The dependence of interplay effects on the field scan direction in PBS proton therapy

Exploring beamline momentum acceptance for tracking respiratory variability in lung cancer proton therapy: a simulation study

Objective. Investigating the aspects of proton beam delivery to track organ motion with pencil beam scanning therapy. Considering current systems as a reference, specify requirements for next-generation units aiming at real-time image-guided treatments.Approach. Proton treatments for six non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were simulated using repeated 4DCTs to model respiratory motion variability. Energy corrections required for this treatment site were evaluated for different approaches to tumour tracking, focusing on the potential for energy adjustment within beamline momentum acceptance (dp/p). A respiration-synchronised tracking, taking into account realistic machine delivery limits, was compared to ideal tracking scenarios, in which unconstrained energy corrections are possible. Rescanning and the use of multiple fields to mitigate residual interplay effects and dose degradation have also been investigated.Main results. Energy correction requirements increased with motion amplitudes, for all patients and tracking scenarios. Higher dose degradation was found for larger motion amplitudes, rescanning has beneficial effects and helped to improve dosimetry metrics for the investigated limited dp/pof 1.2% (realistic) and 2.4%. The median differences between ideal and respiratory-synchronised tracking show minimal discrepancies, 1% and 5% respectively for dose coverage (CTV V95) and homogeneity (D5-D95). Multiple-field planning improves D5-D95 up to 50% in the most extreme cases while it does not show a significant effect on V95.Significance. This work shows the potential of implementing tumour tracking in current proton therapy units and outlines design requirements for future developments. Energy regulation within momentum acceptance was investigated to tracking tumour motion with respiratory-synchronisation, achieving results in line with the performance of ideal tracking scenarios. ±5% Δp/p would allow to compensate for all range offsets in our NSCLC patient cohort, including breathing variability. However, the realistic momentum of 1.2% dp/prepresentative of existing medical units limitations, has been shown to preserve plan quality.

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is sensitive to uncertainties from patient setup and proton beam range, as well as interplay effect. In addition, respiratory motion may vary from cycle to cycle, and also from day to day. These uncertainties can severely degrade the original plan quality and potentially affect patient's outcome. In this work, we developed a new tool to comprehensively consider the impact of all these uncertainties and provide plan robustness evaluation under them.

METHODS

We developed a comprehensive plan robustness evaluation tool that considered both uncertainties from patient setup and proton beam range, as well as respiratory motion simultaneously. To mimic patients' respiratory motion, the time spent in each phase was randomly sampled based on patient-specific breathing pattern parameters as acquired during the four-dimensional (4D)-computed tomography (CT) simulation. Spots were then assigned to one specific phase according to the temporal relationship between spot delivery sequence and patients' respiratory motion. Dose in each phase was calculated by summing contributions from all the spots delivered in that phase. The final 4D dynamic dose was obtained by deforming all doses in each phase to the maximum exhalation phase. Three hundred (300) scenarios (10 different breathing patterns with 30 different setup and range uncertainty scenario combinations) were calculated for each plan. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) band method was used to assess plan robustness. Benchmarking the tool as an application's example, we compared plan robustness under both three-dimensional (3D) and 4D robustly optimized IMPT plans for 10 nonrandomly selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

The developed comprehensive plan robustness tool had been successfully applied to compare the plan robustness between 3D and 4D robustly optimized IMPT plans for 10 lung cancer patients. In the presence of interplay effect with uncertainties considered simultaneously, 4D robustly optimized plans provided significantly better CTV coverage (D_95% , P = 0.002), CTV homogeneity (D_5% -D_95% , P = 0.002) with less target hot spots (D_5% , P = 0.002), and target coverage robustness (CTV D_95% bandwidth, P = 0.004) compared to 3D robustly optimized plans. Superior dose sparing of normal lung (lung D_mean , P = 0.020) favoring 4D plans and comparable normal tissue sparing including esophagus, heart, and spinal cord for both 3D and 4D plans were observed. The calculation time for all patients included in this study was 11.4 ± 2.6 min.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive plan robustness evaluation tool was successfully developed and benchmarked for plan robustness evaluation in the presence of interplay effect, setup and range uncertainties. The very high efficiency of this tool marks its clinical adaptation, highly practical and versatile nature, including possible real-time intra-fractional interplay effect evaluation as a potential application for future use.