1
|
Protti M, Mandrioli R, Marasca C, Cavalli A, Serretti A, Mercolini L. New‐generation, non‐SSRI antidepressants: Drug‐drug interactions and therapeutic drug monitoring. Part 2: NaSSAs, NRIs, SNDRIs, MASSAs, NDRIs, and others. Med Res Rev 2020; 40:1794-1832. [DOI: 10.1002/med.21671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Protti
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBiT), Pharmaco‐Toxicological Analysis Laboratory (PTA Lab)Alma Mater Studiorum ‐ University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Roberto Mandrioli
- Department for Life Quality Studies (QuVi)Alma Mater Studiorum ‐ University of BolognaRimini Italy
| | - Camilla Marasca
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBiT), Pharmaco‐Toxicological Analysis Laboratory (PTA Lab)Alma Mater Studiorum ‐ University of Bologna Bologna Italy
- Computational and Chemical BiologyFondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT) Genoa Italy
| | - Andrea Cavalli
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBiT), Pharmaco‐Toxicological Analysis Laboratory (PTA Lab)Alma Mater Studiorum ‐ University of Bologna Bologna Italy
- Computational and Chemical BiologyFondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT) Genoa Italy
| | - Alessandro Serretti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM)Alma Mater Studiorum ‐ University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Laura Mercolini
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBiT), Pharmaco‐Toxicological Analysis Laboratory (PTA Lab)Alma Mater Studiorum ‐ University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schoretsanitis G, de Leon J, Eap CB, Kane JM, Paulzen M. Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Agents for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. CNS Drugs 2019; 33:1201-1222. [PMID: 31776871 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-019-00683-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) for agents prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Polypharmacy in the treatment of patients with ADHD leads to high exposures to DDIs and possibly adverse safety outcomes. We performed a systematic search of DDI reports for ADHD agents in Embase and Medline. We also searched for agents in the pharmacological pipeline, which include (1) mazindol, molindone and viloxazine, which were previously prescribed for other indications; (2) centanafadine and AR-08, never before approved; and (3) two extracts (Polygala tenuifolia extract and the French maritime pine bark extracts). The identified literature included case reports, cross-sectional, cross-over and placebo-controlled studies of patient cohorts and healthy volunteers. The DDIs were classified as follows: ADHD agents acting as perpetrators, i.e., affecting the clearance of co-prescribed agents (victim drugs), or ADHD agents being the victim drugs, being affected by other agents. Ratios for changes in pharmacokinetic parameters before and after the DDI were used as a rough estimate of the extent of the DDI. Alcohol may increase plasma dextroamphetamine concentrations by presystemic effects. Until studies are done to orient clinicians regarding dosing changes, clinicians need to be aware of the potential for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 inhibitors to increase amphetamine levels, which is equivalent to increasing dosages. Atomoxetine is a wide therapeutic window drug. The CYP2D6 poor metabolizers who do not have CYP2D6 activity had better atomoxetine response, but also an increased risk of adverse effects. CYP2D6 inhibitors have been used to increase atomoxetine response in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. Guanfacine is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4, which can be induced and inhibited. The package insert recommends that in guanfacine-treated patients, after adding potent CYP3A4 inducers, the guanfacine dose should be doubled; after adding potent CYP3A4 inhibitors the guanfacine dose should be halved. Based on a phenobarbital case report and our experience with CYP3A4-metabolized antipsychotics, these correction factors may be too low. According to two case reports, carbamazepine is a clinically relevant inducer of methylphenidate (MPH). A case series study suggested that MPH may be associated with important elevations in imipramine concentrations. Due to the absence of or limitations in the data, no comments for clinicians can be provided on the pharmacokinetic DDIs for clonidine, centanafadine, mazindol, molindone, AR-08, P. tenuifolia extract and the French maritime pine bark extracts. According to currently available data, clinicians should not expect that ADHD drugs modify each other's serum concentrations. A summary table for clinicians provides our current recommendations on pharmacokinetic DDIs of ADHD agents based on our literature review and the package inserts; whenever it was possible, we provide information on serum concentrations and dose correction factors. There will be a need to periodically update these recommendations and these correction factors as new knowledge becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose de Leon
- University of Kentucky Mental Health Research Center at Eastern State Hospital, Lexington, KY, USA
- Psychiatry and Neurosciences Research Group (CTS-549), Institute of Neurosciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre in Mental Health Net (CIBERSAM), Santiago Apostol Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria, Spain
| | - Chin B Eap
- Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Hospital of Cery, University of Lausanne, Prilly, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western, Switzerland University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - John M Kane
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
- The Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA
- The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Michael Paulzen
- Alexianer Hospital Aachen, Alexianergraben 33, 52062, Aachen, Germany.
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
- JARA-Translational Brain Medicine, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dagenais R, Leung M, Poinen K, Landsberg D. Common Questions and Misconceptions in the Management of Renal Transplant Patients: A Guide for Health Care Providers in the Posttransplant Setting. Ann Pharmacother 2018; 53:419-429. [PMID: 30345802 DOI: 10.1177/1060028018809318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Once renal transplant recipients are stabilized and require less frequent follow-up with their transplant team, health care providers outside of the transplant setting play an integral role in patients' ongoing medical care. Given renal transplant recipients' inherent complexity, these health care providers often seek consult regarding decisions that may affect transplant-related medications or outcomes. In this review, we discuss answers to 10 of the questions commonly posed to our renal transplant team by other health care providers.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hofmann P, Benden C, Kohler M, Schuurmans MM. Smoking resumption after heart or lung transplantation: a systematic review and suggestions for screening and management. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:4609-4618. [PMID: 30174913 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the developed world and kills half of all long-term users. Smoking resumption after heart or lung transplantation is associated with allograft dysfunction, higher incidence of cancer, and reduced overall survival. Although self-reporting is considered an unreliable method for tobacco use detection, implementing systematic cotinine-based screening has proven challenging. This review examines the prevalence of smoking resumption in thoracic transplant patients, explores the risk factors associated with a post-transplant smoking resumption and discusses the currently available smoking cessation interventions for transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Hofmann
- Division of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Benden
- Division of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Malcolm Kohler
- Division of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Macé M Schuurmans
- Division of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dash RP, Rais R, Srinivas NR. Chirality and neuropsychiatric drugs: an update on stereoselective disposition and clinical pharmacokinetics of bupropion. Xenobiotica 2017; 48:945-957. [DOI: 10.1080/00498254.2017.1376765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjeet Prasad Dash
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA,
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, and
| | - Rana Rais
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA,
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, and
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Over the last two decades in particular there has been a remarkable increase in the number of solid organ transplants being performed worldwide alongside improvements in long-term survival rates. However, the infrastructure at transplant centres has been unable to keep pace with the current volume of the transplant patient work load. These pressures on transplant specialist centres has led to calls for an increased role of the general practitioner (GP) managing particular aspects of transplant patients' medical care. Indeed, many aspects of follow-up care such as screening for malignancies, preventing infection through immunisation programmes, and managing cardiovascular risk factors are already important aspects of family practice medicine. This paper aims to review some of the aspects of transplant patient care that is important for healthcare workers in family practice to manage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lloyd D. Hughes
- Department of Ageing and Health, Academic Foundation Doctor, NHS Tayside and University of Dundee, 1 Albert Crescent, Newport on Tay, Kingdom of Fife, DD6 8DT, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Background Combination of different agents is widely used in clinic to combat complex diseases with improved therapy and reduced side effects. However, the identification of effective drug combinations remains a challenging task due to the huge number of possible combinations among candidate drugs that makes it impractical to screen putative combinations. Results In this work, we construct a 'drug cocktail network' using all the known effective drug combinations extracted from the Drug Combination Database (DCDB), and propose a network-based approach to investigate drug combinations. Our results show that the agents in an effective combination tend to have more similar therapeutic effects and share more interaction partners. Based on our observations, we further develop a statistical approach termed as DCPred (Drug Combination Predictor) to predict possible drug combinations by exploiting the topological features of the drug cocktail network. Validating on the known drug combinations, DCPred achieves the overall AUC (Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve) score of 0.92, indicating the predictive power of our proposed approach. Conclusions The drug cocktail network constructed in this work provides useful insights into the underlying rules of effective drug combinations and offer important clues to accelerate the future discovery of new drug combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Jia Xu
- Institute of Systems Biology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang YY, Xu KJ, Song J, Zhao XM. Exploring drug combinations in genetic interaction network. BMC Bioinformatics 2012; 13 Suppl 7:S7. [PMID: 22595004 PMCID: PMC3348050 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-s7-s7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Drug combination that consists of distinctive agents is an attractive strategy to combat complex diseases and has been widely used clinically with improved therapeutic effects. However, the identification of efficacious drug combinations remains a non-trivial and challenging task due to the huge number of possible combinations among the candidate drugs. As an important factor, the molecular context in which drugs exert their functions can provide crucial insights into the mechanism underlying drug combinations. Results In this work, we present a network biology approach to investigate drug combinations and their target proteins in the context of genetic interaction networks and the related human pathways, in order to better understand the underlying rules of effective drug combinations. Our results indicate that combinatorial drugs tend to have a smaller effect radius in the genetic interaction networks, which is an important parameter to describe the therapeutic effect of a drug combination from the network perspective. We also find that drug combinations are more likely to modulate functionally related pathways. Conclusions This study confirms that the molecular networks where drug combinations exert their functions can indeed provide important insights into the underlying rules of effective drug combinations. We hope that our findings can help shortcut the expedition of the future discovery of novel drug combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin-Ying Wang
- Institute of Systems Biology, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gupta G, Unruh ML, Nolin TD, Hasley PB. Primary care of the renal transplant patient. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25:731-40. [PMID: 20422302 PMCID: PMC2881977 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1354-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2009] [Revised: 11/30/2009] [Accepted: 03/26/2010] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
There has been a remarkable rise in the number of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) in the US over the last decade. Increasing use of potent immunosuppressants, which are also potentially diabetogenic and atherogenic, can result in worsening of pre-existing medical conditions as well as development of post-transplant disease. This, coupled with improving long-term survival, is putting tremendous pressure on transplant centers that were not designed to deliver primary care to KTR. Thus, increasing numbers of KTR will present to their primary care physicians (PCP) post-transplant for routine medical care. Similar to native chronic kidney disease patients, KTRs are vulnerable to cardiovascular disease as well as a host of other problems including bone disease, infections and malignancies. Deaths related to complications of cardiovascular disease and malignancies account for 60-65% of long-term mortality among KTRs. Guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation and the European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on the management of hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, diabetes and bone disease should be incorporated into the long-term care plan of the KTR to improve outcomes. A number of transplant centers do not supply PCPs with protocols and guidelines, making the task of the PCP more difficult. Despite this, PCPs are expected to continue to provide general preventive medicine, vaccinations and management of chronic medical problems. In this narrative review, we examine the common medical problems seen in KTR from the PCP's perspective. Medical management issues related to immunosuppressive medications are also briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Gupta
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wolraich ML, McGuinn L, Doffing M. Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Drug Saf 2007; 30:17-26. [PMID: 17194168 DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200730010-00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Despite a large body of evidence for both the validity of the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the efficacy of its treatment with medication, there is an equally long history of controversy. This article focuses on presenting safety information for medications approved by the US FDA for the treatment of individuals with ADHD. Stimulant medications are generally safe and effective. The common adverse effects of stimulant medications, including appetite suppression and insomnia, are usually of mild severity and manageable without stopping the medication. The more severe adverse effects such as tics or bizarre behaviours occur with low frequency and usually resolve when the medication is stopped. The possible impact on growth requires careful monitoring. Several rare but potentially severe adverse effects including sudden cardiac death and cancer following long-term treatment have been reported; however, these effects have not been adequately demonstrated to be of significant concern at this time. Atomoxetine also has a mild adverse effect profile in terms of severity and frequency although the numbers of studies and years of clinical experience is considerably less with this drug than for the stimulant medications. When the risks are juxtaposed to the clear efficacy in significantly reducing dysfunctional symptoms of ADHD, benefit-risk analyses support the continued use of these pharmacological treatments for patients with ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L Wolraich
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wolraich ML, Doffing MA. Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with methylphenidate. CNS Drugs 2004; 18:243-50. [PMID: 15015904 DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200418040-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Methylphenidate is commonly used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Its efficacy in improving the core symptoms of ADHD, as well as some of the aggressive and oppositional behaviours, is well documented, based on a large volume of research. Methylphenidate has a wide margin of safety and relatively mild adverse effects, most commonly appetite suppression and insomnia. Methylphenidate is a rapidly absorbed medication that, in its d-isomer form, readily penetrates the CNS, particularly the striatum. It appears to function by blocking the reuptake of dopamine. Both the plasma concentrations and behavioural effects of methylphenidate demonstrate a time to maximum of between 1 and 3 hours, with the maximum behavioural effects occurring when the plasma concentrations are increasing. Because of the rapid onset of action, the effects of methylphenidate can be dramatic but usually last only about 4 hours with the immediate-release formulation. The behavioural responses of individuals are also highly variable, so that it is necessary to start treatment at a low dosage and increase up to a maximally effective dosage (usually starting at 10-15 mg/day with increases of 10-15mg at weekly intervals to a maximum dosage of 60 mg/day, irrespective of formulation). Because of the variability in behavioural responses, assessment of plasma concentrations is not clinically useful nor does weight help in deciding an appropriate dosage. The difficulties in administering methylphenidate multiple times a day, particularly during the school day, have been alleviated in the past few years by the development of extended-release preparations with varying behavioural effects lasting 8-12 hours. The 8-hour preparations (Metadate) CD and Ritalin) LA) utilise a microbead technology, while the 12-hour preparation (Concerta) utilises an osmotic pump system. All extended-release formulations effectively control the symptoms of ADHD. While pharmacokinetic differences appear to exist between some of these new formulations, there are currently no clinical data available to demonstrate clinical efficacy differences between them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L Wolraich
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Child Study Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moons P, Vanrenterghem Y, Hooff JP, Squifflet JP, Margodt D, Mullens M, Thevissen I, Geest S. Health-related quality of life and symptom experience in tacrolimus-based regimens after renal transplantation: a multicentre study. Transpl Int 2003. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2003.tb00366.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
14
|
Akhavan A, Rudikoff D. The treatment of atopic dermatitis with systemic immunosuppressive agents. Clin Dermatol 2003; 21:225-40. [PMID: 12781440 DOI: 10.1016/s0738-081x(02)00362-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Akhavan
- Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|