Beam characterisation of the 1.5 T MRI-linac

A virtual phantom for patient-specific QA On A 1.5T MR-linac

Create a virtual ArcCHECK-MR phantom, customized for a 1.5T MR-linac, with consideration of the different density regions within the quality assurance (QA) phantom, aiming to streamline the utilization of this specialized QA device. A virtual phantom was constructed in the treatment planning system (TPS) to replicate the ArcCHECK-MR's composition, consisting of five distinct layers: "Outer" (representing the outer PMMA ring), "Complex" (simulating the printed circuit boards), "Detectors" (encompassing the detector area), "Inner" (signifying the inner PMMA ring) and "Insert" (representing the PMMA insert). These layers were defined based on geometric data and represented as contour points on a set of dummy CT images. Additionally, a setup platform was integrated as contoured structures. To determine the relative electron density (RED) values of the external and internal PMMA components, measurements were taken at 25 points in the insert using an ion chamber. A novel method for establishing the exit/entrance dose ratio (EEDR) for ArcCHECK-MR was introduced. The RED of higher density region was derived by evaluating the local gamma index passing rate results with criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance-to-agreement. The performance of the virtual phantom was assessed for Unity 7 FFF beams with a 1.5T magnetic field. The radii of the five ring structures within the virtual phantom measured 133.0 mm, 110.0 mm, 103.4 mm, 100.0 mm, and 75.0 mm for the "Outer," "Complex," "Detectors," "Inner" and "Insert" regions, respectively. The RED values were as follows: ArcCHECK-MR PMMA had a RED of 1.130, "Detectors" were assumed to have a RED of 1.000, "Complex" had a RED of 1.200, and the setup QA phantom justified a RED of 1.350. Early validation results demonstrate that the 5-layer virtual phantom, when compared to the commonly used bulk overridden phantom, offers improved capability in MR-linac environments. This enhancement led to an increase in passing rates for the local gamma index by approximately 5 ∼ 6%, when applying the criteria of 2%, 2 mm. We have successfully generated a virtual representation of the distinct regions within the ArcCHECK-MR using a TPS, addressing the challenges associated with its use in conjunction with a 1.5T MR-linac. We consistently observed favorable local gamma index passing rates across two 1.5T MR-linac and ArcCHECK-MR unit combinations. This approach has the potential to minimize uncertainties in the creation of the QA phantom for ArcCHECK-MR across various institutions.

Multileaf collimator characterization and modeling for a 1.5 T MR-linac using static synchronous and asynchronous sweeping gaps

Objective.The Elekta unity MR-linac delivers step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy plans using a multileaf collimator (MLC) based on the Agility MLC used on conventional Elekta linacs. Currently, details of the physical Unity MLC and the computational model within its treatment planning system (TPS)Monacoare lacking in published literature. Recently, a novel approach to characterize the physical properties of MLCs was introduced using dynamic synchronous and asynchronous sweeping gap (aSG) tests. Our objective was to develop a step-and-shoot version of the dynamic aSG test to characterize the Unity MLC and the computational MLC models in theMonacoandRayStationTPSs.Approach.Dynamic aSG were discretized into a step-and-shoot aSG by investigating the number of segments/sweep and the minimal number of monitor units (MU) per segment. The step-and-shoot aSG tests were compared to the dynamic aSG tests on a conventional linac at a source-to-detector distance of 143.5 cm, mimicking the Unity configuration. the step-and-shoot aSG tests were used to characterize the Unity MLC through measurements and dose calculations in both TPSs.Main results.The step-and-shoot aSGs tests with 100 segments and 5 MU/segment gave results very similar to the dynamic aSG experiments. The effective tongue-and-groove width of the Unity gradually increased up to 1.4 cm from the leaf tip end. The MLC models inRayStationandMonacoagreed with experimental data within 2.0% and 10%, respectively. The largest discrepancies inMonacowere found for aSG tests with >10 mm leaf interdigitation, which are non-typical for clinical plans.Significance.The step-and-shoot aSG tests accurately characterize the MLC in step-and-shoot delivery mode. The MLC model inRayStation2023B accurately describes the tongue-and-groove and leaf tip effects whereasMonacooverestimates the tongue-and-groove shadowing further away from the leaf tip end.

The Quality Assurance of a 1.5 T MR-Linac

The recent introduction of a commercial 1.5 T MR-linac system has considerably improved the image quality of the patient acquired in the treatment unit as well as enabling online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) treatment strategies. Quality Assurance (QA) of this new technology requires new methodology that allows for the high field MR in a linac environment. The presence of the magnetic field requires special attention to the phantoms, detectors, and tools to perform QA. Due to the design of the system, the integrated megavoltage imager (MVI) is essential for radiation beam calibrations and QA. Additionally, the alignment between the MR image system and the radiation isocenter must be checked. The MR-linac system has vendor-supplied phantoms for calibration and QA tests. However, users have developed their own routine QA systems to independently check that the machine is performing as required, as to ensure we are able to deliver the intended dose with sufficient certainty. The aim of this work is therefore to review the MR-linac specific QA procedures reported in the literature.

MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy Systems

MR-Guided Radiation Therapy (MRIgRT) has been made possible only due to the ingenuity and commitment of commercial radiation therapy system vendors. Unlike conventional linear accelerator systems, MRIgRT systems have had to overcome significant and previously untested techniques to integrate the MRI systems with the radiation therapy delivery systems. Each of these three commercial systems has developed different approaches to integrating their MR and Linac functions. Each has also decided on a different main magnetic field strength, from 0.35T to 1.5T, as well as different design philosophies for other systems, such as the patient support assembly and treatment planning workflow. This paper is intended to provide the reader with a detailed understanding of each system's configuration so that the reader can better interpret the scientific literature concerning these commercial MRIgRT systems.

Dose-response dependencies of OSL dosimeters in conventional linacs and 1.5T MR-linacs: an experimental and Monte Carlo study

Objective. This work focuses on the optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry (OSLD) dose-response characterization, with emphasis on 1.5T MR-Linacs.Approach. Throughout this study, the nanoDots OSLDs (Landauer, USA) were considered. In groups of three, the mean OSLD response was measured in a conventional linac and an MR-Linac under various irradiation conditions to investigate (i) dose-response linearity with and without the 1.5T magnetic field, (ii) signal fading rate and its dependencies, (iii) beam quality, detector orientation and dose rate dependencies in a conventional linac, (iii) potential MR imaging related effects on OSLD response and (iv) detector orientation dependence in an MR-Linac. Monte Carlo calculations were performed to further quantify angular dependence after rotating the detector around its central axis parallel to the magnetic field, and determine the magnetic field correction factors,kB,Q,for all cardinal detector orientations.Main results. OSLD dose-response supralinearity in an MR-Linac setting was found to agree within uncertainties with the corresponding one in a conventional linac, for the axial detector orientation investigated. Signal fading rate does not depend on irradiation conditions for the range of 3-30 d considered. OSLD angular (orientation) dependence is more pronounced under the presence of a magnetic field. OSLDs irradiated with and without real-time T2w MR imaging enabled during irradiation yielded the same response within uncertainties.kB,Qvalues were determined for all three cardinal orientations. Corrections needed reached up to 6.4%. However, if OSLDs are calibrated in the axial orientation and then irradiated in an MR-Linac placed again in the axial orientation (perpendicular to the magnetic field), then simulations suggest thatkB,Qcan be considered unity within uncertainties, irrespective of the incident beam angle.Significance. This work contributes towards OSLD dose-response characterization and relevant correction factors availability. OSLDs are suitable for QA checks in MR-based beam gating applications andin vivodosimetry in MR-Linacs.

Dosimetric validation of the couch and coil model for high-field MR-linac treatment planning

PURPOSE

The precision of the dose delivery in radiation therapy with high-field MR-linacs is challenging due to the substantial variation in the beam attenuation of the patient positioning system (PPS) (the couch and coils) as a function of the gantry angle. This work aimed to compare the attenuation of two PPSs located at two different MR-linac sites through measurements and calculations in the treatment planning system (TPS).

METHODS

Attenuation measurements were performed at every 1° gantry angle at the two sites with a cylindrical water phantom with a Farmer chamber inserted along the rotational axis of the phantom. The phantom was positioned with the chamber reference point (CRP) at the MR-linac isocentre. A compensation strategy was applied to minimise sinusoidal measurement errors due to, e.g. air cavity or setup. A series of tests were performed to assess the sensitivity to measurement uncertainties. The dose to a model of the cylindrical water phantom with the PPS added was calculated in the TPS (Monaco v5.4 as well as in a development version Dev of an upcoming release), for the same gantry angles as for the measurements. The TPS PPS model dependency of the dose calculation voxelisation resolution was also investigated.

RESULTS

A comparison of the measured attenuation of the two PPSs yielded differences of less than 0.5% for most gantry angles. The maximum deviation between the attenuation measurements for the two different PPSs exceeded ±1% at two specific gantry angles 115° and 245°, where the beam traverses the most complex PPS structures. The attenuation increases from 0% to 25% in 15° intervals around these angles. The measured and calculated attenuation, as calculated in v5.4, was generally within 1-2% with a systematic overestimation of the attenuation for gantry angles around 180°, as well as a maximum error of 4-5% for a few discrete angles in 10° gantry angle intervals around the complex PPS structures. The PPS modelling was improved compared to v5.4 in Dev, especially around 180°, and the results of those calculations were within ±1%, but with a similar 4% maximum deviation for the most complex PPS structures.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, the two tested PPS structures exhibit very similar attenuation as a function of the gantry angle, including the angles with a steep change in attenuation. Both TPS versions, v5.4 and Dev delivered clinically acceptable accuracy of the calculated dose, as the differences in the measurements were overall better than ±2%. Additionally, Dev improved the accuracy of the dose calculation to ±1% for gantry angles around 180°.

A new workflow of the on-line 1.5-T MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a new workflow for 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR)-guided on-line adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) and assess its feasibility in achieving dose constraints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data of patients who underwent on-line adaptive radiation therapy using a 1.5-T MR linear accelerator (MR-Linac). The workflow in MRgART was established by reviewing the disease site, number of fractions, and re-planning procedures. Five cases of prostate cancer were selected to evaluate the feasibility of the new workflow with respect to achieving dose constraints.

RESULTS

Between December 2021 and September 2022, 50 consecutive patients underwent MRgART using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Of these, 20 had prostate cancer, 10 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 6 had pancreatic cancer, 5 had lymph node oligo-metastasis, 3 had renal cancer, 3 had bone metastasis, 2 had liver metastasis from colon cancer, and 1 had a mediastinal tumor. Among a total of 247 fractions, 235 (95%) were adapt-to-shape (ATS)-based re-planning. The median ATS re-planning time in all 50 cases was 17 min. In the feasibility study, all dose constraint sets were met in all 5 patients by ATS re-planning. Conversely, a total of 14 dose constraints in 5 patients could not be achieved by virtual plan without using adaptive re-planning. These dose constraints included the minimum dose received by the highest irradiated volume of 1 cc in the planning target volume and the maximum dose of the rectal/bladder wall.

CONCLUSION

A new workflow of 1.5-T MRgART was established and found to be feasible. Our evaluation of the dose constraint achievement demonstrated the effectiveness of the workflow.

High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin™, for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin™ entry surface doses, relative to D_max, were (9.9 ± 0.2)%, (10.1 ± 0.3)%, (11.3 ± 0.6)%, (12.9 ± 1.0)%, and (13.4 ± 1.0)% for 1 × 1 cm², 3 × 3 cm², 5 × 5 cm², 10 × 10 cm², and 22 × 22 cm² fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin™ measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 × 10 cm² field size using the MOSkin™ and 17.9% for the 22 × 22 cm² field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin™ detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.

Development and clinical application of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose verification module and software for 1.5 T MR-LINAC

BACKGROUND

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has made significant advances owing to magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-LINAC), which provides superior soft-tissue contrast, fast speed and rich functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide radiotherapy. Independent dose verification plays a critical role in discovering errors, while several challenges remain in MR-LINAC.

PURPOSE

A Monte Carlo-based GPU-accelerated dose verification module for Unity is proposed and integrated into the commercial software ArcherQA to achieve fast and accurate quality assurance (QA) for online ART.

METHODS

Electron or positron motion in a magnetic field was implemented, and a material-dependent step-length limit method was used to trade off speed and accuracy. Transport was verified by dose comparison with EGSnrc in three A-B-A phantoms. Then, an accurate Monte Carlo-based Unity machine model was built in ArcherQA, including an MR-LINAC head, cryostat, coils, and treatment couch. In particular, a mixed model combining measured attenuation and homogeneous geometry was adopted for the cryostat. Several parameters in the LINAC model were tuned to commission it in the water tank. An alternating open-closed MLC plan on solid water measured with EBT-XD film was used to verify the LINAC model. Finally, the ArcherQA dose was compared with ArcCHECK measurements and GPUMCD in 30 clinical cases through the gamma test.

RESULTS

ArcherQA and EGSnrc were well matched in three A-B-A phantom tests, and the relative dose difference (RDD) was less than 1.6% in the homogenous region. A Unity model was commissioned in the water tank, and the RDD in the homogenous region was less than 2%. In the alternating open-closed MLC plan, the gamma result (3%/3 mm) between ArcherQA and Film was 96.55%, better than the gamma result between GPUMCD and Film (92.13%). In 30 clinical cases, the mean three-dimensional (3D) gamma result (3%/2 mm) was 99.36% ± 1.28% between ArcherQA and ArcCHECK for the QA plans and 99.27% ± 1.04% between ArcherQA and GPUMCD for the clinical patient plans. The average dose calculation time was 106 s in all clinical patient plans.

CONCLUSIONS

A GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo-based dose verification module was developed and built for the Unity MR-LINAC. The fast speed and high accuracy were proven by comparison with EGSnrc, commission data, the ArcCHECK measurement dose, and the GPUMCD dose. This module can achieve fast and accurate independent dose verification for Unity.

ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators

Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics. This report provides recommendations on reference dosimetry measurements for MRI-linacs on behalf of the Australiasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) MRI-linac working group. There are two configurations considered for MRI-linacs, perpendicular and parallel, referring to the relative direction of the magnetic field and radiation beam, with different impacts on dose deposition in a medium. These recommendations focus on ion chambers which are most commonly used in the clinic for reference dosimetry. Water phantoms must be MR safe or conditional and practical limitations on phantom set-up must be considered. Solid phantoms are not advised for reference dosimetry. For reference dosimetry, IAEA TRS-398 recommendations cannot be followed completely due to physical differences between conventional linac and MRI-linac systems. Manufacturers' advice on reference conditions should be followed. Beam quality specification of TPR_20,10 is recommended. The configuration of the central axis of the ion chamber relative to the magnetic field and radiation beam impacts the chamber response and must be considered carefully. Recommended corrections to delivered dose are [Formula: see text], a correction for beam quality and [Formula: see text], for the impact of the magnetic field on dosimeter response in the magnetic field. Literature based values for [Formula: see text] are given. It is important to note that this is a developing field and these recommendations should be used together with a review of current literature.

Evaluation of MU2net as an online secondary dose check for MR guided radiation therapy with the Elekta unity MR linac

During the adaptive workflow associated with MRgRT, a secondary dose calculation is required and MU2net (DOSIsoft, France) is one commercial option. The suitability of MU2net to be used in conjunction with the online Monaco treatment planning system of the Elekta Unity (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), is evaluated in this work. Monaco and MU2net point doses are compared for various fields on and off axis and at different SSDs. To investigate the comparative effects of attenuation due to the cryostat, couch and posterior coil, measured, MU2net and Monaco dose outputs at the isocentre, as a function of gantry angle, were compared. Point doses for the beams of nine step and shoot IMRT (SSIMRT) test plans (courtesy Elekta) were calculated with Monaco v5.4 and compared to corresponding doses computed with MU2net. In addition, Monaco v5.4 and MU2net point doses were compared for 1552 beams treated on the Unity at our facility. For the on-axis fields investigated the agreement between MU2net and measured data is acceptable. MU2net and Monaco point doses for the Elekta SSIMRT test plans were within ± 5.0% and ± 6.4% for beams delivered from gantry zero and at planned beam angles, respectively. For the 1552 beams delivered approximately 80.0% of MU2net and Monaco point doses agree within ± 5.0%, therefore it is recommended to correlate MU2net Dose Reference Points (DRPs) with pre and post treatment dosimetry verification. Computational accuracy of MU2net could be enhanced with improved modelling of attenuation due to the couch, cryostat and posterior MR imaging coil.

Clinical implementation and initial experience with a 1.5 Tesla MR-linac for MR-guided radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer: An R-IDEAL stage 1/2a first in humans/feasibility study of new technology implementation

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided linear accelerator systems (MR-linacs) can facilitate the daily adaptation of radiotherapy plans. Here, we report our early clinical experience using an MR-linac for adaptive radiotherapy of gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatments were planned with an Elekta Monaco v5.4.01 and delivered by a 1.5 Tesla Elekta Unity MR-linac. The system offers a choice of daily adaptation based on either position (ATP) or shape (ATS) of the tumor and surrounding normal structures. The ATS approach has the option of manually editing the contours of tumors and surrounding normal structures before the plan is adapted. Here we documented the duration of each treatment fraction; set-up variability (assessed by isocenter shifts in each plan) between fractions; and, for quality assurance, calculated the percentage of plans meeting the γ-criterion of 3%/3-mm distance to agreement. Deformable accumulated dose calculations were used to compare accumulated versus planned dose for patient treated with exclusively ATP fractions.

RESULTS

Of the 10 patients treated with 90 fractions on the MR-linac, most received boost doses to recurrence in nodes or isolated tumors. Each treatment fraction lasted a median 32 minutes; fractions were shorter with ATP than with ATS (30 min vs 42 min, P<0.0001). The γ criterion for all fraction plans exceeded >90% (median 99.9%, range 92.4%-100%), i.e., all plans passed quality assurance testing. The average extent of isocenter shift was <0.5 cm in each axis. The accumulated dose to the gross tumor volume was within 5% of the reference plan for all ATP cases. Accumulated doses for lesions in the pelvic periphery were within <1% of the reference plan as opposed to -1.6% to -4.4% for central pelvic tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR-linac is a reliable and clinically feasible tool for treating patients with gynecologic cancer.

A multi-institutional comparison of dosimetric data for a 0.35 T MR-linac

Objective. A comparison of percent depth dose (PDD) curves, lateral beam profiles, output factors (OFs), multileaf collimator (MLC) leakage, and couch transmission factors was performed between ten institutes for a commercial 0.35 T MR-linac. Approach. The measured data was collected during acceptance testing of the MR-linac. The PDD curves were measured for the 3.32 × 3.32 cm2, 9.96 × 9.96 cm2, and 27.20 × 24.07 cm2 field sizes. The lateral beam profiles were acquired for a 27.20 × 24.07 cm2 field size using an ion chamber array and penumbra was defined as the distance between 80% of the maximum dose and 20% of the maximum dose after normalizing the profiles to the dose at the inflection points. The OFs were measured using solid-state dosimeters, whereas radiochromic films were utilized to measure radiation leakage through the MLC stacks. The relative couch transmission factors were measured for various gantry angles. The variation in the multi-institutional data was quantified using the percent standard deviation metric. Main results. Minimal variations (<1%) were found between the PDD data, except for the build-up region and the deeper regions of the PDD curve. The in-field region of the lateral beam profiles varied <1.5% between different institutions and a small variation (<0.7 mm) in penumbra was observed. A variation of <1% was observed in the OF data for field sizes above 1.66 × 1.66 cm2, whereas large variations were shown for small-field sizes. The average and maximum MLC leakage was calculated to be <0.3% and <0.6%, which was well below the international electrotechnical commission (IEC) leakage thresholds. The couch transmission was smallest for oblique beams and ranged from 0.83 to 0.87. Significance. The variation in the data was found to be relatively small and the different 0.35 T MR-linacs were concluded to have similar dosimetric characteristics.

Commissioning measurements on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy technology is relatively new and commissioning publications, quality assurance (QA) protocols and commercial products are limited. This work provides guidance for implementation measurements that may be performed on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). Adaptations of vendor supplied phantoms facilitated determination of gantry angle accuracy and linac isocentre, whereas in-house developed phantoms were used for end-to-end testing and anterior coil attenuation measurements. Third-party devices were used for measuring beam quality, reference dosimetry and during treatment plan commissioning; however, due to several challenges, variations on standard techniques were required. Gantry angle accuracy was within 0.1°, confirmed with pixel intensity profiles, and MV isocentre diameter was < 0.5 mm. Anterior coil attenuation was approximately 0.6%. Beam quality as determined by TPR_20,10 was 0.705 ± 0.001, in agreement with treatment planning system (TPS) calculations, and gamma comparison against the TPS for a 22.0 × 22.0 cm² field was above 95.0% (2.0%, 2.0 mm). Machine output was 1.000 ± 0.002 Gy per 100 MU, depth 5.0 cm. During treatment plan commissioning, sub-standard results indicated issues with machine behaviour. Once rectified, gamma comparisons were above 95.0% (2.0%, 2.0 mm). Centres which may not have access to specialized equipment can use in-house developed phantoms, or adapt those supplied by the vendor, to perform commissioning work and confirm operation of the MRL within published tolerances. The plan QA techniques used in this work can highlight issues with machine behaviour when appropriate gamma criteria are set.

A portable magnet for radiation biology and dosimetry studies in magnetic fields

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In the current and rapidly evolving era of real-time MRI-guided radiotherapy, our radiation biology and dosimetry knowledge is being tested in a novel way. This paper presents the successful design and implementation of a portable device used to generate strong localized magnetic fields. These are ideally suited for small scale experiments that mimic the magnetic field environment inside an MRI-linac system, or more broadly MRI-guided particle therapy as well.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A portable permanent magnet based device employing an adjustable steel yoke and magnetic field focusing cones has been designed, constructed and tested. The apparatus utilises two banks of Nd₂ Fe₁₄ B permanent magnets totalling around 50 kg in mass to generate a strong magnetic field throughout a small volume between two pole tips. The yoke design allows adjustment of the pole tip gap and exchanging of the focusing cones. Further to this, beam portal holes are present in the yoke and focusing cones, allowing for radiation beams of up to 5 x 5 cm² to pass through the region of high magnetic field between the focusing cone tips. Finite element magnetic modelling was performed to design and characterise the performance of the device. Automated physical measurements of the magnetic field components at various locations were measured to confirm the performance. The adjustable pole gap and interchangeable cones allows rapid changing of the experimental set-up to allow different styles of measurements to be performed.

RESULTS

A mostly uniform magnetic field of 1.2 T can be achieved over a volume of at least 3 x 3 x 3 cm³ . This can be reduced in strength to 0.3 T but increased in volume to 10 x 10 x 10 cm³ via removal of the cone tips and/or adjustment of the steel yoke. Although small, these volumes are sufficient to house radiation detectors, cell culture dishes and various phantom arrangements targeted at examining small radiation field dosimetry inside magnetic field strengths that can be changed with ease. Most important is the ability to align the magnetic field both perpendicular to, or inline with the radiation beam. To date, the system has been successfully used to conduct published research in the areas of radiation detector performance, lung phantom dosimetry, and how small clinical electron beams behave in these strong magnetic fields.

CONCLUSIONS

A portable, relatively inexpensive, and simple to operate device has successfully been constructed and used for performing radiation oncology studies around the theme of MRI-guided radiotherapy. This can be in either inline and perpendicular magnetic fields of up to 1.2 T with x-ray and particle beams.

Variation in isocentre location of an Elekta Unity MR-linac through full gantry rotation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to separately quantify the stability of the megavoltage imager (MVI) and radiation head of an Elekta Unity MRL, throughout full gantry rotation.

APPROACH

A ball-bearing (BB) phantom was attached to the radiation head of the Unity, while a single BB was placed at isocentre. Images were acquired during rotation, using the MVI. These images were processed using an in-house developed MATLAB program to reduce the errors resulted by noise, and the positions of the BBs in the images were analysed to extract MVI and radiation head sag data.

MAIN RESULTS

The results returned by this method showed reproducibility, with a mean standard deviation of 7 µm for the position of BBs across all gantry angles. The radiation head was found to sag throughout rotation, with a maximum course of movement of 0.59 mm. The sag pattern was stable over a period greater than a year but showed some dependence on gantry rotation direction.

SIGNIFICANCE

As MRL is a relatively new system, it is promising to have data supporting the high level of precision on one Elekta Unity machine. Isolating and quantifying the sources of uncertainty in radiation delivery may allow more sophisticated analysis of how the system performance may be improved.

Acceptance procedure for the linear accelerator component of the 1.5 T MRI-linac

Purpose

To develop and implement an acceptance procedure for the new Elekta Unity 1.5 T MRI‐linac.

Methods

Tests were adopted and, where necessary adapted, from AAPM TG106 and TG142, IEC 60976 and NCS 9 and NCS 22 guidelines. Adaptations were necessary because of the atypical maximum field size (57.4 × 22 cm), FFF beam, the non‐rotating collimator, the absence of a light field, the presence of the 1.5 T magnetic field, restricted access to equipment within the bore, fixed vertical and lateral table position, and the need for MR image to MV treatment alignment. The performance specifications were set for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Results

The new procedure was performed similarly to that of a conventional kilovoltage x‐ray (kV) image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) linac. Results were acquired for the first Unity system.

Conclusions

A comprehensive set of tests was developed, described and implemented for the MRI‐linac. The MRI‐linac met safety requirements for patients and operators. The system delivered radiation very accurately with, for example a gantry rotation locus of isocenter of radius 0.38 mm and an average MLC absolute positional error of 0.29 mm, consistent with use for SBRT. Specifications for clinical introduction were met.

ESTRO-ACROP recommendations on the clinical implementation of hybrid MR-linac systems in radiation oncology

Online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) represents one of the most innovative applications of current image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). The revolutionary concept of oMRgRT systems is the ability to acquire MR images for adaptive treatment planning and also online imaging during treatment delivery. The daily adaptive planning strategies allow to improve targeting accuracy while avoiding critical structures. This ESTRO-ACROP recommendation aims to provide an overview of available systems and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase of hybrid MR-linac systems. Unlike the implementation of other radiotherapy techniques, oMRgRT adds the MR environment to the daily practice of radiotherapy, which might be a new experience for many centers. New issues and challenges that need to be thoroughly explored before starting clinical treatments will be highlighted.

Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters

PURPOSE

To assess the out-of-field surface and internal dose of the 1.5 T MR-Linac compared to the conventional external beam linac using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), and evaluate the out-of-field dose calculation accuracy of the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS) of the 1.5T MR-Linac.

METHODS

A cubic solid water phantom, with OSLDs on the surface, was vertically irradiated by MR-Linac square fields with different sizes. In addition, OSLDs were arranged out of the beam edges in four directions. An anthropomorphic adult phantom, with 125 cm³ simulated volume, was irradiated in four orthogonal directions by both MR-Linac and conventional linac at the head, thoracic, and pelvic sites. Out-of-field doses were measured by OSLDs on both the surface and internal emulational organs at risk (OARs). The results were compared to the simulated dose from Monaco TPS.

RESULTS

At different field sizes (5 × 5 to 20 × 20 cm² ) and distances (1 to 10 cm) to beam edge, the out-of-field surface dose measured on MR-Linac varied from 0.16 % (10 cm to 5 × 5 cm² edge) to 7.02 % (1 cm to 20 × 20 cm² edge) of the maximum dose laterally and from 0.14 % (10 cm to 5 × 5 cm² edge) to 8.56 % (1 cm to 20 × 20 cm² edge) of the maximum dose longitudinally. Compared to the OSLDs measured data, the Monaco TPS presented an overestimate of the out-of-field dose of OARs at 0-2 % isodose area on both surface and internal check points, and the overestimation gets greater as the distance increases. The underestimation was found to be 0-35% at 2-5% isodose area on both surface and internal check points. Compared to the conventional linac, MR-Linac delivered higher average values of out-of-field dose on surface check points (20%, 19%, 21%) and internal simulated OARs (42%, 37%, 9%) of the anthropomorphic phantom at head, thoracic, and pelvic irradiations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the conventional linac, MR-Linac has the same out-of-field dose distribution. However, considering the absolute dose values, MR-Linac delivered relatively higher out-of-field doses on both surface and internal OARs. Additional radiation shielding to patients undergoing MR-Linac may provide protection from out-of-field exposure.

Quantitative assessment of acquisition imaging parameters on MRI radiomics features: a prospective anthropomorphic phantom study using a 3D-T2W-TSE sequence for MR-guided-radiotherapy

Background

MRI pulse sequences and imaging parameters substantially influence the variation of MRI radiomics features, thus impose a critical challenge on MRI radiomics reproducibility and reliability. This study aims to prospectively investigate the impact of various imaging parameters on MRI radiomics features in a 3D T2-weighted (T2W) turbo-spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequence for MR-guided-radiotherapy (MRgRT).

Methods

An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a 3D-T2W-TSE MRgRT sequence at 1.5T under a variety of acquisition imaging parameter changes. T1 and T2 relaxation times of the phantom were also measured. 93 first-order and texture radiomics features in the original and 14 transformed images, yielding 1,395 features in total, were extracted from 10 volumes-of-interest (VOIs). The percentage deviation (d%) of radiomics feature values from the baseline values and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with the baseline were calculated. Robust radiomics features were identified based on the excellent agreement of radiomics feature values with the baseline, i.e., the averaged d% <5% and ICC >0.90 in all VOIs for all imaging parameter variations.

Results

The radiomics feature values changed considerably but to different degrees with different imaging parameter adjustments, in the ten VOIs. The deviation d% ranged from 0.02% to 321.3%, with a mean of 12.5% averaged for all original features in all ten VOIs. First-order and GLCM features were generally more robust to imaging parameters than other features in the original images. There were also significantly different radiomics feature values (ANOVA, P<0.001) between the original and the transformed images, exhibiting quite different robustness to imaging parameters. 330 out of 1395 features (23.7%) robust to imaging parameters were identified. GLCM and GLSZM features had the most (42.5%, 153/360) and least (3.8%, 9/240) robust features in the original and transformed images, respectively.

Conclusions

This study helps better understand the quantitative dependence of radiomics feature values on imaging parameters in a 3D-T2W-TSE sequence for MRgRT. Imaging parameter heterogeneity should be considered as a significant source of radiomics variability and uncertainty, which must be well harmonized for reliable clinical use. The identified robust features to imaging parameters are helpful for the pre-selection of radiomics features for reliable radiomics modeling.

Machine QA for the Elekta Unity system: A Report from the Elekta MR-linac consortium

Over the last few years, magnetic resonance image‐guided radiotherapy systems have been introduced into the clinic, allowing for daily online plan adaption. While quality assurance (QA) is similar to conventional radiotherapy systems, there is a need to introduce or modify measurement techniques. As yet, there is no consensus guidance on the QA equipment and test requirements for such systems. Therefore, this report provides an overview of QA equipment and techniques for mechanical, dosimetric, and imaging performance of such systems and recommendation of the QA procedures, particularly for a 1.5T MR‐linac device. An overview of the system design and considerations for QA measurements, particularly the effect of the machine geometry and magnetic field on the radiation beam measurements is given. The effect of the magnetic field on measurement equipment and methods is reviewed to provide a foundation for interpreting measurement results and devising appropriate methods. And lastly, a consensus overview of recommended QA, appropriate methods, and tolerances is provided based on conventional QA protocols. The aim of this consensus work was to provide a foundation for QA protocols, comparative studies of system performance, and for future development of QA protocols and measurement methods.

Effects on skin dose from unwanted air gaps under bolus in an MR-guided linear accelerator (MR-linac) system

Bolus is commonly used in MV photon radiotherapy to increase superficial dose and improve dose uniformity for treating shallow lesions. However, irregular patient body contours can cause unwanted air gaps between a bolus and patient skin. The resulting dosimetric errors could be exacerbated in MR-Linac treatments, as secondary electrons generated by photons are affected by the magnetic field. This study aimed to quantify the dosimetric effect of unwanted gaps between bolus and skin surface in an MR-Linac. A parallel-plate ionization chamber and EBT3 films were utilized to evaluate the surface dose under bolus with various gantry angles, field sizes, and different air gaps. The results of surface dose measurements were then compared to Monaco 5.40 Treatment Planning System (TPS) calculations. The suitability of using a parallel-plate chamber in MR-Linac measurement was validated by benchmarking the percentage depth dose and output factors with the microDiamond detector and air-filled ionization chamber measurements in water. A non-symmetric response of the parallel-plate chamber to oblique beams in the magnetic field was characterized. Unwanted air gaps significantly reduced the skin dose. For a frontal beam, skin dose was halved when there was a 5 mm gap, a much larger difference than in a conventional linac. Skin dose manifested a non-symmetric pattern in terms of gantry angle and gap size. The TPS overestimated skin dose in general, but shared the same trend with measurement when there was no air gap, or the gap size was larger than 5 mm. However, the calculated and measured results had a large discrepancy when the bolus-skin gap was below 5 mm. When treating superficial lesions, unwanted air gaps under the bolus will compromise the dosimetric goals. Our results highlight the importance of avoiding air gaps between bolus and skin when treating superficial lesions using an MR-Linac system.

Reference dosimetry in MRI-linacs: evaluation of available protocols and data to establish a Code of Practice

With the rapid increase in clinical treatments with MRI-linacs, a consistent, harmonized and sustainable ground for reference dosimetry in MRI-linacs is needed. Specific for reference dosimetry in MRI-linacs is the presence of a strong magnetic field. Therefore, existing Code of Practices (CoPs) are inadequate. In recent years, a vast amount of papers have been published in relation to this topic. The purpose of this review paper is twofold: to give an overview and evaluate the existing literature for reference dosimetry in MRI-linacs and to discuss whether the literature and datasets are adequate and complete to serve as a basis for the development of a new or to extend existing CoPs. This review is prefaced with an overview of existing MRI-linac facilities. Then an introduction on the physics of radiation transport in magnetic fields is given. The main part of the review is devoted to the evaluation of the literature with respect to the following subjects: • beam characteristics of MRI-linac facilities; • formalisms for reference dosimetry in MRI-linacs; • characteristics of ionization chambers in the presence of magnetic fields; • ionization chamber beam quality correction factors; and • ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors. The review is completed with a discussion as to whether the existing literature is adequate to serve as basis for a CoP. In addition, it highlights subjects for future research on this topic.

Focal salvage treatment for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: A magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning study

•

SBRT may provide a non-invasive treatment option for recurrent prostate cancer.

•

MR-Linac single fraction 19 Gy treatment of recurrent prostate cancer is feasible.

•

MR-Linac dose distributions for the target were comparable to HDR-brachytherapy.

•

Real-time intrafraction adaptation techniques are needed for clinical introduction.

Background and Purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (FS-HDR-BT) is one of the treatment options for radiorecurrent localized prostate cancer. However, due to the invasive nature of the treatment, not all patients are eligible. Magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) systems open up new treatment possibilities and could potentially replace FS-HDR-BT treatment. We conducted a planning study to investigate the feasibility of delivering a single 19 Gy dose to the recurrent lesion using a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients who underwent FS-HDR-BT were included. The clinical target volume (CTV) encompassed the visible lesion plus a 5 mm margin. Treatment plans were created for a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system using a 1 mm planning target volume (PTV) margin. A dose of 19 Gy was prescribed to ≥ 95% of the PTV. In case this target could not be reached, i.e. when organs-at-risk (OAR) constraints were violated, a dose of ≥ 17 Gy to ≥ 90% of the PTV was accepted. MR-Linac plans were compared to clinical FS-HDR-BT plans.

Results

Target dose coverage was achieved in 14/30 (47%) FS-HDR-BT plans and 17/30 (57%) MR-Linac plans, with comparable median D95% and D90%. In FS-HDR-BT plans, a larger volume reached ≥ 150% of the prescribed dose. Urethra D10%, rectum D1cm³, and rectum D2cm³ were lower in the FS-HDR-BT plans, while bladder dose was comparable for both modalities.

Conclusion

Single fraction treatment of recurrent prostate cancer lesions may be feasible using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on a MR-Linac system.

In-Air Electron Streaming Effect for Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy With a 1.5 T Perpendicular Magnetic Field: A Treatment Planning Study

Purpose

To investigate the in-air out-of-field electron streaming effect (ESE) for esophageal cancer radiotherapy in the presence of 1.5 T perpendicular magnetic field.

Methods

Ten esophageal cancer patients treated with conventional Linac were retrospectively enrolled into a cohort of this study, with the prescription of 4,400 cGy/20 fx. All cases received IMRT replanning using Elekta Unity MR-Linac specified Monaco system, denoted as primary plan. To visualize the in-air dose outside the body in Monaco system, an auxiliary structure was created by extending the external structure. For each case, another comparable plan with no magnetic field was created using the same planning parameters. The plan was also recalculated by placing a bolus upon the neck and chin area to investigate its shielding effect for ESE. Dosimetric evaluations of the out-of-field neck and chin skin area and statistical analysis for these plans were then performed.

Results

Out-of-field ESE was also observed in esophageal cancer treatment planning under 1.5 T magnetic field, while totally absent for plans with no magnetic field. On average, the maximum dose to the neck and chin skin area of the primary plan (657.92 ± 69.07 cGy) was higher than that of plan with no magnetic field (281.78 ± 36.59 cGy, p = 0.005) and plan with bolus (398.43 ± 69.19 cGy, p = 0.007). DVH metrics D_1cc (the minimum dose to 1 cc volume) of the neck and chin skin for primary plan was 382.06 ± 44.14 cGy, which can be reduced to 212.42 ± 23.65 cGy by using the 1 cm bolus (with p = 0.005), even lower than the plan without magnetic field (214.45 ± 23.82, p = 0.005). No statistically significant difference of the neck and chin skin dose between the plan with bolus and plan with no magnetic field was observed (all with p > 0.05).

Conclusion

For MRI guided esophageal cancer radiotherapy, a relatively high out-of-field neck and chin skin doses will be introduced by ESE in the presence of magnetic field. It is therefore recommended to take this into account during the planning phase. Adding bolus could effectively reduce the ESE dose contributions, achieve the shielding effect almost equivalent to the scenario with no magnetic field. Further explorations of measurement verifications for the ESE dose distributions are required.

Performance of a multileaf collimator system for a 1.5T MR-linac

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a multileaf collimator (MLC) system for the high magnetic field of the Elekta Unity magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac).

METHODS

Performance was evaluated as recommended in AAPM Report Nos. 72 and 142, and MLC motor radiofrequency (RF) shielding was also evaluated. Fields of 99.8 × 99.8 mm² and 199.6 × 199.6 mm² were examined to calculate the leaf width. Profiles of 28.4 × 28.4 mm² , 57.0 × 57.0 mm² , 99.8 × 99.8 mm² , and 199.6 × 199.6 mm² fields at center and off-axis positions were measured using a microDiamond detector and BEAMSCAN^® MR water phantom to determine the field penumbra. EBT3 film was exposed to a 190.0 × 220.0 mm² field composed of two strip segments to assess the tongue-and-groove (T&G) effect. Outputs of 100.0 × 100.0 mm² open and blocked fields at center and off-axis positions were measured using a PTW TW31021 ion chamber and a film with the full MLC-blocked field to determine transmission. The minimum gap fields were also exposed on EBT3 film at center and off-axis positions to assess leakage between leaf tips in the "closed" position. The picket fence test was performed using a megavoltage imager to analyze leaf positional reproducibility. RF shielding was measured via real-time MR imaging of a homogeneous phantom and quantified using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

RESULTS

The leaf widths were 7.00 ± 0.00 and 7.10 ± 0.00 mm for 99.8 × 99.8 and 199.6 × 199.6 mm² fields, respectively. The leaf side penumbra ranged from 5.11 ± 0.08 to 11.28 ± 0.29 mm and the leaf tips penumbra ranged from 4.47 ± 0.03 to 6.25 ± 0.15 mm for the field size range of 28.4 × 28.4 mm² to 199.6 × 199.6 mm² . The T&G effect resulted in an underdose of up to 23.41 ± 0.88%. The max leaf transmission was 0.33 ± 0.00% when MLCs were all closed and diaphragms were all opened, and this value was reduced to 0.18 ± 0.00% when the diaphragm blocked the field with a minimum MLC gap. The leaf tip leakage rates were 60.08 ± 0.05% at field center and 2.94 ± 0.00% approximately 100 mm off-axis. At 6 months, the short-term leaf position reproducibility was 0.11 mm (2σ), and the long-term leaf position reproducibility was 0.19 mm (2σ). Leaf motion led to small fluctuations of the SNR of up to 1.64%.

CONCLUSION

The new MLC system has a comparable T&G effect, low radiation leakage, high positioning reproducibility, and good RF shielding for the Elekta Unity MR-linac. However, more attention is required for the positional change of the leaf side penumbra.

Current Status of Anatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiotherapy Planning and Delivery

Radiotherapy planning and delivery have dramatically improved in recent times. Imaging is key to a successful three-dimensional and increasingly four-dimensional based pathway with computed tomography embedded as the backbone modality. Computed tomography has significant limitations for many tumour sites where soft-tissue discrimination is suboptimal, and where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has largely superseded in the diagnostic arena. MRI is increasingly used together with computed tomography in the radiotherapy planning pathway and is now established as a prerequisite for several tumours. With the advent of combined MRI and linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems, a transition to MRI-based radiotherapy planning is becoming reality, with increasing experience and research involving these new platforms. In this overview, we aim to highlight how magnetic resonance-guided imaging has improved radiotherapy, using gynaecological malignancies to illustrate, in both external beam radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy, and will assess the early evidence for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy using combined MR-linac systems.

Quality assurance of IMRT treatment plans for a 1.5 T MR-linac using a 2D ionization chamber array and a static solid phantom

MR-guided radiotherapy requires novel quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment plans (TPs). Here, an optimized method for TPs for a 1.5 T MR-linac was developed and implemented clinically. A static solid phantom and an MR-compatible 2D ionization chamber array were used. The array's response with respect to the incident beam gantry angles was characterized for four different orientations of the array relative to the beam. A lookup table was created identifying the optimum orientation for each gantry angle. For the QA of clinical MR-linac TPs, beams were grouped according to their gantry angles and measured with up to four setups. The method was applied to n = 106 clinical TPs of 54 patients for different tumour entities. Reference plans and plans created in the online adaptive workflow were analysed, using a local 3%/3 mm gamma criterion for dose values larger than 30% of the maximum. Pass rates were averaged over all beam groups. The array's response strongly depends on the beam incidence angle. Optimum angles typically range from -10° to 80° around the phantom setup angle. Consequently, plan verification required up to four setups. For clinical MR-linac TPs, the overall median pass rate was 98.5% (range 88.6%-100%). Pass rates depended on the tumour entity. Median pass rates were for liver metastases stereotactic body radiotherapy 99.2%, prostate cancer 99%, pancreatic cancer 98.9%, lymph node metastases 98.7%, partial breast irradiation (PBI) 98%, head-and-neck cancer 97.7%, rectal cancer 94% and others 96.6%. 85% of plans were accepted straightaway, with pass rates above 95%. A single plan with a pass rate below 90% was subsequently verified with a modified method. Off-axis target volumes, e.g. PBI, were verified successfully using a lateral shift of the phantom. The method is suitable to verify reference and online adapted TPs for a 1.5 T MR-linac, including plans for off-axis target volumes.

Commissioning of a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-linac: A single institution experience

MR image-guided radiotherapy has the potential to improve patient care, but integration of an MRI scanner with a linear accelerator adds complexity to the commissioning process. This work describes a single institution experience of commissioning an Elekta Unity MR-linac, including mechanical testing, MRI scanner commissioning, and dosimetric validation. Mechanical testing included multileaf collimator (MLC) positional accuracy, measurement of radiation isocenter diameter, and MR-to-MV coincidence. Key MRI tests included magnetic field homogeneity, geometric accuracy, image quality, and the accuracy of navigator-triggered imaging for motion management. Dosimetric validation consisted of comparison between measured and calculated PDDs and profiles, IMRT measurements, and end-to-end testing. Multileaf collimator positional accuracy was within 1.0 mm, the measured radiation isocenter walkout was 0.20 mm, and the coincidence between MR and MV isocenter was 1.06 mm, which is accounted for in the treatment planning system (TPS). For a 350-mm-diameter spherical volume, the peak-to-peak deviation of the magnetic field homogeneity was 4.44 ppm and the geometric distortion was 0.8 mm. All image quality metrics were within ACR recommendations. Navigator-triggered images showed a maximum deviation of 0.42, 0.75, and 3.0 mm in the target centroid location compared to the stationary target for a 20 mm motion at 10, 15, and 20 breaths per minute, respectively. TPS-calculated PDDs and profiles showed excellent agreement with measurement. The gamma passing rate for IMRT plans was 98.4 ± 1.1% (3%/ 2 mm) and end-to-end testing of adapted plans showed agreement within 0.4% between ion-chamber measurement and TPS calculation. All credentialing criteria were satisfied in an independent end-to-end test using an IROC MRgRT phantom.

Characterizing MR Imaging isocenter variation in MRgRT

We characterized MRI isocenter variation at various gantry positions in two 0.35 T MRgRT systems using two independent methods. First, image center-based quantification was employed on 3D volumetric and 2D cine images of a 24 cm diameter spherical phantom at various gantry positions in the MRI QA mode. The center of the phantom images was identified to quantify the variation of the imaging center at each gantry position. Second, image registration-based quantification was used in radiotherapy mode. 3D volumetric MRIs of a cylindrical phantom were acquired and corresponding image registration from MRI to planning CT was performed. The shifts of the couch were identified to quantify the variation of the imaging center. For verification of noticeable MRI isocenter variation, star-shot pattern measurements with five beams were delivered on the radio-chromic film inserted into the phantom after the couch was shifted. The center of the star-shot pattern was identified to quantify the variation of the imaging center. The proposed methods for measuring MRI isocenter variation were demonstrated with MR-LINAC and MR-60Co systems. Both of the MRgRT systems had field inhomogeneities <5 ppm over a 24 cm diameter spherical volume (DSV) and spatial integrity distortion: <1 mm within 100 mm radius and <2 mm within 175 mm radius. The MRI isocenter of the MR-LINAC system showed noticeable 3D variation (max magnitude: 1.8 mm) compared to that of MR-60Co system (max magnitude: 0.9 mm) relative to the reference gantry positions. In addition, 2D variations (max magnitude) of the MRI isocenter from sagittal cine images were 0.9 mm for the MR-LINAC system and 0.5 mm for the MR-60Co system. Two proposed methods quantified the MRI isocenter variation for various gantry positions in two 0.35 T MRgRT systems. The results of significant isocenter variation in the MR-LINAC system requires further investigation to determine the cause.

Dosimetric Optimization and Commissioning of a High Field Inline MRI-Linac

Purpose: Unique characteristics of MRI-linac systems and mutual interactions between their components pose specific challenges for their commissioning and quality assurance. The Australian MRI-linac is a prototype system which explores the inline orientation, with radiation beam parallel to the main magnetic field. The aim of this work was to commission the radiation-related aspects of this system for its application in clinical treatments.

Methods: Physical alignment of the radiation beam to the magnetic field was fine-tuned and magnetic shielding of the radiation head was designed to achieve optimal beam characteristics. These steps were guided by investigative measurements of the beam properties. Subsequently, machine performance was benchmarked against the requirements of the IEC60976/77 standards. Finally, the geometric and dosimetric data was acquired, following the AAPM Task Group 106 recommendations, to characterize the beam for modeling in the treatment planning system and with Monte Carlo simulations. The magnetic field effects on the dose deposition and on the detector response have been taken into account and issues specific to the inline design have been highlighted.

Results: Alignment of the radiation beam axis and the imaging isocentre within 2 mm tolerance was obtained. The system was commissioned at two source-to-isocentre distances (SIDs): 2.4 and 1.8 m. Reproducibility and proportionality of the dose monitoring system met IEC criteria at the larger SID but slightly exceeded it at the shorter SID. Profile symmetry remained under 103% for the fields up to ~34 × 34 and 21 × 21 cm² at the larger and shorter SID, respectively. No penumbra asymmetry, characteristic for transverse systems, was observed. The electron focusing effect, which results in high entrance doses on central axis, was quantified and methods to minimize it have been investigated.

Conclusion: Methods were developed and employed to investigate and quantify the dosimetric properties of an inline MRI-Linac system. The Australian MRI-linac system has been fine-tuned in terms of beam properties and commissioned, constituting a key step toward the application of inline MRI-linacs for patient treatments.

[Inter- and intrafraction imaging during stereotactic body radiation therapy: Which solutions for which tumours?]

Due to high dose gradients, stereotactic body radiation therapy requires high precision in the location of the tumour. Uncertainties in the positioning can introduce serious damage on organs at risk and consequently can reduce tumour local control. A better tumour location can be achieved by controlling its position with an efficient inter and intrafraction imaging procedure. The various imaging techniques available on treatment systems are presented and performances are discussed. Finally, propositions are given in terms of imaging system according to the location treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Do all the linear accelerators comply with the ICRU 91's constraints for stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments?

Recent technological developments in linear accelerators (linacs) and their imaging systems have made it possible to routinely perform stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatments. To ensure the security and quality of the treatments, national and international recommendations have been written. This review focuses on the recommendations of the report 91 of the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) on stereotactic treatments with small photon beams and proposes to answer the question of the eligibility of the commercially available accelerators for the treatment of extra-cranial SRT (SBRT). The ICRU 91 report outlines important features needed to respect the constraints, which are high intensity photon beam, integrated image-guidance, high mechanical accuracy of the linac, multileaf collimator with reduced leaf width, bundled motion management and bundled 6 Dimensional "robotic" couch tabletop. Most of the contemporary linacs meet these recommendations, in particular, stereotactic dedicated linacs, or modern gantry-based linacs equipped with 3 dimensional cone-beam CT imaging and 2D-stereoscopic planar imaging. Commercially available ring-based linacs have some limitations: they offer only coplanar treatments, and couch movements are limited to translations and, some have limited imaging equipment and no ability to manage intrafraction motion. However, for performing SBRT, non-coplanar irradiations are not mandatory, contrarily to intracranial stereotactic irradiations. Furthermore, patients' rotations can be corrected, thanks to real-time adaptive radiotherapy available on MRI-linacs. Finally, significant improvements are expected in the short term to compensate the weaknesses of the current devices.

Planning feasibility of extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recently, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients have been treated in a multicenter phase II trial with extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy (hypo-FLAME trial). The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator (MRI-linac) could achieve complex dose distributions of a quality similar to conventional linac state-of-the-art prostate treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinically delivered treatment plans of 20 hypo-FLAME patients (volumetric modulated arc therapy, 10 MV, 5 mm leaf width) were included. Prescribed dose to the prostate was 5 × 7 Gy, with a focal tumor boost up to 5 × 10 Gy. MRI-linac treatment plans (intensity modulated radiotherapy, 7 MV, 7 mm leaf width, fixed collimator angle and 1.5 T magnetic field) were calculated. Dose distributions were compared.

RESULTS

In both conventional and MRI-linac treatment plans, the V35Gy to the whole prostate was >99% in all patients. Mean dose to the gross tumor volume was 45 Gy for conventional and 44 Gy for MRI-linac plans, respectively. Organ at risk doses were met in the majority of plans, except for a rectal V35Gy constraint, which was exceeded in one patient, by 1 cc, for both modalities. The bladder V32Gy and V28Gy constraints were exceeded in two and one patient respectively, for both modalities.

CONCLUSION

Planning of stereotactic radiotherapy with focal ablative boosting in prostate cancer on a high field MRI-linac is feasible with the current MRI-linac properties, without deterioration of plan quality compared to conventional treatments.

Realizing the potential of magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy in gynaecological and rectal cancer

CT-based radiotherapy workflow is limited by poor soft tissue definition in the pelvis and reliance on rigid registration methods. Current image-guided radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy models therefore have limited ability to improve clinical outcomes. The advent of MRI-guided radiotherapy solutions provides the opportunity to overcome these limitations with the potential to deliver online real-time MRI-based plan adaptation on a daily basis, a true "plan of the day." This review describes the application of MRI guided radiotherapy in two pelvic tumour sites likely to benefit from this approach.

Potential benefit of MRI-guided IMRT for flank irradiation in pediatric patients with Wilms' tumor

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Flank irradiation for Wilms' tumor (WT) is currently performed at our institute using a cone-beam computed tomography-guided volumetric modulated arc (VMAT_CBCT) workflow. By adding real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance to the treatment, safety margins could be reduced. The study purpose was to quantify the potential reduction of the planning target volume (PTV) margin and its dosimetric impact when using an MRI-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT_MRI) workflow compared to the VMAT_CBCT workflow.

MATERIAL/METHODS

4D-CT, MRI and CBCT scans acquired during preparation and treatment of 15 patients, were used to estimate both geometric, motion and patient set-up systematic (∑) and random (σ) errors for VMAT_CBCT and IMRT_MRI workflows. The mean PTV (PTV_mean) expansion was calculated using the van Herk formula. Treatment plans were generated using five margin scenarios (PTV_mean ± 0, 1 and 2 mm). Furthermore, the IMRT_MRI plans were optimized with a 1.5T transverse magnetic field turned-on to realistically model an MRI-guided treatment. Plans were evaluated using dose-volume statistics (p<.01, Wilcoxon).

RESULTS

Analysis of ∑ and σ errors resulted in a PTV_mean of 5 mm for the VMAT_CBCT and 3 mm for the IMRT_MRI workflows in each orthogonal direction. Target coverage was unaffected by the margin decrease with a mean V_95%=100% for all margin scenarios. For the PTV_mean, an average reduction of the mean dose to the organs at risk (OARs) was achieved with IMRT_MRI compared to VMAT_CBCT: 3.4 ± 2.4% (p<.01) for the kidney, 3.4 ± 2.1% (p<.01) for the liver, 2.8 ± 3.0% (p<.01) for the spleen and 4.9 ± 3.8% (p<.01) for the pancreas, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging data in children with WT demonstrated that the PTV margin could be reduced isotropically down to 2 mm when using the IMRT_MRI compared to the VMAT_CBCT workflow. The former results in a dose reduction to the OARs while maintaining target coverage.

Beam characterisation of the 1.5 T MRI-linac

As a prerequisite for clinical treatments it was necessary to characterize the Elekta 1.5 T MRI-linac 7 MV FFF radiation beam. Following acceptance testing, beam characterization data were acquired with Semiflex 3D (PTW 31021), microDiamond (PTW 60019), and Farmer-type (PTW 30013 and IBA FC65-G) detectors in an Elekta 3D scanning water phantom and a PTW 1D water phantom. EBT3 Gafchromic film and ion chamber measurements in a buildup cap were also used. Special consideration was given to scan offsets, detector effective points of measurement and avoiding air gaps. Machine performance has been verified and the system satisfied the relevant beam requirements of IEC60976. Beam data were acquired for field sizes between 1  ×  1 and 57  ×  22 cm². New techniques were developed to measure percentage depth dose (PDD) curves including the electron return effect at beam exit, which exhibits an electron-type practical range of 1.2 ± 0.1 cm. The Lorentz force acting on the secondary charged particles creates an asymmetry in the crossline profiles with an average shift of  +0.24 cm. For a 10  ×  10 cm² beam, scatter from the cryostat contributes 1% of the dose at isocentre. This affects the relative output factors, scatter factors and beam profiles, both in-field and out-of-field. The average 20%-80% penumbral width measured for small fields with a microDiamond detector at 10 cm depth is 0.50 cm. MRI-linac penumbral widths are very similar to that of the Elekta Agility linac MLC, as is the near-surface dose PDD(0.2 cm)  =  57%. The entrance surface dose is  ∼36% of Dmax. Cryostat transmission is quantified for inclusion within the treatment planning system. As a result, the 1.5 T MRI-linac 7 MV FFF beam has been characterised for the first time and is suitable for clinical use. This was a key step towards the first clinical treatments with the MRI-linac, which were delivered at University Medical Center Utrecht in May 2017 (Raaymakers et al 2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 L41-50).