1
|
Figueroa-Romero A, Saura-Lázaro A, Fernández-Luis S, González R. Uncovering HIV and malaria interactions: the latest evidence and knowledge gaps. Lancet HIV 2024:S2352-3018(24)00035-3. [PMID: 38458223 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3018(24)00035-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
The geographical distribution of malaria and HIV infections widely overlap in sub-Saharan Africa, constituting a complex global health challenge. The interplay between both infections raises concerns about potential immunological, clinical, and therapeutic interactions. Both diseases have been reported to exacerbate the transmission of the other, including the possible vertical transmission of HIV in pregnant individuals with malaria. Co-infection also increases the risk of adverse outcomes such as severe malaria and death. In addition, interactions between antiretroviral and antimalarial drugs have been reported, potentially reducing the efficacy of these drugs. We review the current knowledge of the epidemiological, clinical, immunological, and therapeutic interactions of both infections. We focus on the latest available data and identify key knowledge gaps that should be addressed to guide policy makers in providing optimal HIV and malaria prevention, care, and treatment in vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antía Figueroa-Romero
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Saura-Lázaro
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sheila Fernández-Luis
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique; Pediatrics Department, Pediatric Research and Clinical Trials Unit (UPIC), Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (IMAS12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel González
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barsosio HC, Madanitsa M, Ondieki ED, Dodd J, Onyango ED, Otieno K, Wang D, Hill J, Mwapasa V, Phiri KS, Maleta K, Taegtmeyer M, Kariuki S, Schmiegelow C, Gutman JR, Ter Kuile FO. Chemoprevention for malaria with monthly intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in pregnant women living with HIV on daily co-trimoxazole in Kenya and Malawi: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2024; 403:365-378. [PMID: 38224710 PMCID: PMC10865779 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02631-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of daily co-trimoxazole, an antifolate used for malaria chemoprevention in pregnant women living with HIV, is threatened by cross-resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to the antifolate sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. We assessed whether addition of monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to daily co-trimoxazole is more effective at preventing malaria infection than monthly placebo plus daily co-trimoxazole in pregnant women living with HIV. METHODS We did an individually randomised, two-arm, placebo-controlled trial in areas with high-grade sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in Kenya and Malawi. Pregnant women living with HIV on dolutegravir-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) who had singleton pregnancies between 16 weeks' and 28 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation, stratified by site and HIV status (known positive vs newly diagnosed), to daily co-trimoxazole plus monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (three tablets of 40 mg dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine given daily for 3 days) or daily co-trimoxazole plus monthly placebo. Daily co-trimoxazole consisted of one tablet of 160 mg sulfamethoxazole and 800 mg trimethoprim. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Plasmodium infection detected in the peripheral (maternal) or placental (maternal) blood or tissue by PCR, microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, or placental histology (active infection) from 2 weeks after the first dose of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or placebo to delivery. Log-binomial regression was used for binary outcomes, and Poisson regression for count outcomes. The primary analysis was by modified intention to treat, consisting of all randomised eligible participants with primary endpoint data. The safety analysis included all women who received at least one dose of study drug. All investigators, laboratory staff, data analysts, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04158713. FINDINGS From Nov 11, 2019, to Aug 3, 2021, 904 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=448) or co-trimoxazole plus placebo (n=456), of whom 895 (99%) contributed to the primary analysis (co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, n=443; co-trimoxazole plus placebo, n=452). The cumulative risk of any malaria infection during pregnancy or delivery was lower in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group than in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group (31 [7%] of 443 women vs 70 [15%] of 452 women, risk ratio 0·45, 95% CI 0·30-0·67; p=0·0001). The incidence of any malaria infection during pregnancy or delivery was 25·4 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group versus 77·3 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group (incidence rate ratio 0·32, 95% CI 0·22-0·47, p<0·0001). The number needed to treat to avert one malaria infection per pregnancy was 7 (95% CI 5-10). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between groups in mothers (17·7 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group [23 events] vs 17·8 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole group [25 events]) and infants (45·4 per 100 person-years [23 events] vs 40·2 per 100 person-years [21 events]). Nausea within the first 4 days after the start of treatment was reported by 29 (7%) of 446 women in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group versus 12 (3%) of 445 women in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION Addition of monthly intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to the standard of care with daily unsupervised co-trimoxazole in areas of high antifolate resistance substantially improves malaria chemoprevention in pregnant women living with HIV on dolutegravir-based cART and should be considered for policy. FUNDING European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2; UK Joint Global Health Trials Scheme (UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health Research; Wellcome); and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hellen C Barsosio
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya; Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Mwayiwawo Madanitsa
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi; Academy of Medical Sciences, Malawi University of Science and Technology, Thyolo, Malawi
| | - Everlyne D Ondieki
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - James Dodd
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eric D Onyango
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Kephas Otieno
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Duolao Wang
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jenny Hill
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Victor Mwapasa
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Kamija S Phiri
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Kenneth Maleta
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon Kariuki
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya; Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christentze Schmiegelow
- Centre for Medical Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Julie R Gutman
- Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Feiko O Ter Kuile
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya; Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amariles P, Rivera-Cadavid M, Ceballos M. Clinical Relevance of Drug Interactions in People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Antiretroviral Therapy-Update 2022: Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:2488. [PMID: 37896248 PMCID: PMC10610003 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15102488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical outcomes of antiretroviral drugs may be modified through drug interactions; thus, it is important to update the drug interactions in people living with HIV (PLHIV). AIM To update clinically relevant drug interactions in PLHIV on antiretroviral therapy with novel drug interactions published from 2017 to 2022. METHODS A systematic review in Medline/PubMed database from July 2017 to December 2022 using the Mesh terms antiretroviral agents and drug interactions or herb-drug interactions or food-drug interactions. Publications with drug interactions in humans, in English or Spanish, and with full-text access were retrieved. The clinical relevance of drug interactions was grouped into five levels according to the gravity and probability of occurrence. RESULTS A total of 366 articles were identified, with 219 (including 87 citation lists) were included, which allowed for the identification of 471 drug interaction pairs; among them, 291 were systematically reported for the first time. In total 42 (14.4%) and 137 (47.1%) were level one and two, respectively, and 233 (80.1%) pairs were explained with the pharmacokinetic mechanism. Among these 291 pairs, protease inhibitors (PIs) and ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted PIs, as well as integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs), with 70 (24.1%) and 65 (22.3%) drug interaction pairs of levels one and two, respectively, were more frequent. CONCLUSIONS In PLHIV on antiretroviral therapy, we identify 291 drug interaction pairs systematically reported for the first time, with 179 (61.5%) being assessed as clinically relevant (levels one and two). The pharmacokinetic mechanism was the most frequently identified. PIs, ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted PIs, and InSTIs were the antiretroviral groups with the highest number of clinically relevant drug interaction pairs (levels one and two).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Amariles
- Research Group on Pharmaceutical Promotion and Prevention, University of Antioquia, UdeA, AA 1226, Medellin 050010, Colombia; (M.R.-C.); (M.C.)
- Research Group on Pharmaceutical Care, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Mónica Rivera-Cadavid
- Research Group on Pharmaceutical Promotion and Prevention, University of Antioquia, UdeA, AA 1226, Medellin 050010, Colombia; (M.R.-C.); (M.C.)
| | - Mauricio Ceballos
- Research Group on Pharmaceutical Promotion and Prevention, University of Antioquia, UdeA, AA 1226, Medellin 050010, Colombia; (M.R.-C.); (M.C.)
- Research Group on Pharmacy Regency Technology, University of Antioquia, Medellin 050010, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Figueroa-Romero A, Pons-Duran C, Gonzalez R. Drugs for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Current Knowledge and Way Forward. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022; 7:tropicalmed7080152. [PMID: 36006244 PMCID: PMC9416188 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Malaria infection during pregnancy is an important driver of maternal and neonatal health in endemic countries. Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended for malaria prevention at each scheduled antenatal care visit, starting at the second trimester, in areas of high and moderate transmission. However, the increased resistance to SP in some endemic areas challenges its effectiveness. Furthermore, SP is contraindicated in the first trimester of pregnancy and in HIV-infected women on co-trimoxazole prophylaxis due to potential drug–drug interactions. Thus, in recent last decades, several studies evaluated alternative drugs that could be used for IPTp. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of antimalarial drugs being evaluated for IPTp. Chloroquine, amodiaquine, mefloquine and azithromycin as IPTp have proven to be worse tolerated than SP. Mefloquine was found to increase the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Dihydroartemisin-piperaquine currently constitutes the most promising IPTp drug alternative; it reduced the prevalence of malaria infection, and placental and clinical malaria in studies among HIV-uninfected women, and it is currently being tested in HIV-infected women. Research on effective antimalarial drugs that can be safely administered for prevention to pregnant women should be prioritized. Malaria prevention in the first trimester of gestation and tailored interventions for HIV-infected women remain key research gaps to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antia Figueroa-Romero
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clinic-Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer Rosselló 132, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (A.F.-R.); (C.P.-D.)
| | - Clara Pons-Duran
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clinic-Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer Rosselló 132, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (A.F.-R.); (C.P.-D.)
| | - Raquel Gonzalez
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clinic-Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer Rosselló 132, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (A.F.-R.); (C.P.-D.)
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Manhiça, Maputo 1929, Mozambique
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moore BR, Davis TM. Updated pharmacokinetic considerations for the use of antimalarial drugs in pregnant women. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2020; 16:741-758. [PMID: 32729740 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2020.1802425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The association between pregnancy and altered drug pharmacokinetic (PK) properties is acknowledged, as is its impact on drug plasma concentrations and thus therapeutic efficacy. However, there have been few robust PK studies of antimalarial use in pregnancy. Given that inadequate dosing for prevention or treatment of malaria in pregnancy can result in negative maternal/infant outcomes, along with the potential to select for parasite drug resistance, it is imperative that reliable pregnancy-specific dosing recommendations are established. AREAS COVERED PK studies of antimalarial drugs in pregnancy. The present review summarizes the efficacy and PK properties of WHO-recommended therapies used in pregnancy, with a focus on PK studies published since 2014. EXPERT OPINION Changes in antimalarial drug disposition in pregnancy are well described, yet pregnant women continue to receive treatment regimens optimized for non-pregnant adults. Contemporary in silico modeling has recently identified a series of alternative dosing regimens that are predicted to provide optimal therapeutic efficacy for pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brioni R Moore
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University , Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia , Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Timothy M Davis
- Medical School, University of Western Australia , Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bukkems VE, Colbers A, Marzolini C, Molto J, Burger DM. Drug-Drug Interactions with Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant Women Living with HIV: Are They Different from Non-Pregnant Individuals? Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 59:1217-1236. [PMID: 32696442 PMCID: PMC7550380 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-020-00914-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objective Although the separate effects of drug–drug interactions and pregnancy on antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics have been widely studied and described, their combined effect is largely unknown. Physiological changes during pregnancy may change the extent or clinical relevance of a drug–drug interaction in a pregnant woman. This review aims to provide a detailed overview of the mechanisms, magnitude, and clinical significance of antiretroviral drug–drug interactions in pregnant women. Methods We performed a literature search and selected studies that compared the magnitude of drug–drug interactions with antiretroviral drugs in pregnant vs non-pregnant women. Results Forty-eight papers examining drug–drug interactions during pregnancy were selected, of which the majority focused on pharmacokinetic boosting. Other selected studies examined the drug–drug interactions between efavirenz and lumefantrine, efavirenz and tuberculosis drugs, etravirine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, atazanavir and tenofovir disoproxil, and mefloquine and nevirapine in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women. The clinical significance of antiretroviral drug–drug interactions changed during pregnancy from a minimal effect to a contra-indication. In almost all cases, the clinical significance of a drug–drug interaction was more relevant in pregnant women, owing to the combined effects of pregnancy-induced physiological changes and drug–drug interactions leading to a lower absolute drug exposure. Conclusions Multiple studies show that the clinical relevance of a drug–drug interaction can change during pregnancy. Unfortunately, many potential interactions have not been studied in pregnancy, which may place pregnant women living with human immunodeficiency virus and their newborns at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera E Bukkems
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center and Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Angela Colbers
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center and Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Catia Marzolini
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Departments of Medicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital of Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jose Molto
- Fundació Lluita Contra La Sida, Badalona, Spain.,Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David M Burger
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center and Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neary M, Owen A, Olagunju A. Pharmacokinetics of HIV therapies in pregnant patients: an update. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2020; 16:449-461. [PMID: 32271621 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2020.1754792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV is thought to account for over 90% of new pediatric infections, and is associated with poor maternal and fetal outcomes. As such ensuring further reduction in MTCT is a priority in HIV treatment and prevention programs. AREAS COVERED This review aims to provide a comprehensive update on the pharmacokinetics of recently approved antiretroviral drugs and novel drug formulations and delivery systems. Alongside recent recommendations for dose adjustments, and an overview of the implications of co-infections on the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals relevant to pregnant HIV positive patients. Additionally, potential opportunities to progress pharmacokinetic research of new treatments in this population are highlighted. EXPERT OPINION In order to improve our understanding of how to provide safe and effective treatment to HIV positive pregnant women, further work is required to enable their inclusion in early stages of clinical trials. Incentives must be created for this research, in the form of additional investment by key stakeholders and regulatory agencies. Furthermore, as the incidence of MTCT is reduced globally there is a need to conduct long-term pharmacovigilance studies in uninfected children exposed to HIV and antiretrovirals in utero, in order to determine the safest and most effective antiretroviral therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Neary
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Owen
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool, UK
| | - Adeniyi Olagunju
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool, UK.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University , Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|