Anatomic limitations of prostatic urethra in using cylindrical stents

The Bell-Shaped Nitinol Prostatic Stent in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Experience in 108 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy, safety, and durability of the bell-shaped nitinol prostatic stent in the treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic enlargement in otherwise healthy patients.

METHODS

Stents were inserted in an outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. Assessments included maximum urinary flow (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), including quality of life (QoL) item, at baseline and follow-up visits.

RESULTS

108 men were enrolled in the trial. Stents were successfully inserted in 97% of the patients. Spontaneous voiding was achieved in all patients. After one month Qmax (+3.7 ml/s), PVR (-99 ml), IPSS (-12) and QoL (-1.7) all showed statistically significant improvements compared to baseline. Substantial improvements, however, were maintained for only one to two months. The main complications were haematuria (19%), urge incontinence (22%), and migration (15%). The median indwelling time was 105 days. The main reason for removal of stents was worsening of symptoms, which might be attributable to the tilting of stents within the prostatic urethra, found upon removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Insertion of the bell-shaped nitinol prostatic stent temporarily improves voiding parameters and symptom scores. Because of the limited durability, however, the bell-shaped prostatic stent is not suitable for clinical practice.

Experience with urethral stent explantation

PURPOSE

We examined the timing, causes and results of the explantation of UroLume (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minnesota) urethral stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The North American Study Group enrolled 465 patients in a trial of UroLume stent placement, including 69 (14.8% of the series) who required removal of a total of 73 stents (15.6% of stents) in 7 years. The time of explantation, reason for stent removal and local histological findings were determined from patient charts and reviewed in relation to the indication for stent placement.

RESULTS

In patients treated for bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia 23% of the stents were removed, as were 5% of those implanted in patients with bulbar urethral stricture and 22% of those in patients with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (see figure). Of the explantations 43.8% were done during year 1. Migration and/or inappropriate placement was the cause in 38.4% of cases. The most common stent site tissue finding was focal inflammation with a hyperplastic tissue response. Stent specific malignant changes were not observed. Stent removal was feasible with no sequelae. CONCLUSIONS When used appropriately, the UroLume endoprosthesis has a low incidence of failure. Stent removal is technically feasible and options are available for subsequent therapy. Local tissue reaction is minimal.