] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In this work dosimetric parameters of two multi-leaf collimator (MLC) systems, namely the beam modulator (BM), which is the MLC commercial name for Elekta "Synergy S" linear accelerator and Radionics micro-MLC (MMLC), are compared using measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Dosimetric parameters, such as percentage depth doses (PDDs), in-plane and cross-plane dose profiles, and penumbras for different depths and field sizes of the 6 MV photon beams were measured using ionization chamber and a water tank. The collimator leakages were measured using radiographic films. MMLC and BM were modeled using the EGSnrc-based BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code and above dosimetric parameters were calculated. The energy fluence spectra for the two MLCs were also determined using the BEAMnrc and BEAMDP. Dosimetric parameters of the two MLCs were similar, except for penumbras. Leaf-side and leaf-end 80-20% dose penumbras at 10 cm depth for a 10×10 cm(2) field size were 4.8 and 5.1mm for MMLC and 5.3 mm and 6.3 mm for BM, respectively. Both Radionics MMLC and Elekta BM can be used effectively based on their dosimetric characteristics for stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy, although the former showed slightly sharper dose penumbra especially in the leaf-end direction.
Collapse
|
9
|
Magaddino V, Manser P, Frei D, Volken W, Schmidhalter D, Hirschi L, Fix MK. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam. Z Med Phys 2011; 21:124-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2010.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2010] [Revised: 10/08/2010] [Accepted: 10/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
10
|
Fragoso M, Wen N, Kumar S, Liu D, Ryu S, Movsas B, Munther A, Chetty IJ. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:4445-64. [PMID: 20668343 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/s02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
11
|
Zhang H, Wang JZ, Mayr N, Kong X, Yuan J, Gupta N, Lo S, Grecula J, Montebello J, Martin D, Yuh W. Fractionated Grid Therapy in Treating Cervical Cancers: Conventional Fractionation or Hypofractionation? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70:280-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2007] [Revised: 07/12/2007] [Accepted: 08/04/2007] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
12
|
Chetty IJ, Curran B, Cygler JE, DeMarco JJ, Ezzell G, Faddegon BA, Kawrakow I, Keall PJ, Liu H, Ma CMC, Rogers DWO, Seuntjens J, Sheikh-Bagheri D, Siebers JV. Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys 2007; 34:4818-53. [PMID: 18196810 DOI: 10.1118/1.2795842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 438] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
|
13
|
Srivastava RP, De Wagter C. The value of EDR2 film dosimetry in compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52:N449-57. [PMID: 17881795 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/19/n03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiographic or silver halide film is a well-established 2D dosimeter with an unquestioned spatial resolution. But its higher sensitivity to low-energy photons has to be taken into consideration. Metal compensators or physical modulators to deliver intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are known to change the beam energy spectrum and to produce scattered photons and contaminating electrons. Therefore the reliability of film dosimetry in compensator-based IMRT might be questioned. Conflicting data have been reported in the literature. This uncertainty about the validity of film dosimetry in compensator-based IMRT triggered us to conduct this study. First, the effect of MCP-96 compensators of varying thickness on the depth dose characteristics was investigated using a diamond detector which has a uniform energy response. A beam hardening effect was observed at 6 MV that resulted in a depth dose increase that remained below 2% at 20 cm depth. At 25 MV, in contrast, beam softening produced a dose decrease of up to 5% at the same depth. Second, dose was measured at depth using EDR2 film in perpendicular orientation to both 6 MV and 25 MV beams for different compensator thicknesses. A film dose underresponse of 1.1% was found for a 30 mm thick block in a 25 MV beam, which realized a transmission factor of 0.243. The effect induced by the compensators is higher than the experimental error but still within the accepted overall uncertainty of film dosimetry in clinical IMRT QA. With radiographic film as an affordable QA tool, the physical compensator remains a low threshold technique to deliver IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R P Srivastava
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang H, Johnson EL, Zwicker RD. Dosimetric validation of the MCNPX Monte Carlo simulation for radiobiologic studies of megavoltage grid radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66:1576-83. [PMID: 17126214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2006] [Revised: 08/21/2006] [Accepted: 08/23/2006] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate the MCNPX Monte Carlo simulation for radiobiologic studies of megavoltage grid radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS EDR2 films, a scanning water phantom with microionization chamber and MCNPX Monte Carlo code, were used to study the dosimetric characteristics of a commercially available megavoltage grid therapy collimator. The measured dose profiles, ratios between maximum and minimum doses at 1.5 cm depth, and percentage depth dose curve were compared with those obtained in the simulations. The simulated two-dimensional dose profile and the linear-quadratic formalism of cell survival were used to calculate survival statistics of tumor and normal cells for the treatment of melanoma with a list of doses of the fractionated grid therapy. RESULTS A good agreement between the simulated and measured dose data was found. The therapeutic ratio based on normal cell survival has been defined and calculated for treating both the acute and late responding melanoma tumors. The grid therapy in this study was found to be advantageous for treating the acutely responding tumors, but not for late responding tumors. CONCLUSIONS Monte Carlo technique was demonstrated to be able to provide the dosimetric characteristics for grid therapy. The therapeutic ratio was dependent not only on the single alpha/beta value, but also on the individual alpha and beta values. Acutely responding tumors and radiosensitive normal tissues are more suitable for using the grid therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hualin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210--1228, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Popple RA, Weinberg R, Antolak JA, Ye SJ, Pareek PN, Duan J, Shen S, Brezovich IA. Comprehensive evaluation of a commercial macro Monte Carlo electron dose calculation implementation using a standard verification data set. Med Phys 2006; 33:1540-51. [PMID: 16872061 DOI: 10.1118/1.2198328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
A commercial electron dose calculation software implementation based on the macro Monte Carlo algorithm has recently been introduced. We have evaluated the performance of the system using a standard verification data set comprised of two-dimensional (2D) dose distributions in the transverse plane of a 15 X 15 cm2 field. The standard data set was comprised of measurements performed for combinations of 9-MeV and 20-MeV beam energies and five phantom geometries. The phantom geometries included bone and air heterogeneities, and irregular surface contours. The standard verification data included a subset of the data needed to commission the dose calculation. Additional required data were obtained from a dosimetrically equivalent machine. In addition, we performed 2D dose measurements in a water phantom for the standard field sizes, a 4 cm X 4 cm field, a 3 cm diameter circle, and a 5 cm X 13 cm triangle for the 6-, 9-, 12-, 15-, and 18-MeV energies of a Clinac 21EX. Output factors were also measured. Synthetic CT images and structure contours duplicating the measurement configurations were generated and transferred to the treatment planning system. Calculations for the standard verification data set were performed over the range of each of the algorithm parameters: statistical precision, grid-spacing, and smoothing. Dose difference and distance-to-agreement were computed for the calculation points. We found that the best results were obtained for the highest statistical precision, for the smallest grid spacing, and for smoothed dose distributions. Calculations for the 21EX data were performed using parameters that the evaluation of the standard verification data suggested would produce clinically acceptable results. The dose difference and distance-to-agreement were similar to that observed for the standard verification data set except for the portion of the triangle field narrower than 3 cm for the 6- and 9-MeV electron beams. The output agreed with measurements to within 2%, with the exception of the 3-cm diameter circle and the triangle for 6 MeV, which were within 5%. We conclude that clinically acceptable results may be obtained using a grid spacing that is no larger than approximately one-tenth of the distal falloff distance of the electron depth dose curve (depth from 80% to 20% of the maximum dose) and small relative to the size of heterogeneities. For judicious choices of parameters, dose calculations agree with measurements to better than 3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement for fields with dimensions no less than about 3 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sakthi N, Keall P, Mihaylov I, Wu Q, Wu Y, Williamson JF, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Siebers JV. Monte Carlo–based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64:968-77. [PMID: 16458782 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2004] [Revised: 08/29/2005] [Accepted: 09/04/2005] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of previously reported superposition/convolution (SC) dosimetric results by comparing with Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations for head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) patients treated with the simultaneous integrated boost technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-one plans from 24 patients previously treated on a phase I/II head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma simultaneous integrated boost IMRT protocol were used. Clinical dose distributions, computed with an SC algorithm, were recomputed using an EGS4-based MC algorithm. Phantom-based dosimetry quantified the fluence prediction accuracy of each algorithm. Dose-volume indices were used to compare patient dose distributions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The MC algorithm predicts flat-phantom measurements better than the SC algorithm. Average patient dose indices agreed within 2.5% of the local dose for targets; 5.0% for parotids; and 1.9% for cord and brainstem. However, only 1 of 31 plans agreed within 3% for all indices; 4 of 31 agreed within 5%. In terms of the prescription dose, 4 of 31 plans agreed within 3% for all indices, whereas 28 of 31 agreed within 5%. CONCLUSIONS Average SC-computed doses agreed with MC results in the patient geometry; however deviations >5% were common. The fluence modulation prediction is likely the major source of the dose discrepancy. The observed dose deviations can impact dose escalation protocols, because they would result in shifting patients to higher dose levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmal Sakthi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jarry G, Verhaegen F. Electron beam treatment verification using measured and Monte Carlo predicted portal images. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50:4977-94. [PMID: 16237235 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/21/002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Electron beam treatments may benefit from techniques to verify patient positioning and dose delivery. This is particularly so for complex techniques such as mixed photon and electron beam radiotherapy and electron beam modulated therapy. This study demonstrates that it is possible to use the bremsstrahlung photons in an electron beam from a dual scattering foil linear accelerator to obtain portal images of electron beam treatments. The possibility of using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to predict the electron beam treatment portal images was explored. The MC code EGSnrc was used to model a Varian CL21EX linear accelerator (linac) and to characterize the bremsstrahlung photon production in the linac head. It was found that the main sources of photons in the electron beam are the scattering foils, the applicator and the beam-shaping cut-out. Images were acquired using the Varian CL21EX linac and the Varian aS500 electronic portal imager (EPI); four electron energies (6, 9, 12, 16 MeV), and different applicator and cut-out sizes were used. It was possible to acquire images with as little as 10.7 MU per image. The contrast, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the resolution and an estimate of the modulated transfer function (MTF) of the electron beam portal images were computed using a quality assurance (QA) phantom and were found to be comparable to those of a 6 MV photon beam. Images were also acquired using a Rando anthropomorphic phantom. MC simulations were used to model the aS500 EPID and to obtain predicted portal images of the QA and Rando phantom. The contrast in simulated and measured portal images agrees within +/-5% for both the QA and the Rando phantom. The measured and simulated images allow for a verification of the phantom positioning by making sure that the structure edges are well aligned. This study suggests that the Varian aS500 portal imager can be used to obtain patient portal images of electron beams in the scattering foil linacs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Jarry
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ahnesjö A, Weber L, Murman A, Saxner M, Thorslund I, Traneus E. Beam modeling and verification of a photon beam multisource model. Med Phys 2005; 32:1722-37. [PMID: 16013730 DOI: 10.1118/1.1898485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Dose calculations for treatment planning of photon beam radiotherapy require a model of the beam to drive the dose calculation models. The beam shaping process involves scattering and filtering that yield radiation components which vary with collimator settings. The necessity to model these components has motivated the development of multisource beam models. We describe and evaluate clinical photon beam modeling based on multisource models, including lateral beam quality variations. The evaluation is based on user data for a pencil kernel algorithm and a point kernel algorithm (collapsed cone) used in the clinical treatment planning systems Helax-TMS and Nucletron-Oncentra. The pencil kernel implementations treat the beam spectrum as lateral invariant while the collapsed cone involves off axis softening of the spectrum. Both algorithms include modeling of head scatter components. The parameters of the beam model are derived from measured beam data in a semiautomatic process called RDH (radiation data handling) that, in sequential steps, minimizes the deviations in calculated dose versus the measured data. The RDH procedure is reviewed and the results of processing data from a large number of treatment units are analyzed for the two dose calculation algorithms. The results for both algorithms are similar, with slightly better results for the collapsed cone implementations. For open beams, 87% of the machines have maximum errors less than 2.5%. For wedged beams the errors were found to increase with increasing wedge angle. Internal, motorized wedges did yield slightly larger errors than external wedges. These results reflect the increased complexity, both experimentally and computationally, when wedges are used compared to open beams.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Algorithms
- Calibration
- Computer Simulation
- Film Dosimetry
- Models, Statistical
- Models, Theoretical
- Particle Accelerators
- Phantoms, Imaging
- Photons
- Radiometry
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
- Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted/methods
- Radiotherapy, Conformal/instrumentation
- Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods
- Radiotherapy, High-Energy/instrumentation
- Radiotherapy, High-Energy/methods
- Scattering, Radiation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Ahnesjö
- Nucletron Scandinavia AB, Box 1704, 751 47 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fix MK, Keall PJ, Dawson K, Siebers JV. Monte Carlo source model for photon beam radiotherapy: photon source characteristics. Med Phys 2005; 31:3106-21. [PMID: 15587664 DOI: 10.1118/1.1803431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
A major barrier to widespread clinical implementation of Monte Carlo dose calculation is the difficulty in characterizing the radiation source within a generalized source model. This work aims to develop a generalized three-component source model (target, primary collimator, flattening filter) for 6- and 18-MV photon beams that match full phase-space data (PSD). Subsource by subsource comparison of dose distributions, using either source PSD or the source model as input, allows accurate source characterization and has the potential to ease the commissioning procedure, since it is possible to obtain information about which subsource needs to be tuned. This source model is unique in that, compared to previous source models, it retains additional correlations among PS variables, which improves accuracy at nonstandard source-to-surface distances (SSDs). In our study, three-dimensional (3D) dose calculations were performed for SSDs ranging from 50 to 200 cm and for field sizes from 1 x 1 to 30 x 30 cm2 as well as a 10 x 10 cm2 field 5 cm off axis in each direction. The 3D dose distributions, using either full PSD or the source model as input, were compared in terms of dose-difference and distance-to-agreement. With this model, over 99% of the voxels agreed within +/-1% or 1 mm for the target, within 2% or 2 mm for the primary collimator, and within +/-2.5% or 2 mm for the flattening filter in all cases studied. For the dose distributions, 99% of the dose voxels agreed within 1% or 1 mm when the combined source model-including a charged particle source and the full PSD as input-was used. The accurate and general characterization of each photon source and knowledge of the subsource dose distributions should facilitate source model commissioning procedures by allowing scaling the histogram distributions representing the subsources to be tuned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Fix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fix MK, Keall PJ, Siebers JV. Photon-beam subsource sensitivity to the initial electron-beam parameters. Med Phys 2005; 32:1164-75. [PMID: 15895600 DOI: 10.1118/1.1884385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
One limitation to the widespread implementation of Monte Carlo (MC) patient dose-calculation algorithms for radiotherapy is the lack of a general and accurate source model of the accelerator radiation source. Our aim in this work is to investigate the sensitivity of the photon-beam subsource distributions in a MC source model (with target, primary collimator, and flattening filter photon subsources and an electron subsource) for 6- and 18-MV photon beams when the energy and radial distributions of initial electrons striking a linac target change. For this purpose, phase-space data (PSD) was calculated for various mean electron energies striking the target, various normally distributed electron energy spread, and various normally distributed electron radial intensity distributions. All PSD was analyzed in terms of energy, fluence, and energy fluence distributions, which were compared between the different parameter sets. The energy spread was found to have a negligible influence on the subsource distributions. The mean energy and radial intensity significantly changed the target subsource distribution shapes and intensities. For the primary collimator and flattening filter subsources, the distribution shapes of the fluence and energy fluence changed little for different mean electron energies striking the target, however, their relative intensity compared with the target subsource change, which can be accounted for by a scaling factor. This study indicates that adjustments to MC source models can likely be limited to adjusting the target subsource in conjunction with scaling the relative intensity and energy spectrum of the primary collimator, flattening filter, and electron subsources when the energy and radial distributions of the initial electron-beam change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Fix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980058, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
An essential requirement for successful radiation therapy is that the discrepancies between dose distributions calculated at the treatment planning stage and those delivered to the patient are minimized. An important component in the treatment planning process is the accurate calculation of dose distributions. The most accurate way to do this is by Monte Carlo calculation of particle transport, first in the geometry of the external or internal source followed by tracking the transport and energy deposition in the tissues of interest. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations allow one to investigate the influence of source components on beams of a particular type and their contaminant particles. Since the mid 1990s, there has been an enormous increase in Monte Carlo studies dealing specifically with the subject of the present review, i.e., external photon beam Monte Carlo calculations, aided by the advent of new codes and fast computers. The foundations for this work were laid from the late 1970s until the early 1990s. In this paper we will review the progress made in this field over the last 25 years. The review will be focused mainly on Monte Carlo modelling of linear accelerator treatment heads but sections will also be devoted to kilovoltage x-ray units and 60Co teletherapy sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Verhaegen
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Av Montreal, Québec, H3G1A4, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Spezi E, Lewis DG, Smith CW. A DICOM-RT-based toolbox for the evaluation and verification of radiotherapy plans. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47:4223-32. [PMID: 12502045 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/23/308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The verification of radiotherapy plans is an essential step in the treatment planning process. This is especially important for highly conformal and IMRT plans which produce non-intuitive fluence maps and complex 3D dose distributions. In this work we present a DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine) based toolbox, developed for the evaluation and the verification of radiotherapy treatment plans. The toolbox offers the possibility of importing treatment plans generated with different calculation algorithms and/or different optimization engines and evaluating dose distributions on an independent platform. Furthermore the radiotherapy set-up can be exported to the BEAM Monte Carlo code system for dose verification. This can be done by simulating the irradiation of the patient CT dataset or the irradiation of a software-generated water phantom. We show the application of some of the functions implemented in this toolbox for the evaluation and verification of an IMRT treatment of the head and neck region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Spezi
- Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Flampouri S, Evans PM, Verhaegen F, Nahum AE, Spezi E, Partridge M. Optimization of accelerator target and detector for portal imaging using Monte Carlo simulation and experiment. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47:3331-49. [PMID: 12375824 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/18/305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Megavoltage portal images suffer from poor quality compared to those produced with kilovoltage x-rays. Several authors have shown that the image quality can be improved by modifying the linear accelerator to generate more low-energy photons. This work addresses the problem of using Monte Carlo simulation and experiment to optimize the beam and detector combination to maximize image quality for a given patient thickness. A simple model of the whole imaging chain was developed for investigation of the effect of the target parameters on the quality of the image. The optimum targets (6 mm thick aluminium and 1.6 mm copper) were installed in an Elekta SL25 accelerator. The first beam will be referred to as A16 and the second as Cu1.6. A tissue-equivalent contrast phantom was imaged with the 6 MV standard photon beam and the experimental beams with standard radiotherapy and mammography film/screen systems. The arrangement with a thin Al target/mammography system improved the contrast from 1.4 cm bone in 5 cm water to 19% compared with 2% for the standard arrangement of a thick, high-Z target/radiotherapy verification system. The linac/phantom/detector system was simulated with the BEAM/EGS4 Monte Carlo code. Contrast calculated from the predicted images was in good agreement with the experiment (to within 2.5%). The use of MC techniques to predict images accurately, taking into account the whole imaging system, is a powerful new method for portal imaging system design optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Flampouri
- Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
To do calculations for wedged photon beams with the NRC Monte Carlo simulation package BEAM, a new Component Module for wedges called WEDGE has been designed and built. After an initial series of benchmarks using monoenergetic photon beams as well as realistic 6 MV and 10 MV beams, it was found, that the new CM did work fine for the large wedge (maximum field size 30 x 40 cm2) of the Elekta SL-linac. The next step was to calculate dose distributions and output factors for a range of wedged fields with field size from 3 x 3 cm2 to 30 x 30 cm2. Results from these simulations have been compared to measurements. Calculated values for the reference wedge transmission factor and the relative wedge transmission factors were within 1.5% from the measured data. Dose distributions showed an identical behavior; both depth-dose curves as well as cross profiles were within 1.5% from measured data, usually even better. Despite the increased mean energy, there was no indication that, as a result, the phantom scatter output factors will change for a 10 MV photon beam. It was found that by adding a wedge the contributions for the different sources of head scatter changed considerably as compared to the open fields, apart from the additional scatter from the wedge. Another consequence of inserting a wedge was an increase in the mean energy of both primary and scattered radiation with 0.3 MV and 0.7 MV, respectively, for all wedged fields with respect to the corresponding open fields. Despite the statistical uncertainty in the calculated data, which is in the same order of magnitude as the effect to be determined, it was possible to derive reliable data for the beam hardening from the calculated dose distributions. Only for the smallest field (field size 3 x 3 cm2) a large difference between the measured and calculated beam hardening factor was found due to the relative large voxel size of 1 x 1 x 1 cm3 compared to the field size. For a description of the influence of a wedge on a photon beam, the results of this study strongly support the use of a reference wedge transmission factor (determined under reference conditions) in combination with a relative wedge transmission factor. The product of these variables should replace the collimator scatter output factor used in open fields. The influence on the dose distribution should be incorporated by using the (field size dependent) beam hardening. The ultimate solution will be to make this beam hardening depending on the actual position in the radiation field, as the photon energy varies over the field (holds also for open fields).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W van der Zee
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|