Installation of the 1.5 T MRI accelerator next to clinical accelerators: impact of the fringe field

An ESTRO-ACROP guideline on quality assurance and medical physics commissioning of online MRI guided radiotherapy systems based on a consensus expert opinion

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this consensus expert opinion was to define quality assurance (QA) tests for online magnetic resonance image (MRI) guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) systems and to define the important medical physics aspects for installation and commissioning of an oMRgRT system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten medical physicists and two radiation oncologists experienced in oMRgRT participated in the survey. In the first round of the consensus expert opinion, ideas on QA and commissioning were collected. Only tests and aspects different from commissioning of a CT guided radiotherapy (RT) system were considered. In the following two rounds all twelve participants voted on the importance of the QA tests, their recommended frequency and their suitability for the two oMRgRT systems approved for clinical use as well as on the importance of the aspects to consider during medical physics commissioning.

RESULTS

Twenty-four QA tests were identified which are potentially important during commissioning and routine QA on oMRgRT systems compared to online CT guided RT systems. An additional eleven tasks and aspects related to construction, workflow development and training were collected. Consensus was found for most tests on their importance, their recommended frequency and their suitability for the two approved systems. In addition, eight aspects mostly related to the definition of workflows were also found to be important during commissioning.

CONCLUSIONS

A program for QA and commissioning of oMRgRT systems was developed to support medical physicists to prepare for safe handling of such systems.

Gantry angle dependent beam control optimization of a traveling wave linear accelerator to improve VMAT delivery

Introduction

Increased modulation and dynamical delivery of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with dynamic gantry rotation, continuously variable dose rate (CVDR) and field shapes that change during the beam, place greater demands on the performance of linear accelerators (linac). In this study, the accuracy of the linac beam steering is improved by the application of a new method to determine the gantry‐dependent lookup table.

Methods

An improved method of lookup table creation based on service graphing information from the linac is investigated. This minimizes the impact of magnetic hysteresis due to the previous current in the steering magnets, which is dependent on the previous gantry angle. A software tool, programmed with MATLAB®, is used to calculate and export the new optimal lookup table (LUT).

Results

This method is efficient requiring little clinical machine time or analysis time, and leads to an improved VMAT delivery with a reduction of about 60 percent in beam steering errors. If the surrounding magnetic field is changed, for example, ramping a nearby magnetic resonance imaging system (MRI), the beam steering LUT optimization can be quickly performed.

Conclusion

This study shows an improved linac stability using improved lookup tables. Resulting in a lower number of interruptions, preventing down‐time, and a lower risk of intrafraction motion due to longer treatment times.

Practical Safety Considerations for Integration of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy

Interest in integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) practice has increased dramatically in recent years owing to its unique advantages such as excellent soft tissue contrast and capability of measuring biological properties. Continuous real-time imaging for intrafractional motion tracking without ionizing radiation serves as a particularly attractive feature for applications in RT. Despite its many advantages, the integration of MRI in RT workflows is not straightforward, with many unmet needs. MR safety remains one of the key challenges and concerns in the clinical implementation of MR simulators and MR-guided radiation therapy systems in radiation oncology. Most RT staff are not accustomed to working in an environment with a strong magnetic field. There are specific requirements in RT that are different from diagnostic applications. A large variety of implants and devices used in routine RT practice do not have clear MR safety labels. RT-specific imaging pulse sequences focusing on fast acquisition, high spatial integrity, and continuous, real-time acquisition require additional MR safety testing and evaluation. This article provides an overview of MR safety tailored toward RT staff, followed by discussions on specific requirements and challenges associated with MR safety in the RT environment. Strategies and techniques for developing an MR safety program specific to RT are presented and discussed.

The need for, and implementation of, image guidance in radiation therapy

The introduction of image guidance in radiation therapy and its subsequent innovations have revolutionised the delivery of cancer treatment. Modern imaging systems can supplement and often replace the historical practice of relying on external landmarks and laser alignment systems. Rather than depending on markings on the patient's skin, image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), using techniques such as computed tomography (CT), cone beam CT, MV on-board imaging (OBI), and kV OBI, allows the patient to be positioned based on the internal anatomy. These advances in technology have enabled more accurate delivery of radiation doses to anatomically complex and temporally changing tumour volumes, while simultaneously sparing surrounding healthy tissues. While these imaging modalities provide excellent bony anatomy image quality, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surpasses them in soft tissue image contrast for better visualisation and tracking of soft tissue tumours with no additional radiation dose to the patient. However, the introduction of MRI into a radiotherapy facility has a number of complications, including the influence of the magnetic field on the dose deposition, as well as the effects it can have on dosimetry systems. The development and introduction of these new IGRT techniques will be reviewed, and the benefits and disadvantages of each will be described.

Passive magnetic shielding in MRI-Linac systems

Passive magnetic shielding refers to the use of ferromagnetic materials to redirect magnetic field lines away from vulnerable regions. An application of particular interest to the medical physics community is shielding in MRI systems, especially integrated MRI-linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) systems. In these systems, the goal is not only to minimize the magnetic field in some volume, but also to minimize the impact of the shield on the magnetic fields within the imaging volume of the MRI scanner. In this work, finite element modelling was used to assess the shielding of a side coupled 6 MV linac and resultant heterogeneity induced within the 30 cm diameter of spherical volume (DSV) of a novel 1 Tesla split bore MRI magnet. A number of different shield parameters were investigated; distance between shield and magnet, shield shape, shield thickness, shield length, openings in the shield, number of concentric layers, spacing between each layer, and shield material. Both the in-line and perpendicular MRI-Linac configurations were studied. By modifying the shield shape around the linac from the starting design of an open ended cylinder, the shielding effect was boosted by approximately 70% whilst the impact on the magnet was simultaneously reduced by approximately 10%. Openings in the shield for the RF port and beam exit were substantial sources of field leakage; however it was demonstrated that shielding could be added around these openings to compensate for this leakage. Layering multiple concentric shield shells was highly effective in the perpendicular configuration, but less so for the in-line configuration. Cautious use of high permeability materials such as Mu-metal can greatly increase the shielding performance in some scenarios. In the perpendicular configuration, magnetic shielding was more effective and the impact on the magnet lower compared with the in-line configuration.

Feasibility of automated 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging pancreas segmentation

Purpose

With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiation therapy, internal organ motion can be imaged simultaneously during treatment. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of pancreas MRI segmentation using state-of-the-art segmentation methods.

Methods and materials

T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and T1 weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination images were acquired on 3 patients and 2 healthy volunteers for a total of 12 imaging volumes. A novel dictionary learning (DL) method was used to segment the pancreas and compared to t mean-shift merging, distance regularized level set, and graph cuts, and the segmentation results were compared with manual contours using Dice's index, Hausdorff distance, and shift of the center of the organ (SHIFT).

Results

All volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination images were successfully segmented by at least 1 of the autosegmentation method with Dice's index >0.83 and SHIFT ≤2 mm using the best automated segmentation method. The automated segmentation error of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo images was significantly greater. DL is statistically superior to the other methods in Dice’s overlapping index. For the Hausdorff distance and SHIFT measurement, distance regularized level set and DL performed slightly superior to the graph cuts method, and substantially superior to mean-shift merging. DL required least human supervision and was faster to compute.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated potential feasibility of automated segmentation of the pancreas on MRI scans with minimal human supervision at the beginning of imaging acquisition. The achieved accuracy is promising for organ localization.

MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dose planning requires a CT scan which provides the electron density distribution for dose calculation. MR provides superior soft tissue contrast compared to CT and the use of MR-alone for prostate planning would provide further benefits such as lower cost to the patient. This study compares the accuracy of MR-alone based dose calculations with bulk electron density assignment to CT-based dose calculations for prostate radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT and whole pelvis MR images were contoured for 39 prostate patients. Plans with uniform density and plans with bulk density values assigned to bone and tissue were compared to the patient's gold standard full density CT plan. The optimal bulk density for bone was calculated using effective depth measurements. The plans were evaluated using ICRU point doses, dose volume histograms, and Chi comparisons. Differences in spatial uniformity were investigated for the CT and MR scans.

RESULTS

The calculated dose for CT bulk bone and tissue density plans was 0.1±0.6% (mean±1 SD) higher than the corresponding full density CT plan. MR bulk bone and tissue density plans were 1.3±0.8% lower than the full density CT plan. CT uniform density plans and MR uniform density plans were 1.4±0.9% and 2.6±0.9% lower, respectively. Paired t-tests performed on specific points on the DVH graphs showed that points on DVHs for all bulk electron density plans were equivalent with two exceptions. There was no significant difference between doses calculated on Pinnacle and Eclipse. The dose distributions of six patients produced Chi values outside the acceptable range of values when MR-based plans were compared to the full density plan.

CONCLUSIONS

MR-alone bulk density planning is feasible provided bone is assigned a density, however, manual segmentation of bone on MR images will have to be replaced with automatic methods. The major dose differences for MR bulk density plans are due to differences in patient external contours introduced by the MR couch-top and pelvic coil.