Development of a method for measuring femoral torsion using real-time ultrasound

Validity and reliability of ultrasonographic assessment of femoral and tibial torsion in children and adolescents: a systematic review

Torsional disorders of the lower limb are common in childhood, and they are one of the primary reasons parents seek consultation with healthcare providers. While clinical manoeuvres can assess femoral and tibial torsion, their reliability is medium to low. Various imaging-based techniques, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, fluoroscopy, biplanar radiology and ultrasonography, have been used to evaluate torsional alterations of the lower extremity. Among these, ultrasound assessment offers certain advantages: it is a low-cost, non-irradiating technique, which allows the follow-up of children's torsional development. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, its validity and reliability have not been summarised in a systematic review. This study aims to analyse the validity and reliability of ultrasonography in determining femoral and tibial torsion in children and adolescents. A search from Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL databases were performed from inception to 16 March 2023. No restrictions were placed on the publication year or language. The methodological quality of all eligible studies was independently reviewed by two authors using QUADAS and STARD checklists. Overall, 1546 articles were identified through the searches; 30 were considered eligible for full-text screening; and 8 studies were finally included in this review. The included studies were conducted in Germany, Norway and the UK. Among them, 7 studies analysed the validity of ultrasonography compared with other imaging techniques such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and biplanar X-ray, and 4 studies assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability. All the studies assessed femoral torsion, but only one of them also included tibial torsion.     Conclusion: Ultrasound is a good alternative for routine evaluation and follow-up of femoral torsional alterations in children and adolescents due to its safety, accessibility and immediate results in the clinical examination room. Although ultrasound has good accuracy and reliability for routine evaluations, there is controversy about whether it is sufficient for surgical planning. In cases where greater accuracy is required, magnetic resonance imaging and biplanar radiography are the preferred imaging techniques. What is Known: • Several imaging-based techniques have been described for the assessment of torsional alterations of the lower extremity. • Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, biplanar radiology and ultrasonography are the most used and studied methods. What is New: • Ultrasonography represents a good alternative for the assessment of femoral and tibial torsional alterations in children and adolescents, given its safety, accessibility and immediacy of results in the consultation room. • Its accuracy and reliability are good but not sufficient for surgical planning, in which case MRI and biplanar X-ray will be the preferred choices.

Application of three-dimensional reconstruction to improve the preoperative measurement accuracy and applicability of femoral neck torsion angle

Conventional methods have limitations in measuring femoral neck torsion angle (FNTA) of patients with femoral deformities. A new method of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technology based on computer tomography (CT) was proposed to enhance measurement accuracy and applicability in this study.Bilateral FNTA of 50 developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) patients (DDH group) and 81 volunteers (normal group) were measured by Mimics software based on CT data with the marker lines determined by centerline and curvature. Each FNTA was measured by observer A and observer B for twice separately. 50 DDH patients were classified into 3 groups (group I, II, III) according to Hartofilakidis classification. The statistical analysis of the differences was made among the measurements of the FNTA.The FNTA values were 27.56° ± 12.48° in DDH group and 21.22° ± 8.14° in normal group with significant difference (t = 4.516, P < .001). The FNTA values were 24.53° ± 2.40° in group I, 29.78° ± 1.83° in group II and 39.08° ± 3.13° in group III, with significant difference (F = 7.568, P = .001).The accuracy, reliability and applicable scope of FNTA measurement can be improved by 3D reconstruction in clinical practice. The applicable scope of this method included normal people and patients with femoral deformities. The FNTA of DDH patients is significantly larger than normal volunteers with a positive correlation between the severity of classification. This study will also provide references for preoperative design of Chinese population.

Validity and clinical significance of a clinical method to measure femoral anteversion

BACKGROUND

An increased femoral anteversion may be a risk factor for patellofemoral pain and is measured by Craig's Test clinically using a goniometer. However, its validity has not been examined. The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity of Craig's Test, with those measured using computed tomography (CT), and to investigate the relationship between femoral anteversion and knee external rotation.

METHODS

Twenty-six college students (13 men and 13 women) were measured their femoral anteversion values by Craig's Test (FACraig) and CT (FACT) and knee external rotation values by CT (KERCT). Multiple regression analysis to predict FACraig using FACT and sex was conducted. Mixed design (Measurements × sex) ANOVA examined the difference in FACraig and FACT. Pearson's correlation coefficients examined the relationships between FACT and KERCT for each sex.

RESULTS

FACT (B=0.41, P=0.014) and sex (B=-5.22, P=0.075) together explained 23.4% of the variance in FACraig (F=3.52, P=0.046). FACraig was significantly smaller than FACT in females while no significant difference was found in males. Greater FACT was significantly related with greater KERCT (r=0.47, P=0.02) in females only.

CONCLUSIONS

Craig's Test does not provide highly valid values to reflect the true femoral anteversion despite its clinical significance. Greater femoral anteversion may be associated with increased static knee external rotation, possibly resulting in increased quadriceps-angle and thus patellofemoral pain risk.