An intercomparison of IMRT delivery techniques: a case study for breast treatment

Dosimetric evaluation of conventional radiotherapy, 3-D conformal radiotherapy and direct machine parameter optimisation intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer after conservative surgery

INTRODUCTION

The use of conservative surgery combined with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) has been established as a valid alternative to mastectomy for the management of early-stage breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume(PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) between conventional radiation therapy (CR), 3-D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), and direct machine parameter optimisation intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DMPO-IMRT) after breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Computed tomography (CT) scans from 20 patients (13 left-sided and 7 right-sided) previously treated with T1N0 or ductal carcinoma were selected for this dosimetric planning study. We designed CR, 3DCRT and DMPO-IMRT plans for each patient. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy/2 Gy/25 f, 95% of PTV received the prescription dose. Doses were computed with a commercially available treatment planning system using convolution/superimposition (CS) algorithm. Plans were compared according to dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis in terms of PTV homogeneity and conformity indices (HI and CI) as well as OARs dose and volume parameters.

RESULTS

Both the HI and CI of the PTV showed statistically significant difference between CR, 3DCRT and DMPO-IMRT with those of DMPO-IMRT were best (P < 0.05). Compared with CR, 3DCRT showed smaller exposed volumes of ipsilateral lung, contralateral breast and heart while DMPO-IMRT indicated larger exposed volumes of ipsilateral lung (except for V20 and V30), contralateral breast and heart. In addition, DMPO-IMRT demonstrated an increase of exposed volume of ipsilateral lung (except for V30), contralateral breast and heart compared with 3DCRT.

CONCLUSIONS

In WBI of breast cancer after conservative surgery, 3DCRT and DMPO-IMRT improved the homogeneity and conformity of the PTV compared with CR. Meanwhile, 3DCRT reduced the irradiated volumes of OARs at all dose levels listed in our study while DMPO-IMRT reduced the irradiated volumes of OARs in high-dose areas but increased the irradiated volumes of OARs in low-dose areas.

Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study

PURPOSE

To quantify the multi-institutional and multiobserver variability of target and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation for breast-cancer radiotherapy (RT) and its dosimetric impact as the first step of a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group effort to establish a breast cancer atlas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine radiation oncologists specializing in breast RT from eight institutions independently delineated targets (e.g., lumpectomy cavity, boost planning target volume, breast, supraclavicular, axillary and internal mammary nodes, chest wall) and OARs (e.g., heart, lung) on the same CT images of three representative breast cancer patients. Interobserver differences in structure delineation were quantified regarding volume, distance between centers of mass, percent overlap, and average surface distance. Mean, median, and standard deviation for these quantities were calculated for all possible combinations. To assess the impact of these variations on treatment planning, representative dosimetric plans based on observer-specific contours were generated.

RESULTS

Variability in contouring the targets and OARs between the institutions and observers was substantial. Structure overlaps were as low as 10%, and volume variations had standard deviations up to 60%. The large variability was related both to differences in opinion regarding target and OAR boundaries and approach to incorporation of setup uncertainty and dosimetric limitations in target delineation. These interobserver differences result in substantial variations in dosimetric planning for breast RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in target and OAR delineation for breast irradiation between institutions/observers appear to be clinically and dosimetrically significant. A systematic consensus is highly desirable, particularly in the era of intensity-modulated and image-guided RT.

Direct aperture optimization–based intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To investigate the technical and dosimetric advantages and the efficacy of direct aperture optimized intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DAO-IMRT) over standard (e.g., beamlet optimized) IMRT and conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for whole breast irradiation in supine and prone positions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively designed DAO-IMRT plans for 15 breast cancer patients in supine (10 patients) and prone (5 patients) positions with a goal of uniform dose coverage of the whole breast. These DAO-IMRT plans were compared with standard IMRT using beamlet optimization and conventional 3D-CRT plans using wedges. All plans used opposed tangential beam arrangements.

RESULTS

In all cases, the DAO-IMRT plans were equal to or better than those generated with 3D-CRT and standard beamlet-IMRT. For supine cases, DAO-IMRT provided higher uniformity index (UI, defined as the ratio of the dose to 95% of breast volume to the maximum dose) than either 3D-CRT (0.88 vs. 0.82; p = 0.026) or beamlet-IMRT (0.89 vs. 0.85; p = 0.003). Direct aperture optimized IMRT also gave lower lung doses than either 3D-CRT (V20 = 7.9% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.024) or beamlet-IMRT (V20 = 8.4% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.0008) for supine patients. For prone patients, DAO-IMRT provided higher UI than either 3D-CRT (0.89 vs. 0.83; p = 0.027) or beamlet-IMRT (0.89 vs. 0.85; p = 0.003). The planning time for DAO-IMRT was approximately 75% less than that of 3D-CRT. The monitor units for DAO-IMRT were approximately 60% less than those of beamlet-IMRT.

CONCLUSION

Direct aperture optimized IMRT improved the overall quality of dose distributions as well as the planning and delivery efficiency for treating whole breast in both supine and prone positions.

Choice of beam energy and dosimetric implications for radiation treatment in a subpopulation of women with large breasts in the United States and Japan

Radiation complications are often related to the dose inhomogeneity (hot spot) in breast tissue treated with conservative therapy, especially for large patients. The effect of photon energy on radiation dose distribution is analyzed to provide guidelines for the selection of beam energy when tangential fields and limited slices are used to treat women with large breasts. Forty-eight patients with chest wall separation > 22 cm were selected for dosimetric analysis. We compared the maximum dose in the central axis (CAX) plane (2D) using 6-, 10-, and 18-MV photon beams in all patients and 3D data set for 16 patients. Correlation between hot spot dose (HSD), separation, breast cup size, breast volume, and body weight was derived with beam energy. Among the 48 patients in this study, HSD > 10% in the CAX plane was noted in 98%, 46%, and 4% of the population when 2D dosimetry was performed; however, with 3D study, it was in 50%, 19%, and 6% of the patients with 6-MV, 10-MV and 18-MV beams, respectively. The chest wall separation, body weight, and breast volume were correlated with the HSD in both the 2D and 3D plans. Patient's bra size was not correlated with the hot spot. The chest wall separation was found to be the most important parameter to correlate with hot spot in tangential breast treatment. Simple guidelines are provided for dose uniformity in breast with respect to chest wall separation, body weight, bra size, and breast volume with tangential field irradiations.

A preliminary study of the role of modulated electron beams in intensity modulated radiotherapy, using automated beam orientation and modality selection

PURPOSE

To develop an algorithm for optimal beam arrangement selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of mixed photon and electron beams. To apply this algorithm to study the utility of modulated electron beams in the context of IMRT planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The optimization algorithm selects, for a user-specified number of beams, the optimal IMRT arrangement (beam orientations, and photon/electron modality for each orientation) using a novel fast heuristic intensity modulation procedure. The algorithm was employed to select optimal beam arrangements for breast (two, four, and six axial beams) and head-and-neck (three, four, five, and seven nonaxial beams) cases.

RESULTS

For the two cases, increasing the number of selected beams: (1) increased the number of electron beams for the breast case, but not more than one electron beam was selected for the head-and-neck case; (2) decreased critical structure doses for both cases; and (3) decreased target homogeneity for the breast case, but improved it for the head-and-neck case.

CONCLUSIONS

In the two cases analyzed using the selection algorithm, the primary role of modulated electrons differs based on treatment site-normal tissue dose reduction in breast and target homogeneity improvement in head and neck. Although this preliminary study with two cases appears to suggest that the role of intensity-modulated electrons differs based on treatment site, further investigation of large numbers of cases and varied treatment sites are required to establish a definitive conclusion.

Polymer gel measurement of dose homogeneity in the breast: comparing MLC intensity modulation with standard wedged delivery

Polymer gel dosimetry has been used to measure the radiotherapy dose homogeneity in a breast phantom for two different treatment methods. The first 'standard' method uses two tangential wedged fields while the second method has three static fields shaped by multileaf collimators (MLCs) in addition to the standard wedged fields to create intensity modulated fields. Gel dose distributions from the multileaf modulation treatment show an improved dose uniformity in comparison to the standard treatment with a decreased volume receiving doses over 105%.

Delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional multileaf collimator: comparison of dynamic and segmental methods

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can be delivered with a conventional multileaf collimator (MLC), either in dynamic mode (DMLC) or in segmental mode (SMLC, also known as "step-and-shoot"). The advantage of DMLC is its ability to deliver the desired intensity profile produced by inverse planning with a high degree of fidelity. The SMLC method, on the other hand, resembles treatment with multiple static fields, and can be more easily verified. However, the use of SMLC requires that the desired profile be approximated by discrete levels of intensity, which may lead to degradation in the delivered dose distribution. Clearly, the results of SMLC delivery depend on the number of levels and the spatial resolution of the intensity distribution. In this work, we compare the DMLC method and the SMLC method employing different numbers of levels and different spatial resolutions. Three disease sites were studied: prostate, nasopharynx, and breast, with three cases for each. In general, a 5- to 10-level SMLC plan produced results comparable to that from a DMLC plan. The target coverage is improved by increasing the number of levels while critical organs are better protected with finer spatial resolutions. The beam-on-time (MUs) requirement for SMLC was approximately 20% less than DMLC, but the delivery time (in minutes) was about twice as long. Thus, the choice depends on many factors including machine capability, quality assurance, target coverage, critical organ protection, beam-on-time, delivery time, and other clinical considerations.