Analysis of Critical and Redundant Vertices in Controlling Directed Complex Networks Using Feedback Vertex Sets

A practically efficient algorithm for identifying critical control proteins in directed probabilistic biological networks

Network controllability is unifying the traditional control theory with the structural network information rooted in many large-scale biological systems of interest, from intracellular networks in molecular biology to brain neuronal networks. In controllability approaches, the set of minimum driver nodes is not unique, and critical nodes are the most important control elements because they appear in all possible solution sets. On the other hand, a common but largely unexplored feature in network control approaches is the probabilistic failure of edges or the uncertainty in the determination of interactions between molecules. This is particularly true when directed probabilistic interactions are considered. Until now, no efficient algorithm existed to determine critical nodes in probabilistic directed networks. Here we present a probabilistic control model based on a minimum dominating set framework that integrates the probabilistic nature of directed edges between molecules and determines the critical control nodes that drive the entire network functionality. The proposed algorithm, combined with the developed mathematical tools, offers practical efficiency in determining critical control nodes in large probabilistic networks. The method is then applied to the human intracellular signal transduction network revealing that critical control nodes are associated with important biological features and perturbed sets of genes in human diseases, including SARS-CoV-2 target proteins and rare disorders. We believe that the proposed methodology can be useful to investigate multiple biological systems in which directed edges are probabilistic in nature, both in natural systems or when determined with large uncertainties in-silico.

Measuring criticality in control of complex biological networks

Recent controllability analyses have demonstrated that driver nodes tend to be associated to genes related to important biological functions as well as human diseases. While researchers have focused on identifying critical nodes, intermittent nodes have received much less attention. Here, we propose a new efficient algorithm based on the Hamming distance for computing the importance of intermittent nodes using a Minimum Dominating Set (MDS)-based control model. We refer to this metric as criticality. The application of the proposed algorithm to compute criticality under the MDS control framework allows us to unveil the biological importance and roles of the intermittent nodes in different network systems, from cellular level such as signaling pathways and cell-cell interactions such as cytokine networks, to the complete nervous system of the nematode worm C. elegans. Taken together, the developed computational tools may open new avenues for investigating the role of intermittent nodes in many biological systems of interest in the context of network control.

What Makes a Functional Gene Regulatory Network? A Circuit Motif Analysis

One of the key questions in systems biology is to understand the roles of gene regulatory circuits in determining cellular states and their functions. In previous studies, some researchers have inferred large gene networks from genome wide genomics/transcriptomics data using the top-down approach, while others have modeled core gene circuits of small sizes using the bottom-up approach. Despite many existing systems biology studies, there is still no general rule on what sizes of gene networks and what types of circuit motifs a system would need to achieve robust biological functions. Here, we adopt a gene circuit motif analysis to discover four-node circuits responsible for multiplicity (rich in dynamical behavior), flexibility (versatile to alter gene expression), or both. We identify the most reoccurring two-node circuit motifs and the co-occurring motif pairs. Furthermore, we investigate the contributing factors of multiplicity and flexibility for large gene networks of different types and sizes. We find that gene networks of intermediate sizes tend to have combined high levels of multiplicity and flexibility. Our study will contribute to a better understanding of the dynamical mechanisms of gene regulatory circuits and provide insights into rational designs of robust gene circuits in synthetic and systems biology.

Network control principles for identifying personalized driver genes in cancer

To understand tumor heterogeneity in cancer, personalized driver genes (PDGs) need to be identified for unraveling the genotype-phenotype associations corresponding to particular patients. However, most of the existing driver-focus methods mainly pay attention on the cohort information rather than on individual information. Recent developing computational approaches based on network control principles are opening a new way to discover driver genes in cancer, particularly at an individual level. To provide comprehensive perspectives of network control methods on this timely topic, we first considered the cancer progression as a network control problem, in which the expected PDGs are altered genes by oncogene activation signals that can change the individual molecular network from one health state to the other disease state. Then, we reviewed the network reconstruction methods on single samples and introduced novel network control methods on single-sample networks to identify PDGs in cancer. Particularly, we gave a performance assessment of the network structure control-based PDGs identification methods on multiple cancer datasets from TCGA, for which the data and evaluation package also are publicly available. Finally, we discussed future directions for the application of network control methods to identify PDGs in cancer and diverse biological processes.

Inhibitory neurons exhibit high controlling ability in the cortical microconnectome

The brain is a network system in which excitatory and inhibitory neurons keep activity balanced in the highly non-random connectivity pattern of the microconnectome. It is well known that the relative percentage of inhibitory neurons is much smaller than excitatory neurons in the cortex. So, in general, how inhibitory neurons can keep the balance with the surrounding excitatory neurons is an important question. There is much accumulated knowledge about this fundamental question. This study quantitatively evaluated the relatively higher functional contribution of inhibitory neurons in terms of not only properties of individual neurons, such as firing rate, but also in terms of topological mechanisms and controlling ability on other excitatory neurons. We combined simultaneous electrical recording (~2.5 hours) of ~1000 neurons in vitro, and quantitative evaluation of neuronal interactions including excitatory-inhibitory categorization. This study accurately defined recording brain anatomical targets, such as brain regions and cortical layers, by inter-referring MRI and immunostaining recordings. The interaction networks enabled us to quantify topological influence of individual neurons, in terms of controlling ability to other neurons. Especially, the result indicated that highly influential inhibitory neurons show higher controlling ability of other neurons than excitatory neurons, and are relatively often distributed in deeper layers of the cortex. Furthermore, the neurons having high controlling ability are more effectively limited in number than central nodes of k-cores, and these neurons also participate in more clustered motifs. In summary, this study suggested that the high controlling ability of inhibitory neurons is a key mechanism to keep balance with a large number of other excitatory neurons beyond simple higher firing rate. Application of the selection method of limited important neurons would be also applicable for the ability to effectively and selectively stimulate E/I imbalanced disease states.

How small numbers of inhibitory neurons functionally keep balance with large numbers of excitatory neurons in the brain by controlling each other is a fundamental question. Especially, this study quantitatively evaluated a topological mechanism of interaction networks in terms of controlling abilities of individual cortical neurons to other neurons. Combination of simultaneous electrical recording of ~1000 neurons and a quantitative evaluation method of neuronal interactions including excitatory-inhibitory categories, enabled us to evaluate the influence of individual neurons not only about firing rate but also about their relative positions in the networks and controllable ability of other neurons. Especially, the result showed that inhibitory neurons have more controlling ability than excitatory neurons, and such neurons were more often observed in deep layers. Because the limited number of neurons in terms controlling ability were much smaller than neurons based on centrality measure and, of course, more directly selected neurons based on their ability to control other neurons, the selection method of important neurons will help not only to produce realistic computational models but also will help to stimulate brain to effectively treat imbalanced disease states.

Weighted minimum feedback vertex sets and implementation in human cancer genes detection

Background

Recently, many computational methods have been proposed to predict cancer genes. One typical kind of method is to find the differentially expressed genes between tumour and normal samples. However, there are also some genes, for example, ‘dark’ genes, that play important roles at the network level but are difficult to find by traditional differential gene expression analysis. In addition, network controllability methods, such as the minimum feedback vertex set (MFVS) method, have been used frequently in cancer gene prediction. However, the weights of vertices (or genes) are ignored in the traditional MFVS methods, leading to difficulty in finding the optimal solution because of the existence of many possible MFVSs.

Results

Here, we introduce a novel method, called weighted MFVS (WMFVS), which integrates the gene differential expression value with MFVS to select the maximum-weighted MFVS from all possible MFVSs in a protein interaction network. Our experimental results show that WMFVS achieves better performance than using traditional bio-data or network-data analyses alone.

Conclusion

This method balances the advantage of differential gene expression analyses and network analyses, improves the low accuracy of differential gene expression analyses and decreases the instability of pure network analyses. Furthermore, WMFVS can be easily applied to various kinds of networks, providing a useful framework for data analysis and prediction.

Supplementary Information

The online version supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04062-2.

Network controllability analysis of intracellular signalling reveals viruses are actively controlling molecular systems

In recent years control theory has been applied to biological systems with the aim of identifying the minimum set of molecular interactions that can drive the network to a required state. However, in an intra-cellular network it is unclear how control can be achieved in practice. To address this limitation we use viral infection, specifically human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), as a paradigm to model control of an infected cell. Using a large human signalling network comprised of over 6000 human proteins and more than 34000 directed interactions, we compared two states: normal/uninfected and infected. Our network controllability analysis demonstrates how a virus efficiently brings the dynamically organised host system into its control by mostly targeting existing critical control nodes, requiring fewer nodes than in the uninfected network. The lower number of control nodes is presumably to optimise exploitation of specific sub-systems needed for virus replication and/or involved in the host response to infection. Viral infection of the human system also permits discrimination between available network-control models, which demonstrates that the minimum dominating set (MDS) method better accounts for how the biological information and signals are organised during infection by identifying most viral proteins as critical driver nodes compared to the maximum matching (MM) method. Furthermore, the host driver nodes identified by MDS are distributed throughout the pathways enabling effective control of the cell via the high ‘control centrality’ of the viral and targeted host nodes. Our results demonstrate that control theory gives a more complete and dynamic understanding of virus exploitation of the host system when compared with previous analyses limited to static single-state networks.