1
|
Rata M, Blackledge M, Scurr E, Winfield J, Koh DM, Dragan A, Candito A, King A, Rennie W, Gaba S, Suresh P, Malcolm P, Davis A, Nilak A, Shah A, Gandhi S, Albrizio M, Drury A, Roberts S, Jenner M, Brown S, Kaiser M, Messiou C. Implementation of Whole-Body MRI (MY-RADS) within the OPTIMUM/MUKnine multi-centre clinical trial for patients with myeloma. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:123. [PMID: 35900614 PMCID: PMC9334517 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01253-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-body (WB) MRI, which includes diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T1-w Dixon, permits sensitive detection of marrow disease in addition to qualitative and quantitative measurements of disease and response to treatment of bone marrow. We report on the first study to embed standardised WB-MRI within a prospective, multi-centre myeloma clinical trial (IMAGIMM trial, sub-study of OPTIMUM/MUKnine) to explore the use of WB-MRI to detect minimal residual disease after treatment. METHODS The standardised MY-RADS WB-MRI protocol was set up on a local 1.5 T scanner. An imaging manual describing the MR protocol, quality assurance/control procedures and data transfer was produced and provided to sites. For non-identical scanners (different vendor or magnet strength), site visits from our physics team were organised to support protocol optimisation. The site qualification process included review of phantom and volunteer data acquired at each site and a teleconference to brief the multidisciplinary team. Image quality of initial patients at each site was assessed. RESULTS WB-MRI was successfully set up at 12 UK sites involving 3 vendor systems and two field strengths. Four main protocols (1.5 T Siemens, 3 T Siemens, 1.5 T Philips and 3 T GE scanners) were generated. Scanner limitations (hardware and software) and scanning time constraint required protocol modifications for 4 sites. Nevertheless, shared methodology and imaging protocols enabled other centres to obtain images suitable for qualitative and quantitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS Standardised WB-MRI protocols can be implemented and supported in prospective multi-centre clinical trials. Trial registration NCT03188172 clinicaltrials.gov; registration date 15th June 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03188172.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Rata
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK.
| | - Matthew Blackledge
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Erica Scurr
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Jessica Winfield
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Alina Dragan
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Antonio Candito
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Alexander King
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Suchi Gaba
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Priya Suresh
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Foundation Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Paul Malcolm
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Amy Davis
- Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK
| | | | - Aarti Shah
- Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | - Mauro Albrizio
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Arnold Drury
- Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Sadie Roberts
- University of Leeds Clinical Trial Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew Jenner
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Sarah Brown
- University of Leeds Clinical Trial Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin Kaiser
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, SM2 5PT, Sutton, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gagliardi T, Adejolu M, deSouza NM. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ovarian Cancer: Exploiting Strengths and Understanding Limitations. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1524. [PMID: 35329850 PMCID: PMC8949455 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Detection, characterization, staging, and response assessment are key steps in the imaging pathway of ovarian cancer. The most common type, high grade serous ovarian cancer, often presents late, so that accurate disease staging and response assessment are required through imaging in order to improve patient management. Currently, computerized tomography (CT) is the most common method for these tasks, but due to its poor soft-tissue contrast, it is unable to quantify early response within lesions before shrinkage is observed by size criteria. Therefore, quantifiable techniques, such as diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), which generates high contrast between tumor and healthy tissue, are increasingly being explored. This article discusses the basis of diffusion-weighted contrast and the technical issues that must be addressed in order to achieve optimal implementation and robust quantifiable diffusion-weighted metrics in the abdomen and pelvis. The role of DW-MRI in characterizing adnexal masses in order to distinguish benign from malignant disease, and to differentiate borderline from frankly invasive malignancy is discussed, emphasizing the importance of morphological imaging over diffusion-weighted metrics in this regard. Its key role in disease staging and predicting resectability in comparison to CT is addressed, including its valuable use as a biomarker for following response within individual lesions, where early changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient in peritoneal metastases may be detected. Finally, the task of implementing DW-MRI into clinical trials in order to validate this biomarker for clinical use are discussed, along with the trials that include it within their protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Gagliardi
- Department of Imaging, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK; (T.G.); (M.A.)
| | - Margaret Adejolu
- Department of Imaging, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK; (T.G.); (M.A.)
| | - Nandita M. deSouza
- Department of Imaging, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK; (T.G.); (M.A.)
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Winfield JM, Blackledge MD, Tunariu N, Koh DM, Messiou C. Whole-body MRI: a practical guide for imaging patients with malignant bone disease. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:715-727. [PMID: 33934876 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now a crucial tool for the assessment of the extent of systemic malignant bone disease and response to treatment, and forms part of national and international recommendations for imaging patients with myeloma or metastatic prostate cancer. Recent developments in scanners have enabled acquisition of good-quality whole-body MRI data within 45 minutes on modern MRI systems from all main manufacturers. This provides complimentary morphological and functional whole-body imaging; however, lack of prior experience and acquisition times required can act as a barrier to adoption in busy radiology departments. This article aims to tackle the former by reviewing the indications and providing guidance for technical delivery and clinical interpretation of whole-body MRI for patients with malignant bone disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Winfield
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - M D Blackledge
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - N Tunariu
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - D-M Koh
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - C Messiou
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
deSouza NM, Winfield JM, Waterton JC, Weller A, Papoutsaki MV, Doran SJ, Collins DJ, Fournier L, Sullivan D, Chenevert T, Jackson A, Boss M, Trattnig S, Liu Y. Implementing diffusion-weighted MRI for body imaging in prospective multicentre trials: current considerations and future perspectives. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:1118-1131. [PMID: 28956113 PMCID: PMC5811587 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4972-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
For body imaging, diffusion-weighted MRI may be used for tumour detection, staging, prognostic information, assessing response and follow-up. Disease detection and staging involve qualitative, subjective assessment of images, whereas for prognosis, progression or response, quantitative evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is required. Validation and qualification of ADC in multicentre trials involves examination of i) technical performance to determine biomarker bias and reproducibility and ii) biological performance to interrogate a specific aspect of biology or to forecast outcome. Unfortunately, the variety of acquisition and analysis methodologies employed at different centres make ADC values non-comparable between them. This invalidates implementation in multicentre trials and limits utility of ADC as a biomarker. This article reviews the factors contributing to ADC variability in terms of data acquisition and analysis. Hardware and software considerations are discussed when implementing standardised protocols across multi-vendor platforms together with methods for quality assurance and quality control. Processes of data collection, archiving, curation, analysis, central reading and handling incidental findings are considered in the conduct of multicentre trials. Data protection and good clinical practice are essential prerequisites. Developing international consensus of procedures is critical to successful validation if ADC is to become a useful biomarker in oncology. KEY POINTS • Standardised acquisition/analysis allows quantification of imaging biomarkers in multicentre trials. • Establishing "precision" of the measurement in the multicentre context is essential. • A repository with traceable data of known provenance promotes further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. M. deSouza
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT UK
| | - J. M. Winfield
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT UK
| | - J. C. Waterton
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - A. Weller
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT UK
| | - M.-V. Papoutsaki
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT UK
| | - S. J. Doran
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT UK
| | - D. J. Collins
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT UK
| | - L. Fournier
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Radiology Department, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - D. Sullivan
- Duke Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Durham, NC USA
| | - T. Chenevert
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - A. Jackson
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - M. Boss
- Applied Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Boulder, CO USA
| | - S. Trattnig
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Y. Liu
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46:1209-1217. [PMID: 28540521 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2670-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate different fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences in association with different metal artifacts reduction techniques (MARS) to determine which combination allows better fat suppression around metallic hip implants. METHODS An experimental study using an MRI fat-water phantom quantitatively evaluated contrast shift induced by metallic hip implant for different fat-suppression techniques and MARS. Then a clinical study with patients addressed to MRI unit for painful hip prosthesis compared these techniques in terms of fat suppression quality and diagnosis confidence. RESULTS Among sequences without MARS, both T2 Dixon and short tau inversion recuperation (STIR) had significantly lower contrast shift (p < 0.05), Dixon offering the best fat suppression. Adding MARS (view-angle tilting or slice-encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC)) to STIR gave better results than Dixon alone, and also better than SPAIR and fat saturation with MARS (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between STIR with view-angle tilting and STIR with SEMAC in terms of fat suppression quality. CONCLUSIONS STIR sequence is the preferred fluid-sensitive MR sequence in patients with metal implant. In combination with MARS (view-angle tilting or SEMAC), STIR appears to be the best option for high-quality fat suppression.
Collapse
|
6
|
Cameron D, Bouhrara M, Reiter DA, Fishbein KW, Choi S, Bergeron CM, Ferrucci L, Spencer RG. The effect of noise and lipid signals on determination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion parameters in skeletal muscle. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2017; 30:10.1002/nbm.3718. [PMID: 28383778 PMCID: PMC5876728 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
This work characterizes the effect of lipid and noise signals on muscle diffusion parameter estimation in several conventional and non-Gaussian models, the ultimate objectives being to characterize popular fat suppression approaches for human muscle diffusion studies, to provide simulations to inform experimental work and to report normative non-Gaussian parameter values. The models investigated in this work were the Gaussian monoexponential and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) models, and the non-Gaussian kurtosis and stretched exponential models. These were evaluated via simulations, and in vitro and in vivo experiments. Simulations were performed using literature input values, modeling fat contamination as an additive baseline to data, whereas phantom studies used a phantom containing aliphatic and olefinic fats and muscle-like gel. Human imaging was performed in the hamstring muscles of 10 volunteers. Diffusion-weighted imaging was applied with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR), slice-select gradient reversal and water-specific excitation fat suppression, alone and in combination. Measurement bias (accuracy) and dispersion (precision) were evaluated, together with intra- and inter-scan repeatability. Simulations indicated that noise in magnitude images resulted in <6% bias in diffusion coefficients and non-Gaussian parameters (α, K), whereas baseline fitting minimized fat bias for all models, except IVIM. In vivo, popular SPAIR fat suppression proved inadequate for accurate parameter estimation, producing non-physiological parameter estimates without baseline fitting and large biases when it was used. Combining all three fat suppression techniques and fitting data with a baseline offset gave the best results of all the methods studied for both Gaussian diffusion and, overall, for non-Gaussian diffusion. It produced consistent parameter estimates for all models, except IVIM, and highlighted non-Gaussian behavior perpendicular to muscle fibers (α ~ 0.95, K ~ 3.1). These results show that effective fat suppression is crucial for accurate measurement of non-Gaussian diffusion parameters, and will be an essential component of quantitative studies of human muscle quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donnie Cameron
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Mustapha Bouhrara
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David A. Reiter
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth W. Fishbein
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Seongjin Choi
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Luigi Ferrucci
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard G. Spencer
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and MRS in Cancer: Challenges and Advantages of Implementing Qualitative and Quantitative Multi-parametric Imaging in the Clinic. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 25:245-254. [PMID: 27748710 PMCID: PMC5081190 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) offers a unique insight into tumor biology by combining functional MRI techniques that inform on cellularity (diffusion-weighted MRI), vascular properties (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI), and metabolites (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and has scope to provide valuable information for prognostication and response assessment. Challenges in the application of mpMRI in the clinic include the technical considerations in acquiring good quality functional MRI data, development of robust techniques for analysis, and clinical interpretation of the results. This article summarizes the technical challenges in acquisition and analysis of multi-parametric MRI data before reviewing the key applications of multi-parametric MRI in clinical research and practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Blackledge MD, Tunariu N, Orton MR, Padhani AR, Collins DJ, Leach MO, Koh DM. Inter- and Intra-Observer Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (WBDWI) in Metastatic Bone Disease. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0153840. [PMID: 27123931 PMCID: PMC4849763 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantitative whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWI) is now possible using semi-automatic segmentation techniques. The method enables whole-body estimates of global Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (gADC) and total Diffusion Volume (tDV), both of which have demonstrated considerable utility for assessing treatment response in patients with bone metastases from primary prostate and breast cancers. Here we investigate the agreement (inter-observer repeatability) between two radiologists in their definition of Volumes Of Interest (VOIs) and subsequent assessment of tDV and gADC on an exploratory patient cohort of nine. Furthermore, each radiologist was asked to repeat his or her measurements on the same patient data sets one month later to identify the intra-observer repeatability of the technique. Using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation method provided full posterior probabilities of repeatability measures along with maximum a-posteriori values and 95% confidence intervals. Our estimates of the inter-observer Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICCinter) for log-tDV and median gADC were 1.00 (0.97-1.00) and 0.99 (0.89-0.99) respectively, indicating excellent observer agreement for these metrics. Mean gADC values were found to have ICCinter = 0.97 (0.81-0.99) indicating a slight sensitivity to outliers in the derived distributions of gADC. Of the higher order gADC statistics, skewness was demonstrated to have good inter-user agreement with ICCinter = 0.99 (0.86-1.00), whereas gADC variance and kurtosis performed relatively poorly: 0.89 (0.39-0.97) and 0.96 (0.69-0.99) respectively. Estimates of intra-observer repeatability (ICCintra) demonstrated similar results: 0.99 (0.95-1.00) for log-tDV, 0.98 (0.89-0.99) and 0.97 (0.83-0.99) for median and mean gADC respectively, 0.64 (0.25-0.88) for gADC variance, 0.85 (0.57-0.95) for gADC skewness and 0.85 (0.57-0.95) for gADC kurtosis. Further investigation of two anomalous patient cases revealed that a very small proportion of voxels with outlying gADC values lead to instability in higher order gADC statistics. We therefore conclude that estimates of median/mean gADC and tumour volume demonstrate excellent inter- and intra-observer repeatability whilst higher order statistics of gADC should be used with caution when ascribing significance to clinical changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D. Blackledge
- CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nina Tunariu
- CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew R. Orton
- CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anwar R. Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - David J. Collins
- CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin O. Leach
- CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Winfield JM, Collins DJ, Priest AN, Quest RA, Glover A, Hunter S, Morgan VA, Freeman S, Rockall A, deSouza NM. A framework for optimization of diffusion-weighted MRI protocols for large field-of-view abdominal-pelvic imaging in multicenter studies. Med Phys 2016; 43:95. [PMID: 26745903 DOI: 10.1118/1.4937789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2015] [Revised: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop methods for optimization of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in the abdomen and pelvis on 1.5 T MR scanners from three manufacturers and assess repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimates in a temperature-controlled phantom and abdominal and pelvic organs in healthy volunteers. METHODS Geometric distortion, ghosting, fat suppression, and repeatability and homogeneity of ADC estimates were assessed using phantoms and volunteers. Healthy volunteers (ten per scanner) were each scanned twice on the same scanner. One volunteer traveled to all three institutions in order to provide images for qualitative comparison. The common volunteer was excluded from quantitative analysis of the data from scanners 2 and 3 in order to ensure statistical independence, giving n = 10 on scanner 1 and n = 9 on scanners 2 and 3 for quantitative analysis. Repeatability and interscanner variation of ADC estimates in kidneys, liver, spleen, and uterus were assessed using within-patient coefficient of variation (wCV) and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. RESULTS The coefficient of variation of ADC estimates in the temperature-controlled phantom was 1%-4% for all scanners. Images of healthy volunteers from all scanners showed homogeneous fat suppression and no marked ghosting or geometric distortion. The wCV of ADC estimates was 2%-4% for kidneys, 3%-7% for liver, 6%-9% for spleen, and 7%-10% for uterus. ADC estimates in kidneys, spleen, and uterus showed no significant difference between scanners but a significant difference was observed in liver (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS DW-MRI protocols can be optimized using simple phantom measurements to produce good quality images in the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T with repeatable quantitative measurements in a multicenter study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Winfield
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom and Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom
| | - David J Collins
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom and Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew N Priest
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca A Quest
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imaging Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Glover
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imaging Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Hunter
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Veronica A Morgan
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom and Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Freeman
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imaging Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Nandita M deSouza
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom and Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|