Identification and Archive of Mars 2020 Spacecraft Microbial Isolates

Modeling of recovery efficiency of sampling devices used in planetary protection bioburden estimation

IMPORTANCE

Planetary protection at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) requires bioburden on certain spacecraft to be estimated via sampling in order to comply with biological cleanliness requirements. To achieve this, the recovery efficiency of devices used to sample the spacecraft pre-launch must be understood and their uncertainty quantified in order to produce the most reasonable estimates of bioburden. This study brings together experiments performed by NASA and the European Space Agency with approved swab and wipe sampling devices, inoculating steel coupons with laboratory strains of Bacillus spp. spores commonly recovered from spacecraft assembly clean rooms (B. atrophaeus, B. megaterium, B. safensis and B. thuringiensis), with a mathematical model of the assay process to assess recovery efficiency. The statistical treatment developed in this study allows comparison of bioburden estimates made from different devices processed by different methods. This study also gives stakeholders and practitioners a statistically rigorous approach to predict bioburden that can be folded into future modeling efforts.

Bacterial and fungal bioburden reduction on material surfaces using various sterilization techniques suitable for spacecraft decontamination

Planetary protection is a guiding principle aiming to prevent microbial contamination of the solar system by spacecraft (forward contamination) and extraterrestrial contamination of the Earth (backward contamination). Bioburden reduction on spacecraft, including cruise and landing systems, is required to prevent microbial contamination from Earth during space exploration missions. Several sterilization methods are available; however, selecting appropriate methods is essential to eliminate a broad spectrum of microorganisms without damaging spacecraft components during manufacturing and assembly. Here, we compared the effects of different bioburden reduction techniques, including dry heat, UV light, isopropyl alcohol (IPA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), and oxygen and argon plasma on microorganisms with different resistance capacities. These microorganisms included Bacillus atrophaeus spores and Aspergillus niger spores, Deinococcus radiodurans, and Brevundimonas diminuta, all important microorganisms for considering planetary protection. Bacillus atrophaeus spores showed the highest resistance to dry heat but could be reliably sterilized (i.e., under detection limit) through extended time or increased temperature. Aspergillus niger spores and D. radiodurans were highly resistant to UV light. Seventy percent of IPA and 7.5% of H2O2 treatments effectively sterilized D. radiodurans and B. diminuta but showed no immediate bactericidal effect against B. atrophaeus spores. IPA immediately sterilized A. niger spores, but H2O2 did not. During VHP treatment under reduced pressure, viable B. atrophaeus spores and A. niger spores were quickly reduced by approximately two log orders. Oxygen plasma sterilized D. radiodurans but did not eliminate B. atrophaeus spores. In contrast, argon plasma sterilized B. atrophaeus but not D. radiodurans. Therefore, dry heat could be used for heat-resistant component bioburden reduction, and VHP or plasma for non-heat-resistant components in bulk bioburden reduction. Furthermore, IPA, H2O2, or UV could be used for additional surface bioburden reduction during assembly and testing. The systemic comparison of sterilization efficiencies under identical experimental conditions in this study provides basic criteria for determining which sterilization techniques should be selected during bioburden reduction for forward planetary protection.