Common Factors in Pediatric Psychiatry: A Review of Essential and Adjunctive Mechanisms of Treatment Outcome

Adding the missing voice: How self-report of autistic youth self-report on an executive functioning rating scale compares to parent report and that of youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or neurotypical development

LAY ABSTRACT

Executive functions are often impaired in autistic people and relate to important outcomes such as mental health, success in school and work, and quality of life. Evaluating executive functions helps autistic people, clinicians, and families identify targets for external supports and skill building. Youth self-report of executive function has not been studied, yet we know that self-report from autistic youth is key to understanding other cognitive/behavioral phenomena in autism such as anxiety, obsessions/compulsions, sensory sensitivities, and repetitive behaviors. We investigated self- and parent-report of executive function problems in 197 autistic youth without intellectual disability (ages 11-18 years), including the magnitude and profiles of executive function problems autistic youth report across subdomains of executive function. We compared autistic self-report with that of 114 youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder without intellectual disability and 197 neurotypical youth. We found that autistic youth report significant executive function problems compared to neurotypical youth and a distinctive profile of challenges in comparison to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder youth. Parents and their autistic children diverged regarding the magnitude of the youth's executive function difficulties, but both identify inflexibility as the most impaired executive function subdomain. Autistic youth and their parents were somewhat more concordant in their report of executive function problems than youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and their parents, but only showed moderate concordance at best. These findings elevate the importance of asking autistic youth directly about their executive functioning when engaging them in assessment and intervention, or researching executive functions in autism.

Do adolescents consider mind-body skills groups an acceptable treatment for depression: results from a pilot study

Background

Mind-Body Skills Groups (MBSGs) have shown promise in reducing adolescent depression symptoms; however, little is known about adolescents’ perspectives on this treatment. The objective of this study was to understand the acceptability of a new treatment for depressed adolescents in primary care settings.

Methods

Adolescents participating in a 10-week MBSG treatment were interviewed to understand their perspectives on the acceptability and effectiveness of the treatment. Interviews were collected at post-intervention and at a 3-month follow-up visit.

Results

A total of 39 adolescents completed both the post-intervention and 3-month follow-up interview. At post-intervention and follow-up, 84% of adolescents stated the MBSGs helped them. When asked how the MBSGs helped them, 3 areas were identified: learning new MBSG activities and skills, social connection with others within the group, and outcomes related to the group. Many adolescents reported no concerns with the MBSGs (49% at post- intervention; 62% at follow-up). Those with concerns identified certain activities as not being useful, wanting the group to be longer, and the time of group (after school) being inconvenient. Most adolescents reported that their life had changed because of the group (72% at post-intervention; 61% at follow-up), and when asked how, common responses included feeling less isolated and more hopeful.

Conclusions

Adolescents found the MBSGs to be helpful and acceptable as a treatment option for depression in primary care. Given the strong emphasis on treatment preference autonomy and the social activities within the group, MBSGs appear well-suited for this age group.

Trial registration

NCT03363750; December 6th, 2017.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02942-3.

Self-Efficacy As a Target for Neuroscience Research on Moderators of Treatment Outcomes in Pediatric Anxiety

Objective: Despite the advances in the field of neuroscience, many questions remain regarding the mechanisms of anxiety, as well as moderators of treatment outcome. Long-term adverse outcomes for anxious youth may relate to pathophysiologically based information processing patterns and self-referential beliefs, such as self-efficacy. In fact, there are no studies highlighting the relationship between self-efficacy and neurocircuitry in youth. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between self-efficacy, brain morphometry, and youth anxiety. Methods: Parent, child, and clinician ratings of anxiety symptoms and child-reported self-efficacy were analyzed in a sample of 8- to 17-year-old youth (n = 51). Measures were collected from all youth at baseline and during and after treatment for the patients. Anxious patients (n = 26) received 12 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Moreover, imaging data obtained from all participants before treatment were utilized in analyses. Results: Patients reported lower self-efficacy than healthy volunteers. Across the entire sample, anxiety was negatively related to total, social, and emotional efficacy. Both social and emotional efficacy predicted anxiety posttreatment. In addition, social efficacy predicted social anxiety symptoms posttreatment and social efficacy increased across treatment. There were no significant relations between self-efficacy and neurocircuitry. Conclusions: Self-efficacy is an important treatment target for anxious youth. Although self-efficacy was not related to brain morphometry, self-efficacy beliefs may constitute an important mechanism through which CBT and psychopharmacological interventions decrease fear and anxiety symptoms in youth.

Factors influencing adherence to therapeutic recommendations made after diagnostic reassessment of medically unexplained symptoms in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are common among children and adolescents and may be highly impairing. Even after long diagnostic and/or therapeutic trajectories, many of these children and their parents feel dissatisfied with the advice and therapies they were given.

OBJECTIVES

After a 2-week hospitalisation for somatic and psychiatric reassessment, children and their families were given recommendations for further treatment. This study evaluates which of these recommendations were carried out (primary outcome measure) and which factors influenced the (non-)adherence to therapeutic advice.

METHODS

Parents of 27 children aged 7-17 with impairing MUS took part in a structured telephone survey to assess adherence to and perceived effectiveness of therapeutic recommendations (cross-sectional study). Influencing factors were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Psychotherapy was recommended to all 27 patients and their families; 19 of them (70.4%) carried out this advice. When physiotherapy was recommended, adherence proved lower (6/22 children; 27.3%). No influencing factors were found to have a statistically significant correlation with adherence. Effect sizes may be indicative of clinically relevant influential factors, but should be considered cautiously.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that more efforts need to be made to ensure adherence to therapeutic recommendations. Known risk factors for non-adherence to treatments for chronic somatic disorders may not apply for children with somatoform disorders.