Evolution of clinical practice guidelines: evidence supporting expanded use of medicines

Are Corporations Re-Defining Illness and Health? The Diabetes Epidemic, Goal Numbers, and Blockbuster Drugs

While pharmaceutical industry involvement in producing, interpreting, and regulating medical knowledge and practice is widely accepted and believed to promote medical innovation, industry-favouring biases may result in prioritizing corporate profit above public health. Using diabetes as our example, we review successive changes over forty years in screening, diagnosis, and treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, which have dramatically expanded the population prescribed diabetes drugs, generating a billion-dollar market. We argue that these guideline recommendations have emerged under pervasive industry influence and persisted, despite weak evidence for their health benefits and indications of serious adverse effects associated with many of the drugs they recommend. We consider pharmaceutical industry conflicts of interest in some of the research and publications supporting these revisions, and in related standard-setting committees and oversight panels. We raise concern over the long-term impact of these multifaceted involvements. Rather than accept industry conflicts of interest as normal, needing only to be monitored and managed, we suggest challenging that normalcy, and ask: what are the real costs of tolerating such industry participation? We urge the development of a broader focus to fully understand and curtail the systemic nature of industry's influence over medical knowledge and practice.

Impact of Guidelines on the Diffusion of Medical Technology: A Case Study of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the UK

INTRODUCTION

Research on clinical practice guidelines as a determinant of the diffusion of medical technology remains sparse. We aim to evaluate the impact of guidelines on the awareness of medical technology, as a proxy of its use, with the example of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

We measured clinician awareness based on Google searches performed for CRT that corresponded with actual CRT implant numbers provided by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). We identified the guideline recommendations published by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) within the UK, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) at the European level, and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association in the United States (US). We specified a dynamic moving average model, with Google searches as the dependent variable and guideline changes as the independent variables.

RESULTS

One guideline change published by NICE in 2007 and two changes released by the US guidelines in 2005 and 2012 were significantly correlated with the Google searches (p = 0.08, p = 0.02, and p = 0.02, respectively). Guideline changes by the ESC had no significant impact. Changes recommending CRT in place of a conventional pacemaker, in patients with atrial fibrillation, and restricting CRT due to contraindication, remained universally uninfluential.

CONCLUSION

The factors associated with a lack of awareness (as a proxy for technology diffusion) in our case study were: a lack of strong clinical evidence that resulted in the moderate strength of a recommendation, a lack of recognition of any externally published recommendation by NICE, and the frequent release of guidelines with minor changes targeting small patient groups. At least in our case, in the absence of NICE guidelines, the US guidelines received more attention than their non-UK European counterparts, even if the former were released after the latter.

Treated disease prevalence and spending per treated case drove most of the growth in health care spending in 1987-2009

Analysis of data from the National Medical Expenditure Survey and the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys from 1987-2009 reinforces previous observations that increased prevalence of treated disease has become the main driver of increased spending on health care in the United States. Higher treated disease prevalence and higher spending per treated case were associated with 50.8 percent and 39.0 percent, respectively, of the spending increase seen in the population ages eighteen and older, while their joint effect accounts for the remaining 10.2 percent. The proportion of increased spending attributable to increased treated prevalence alone is particularly high in the Medicare population: 77.7 percent, compared to 33.5 percent among the privately insured. Moreover, the current findings reveal a substantial contribution to the increase in total spending (10.4 percent) from a doubling of the share of the population considered to be obese and from increases in treatment intensity, a component of spending per treated case (11.9 percent), in 1987-2009. Constraining the cost of health care will require policy options focused on reducing the incidence of disease, as well as improved understanding of the extent to which more aggressive treatments for chronic conditions do, or do not, result in lower morbidity and mortality.

Clinical practice guidelines and practice parameters for the child neurologist

Guidance about how to practice child neurology has been around for decades. Recently, however, clinical practice guidelines, practice parameters, and standardized clinical assessment and management plans are gaining increasing attention. This overview, written for child neurologists, addresses such issues as the following: what are clinical practice guidelines, why are they needed, how are they created, how should they be created, how well are they accepted and adhered to, what influences acceptance and adherence, do guidelines improve care, do they reduce costs, will they be viewed by courts as the standard of care, how can they be updated and improved, and are there better alternatives?

Statin utilization according to indication and age: a Danish cohort study on changing prescribing and purchasing behaviour

OBJECTIVE

Introduced to reduce mortality after myocardial infarction (MI), statins are now recommended for a range of other conditions, including asymptomatic individuals without cardiovascular disease or diabetes. The aim was to describe trends in Danish statin utilization according to indication and age during 1996-2009, and to analyse changing prescribing and purchasing behaviour during time intervals (driver periods) a priori defined by potential influential factors.

METHODS

A nationwide cohort (N=4,998,580) was followed in Danish individual-level registries. Based on a hierarchy of register markers of indications for statin prescribing, we analysed incidence and prevalence of use by age and indication (age ≥ 40). Applying Poisson regression, we calculated Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) of statin treatment for the last year of each driver period, applying the first year as reference.

RESULTS

Treatment prevalence increased from 7/1000 to 187/1000, representing a shift towards lower-level indications and increased relatively more in individuals aged 75+. While treatment prevalence in MI-patients reached 780/1000, asymptomatic individuals represented 50% of incident statin-users in 2009. A marked increase in incidence of statin use occurred during 1999-2003 (IRR=3.05) across all indications, followed by a more moderate rise during 2003-2006 (IRR=1.29) and 2006-2008 (IRR=1.15) - most marked increases in asymptomatic individuals. A sudden decrease was observed in 2009 (IRR=0.82) for all indications and ages.

CONCLUSION

While patent expiry and lower prices most likely boosted the general increase in statin utilization, the gradually altered indication and age pattern seems to be driven by guidelines, influencing both reimbursement rules and general healthcare policies. A media debate on statin side effects may have modified the general attitudes.

The growth in cost per case explains far more of US health spending increases than rising disease prevalence

Some prior research has suggested that health spending for many diseases has been driven more by increases in so-called treated prevalence-the number of people receiving treatment for a given condition-than by increases in cost per case. Our study reached a different conclusion. We examined treated prevalence, clinical prevalence-the number of people with a given disease, treated or not-and cost per case across all medical conditions between 1996 and 2006. Over this period, three-fourths of the increase in real per capita health spending was attributable to growth in cost per case, while treated prevalence accounted for about one-fourth of spending growth. Our evidence suggests that most of the treated-prevalence effect is due to an increase in the share of eligible people being treated rather than an increase in clinical prevalence of diseases. We conclude that efforts to curb health spending should focus more on reining in cost per case.

The impact of ageing and changing utilization patterns on future cardiovascular drug expenditure: a pharmacoepidemiological projection approach

PURPOSE

To develop a method for projecting the impact of ageing and changing drug utilization patterns on future drug expenditure.

METHODS

Applying nationwide registries, prescriptions of three categories of cardiovascular drugs were followed for all Danish residents from 1 January 1996 until 2006. The official Danish population forecast 2006-2015 was applied for projecting the population composition. A previously developed pharmacoepidemiological semi-Markov model was extended to apply for projection of future drug utilization. We either assumed that past trends in model parameters (incidence, discontinuation and drug user mortality) would continue during 2006-2015, or that all model parameters would remain unchanged at their values in 2005. Yearly drug expenditure per user of a particular drug was assumed to remain unchanged. Scenarios of future treatment prevalence with different drug categories were modelled by extrapolating future age- and gender-specific parameter values (treatment incidence, discontinuation and drug user mortality) from historic point estimates and their historic trend.

RESULTS

Provided a continuance of past trends, increasing utilization of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonists and statins translates into a rise in annual expenditure of 176%, mainly explained by increases in treatment incidence. Due to pharmacoepidemiological disequilibrium, unchanged model parameters would imply an increase of 64%, ageing alone 14%.

CONCLUSION

Increasing cardiovascular drug utilization may pose a substantial burden on future health care resources. However, prescribing behaviour is likely to depend on changing clinical guidelines. Despite the limited impact as cost driver, population ageing remains a challenge for future health care services.

Chronic conditions account for rise in Medicare spending from 1987 to 2006

Medicare beneficiaries' medical needs, and where beneficiaries undergo treatment, have changed dramatically over the past two decades. Twenty years ago, most spending growth was linked to intensive inpatient (hospital) services, chiefly for heart disease. Recently, much of the growth has been attributable to chronic conditions such as diabetes, arthritis, hypertension, and kidney disease. These conditions are chiefly treated not in hospitals but in outpatient settings and by patients at home with prescription drugs. Health reform must address changed health needs through evidence-based community prevention, care coordination, and support for patient self-management.

Type 2 diabetes: the many facets of care

A review of Type 2 diabetes mellitus is presented. Lifestyle recommendations with a focus on currently available medications are discussed. A case study involving a patient with diabetes mellitus and a foot ulcer is discussed in relation to current treatment recommendations.

The emergence of clinical practice guidelines

Clinical practice guidelines are now ubiquitous. This article describes the emergence of such guidelines in a way that differs from the two dominant explanations, one focusing on administrative cost-cutting and the other on the need to protect collective professional autonomy. Instead, this article argues that the spread of guidelines represents a new regulation of medical care resulting from a confluence of circumstances that mobilized many different groups. Although the regulation of quality has traditionally been based on the standardization of professional credentials, since the 1960s it has intensified and been supplemented by efforts to standardize the use of medical procedures. This shift is related to the spread of standardization within medicine and especially in research, public health, and large bureaucratic health care organizations.