Complementary Medicine Provision in an Academic Hospital: Evaluation and Structuring Project

Complementary and integrative medicine - Resolving situations of reduced remuneration for additional work under the SwissDRG system

Aim of the study

Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) has been increasingly recognized as offering promising treatment adjunctions in various clinical settings, even amongst patients with serious, chronic, or recurrent illness. Today, only few tertiary care facilities in Switzerland offer dedicated CIM services for inpatients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether CIM services for complex medical conditions are adequately valued by the national inpatient SwissDRG reimbursement system.

Methods

A simulation was performed by adding a specific code of the Swiss classification of interventions (CHOP) to the list of codes of each patient who received CIM therapies at the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) in 2021. This code is to be used when CIM services are provided. Hitherto, it was not entered due to a lack of specific documents justifying the resources used. The analysis focused on the impact of adding this CIM CHOP code on the Swiss Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) reimbursement.

Results

In total, 275 patients received a CIM therapy in 2021. The addition of the CIM CHOP code 99.BC.12 (10-25 CIM sessions per stay) resulted in a simulated loss of income of CHF 766 630 for the hospital, while the net real result is already negative by more than CHF 6 million. The DRGs positively impacted by the addition of CIM CHOP code 99.BC.12 had a mean (SD) cost weight (CW) of 1.014 (0.620), while the DRGs negatively impacted had a mean (SD) CW of 3.97 (2.764) points.

Conclusion

It is necessary to quickly react and improve the incentives contained in the grouping algorithm of the prospective payment system, whose effects can threaten the provision of adequate medical care to the patients despite suitable indications and potential for cost-savings.

Complementary and Integrative Medicine: a plea for a better resource allocation by the SwissDRG grouping algorithm

No abstract available.

The influence of psychosocial factors on the intention to incorporate complementary and integrative medicine into psychiatric clinical practices

Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) can be of great support to individuals suffering from psychiatric conditions; however, it is still rarely incorporated into clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influences of psychosocial and sociodemographic factors on health-care professionals' intention to use CIM in their psychiatric clinical practice.

METHOD

One-hundred-and-five participants completed a questionnaire developed from an adapted version of Triandis' Theory of Interpersonal Behavior (TIB). Intentions to use CIM (yes or no) were analyzed using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The multivariate model retained three main factors: affect, perceived social norms, and conditions facilitating CIM. These predicted health-care professionals' intention to use CIM with an AUC = 94.7%.

RESULTS

underlined that positive affective attitudes towards CIM, feeling that CIM was congruent with professional and institutional goals, and having sufficient skills in CIM were essential to ensuring that health-care professionals would integrate CIM into their clinical practice.

Designing delivery models of traditional and complementary medicine services: a review of international experiences

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization advocates integration of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) into the conventional health services delivery system. Integrating quality services in a patient-centred manner faces substantial challenges when T&CM is delivered within a health system dominated by conventional medicine. This review has synthesized international experiences of integration strategies across different contexts.

SOURCES OF DATA

Publications describing international experiences of delivering T&CM service in conventional healthcare settings were searched. Backward and forward citation chasing was also conducted.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Capable leaders are crucial in seeking endorsement from stakeholders within the conventional medicine hierarchy and regulatory bodies. However, patient demands for integrative care can be successful as demonstrated by cases included in this review, as can the promotion of the use of T&CM for filling effectiveness gaps in conventional medicine. Safeguarding quality and safety of the services is a priority.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Different referral mechanisms between conventional and T&CM practitioners suit different contexts, but at a minimum, general guideline on responsibilities across the two professionals is required. Evidence-based condition-specific referral protocols with detailed integrative treatment planning are gaining in popularity.

GROWING POINTS

Interprofessional education is critical to establishing mutual trust and understanding between conventional clinicians and T&CM practitioners. Interprofessional communication is key to a successful collaboration, which can be strengthened by patient chart sharing, instant information exchange, and dedicated time for face-to-face interactions.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Research is needed on the optimal methods for financing integrated care to ensure equitable access, as well as in remuneration of T&CM practitioners working in integrative healthcare.