Effects of viscoelasticity on volume distribution in a two-compartmental model of normal and sick lungs

Respiratory mechanics to understand ARDS and guide mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVE

As precision medicine is becoming a standard of care in selecting tailored rather than average treatments, physiological measurements might represent the first step in applying personalized therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). A systematic assessment of respiratory mechanics in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could represent a step in this direction, for two main reasons. Approach and Main results: On the one hand, respiratory mechanics are a powerful physiological method to understand the severity of this syndrome in each single patient. Decreased respiratory system compliance, for example, is associated with low end expiratory lung volume and more severe lung injury. On the other hand, respiratory mechanics might guide protective mechanical ventilation settings. Improved gravitationally dependent regional lung compliance could support the selection of positive end-expiratory pressure and maximize alveolar recruitment. Moreover, the association between driving airway pressure and mortality in ARDS patients potentially underlines the importance of sizing tidal volume on respiratory system compliance rather than on predicted body weight.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present review article aims to describe the main alterations of respiratory mechanics in ARDS as a potent bedside tool to understand severity and guide mechanical ventilation settings, thus representing a readily available clinical resource for ICU physicians.

Gas distribution in a two-compartment model during volume or pressure ventilation: role of elastic elements

The results of the studies on pulmonary gas distribution during constant-flow controlled-volume inflation (VCV) and inspiratory constant pressure inflation (PCV) in experimental studies are conflicting. In a mathematical model, with the characteristics of two lung compartments including tissue viscoelastic properties, pulmonary gas distribution was tested by simulating PCV and VCV at same inflation volumes. The compartmental distributions of the tidal volume were compared during CMV and PCV in different configurations obtained by changing the elastic and viscoelastic properties in each compartment, but maintaining the same total values of respiratory mechanics measured in patients. In all instances PCV resulted in a slightly higher air-trapping than in VCV mode. Heterogeneous elastic properties diverted most of the tidal volume towards the less compromised compartment. However, both ventilatory modes provided similar compartmental gas distribution, but during VCV compartmental peak pressures were higher in the sicker compartment respect to PCV. The use of PCV could grant a less remarkable pressure variability able to reduce the potential ventilator-associated lung injury. Moreover, the parameters measured during an end-inspiratory pause could not pinpoint unique characteristics for each configuration.