|
1
|
Meikle SR, Sossi V, Roncali E, Cherry SR, Banati R, Mankoff D, Jones T, James M, Sutcliffe J, Ouyang J, Petibon Y, Ma C, El Fakhri G, Surti S, Karp JS, Badawi RD, Yamaya T, Akamatsu G, Schramm G, Rezaei A, Nuyts J, Fulton R, Kyme A, Lois C, Sari H, Price J, Boellaard R, Jeraj R, Bailey DL, Eslick E, Willowson KP, Dutta J. Quantitative PET in the 2020s: a roadmap. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:06RM01. [PMID: 33339012 PMCID: PMC9358699 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd4f7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) plays an increasingly important role in research and clinical applications, catalysed by remarkable technical advances and a growing appreciation of the need for reliable, sensitive biomarkers of human function in health and disease. Over the last 30 years, a large amount of the physics and engineering effort in PET has been motivated by the dominant clinical application during that period, oncology. This has led to important developments such as PET/CT, whole-body PET, 3D PET, accelerated statistical image reconstruction, and time-of-flight PET. Despite impressive improvements in image quality as a result of these advances, the emphasis on static, semi-quantitative 'hot spot' imaging for oncologic applications has meant that the capability of PET to quantify biologically relevant parameters based on tracer kinetics has not been fully exploited. More recent advances, such as PET/MR and total-body PET, have opened up the ability to address a vast range of new research questions, from which a future expansion of applications and radiotracers appears highly likely. Many of these new applications and tracers will, at least initially, require quantitative analyses that more fully exploit the exquisite sensitivity of PET and the tracer principle on which it is based. It is also expected that they will require more sophisticated quantitative analysis methods than those that are currently available. At the same time, artificial intelligence is revolutionizing data analysis and impacting the relationship between the statistical quality of the acquired data and the information we can extract from the data. In this roadmap, leaders of the key sub-disciplines of the field identify the challenges and opportunities to be addressed over the next ten years that will enable PET to realise its full quantitative potential, initially in research laboratories and, ultimately, in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven R Meikle
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Vesna Sossi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Emilie Roncali
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, United States of America
| | - Simon R Cherry
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, United States of America
| | - Richard Banati
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Mankoff
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Terry Jones
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, United States of America
| | - Michelle James
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), CA, United States of America
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, CA, United States of America
| | - Julie Sutcliffe
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, United States of America
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Jinsong Ouyang
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Yoann Petibon
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Chao Ma
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Georges El Fakhri
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Suleman Surti
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Joel S Karp
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Ramsey D Badawi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, United States of America
| | - Taiga Yamaya
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Go Akamatsu
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Georg Schramm
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine & Molecular imaging, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ahmadreza Rezaei
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine & Molecular imaging, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Nuyts
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine & Molecular imaging, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roger Fulton
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - André Kyme
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Cristina Lois
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Hasan Sari
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Julie Price
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUMC, Netherlands
| | - Robert Jeraj
- Departments of Medical Physics, Human Oncology and Radiology, University of Wisconsin, United States of America
- Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dale L Bailey
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Enid Eslick
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathy P Willowson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyita Dutta
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|