1
|
Jeon HJJ, Granner M, Christiansen E, Kohnen T, Park SY, Sarnquist B, MacNeil P, Soto V, Deavers O. Association Between Breastfeeding Peer Support and Confidence in Breastfeeding. J Hum Lact 2025; 41:132-144. [PMID: 39713971 DOI: 10.1177/08903344241299398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support programs may be effective for supporting breastfeeding among diverse groups, and in reducing disparities. This study provides insight regarding the implementation and outcomes of a peer breastfeeding support program. RESEARCH AIMS (1) to examine how participation affected the outcomes of breastfeeding motivation, confidence, and coping strategies; and (2) to evaluate satisfaction with the program. METHOD This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Seven pilot sites in the United States uniquely implemented a federally-funded peer support program for low-income women. Data were collected using a survey and focus groups/interviews. Over 12 months, 1,296 women participated, comprising 615 peer support pairs. A total of 401 women responded to the survey. Twenty-three focus groups and 63 interviews were conducted across the seven sites. RESULTS Participants who enrolled in the program during pregnancy: t (189) = -6.55, p < 0.001, and after the baby was born: t (170) = -2.59, p = 0.001, gained confidence in breastfeeding. More satisfied participants were more likely to breastfeed longer: F (7,352) = 12.75, p < 0.001, and cope with breastfeeding challenges: F (7,352) = 7.83, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION Effective operation strategies of the peer breastfeeding support program have significantly influenced participant satisfaction. Introducing peer support for low-income women to share their breastfeeding experiences would be beneficial in enhancing breastfeeding rates. However, the generalizability of these findings may be limited to this U.S. federally-funded peer support program.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hiito E, Ikonen R, Niela-Vilén H. Internet-based breastfeeding peer support for breastfeeding parents: An integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:4805-4824. [PMID: 38738535 DOI: 10.1111/jan.16221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
AIM To explore what Internet-based breastfeeding peer support offers to breastfeeding parents. DESIGN Integrative review. DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in March 2024 using the following electronic databases: CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Database searches yielded 717 results. Two researchers removed the duplicates (n = 256) and screened the remaining titles (n = 461), abstracts (n = 197) and full texts (n = 60) independently. Eventually, 19 studies were included in the review. The chosen studies had qualitative (n = 11), quantitative (n = 6), or mixed methods designs (n = 2) and were published between 2015 and 2024. Qualitative content analysis was conducted. RESULTS The main categories were supplying support that is responsive to the needs of parents and belonging to a breastfeeding community. The parents looked for and received breastfeeding support, advice, information, emotional support, reassurance and access to shared experiences from various online breastfeeding peer support groups. The support groups helped them in their breastfeeding decisions, thus making a difference in their breastfeeding experience. The support groups created breastfeeding communities for these parents and they were able to bond with others, feel like they belonged and share experiences. Additionally, these breastfeeding communities helped to normalize various breastfeeding practices. CONCLUSION Breastfeeding peer support groups can offer parents the support and guidance they seek and a sense that they are part of a breastfeeding community. However, it is vital these groups are efficiently moderated to ensure the advice parents receive is evidence-based and the support is encouraging. IMPACT These findings show that well-moderated online breastfeeding peer support can offer parents high-quality support. It is essential for health care professionals to be aware of the various options available in order to recommend high-quality support groups for breastfeeding parents. REPORTING METHOD PRISMA. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This was an integrative review therefore no patient or public contribution was necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Hiito
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Riikka Ikonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jackson J, Safari R, Hallam J. A narrative synthesis using the ecological systems theory for understanding a woman’s ability to continue breastfeeding. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION 2022:1-18. [DOI: 10.1080/14635240.2022.2098162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Jackson
- College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - R. Safari
- College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - J. Hallam
- College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoyt-Austin AE, Kair LR, Larson IA, Stehel EK. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #2: Guidelines for Birth Hospitalization Discharge of Breastfeeding Dyads, Revised 2022. Breastfeed Med 2022; 17:197-206. [PMID: 35302875 PMCID: PMC9206473 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2022.29203.aeh] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
A central goal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine is the development of clinical protocols for managing common medical problems that may impact breastfeeding success. These protocols serve only as guidelines for the care of breastfeeding mothers and infants and do not delineate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as standards of medical care. Variations in treatment may be appropriate according to the needs of an individual patient. The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine recognizes that not all lactating individuals identify as women. Using gender-inclusive language, however, is not possible in all languages and all countries and for all readers. The position of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.29188.abm) is to interpret clinical protocols within the framework of inclusivity of all breastfeeding, chestfeeding, and human milk-feeding individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne E Hoyt-Austin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Laura R Kair
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Ilse A Larson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Stehel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Goldbort J, Bresnahan M, Zhuang J, Bogdan-Lovis E, Park S. Breastfeeding but not Exclusively: Exploration of Chinese American Mothers' Infant Feeding Practices. J Hum Lact 2021; 37:380-389. [PMID: 32960121 DOI: 10.1177/0890334420948451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous qualitative researchers have shown that Chinese American mothers experienced high rates of suboptimal breastfeeding, especially early introduction of other foods before the recommended 6-month period of exclusive breastfeeding. RESEARCH AIMS (1) To explore attitudes that Chinese American mothers have about the meaning and practice of exclusive breastfeeding; (2) to evaluate the extent of family pressure and support to maintain exclusive breastfeeding; and (3) to examine the influence of breastfeeding self-efficacy and the intention to continue exclusive breastfeeding. METHOD Guided by the theory of planned behavior, this descriptive cross-sectional prospective online survey was conducted with Chinese American breastfeeding mothers (N = 401). Participants' attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control for exclusive breastfeeding behaviors were measured. RESULTS The M (SD) age of participants was 29.14 (SD = 6.90). Just over 50% reported receiving family support for exclusive breastfeeding. While participants had positive attitudes about exclusive breastfeeding and the value of colostrum, 64% (n = 257) had already introduced foods other than mother's own milk before their infant was 6-months old. Participants also expressed concern that their infants did not receive enough nutrition from exclusive mother's milk. Participants with more than one child had significantly greater intention to continue exclusive breastfeeding compared to participants with only one child. Perception of approval by others for exclusive breastfeeding and breastfeeding self-efficacy were significantly related to behavioral intention to continue exclusive breastfeeding. CONCLUSION Suboptimal infant feeding is a problem for Chinese American women and may also be a problem for mothers in other ethnic groups. We found a lack of adherence with standard recommendations for sustaining 6-months of exclusive breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary Bresnahan
- 3078 Department of Communication, Michigan State University, MI, USA
| | - Jie Zhuang
- 3402 Department of Communication Studies, Texas Christian University, MI, USA
| | | | - Sunyoung Park
- 3078 Department of Communication, Michigan State University, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lok KYW, Chow CLY, Shing JSY, Smith R, Lam CCO, Bick D, Chang YS. Feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of an innovative postnatal home-based breastfeeding peer support programme in Hong Kong: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial. Int Breastfeed J 2021; 16:34. [PMID: 33849582 PMCID: PMC8045301 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-021-00381-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As suggested by the World Health Organization, breastfeeding peer support is being introduced worldwide to support women's breastfeeding needs. Evidence has shown that when such support is offered to women, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding is increased. We developed an innovative home-based intervention to sustain exclusive breastfeeding in Hong Kong. However, potential barriers must be addressed before a full randomised controlled trial (RCT) is conducted. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of a breastfeeding support programme with home-based visits from peer supporters over a six month period among postpartum Chinese women in Hong Kong. METHODS We conducted a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial. Twenty primiparous women intending to breastfeed their healthy term singleton infant were recruited from a hospital in Kowloon, Hong Kong between February and March 2019. Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group received five home-based visits with a peer supporter over a six month period, as well as standard care, whereas participants in the control group received standard care only. We assessed feasibility, compliance, and acceptability of the breastfeeding peer support programme. Other outcomes assessed were breastfeeding self-efficacy, duration, and exclusivity. RESULTS It was feasible to recruit and train existing peer supporters, and peer supporters were able to deliver the intervention, which was acceptable to women, but rates of stopping the intervention and loss to follow-up were high. There was higher retention seen within the first month. Women interviewed at the end of the study reported that the intervention was positive. The cessation risk of any, and exclusive breastfeeding were not statistically different between the intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS This study provided valuable information on feasibility of the trial design and intervention. Modifications to the intervention, such as targeting women with lower breastfeeding self-efficacy, or combining home visits with technology and telephone follow-up may be more appropriate in a larger trial. Implementing the programme early during the antenatal phase and tailoring peer support to most appropriately sustain exclusive breastfeeding and other feeding modes should be incorporated in a future home-based peer support arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03705494 on 15 Oct 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Yuet-Wan Lok
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 4/F, William MW Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| | - Charlotte L Y Chow
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 4/F, William MW Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Jeffery Sheung Yu Shing
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 4/F, William MW Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Robert Smith
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 4/F, William MW Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Christine Chi Oi Lam
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Debra Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, Gibbet Hill, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Yan-Shing Chang
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yin XH, Zhao C, Yang YM, Shi HF, Wu TC, Xie JL, Niu JQ, Wang XL, Fang J. What is the impact of rural-to-urban migration on exclusive breastfeeding: a population-based cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J 2020; 15:86. [PMID: 33054799 PMCID: PMC7560081 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-020-00330-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In China, less than one third of infants under 6 months of age are being exclusively breastfed. Maternal rural-to-urban migration contributes to these low rates of breastfeeding practices. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of breastfeeding practices and associated factors among rural-to-urban migrant children and local children with infants aged 0–12 months in China, 2018. Methods Data were collected from a population-based cross-sectional survey in 2018 that included 6995 infants from eight urban areas (four metropolis and four medium sized/small cities) in China. The prevalence of breastfeeding practices was calculated using a 24-h recall questionnaire for all infants aged under 12 months. Logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between the prevalence of breastfeeding practices and maternal migrant status, after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, mother-infant health information and supportive information. For exclusive breastfeeding, we further analyzed its association with maternal rural-to-urban migration, stratified by maternal education level, maternal resident place and maternal ethnicity, respectively. Results The overall prevalence of ever breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, predominant breastfeeding and age-appropriate breastfeeding (exclusive breastfeeding of infants under 6 months of age and complementary feeding from six to 12 months of age) was 97.51, 29.84, 59.89 and 45.07%, respectively. Rural-to-urban migrant children were less likely to be exclusively breastfed compared to local children (AOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68, 0.95). Stratified by different sociodemographic variables, a negative association between exclusive breastfeeding and rural-to-urban migration was only found in the group with high education level, in the group living in metropolis and in the group of minorities, respectively. Conclusions The overall prevalence of breastfeeding practices was low in both rural-to-urban migrant children and local children. Besides common strategies, special approaches should be provided for urban highly educated migrants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Han Yin
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Zhao
- China Development Research Foundation, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Mei Yang
- School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University; China Center for the Economics of Human Development, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Feng Shi
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Tian Chen Wu
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Lei Xie
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Qiong Niu
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Li Wang
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. .,National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.
| | - Jin Fang
- China Development Research Foundation, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gómez-Acebo I, Dierssen-Sotos T, Palazuelos C, Castaño-Vinyals G, Pérez-Gómez B, Amiano P, Fernández-Villa T, Ardanaz E, Suarez-Calleja C, Alguacil J, Molina-Barceló A, Jiménez-Moleón JJ, Molero JA, Roca-Barceló A, Chirlaque MD, Vázquez JPF, Molinuevo A, Aragonés N, Serra MS, Binefa G, Moreno V, Pollán M, Kogevinas M, Llorca J. Changes in individual and contextual socio-economic level influence on reproductive behavior in Spanish women in the MCC-Spain study. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2020; 20:72. [PMID: 32293415 PMCID: PMC7160989 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-00936-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background The association between socioeconomic level and reproductive factors has been widely studied. For example, it is well known that women with lower socioeconomic status (SES) tend to have more children, the age at first-born being earlier. However, less is known about to what extent the great socioeconomic changes occurred in a country (Spain) could modify women reproductive factors. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the influence of individual and contextual socioeconomic levels on reproductive factors in Spanish women, and to explore whether this influence has changed over the last decades. Methods We performed a cross-sectional design using data from 2038 women recruited as population-based controls in an MCC-Spain case-control study. Results Higher parent’s economic level, education level, occupational level and lower urban vulnerability were associated with higher age at first delivery and lower number of pregnancies. These associations were stronger for women born after 1950: women with unfinished primary education had their first delivery 6 years before women with high education if they were born after 1950 (23.4 vs. 29.8 years) but only 3 years before if they were born before 1950 (25.7 vs. 28.0 years). For women born after 1950, the number of pregnancies dropped from 2.1 (unfinished primary school) to 1.7 (high education), whereas it remained almost unchanged in women born before 1950. Conclusions Reproductive behavior was associated with both individual and area-level socio-economic indicators. Such association was stronger for women born after 1950 regarding age at first delivery and number of pregnancies and for women born before 1950 regarding consumption of hormonal contraceptives or postmenopausal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inés Gómez-Acebo
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. .,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Herrera Oria s/n, 39011, Santander, Spain.
| | - Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Herrera Oria s/n, 39011, Santander, Spain
| | - Camilo Palazuelos
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Herrera Oria s/n, 39011, Santander, Spain
| | - Gemma Castaño-Vinyals
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Pérez-Gómez
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.,Cancer Epidemiology Research Group, Oncology and Hematology Area, IIS Puerta de Hierro, IDIPHIM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Amiano
- Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BioDonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | - Eva Ardanaz
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.,IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Claudia Suarez-Calleja
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,IUOPA, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Juan Alguacil
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, Salud y Medio Ambiente (RENSMA), Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain
| | | | - José J Jiménez-Moleón
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Jessica Alonso Molero
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Herrera Oria s/n, 39011, Santander, Spain
| | - Aina Roca-Barceló
- Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Department of Health, Government of Catalonia, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain.,MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - María-Dolores Chirlaque
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia University, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Amaia Molinuevo
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,BioDonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Nuria Aragonés
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.,Cancer Epidemiology Research Group, Oncology and Hematology Area, IIS Puerta de Hierro, IDIPHIM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Sala Serra
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Binefa
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) and Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor Moreno
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) and Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marina Pollán
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manolis Kogevinas
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Llorca
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Herrera Oria s/n, 39011, Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months after an infant is born. Although the recommendations are well known, mothers face barriers that make breastfeeding difficult. This article reviews the recent literature on barriers to breastfeeding as well as strategies for pediatricians to use to help women overcome them. RECENT FINDINGS The mode of delivery, mother's socioeconomic status, return to work, and prenatal breastfeeding education have been reported as factors that influence breastfeeding. Family-centered models for breastfeeding, peer support groups, and technology have been studied as potential ways to help women meet their breastfeeding goals. SUMMARY Pediatricians are the first providers to care for babies after hospital discharge and are likely the first doctors that mothers see after childbirth. These early visits create opportunities for pediatricians to learn about the barriers that their patients face and open the doors to addressing these barriers.
Collapse
|