Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Safety of Stimulants Across Patient Populations: A Meta-Analysis

Importance

The use of stimulant medications has expanded substantially beyond the traditional treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to encompass a variety of other clinical conditions. Understanding the safety of these medications is important as their use increases across diverse patient populations.

Objective

To assess the safety of stimulant medications as reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines.

Data Sources

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from July 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025, using CINAHL, Embase, PubMed or MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for studies published since 2000. Keywords included safety, adverse event, side effect, amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, stimulant, lisdexamfetamine, and methylphenidate.

Study Selection

RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and December 13, 2024, were included. These trials investigated the safety of stimulants in various clinical conditions, including ADHD, depression, binge eating disorder, schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, and stimulant use disorders as well as in healthy individuals. Trials not focused on safety or adverse events (AEs) of stimulants, nonoriginal research, nonhuman research, trials with concomitant prescriptions other than stimulants, and trials without a placebo group were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Independent reviewers extracted study data, and a random-effects model was used to pool results. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the risk ratio (RR) of developing any AE in participants taking stimulants vs placebo.

Results

A total of 93 RCTs were included after exclusions. The methodological quality assessment of the included trials showed overall low or unclear risk of bias. Trials with a duration of up to 52 weeks showed that stimulant medications were associated with an increased risk of overall AEs compared with placebo (RR, 1.34; 90% CI, 1.27-1.41), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 67%). Statistical significance of this finding was maintained when subgroups (ie, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines) were separately analyzed.

Conclusions and Relevance

This meta-analysis found an increased risk of overall AEs associated with stimulants compared with placebo. Future research could provide more standardized and consistent assessments of this outcome and may improve understanding about misuse risk.

An updated safety review of the current drugs for managing ADHD in children

INTRODUCTION

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent condition that causes persistent problems with attention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity and often results in significant impairment when left untreated. Medications for this disorder continue to evolve and provide new treatment options. Ongoing review of related medication safety and tolerability remains an important task for prescribers.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript provides an updated safety review of medications used to treat ADHD in children and adolescents. PubMed and OneSearch online databases were utilized to search for literature relevant to the topic of ADHD medications and safety. Clinical trials of medications used to treat ADHD, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and articles covering specific safety issues (adverse or unfavorable events) such as cardiovascular effects, seizures, impact on growth, depression, suicidal ideation, substance use disorders, psychosis, and tics are described.

EXPERT OPINION

Available pharmacologic treatments for ADHD have favorable efficacy, safety and tolerability and allow many patients to achieve significant improvement of their symptoms. Despite the availability of multiple stimulant and non-stimulant formulations, some individuals with ADHD may not tolerate available medications or attain satisfactory improvement. To satisfy unmet clinical needs, ADHD pharmaceutical research with stimulant and nonstimulant formulations targeting dopamine, norepinephrine, and novel receptors is ongoing.

d-Amphetamine Transdermal System in Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Secondary Endpoint Results and Post Hoc Effect Size Analyses from a Pivotal Trial

Objectives: Amphetamines are a preferred treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with the dextroamphetamine transdermal system (d-ATS) providing an alternative to oral formulations. A pivotal trial of d-ATS in children and adolescents with ADHD met primary and key secondary endpoints. This analysis reports additional endpoints and safety findings from the pivotal trial and evaluates effect size and number needed to treat (NNT) for d-ATS. Methods: In this study, a 5-week, open-label dose-optimization period (DOP) preceded a 2-week, randomized, crossover double-blind treatment period (DBP). Eligible patients received d-ATS 5 mg during the DOP, with weekly evaluations for increase to 10, 15, and 20 mg (equivalent to labeled doses of 4.5, 9, 13.5, and 18 mg/9 hours, respectively) until reaching and maintaining the optimal dose, which was utilized for the DBP. Secondary endpoints included assessment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Conners' Parent Rating Scale Revised Short Form (CPRS-R:S), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores. NNT was calculated for ADHD-RS-IV and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dermal safety. Results: In total, 110 patients entered the DOP, with 106 patients randomized (DBP). During the DBP, the least-squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference for d-ATS versus placebo in ADHD-RS-IV total score was -13.1 (-16.2 to -10.0; p < 0.001), with effect size of 1.1 and NNT of 3 for ADHD-RS-IV remission, ≥30% improvement, and ≥50% improvement. Significant differences between placebo and d-ATS were also observed for CPRS-R:S and CGI-I scales (p < 0.001), with NNT of 2 for CGI-I response. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate, with three leading to study discontinuation in the DOP and none in the DBP. No patients discontinued due to dermal reactions. Conclusions: d-ATS was effective in treating ADHD in children and adolescents, meeting all secondary endpoints, with a large effect size and NNT of 2-3 to achieve a clinically meaningful response. d-ATS was safe and well tolerated, with minimal dermal reactions. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01711021.

Efficacy of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Effect Size Across the Day

Objective: To evaluate the treatment effect size throughout the day of amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (AMPH EROS; Tris Pharma, Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) in a laboratory classroom study conducted in children aged 6-12 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: A post hoc analysis was performed to assess the overall effect size as well as the effect size at each time point from early morning through evening (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 13 hours postdose) for each efficacy measure evaluated in a 5-week, randomized, dose-optimized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, laboratory classroom assessment, efficacy, and safety study of AMPH EROS (N = 99). Change from baseline of the primary (Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, Pelham [SKAMP]-C) and key secondary (secondary efficacy assessments included the SKAMP attention [SKAMP-A], SKAMP-deportment subscale [SKAMP-D], Permanent Product Measure of Performance-number of problems attempted [PERMP-A], PERMP-number of problems correct [PERMP-C]) efficacy measures were analyzed using a linear mixed model repeated-measures analysis model. Comparisons among treatments were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. The effect size was estimated using Cohen's d, to determine "small," (0.2), "medium," (0.5), or "large" (0.8) magnitudes of treatment effects. Results: Large overall effect sizes were observed for all primary and key secondary efficacy assessments. Moreover, the SKAMP-C, PERMP-number of problems attempted, and PERMP-C scores showed large effect sizes at each time point evaluated across the day, from 1 to 13 hours postdose. The SKAMP-A and SKAMP-D scores showed a medium to large effect size at each time point. Conclusions: AMPH EROS demonstrated a large and consistent effect size across the day, including early in the morning, in the treatment of symptoms of ADHD in children aged 6-12 years. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02083783.

Updates in Pharmacologic Strategies in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) significantly worsens quality of life and long-term functional outcomes in adults. Individual impairments in adults with ADHD can be further contextualized within considerable costs to society at large. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved stimulants and nonstimulant medications can significantly improve ADHD symptoms in adults. In the past 2 decades, the United States FDA has expanded approval of pharmacotherapeutic options for adult ADHD. However, limitations still persist in available psychotropics for certain patient populations such as those with comorbid substance use or cardiovascular illness. Clinicians therefore must appreciate several ongoing investigations into medications with unique mechanisms of action. This article reviews the current FDA approved and emerging medication options while providing guidelines for pharmacologic management of adult ADHD.

Stimulants

Stimulants have been available for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for more than 70 years and are the most effective medications available. During the past 2 decades, several new immediate-release (IR) and extended-release methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamine (AMPH) formulations have become available. These products differ by dose form (capsules, tablets, oral suspensions, oral disintegrating tablets, and patch), by onset and duration of effect, and by bioavailability. The side effect profile is generally similar for all compounds. Although the products are similar, individual patients may have a better response or tolerability to a particular class (MPH or AMPH) or formulation.

Adult Patient Preferences for Long-Acting ADHD Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) requires a multifaceted approach including psychosocial interventions and pharmacological treatment. This study evaluates preferences for specific attributes associated with different long-acting stimulant treatment among US adults with ADHD.

METHODS

Patients completed an online, cross-sectional survey, incorporating a discrete choice experiment to assess preferences for attributes.

RESULTS

Analyses included 200 adults with ADHD (mean age 33.0 years; 60% self-reporting moderate severity); the mean (SD) Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale-v1.1 score was 45.9 (12.4). Overall, patients valued speed of onset most and risk of rebound least. Three population groups with distinct preferences were identified: side effect-driven (n=69, 35%), quick onset-driven (n=47, 24%) and quick onset and long duration-driven (n=84, 42%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows differences in how adults with ADHD value and assess benefit-risk trade-offs when considering the desired attributes of stimulant treatments, highlighting the importance of patient-physician shared decision-making to optimize the desired benefits of individualized treatment.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Healthy Adults

Purpose: This single-dose pivotal study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (AMPH EROS) under fasted and fed conditions and the relative bioavailability of AMPH EROS and immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts (IR MAS) in adults. Methods: This open-label, randomized, three-period, three-treatment, six-sequence crossover study enrolled 30 healthy adult participants who were randomly assigned to receive either 1 dose of AMPH EROS 18.8 mg under fed or fasted conditions or 30 mg of IR MAS under fasted conditions. Participants crossed over with a 7-day washout period between each of the three periods. Plasma samples were measured for C_max, AUC_0-t, AUC_0-5, AUC_5-t, and AUC_0-∞ for comparative bioavailability. Results: The geometric mean ratios for C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ were within the 90% confidence limits [80.0%, 125.0%] for comparable bioavailability. There was no food effect for AMPH EROS. Both the AMPH EROS and IR MAS formulations were generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusions: The bioavailability of a single dose of AMPH EROS was comparable to two 15 mg doses of IR MAS, given 4 hr apart, with no food effect or safety concerns observed.

Novel Formulations of ADHD Medications: Stimulant Selection and Management

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorder in children and adolescents in the United States. In 2016, approximately 3.8 million U.S. children ages 2 to 17 years with ADHD were being treated with medication. There are approximately 30 different amphetamine (AMPH) and methylphenidate (MPH) formulations on the market. These include immediate-release and extended-release compounds. The extended-release formulations contain various ratios of immediate-release and extended-release components, which determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. For stimulants, the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles are tightly linked, and the immediate-release and extended-release percentages influence onset and duration of drug effects. Choosing the right stimulant medication for a patient depends on an understanding of the PK/PD profile, the time of day that symptoms are most impairing, the need for morning and evening symptom control and individual patient preferences.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of amphetamine extended-release tablets compared with amphetamine extended-release oral suspension

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the relative bioavailability of single-dose amphetamine extended-release tablet (AMPH ER TAB) 20 mg, swallowed whole or chewed, and amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (AMPH EROS) 2.5 mg/mL; evaluate food effect on AMPH ER TAB.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers (18-55 years) were randomized to 1 dose of AMPH ER TAB 20 mg swallowed (fasted), chewed (fed/fasted), or 20 mg AMPH EROS (fasted). A crossover study design was used. Plasma samples were collected each period predose and at time points to 60 hours postdose. d- and l-amphetamine were measured and pharmacokinetic (PK) was calculated (90% confidence intervals of the ratios of the plasma levels) for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax. Comparative relative bioavailability between formulations was determined when ratios were within 80% and 125%. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two subjects completed the study. AMPH ER TAB swallowed versus AMPH EROS (fasted): for d- and l-amphetamine, the total and peak exposure was similar: d: AUC0-t: 100.68% to 108.08%, AUC0-∞: 101.47% to 109.52%, Cmax: 98.10% to 103.17%; l: AUC0-t: 100.31% to 108.57%, AUC0-∞: 101.27% to 111.09%, Cmax: 98.2% to 103.37%. For d- and l-amphetamine when the tablet is swallowed whole, Tmax was 5.00 hours (with a range of 2.00-9.00 hours). AMPH ER TAB chewed versus AMPH EROS (fasted): for d- and l-amphetamine, the total and peak exposure was similar: d: AUC0-t: 99.23% to 106.62%, AUC0-∞: 99.58% to 107.59%, Cmax: 99.91% to 105.14%; l: AUC0-t: 98.16% to 106.35%, AUC0-∞: 98.44% to 108.11%, Cmax: 99.53% to 104.75%. For d- and l-amphetamine when the tablet has been chewed, Tmax was 5.00 hours (with a range of 3.00-7.00 hours). PK results were similar for patients in the fasted and fed groups, indicative of no presence of food effect. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, overall AE profiles between the tablet and oral suspension were comparable without any unanticipated safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Single doses of AMPH ER TAB for both d- and l-amphetamine demonstrated comparable bioavailability to a 20 mg dose of AMPH EROS, 2.5 mg/mL under fasted conditions when chewed and swallowed whole, and demonstrated equivalent peak and overall exposure without apparent food effect. AMPH ER TAB was well-tolerated and consistent with adverse events noted in other amphetamine formulations.

Efficacy and Safety of Multilayer, Extended-Release Methylphenidate (PRC-063) in Children 6-12 Years of Age with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Laboratory Classroom Study

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of PRC-063, a once-daily, multilayer, extended-release (ER) formulation of methylphenidate (MPH) hydrochloride, in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, dose-optimized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Methods: Boys and girls aged 6-12 years diagnosed with ADHD were enrolled. During a 6-week, open-label, dose-optimization phase, subjects began treatment at 25 mg/day of PRC-063 and were titrated until an optimal dose (maximum 85 mg/day) was reached. During the double-blind period, subjects were randomized to receive treatment with their optimal dose of PRC-063 or placebo for 1 week. Efficacy was assessed in a laboratory classroom setting on the final day of the double-blind treatment using the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Rating Scale and Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP). Safety was assessed measuring adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Results: The study was completed by 147 subjects. In the primary efficacy analysis, significant improvements were demonstrated with PRC-063 versus placebo (p < 0.0001) when SKAMP-Combined scores were averaged over the 13-hour full-day laboratory classroom (least squares mean difference = -8.6, 95% confidence interval = -10.6 to -6.6). Mean average PERMP-Total scores were also significantly improved with PRC-063 versus placebo at all time points postdose (p < 0.01). The onset of treatment effect was present by 1-hour postdose (the first time point measured) and duration of efficacy was up to and including 13 hours postdose. AEs reported in ≥5% of subjects during the dosing optimization period were decreased appetite, abdominal pain upper, affect lability, weight decreased, headache, irritability, and insomnia. Conclusions: PRC-063 was effective in improving attention and reducing symptoms of ADHD versus placebo and had a rapid onset and extended duration of effect. AEs were consistent to those reported with other ER MPH treatments. Clinical Trial Registry: NCT03172481.

Efficacy and Safety of Dasotraline in Children With ADHD: A Laboratory Classroom Study

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasotraline for treatment of ADHD in children. Method: Children (ages 6-12 years; N = 112) with ADHD were randomized, double-blind, to 14 days of once-daily evening doses of dasotraline 4 mg or placebo. ADHD symptom severity was measured at baseline and Day 15 in seven, 30-min classroom sessions using the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) and the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) math test. Results: Significant improvement was observed for dasotraline versus placebo in the SKAMP-combined score (-3.2 vs. +2.0; p < .001; effect size = 0.85) and SKAMP and PERMP subscale scores. The three most common adverse events for dasotraline (vs. placebo) were insomnia (19.6% vs. 3.6%), headache (10.7% vs. 8.9%), and decreased appetite (10.7% vs. 3.6%). Conclusion: In this laboratory classroom study, dasotraline 4 mg was found to be an efficacious and generally well-tolerated treatment for ADHD in children aged 6 to 12 years.

An update on the pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of ADHD with long-acting methylphenidate and amphetamine formulations

Introduction: Long-acting stimulant formulations are recommended as first-line pharmacotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Over the past 20 years, extended-release (ER) methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamine (AMP) formulations have evolved to include varying drug delivery technologies, enantiomers/salts, and dosage forms. All formulations are characterized by a unique pharmacokinetic profile that is closely mirrored by pharmacodynamic response allowing clinicians to individualize therapy based on their patient's clinical needs and dosing preferences.Areas covered: This review provides an update on the pharmacokinetic properties of approved and investigational ER MPH and AMP formulations and highlights pharmacokinetic features that clinicians should consider when selecting a long-acting stimulant.Expert opinion: Since there are no reliable biomarkers that can predict individualized response to long-acting stimulants, clinicians need to consider their distinctive pharmacokinetic properties, including the pharmacokinetic profile, rate and extent of absorption, variability, dose proportionality, bioequivalence, and potential for accumulation. Clinicians also need to understand that certain factors can contribute to increased variability in pharmacokinetics and potentially affect outcomes. Less invasive, high-throughput techniques and novel time-based scales are being developed to advance research on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of stimulants. Model-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approaches can be applied to aid the development of novel formulations and individualize therapy with existing drugs.

Childhood methylphenidate adherence as a predictor of antidepressants use during adolescence

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a common and effective treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but little is known about the relationship between early childhood intake of MPH and onset of antidepressant treatment during adolescence. The study aimed to examine whether adherence to MPH during early childhood predicts the initiation of antidepressants during adolescence. This is a 12-year historical prospective nationwide cohort study of children enrolled in an integrated care system who were first prescribed MPH between the ages of 6 and 8 years (N = 6830). We tested for an association between their adherence to MPH during early childhood (as indicated by medication possession ratio from MPH onset through the age of twelve) and the likelihood of being prescribed any antidepressant during adolescence (age 13-18). As all country citizens are covered by mandatory health insurance, and full services are provided by one of the four integrated care systems, data regarding patients' diagnoses, prescriptions, and medical purchases are well documented. Logistic regression analysis indicated that those with higher adherence to MPH had a 50% higher risk (95% CI 1.16-1.93) of receiving antidepressants during adolescence when controlling for other comorbid psychiatric conditions and parental use of antidepressants. In this large-scale longitudinal study, MPH adherence during early childhood emerged as a predictor for antidepressant treatment during adolescence, which may reflect increased emotional and behavioral dysregulation in this group. The highly adherent patients are at higher risk and should be clinically monitored more closely, particularly into adolescence.

Amphetamine extended-release oral suspension for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Introduction: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder known to respond to amphetamine (AMPH). Multiple AMPH formulations have been developed during the past two decades and have focused mainly on extending the duration of effect. AMPH extended-release oral suspension, Dyanavel XR, (AMPH EROS) was developed to address the unmet needs of patients who have difficulty swallowing intact extended-release (ER) tablets and capsules. Areas covered: The pharmacokinetic profile of the AMPH EROS in children and adults is discussed along with the technology responsible for its release profile. Efficacy data from two clinical trials are presented and AMPH EROS is compared with other marketed AMPH ER formulations in the United States. Expert opinion: Multiple AMPH ER formulations that do not require ingestion of an intact tablet or capsule have been developed. Initial products allowed for sprinkling or dissolving of capsule contents. Recently, oral disintegrating tablets, chewable tablets, and oral suspensions have been marketed. Each formulation has positive attributes. Tablets may be more portable. However, as a suspension, AMPH EROS dosing can differ depending on daily requirements. Dose can also be titrated with a single prescription. Despite its convenience, AMPH EROS is a branded product, so price may be prohibitive for some patients.

New Formulations of Stimulants: An Update for Clinicians

In the last 15 years, there has been a marked increase in the number of available stimulant formulations with the emphasis on long-acting formulations, and the introduction of several novel delivery systems such as orally dissolving tablets, chewable tablets, extended-release liquid formulations, transdermal patches, and novel "beaded" technology. All of these formulations involve changes to the pharmaceutical delivery systems of the two existing compounds most commonly employed to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), amphetamine (AMP) and methylphenidate (MPH). In addition to these new formulations, our knowledge about the individual differences in response has advanced and contributes to a more nuanced approach to treatment. The clinician can now make increasingly informed choices about these formulations and more effectively individualize treatment in a way that had not been possible before. In the absence of reliable biomarkers that can predict individualized response to ADHD treatment, clinical knowledge about differences in MPH and AMP pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism can be utilized to personalize treatment and optimize response. Different properties of these new formulations (delivery modality, onset of action, duration of response, safety, and tolerability) will most likely weigh heavily into the clinician's choice of formulation. To manage the broad range of options that are now available, clinicians should familiarize themselves in each of these categories for both stimulant compounds. This review is meant to serve as an update and a guide to newer stimulant formulations and includes a brief review of ADHD and stimulant properties.

Early-Onset Efficacy and Safety Pilot Study of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in the Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (AMPH EROS) has an onset of effect at 30 minutes postdose in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, two-treatment, two-sequence, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study enrolled subjects aged 6-12 years with ADHD and ADHD-Rating Scale-5 scores of ≥90th percentile for sex and age. An optimized dose of 5-20 mg/day of AMPH EROS was determined during a 1-week open-label dose optimization phase based on medication history, symptom control, and tolerability. Subjects completed a practice laboratory classroom then received 1 day of double-blind active drug or placebo each in random sequence during two double-blind laboratory classroom days. Subjects completed the first double-blind laboratory classroom, returned to open-label drug for 5 days, and then crossed over on day 6 during a second double-blind laboratory classroom. Double-blind dose was fixed at AMPH EROS 15, 17.5, or 20 mg. The primary end point was change from predose in the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, Pelham-Combined (SKAMP-C) Rating Scale score at 30 minutes postdose on two double-blind days. The key secondary end points were change from predose in the SKAMP-C score at 3 hours postdose for AMPH EROS compared with placebo and change from baseline Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) scores at 30 minutes and 3 hours postdose compared with placebo. Safety assessments included vital signs and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Eighteen subjects were enrolled in the study (14 males and 4 females) with a mean age of 9 years. At both 30 minutes and 3 hours postdose, changes from baseline in SKAMP-C for AMPH EROS versus placebo were statistically significant (p < 0.01 and p = 0.0002, respectively). PERMP scores were not statistically significantly improved at 30 minutes postdose for AMPH EROS relative to the placebo group. PERMP scores were statistically significantly improved at 3 hours postdose for AMPH EROS relative to the placebo group (PERMP problems attempted treatment difference least-squares [LS] mean [SE] = 60.3 [12.93], p = 0.0003; PERMP problems correct treatment difference LS mean [SE] = 61.6 [13.16], p = 0.0003). AEs (>10%) during the open-label phase included upper respiratory tract infection, fatigue, upper abdominal pain, headache, decreased appetite, and affect lability.

CONCLUSIONS

AMPH EROS was effective in reducing ADHD symptoms at 30 minutes postdose as indicated by SKAMP-C score improvement, although improvements in PERMP scores at 30 minutes were not statistically significant. AEs were mild or moderate and consistent with those of other extended-release amphetamines.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Preschool-Aged Children

OBJECTIVES

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder defined as a persistent pattern of inactivity and/or hyperactivity that interferes with behavioral function or development. Diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in the preschool-aged population (children 3-5 years old) is more complicated compared with older children because of developmental and physiological differences. This article reviews the available literature regarding the challenges associated with ADHD diagnosis and treatment in preschool-aged children, as well as the unmet needs of preschool-aged children with ADHD.

METHODS

Key considerations for ADHD diagnosis and treatment patterns in preschool-aged children are summarized in this review, including the need for early intervention, the association with comorbidities, and the differences in pharmacokinetic profiles between preschool-aged children and older children.

RESULTS

Efficacy and safety data are lacking, as clinical trial design and execution pose unique challenges in this population. Preschool-aged children often have difficulty with pill swallowing and tolerating phlebotomy necessary for the collection of pharmacokinetic and safety data. However, early diagnosis and treatment are essential to mitigate ADHD symptoms and comorbidities that may develop during childhood and adolescence in patients with persistent ADHD.

CONCLUSION

This review describes the established diagnostic and treatment modalities, along with the unmet needs of preschool-aged children with ADHD.