Durability of results obtained with transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the treatment of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

Thermal ablation and high-temperature thermal therapy: Overview of technology and clinical implementation

High-temperature hyperthermia or thermal therapy is being applied for destruction of cancerous tissue, eradication or reduction of benign tumours and targeted tissue modification and remodelling. Many of these high-temperature technologies provide a minimally-invasive alternative with lower morbidities compared to the traditional surgical procedures. The effects of high-temperature thermal exposure on tissues, examples of heating technology and procedures of clinical practice related to high-temperature thermal therapy are reviewed. This brief review encompasses interstitial, endocavity, intraluminal and external applications of RF, microwave, ultrasound, laser and thermal conduction energy sources. The technology is prevalent and in various levels of advancement, with the move toward more spatially-accurate and controllable heating systems combined with image-guidance and treatment verification warranted, especially for the treatment of cancer.

Long-term results of three different minimally invasive therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison at a single institute

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the efficacy and durability of three different minimally invasive therapies (MIT) for lower urinary symptoms performed at a single institution based on a 5-year prospective cohort study.

METHODS

The pre- and postoperative evaluation was made in 103 patients with the following three MIT options: (i) transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT, n = 34); (ii) transurethral needle ablation (TUNA, n = 29); and (iii) transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU, n = 40).

RESULTS

All three treatments significantly improved the symptom scores up to 2 years after treatment. However, no statistical difference was observed in the efficacy between MIT. The percentage of men requiring the secondary treatment also showed no statistical differences. Cox's proportional hazards multivariate regression model revealed the baseline peak flow rate (Qmax) and total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) but the types of MIT are independent significant factors for determining the long-term clinical results of MIT.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed no statistical differences in either the efficacy or in the durability between the three MIT. The baseline Qmax and total IPSS are the significant factors for determining the long-term results of MIT.

Rotoresection versus transurethral resection of the prostate: short-term evaluation of a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

We compared in a prospective fashion the short-term outcome of rotoresection to transurethral resection of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 patients with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized into 2 groups, rotoresection and transurethral resection of the prostate. Mean+/-SD patient age was 60.76+/-5.85 years in the rotoresection and 64.24+/-6.84 in the transurethral resection groups. All patients had an International Prostate Symptom Score of 8 or more, maximum free flow rate less than 15 ml per second, prostate volume 20 to 100 ml and prostate specific antigen 1 to 4 ng/ml. Pressure flow study revealed bladder outlet obstruction (Schafer's grade 3 or more). Patients were assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months by International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum free flow rate, transrectal ultrasound, pressure flow study, hemoglobin and urinalysis.

RESULTS

At 6 months International Prostate Symptom Score decreased from 26.2+/-4.06 to 5.32+/-1.52 in the rotoresection group and from 22.84+/-4.56 to 7+/-1.4 in the transurethral resection group. Maximum free flow rate increased from 7.87+/-2.24 to 25.29+/-10.39 ml per second in the rotoresection group and from 9.44+/-2.29 to 25.2+/-5.8 ml per second in the transurethral group. Prostate volume decreased from 41.2+/-16.58 to 17.24+/-7.61 ml in the rotoresection group and from 40.6+/-16.93 to 18.28+/-8.75 ml in the transurethral group. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow and Schafer grade decreased from 79.84+/-26.8 cm H2O and 4.24+/-0.97 to 38.8+/-18.8 cm H2O and 1.24+/-0.93 in the rotoresection group, and from 63.04+/-21.08 cm H2O and 3.48+/-0.65 to 34.16+/-12.7 cm H2O and 1+/-0.7 in the transurethral group. Dilutional hyponatremia was higher with transurethral resection of the prostate (p=0.005) but no patient showed manifestations of the transurethral syndrome. Mild stress urinary incontinence was noted in 4 patients in the rotoresection group and in 3 in the transurethral group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotoresection is a safe and effective method of treating bladder outlet obstruction resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia, and its efficacy is comparable to transurethral resection of the prostate.

A 2-year follow-up after rotoresection of the prostate: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success of rotoresection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), after a follow-up of 24 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The 24 patients who were the subject of a previous report were followed for up to 24 months; only one patient was lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean (sd) American Urologic Association-7 score decreased from 20.5 (3.8) before surgery to 1.12 (1.56) at 24 months; the mean maximum urinary flow rate increased from 8.7 (2.1) to 21.8 (8.5) mL/s, and the mean total prostate volume decreased from 36.5 (12.9) to 21 (7.9) mL. Early complications were urinary tract infection in 10 patients and mild stress urinary incontinence in 11. One patient had a urethral stricture and another had a posterior urethral stone at 6 months; both were treated successfully with good urinary flow rates thereafter. At 24 months, 23 patients had sterile urine and were continent.

CONCLUSION

Thus far, rotoresection of the prostate is a safe and effective method for treating BPH. The hospital stay was short and the functional results excellent at up to 24 months.

Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy: Clinical Results after 11 Years of Use

PURPOSE

To evaluate the durability of the effect of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for lower urinary-tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 841 patients with LUTS received TUMT using the Prostatron device at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. Two treatment programs were used: low-energy Program 2.0 and high-energy Program 3.5. A questionnaire, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, and questions about general health status, was sent to all the patients. The mean followup after TUMT was 8.8 years for Program 2.0 and 2.5 years for Program 3.5.

RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, 67% of the patients treated with Program 2.0 were satisfied with the TUMT. During the follow-up period, 37% of patients experienced worsened symptoms, 18% various complications (e.g., hematuria), and 25% transient urinary-tract infection, and 16% went into retention. Secondary treatment (repeat TUMT, transurethral resection, medical therapy) was needed in 32% of patients. The mean IPSS was 13.5, and QoL score decreased to 2.1. With Program 3.5, 82% of the patients were satisfied, with another 17% having increased symptoms, 17% various complication, 25% urinary tract infection, and 26% retention. Only 7% of patients needed secondary treatment. The IPSS and QoL score went down to 11.4 and 1.6, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These long-term data show that TUMT produces durable improvement and, with its safety and low retreatment rate, presents an attractive alternative for patients with LUTS suggestive of BOO.

Catheter-based ultrasound applicators for selective thermal ablation: progress towards MRI-guided applications in prostate

High-temperature thermal therapy is emerging as a feasible treatment option for prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Previous investigations have demonstrated distinct advantages of catheter-based ultrasound technology over other heating modalities for thermal ablation therapies, with significant potential for better spatial control and faster heating times. The purpose of this study was to develop ultrasound devices and techniques specifically for treating prostate cancer in conjunction with magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) to monitor and control treatment progression. Directional transurethral applicators have been designed with arrays of sectored tubular (90 degrees active acoustic sector) or with narrow planar transducer segments and integrated with a flexible delivery catheter with a cooling balloon. This applicator can be rotated within the prostatic urethra to target specific regions during treatment. MRI compatible catheter-cooled interstitial ultrasound applicators with 180 degrees active acoustic sectors were developed specifically to treat the prostate. These applicators may be implanted through the perineum into the posterior portion of the prostate, with their heating energy directed away from the rectum. Both heating strategies were evaluated via biothermal simulations and in vivo experiments within canine prostate (n = 3). During the in vivo studies, MRTI was used to monitor treatment temperatures, cytotoxic thermal doses (t43 > 240 min) and corresponding maximum temperature thresholds (Tmax > 52 degrees C) within three imaging planes simultaneously. Urethral and endorectal cooling was employed with both treatment strategies to provide further protection of the urethral mucosa and rectum from thermal damage. Results using the transurethral applicators demonstrated that narrow zones of coagulation (approximately 30 degrees sector for planar, approximately 90 degrees for tubular), extending up to 20 mm from the urethra to the periphery of the prostate gland, could be produced within 10-15 min. Further, rotation of the applicator during treatment could be used to destroy larger regions in the prostate. Experiments using multiple interstitial directional applicators (approximately 180 degrees active sectors), implanted within the posterior margin of the prostate with the energy directed away from the rectum, produced contiguous zones of thermal coagulation which extended from the posterior prostate toward the anterior-lateral periphery of the gland. Both transurethral and interstitial treatment strategies demonstrated significant potential for thermal ablation of localized prostate cancer, particularly when MRTI is used to guide and assess treatment.

Transurethral Electrovaporization of the Prostate: Is It Any Better Than Standard Transurethral Prostatectomy? 5-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

At present, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is regarded as the most effective treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). In the present randomized study, we compared TURP with transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate (TUVP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 77 BPH patients who underwent operation between 1996 and 2001 were included in the study, 40 who had TURP with a standard resection loop and 32 who had TUVP with a Spike loop. All available patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 1 month and 3 months after the operation (N=73), and 5 years after the operation (N=44). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), sexual function questionnaire, uroflowmetry (Qmax), postvoiding residual urine volume (PVR), and transrectal ultrasonography were used. In addition, postoperative serum sodium concentration, serum hematocrit, duration of catheterization, and operation time were compared.

RESULTS

In the TUVP group, the mean IPSS decreased from 17.3 to 6.5, the PVR from 88 to 35 mL, and the prostate volume from 39 to 24 cc, while the Qmax increased from 6.3 to 12.9 mL/sec and the average flow from 2.6 to 7.9 mL/sec. In the TURP group, the mean IPSS decreased from 17.6 to 6.1, the PVR from 95 to 38 mL, and the prostate volume from 38 to 23 cc, while the Qmax increased from 5.9 to 13.2 mL/sec and the average flow from 2.4 to 8.3 mL/sec. Thus, significant improvements were observed in both groups, and the differences between them 5 years later were not significant P>0.05). Postoperative serum hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly lower in the TURP group (P>0.05). However, no difference was seen in serum sodium concentrations. Also, there was no difference in the duration of the operations. The catheterization period was 22+/-5.7 hours in the TUVP group, while it was 75.7+/-10.5 hours in the TURP group (P<0.001). When morbidities observed during follow-up were evaluated, no significant difference was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The TUVP procedure is as effective as TURP with similar morbidity. The advantages of TUVP are that the urethral catheter is withdrawn earlier, hospitalization is shorter, and bleeding is less. Its disadvantage is that tissue cannot be sampled for histologic diagnosis. In our opinion, in order to exploit the advantages of this technique, TUVP should be preferred in elderly patients without any suspicion of prostate cancer for whom bleeding during operation is a source of risk.

Transurethral ultrasound applicators with directional heating patterns for prostate thermal therapy: in vivo evaluation using magnetic resonance thermometry

A catheter-based transurethral ultrasound applicator with angularly directional heating patterns has been designed for prostate thermal therapy and evaluated in canine prostate in vivo using MRI to monitor and assess performance. The ultrasound transducer array (3.5 mm diameter tubular transducers, 180 degrees active sectors, approximately 7.5 MHz) was integrated to a flexible delivery catheter (4 mm OD), and encapsulated within an expandable balloon (35 mm x 10 mm OD, 80 ml min(-1) ambient water) for coupling and cooling of the prostatic urethra. These devices were used to thermally coagulate targeted portions of the canine prostate (n = 2) while using MR thermal imaging (MRTI) to monitor the therapy. MRI was also used for target definition, positioning of the applicator, and evaluation of target viability post-therapy. MRTI was based upon the complex phase-difference mapping technique using an interleaved gradient echo-planar imaging sequence with lipid suppression. MRTI derived temperature distributions, thermal dose exposures, T1-contrast enhanced MR images, and histology of sectioned prostates were used to define destroyed tissue zones and characterize the three-dimensional heating patterns. The ultrasound applicators produced approximately 180 degrees directed zones of thermal coagulation within targeted tissue which extended 15-20 mm radially to the outer boundary of the prostate within 15 min. Transducer activation lengths of 17 mm and 24 mm produced contiguous zones of coagulation extending axially approximately 18 mm and approximately 25 mm from base to apex, respectively. Peak temperatures around 90 degrees C were measured, with approximately 50 degrees C-52 degrees C corresponding to outer boundary t43 = 240 min at approximately 15 min treatment time. These devices are MRI compatible, and when coupled with multiplanar MRTI provide a means for selectively controlling the length and sector angle of therapeutic thermal treatment in the prostate.

Long-term treatment outcomes of CoreTherm microwave feedback thermotherapy

The gold standard for definitive management of symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Despite its efficacy, TURP has significant morbidity/mortality concerns such as hemorrhage and transurethral resection syndrome. This is especially worrisome for the medically high-risk patient, but the high rates of retrograde ejaculation found with TURP also pose a problem for young patients. A minimally invasive, outpatient alternative to TURP that has long-term efficacy, low morbidity/mortality, and provides a cost-effective advantage is in high demand. This review article discusses microwave thermotherapy as such an option and reports the long-term experience with the CoreTherm (CoreTherm Operations AB, Sweden) device.

Short-term results of rotoresection for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective study of safety and efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of rotoresection as a method for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled between September 2000 and May 2001 (mean age 61 years, sd 6, range 52-78). All patients had a symptom score (AUA) of > 12, a maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) of < 12 mL/s, a prostate of 20-80 mL and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 0-4 ng/mL. Patients with prostate or bladder cancer, a PSA level of > 10 ng/mL, previous prostate surgery, previous pelvic surgery, urethral stricture, active urinary tract infection (UTI), acute urine retention, neuropathic bladder and a serum creatinine of > 1.8 mg/mL were excluded. The adenoma was resected using the Rotoresect system (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany); the mean (sd) operative duration was 45.2 (9.9) min. The catheter was removed after 1.97 (0.3) days and patients assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery by an AUA score, Qmax, blood haemoglobin level, urine analysis and transrectal ultrasonography; all patients but two completed the follow-up.

RESULTS

At 6 months the mean (sd) AUA score decreased from 20.5 (3.8) to 1.6 (1.3), the Qmax increased from 8.7 (2) to 25.3 (12.6) mL/s, and the total prostate volume decreased from 36.5 (13) to 20.5 (7.8) mL. The mean initial haemoglobin level was 138 (10) g/L and at 1 month was 135 (12) g/L. No patient required a blood transfusion or had signs of transurethral resection syndrome. Early complications included UTI and mild stress incontinence in 10 and 11 patients, respectively. At 6 months these patients had sterile urine and were continent. Two patients had a urethral stricture and posterior urethral stone at 6 months and were treated successfully.

CONCLUSION

In the short-term, rotoresection is a safe and effective method for treating BPH; there was no significant blood loss or resection syndrome. The hospital stay was short, with excellent functional results.

Efficacy and safety of intraprostatic temperature-controlled microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a prospective, open-label, single-center study with 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Different devices for transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) are currently available for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Prostalund Feedback Treatment (PLFT), which continuously records the intraprostatic temperature, and its impact on sexual function of the patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 41 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to BPH were entered in this prospective open-label, single-center study of PLFT. The initial evaluation was performed according to a standard protocol. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), bother score, sexual function, and peak flow rate (Qmax) were recorded. In addition, determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and measurement of residual urine volume were repeated at the 6- and 12-month visits. All adverse events were also recorded. Patients with IPSS of < or =7, > or =50% improvement in IPSS from baseline, a Qmax of > or =15 mL/sec, or > or =50% improvement in Qmax from baseline were judged responders to the treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of the patients completed the 12-month visit. The response rate was 88% (29 of 33 patients). There was a statistically significant decrease in IPSS at the 12-month visit, the mean IPSS being 7.1 v 21.9 at baseline (P<0.001). The mean IPSS was 10.3 and 7.6 at the 3- and 6-months' follow-up, respectively. The bother score presented a similar improvement, with a decrease from a mean of 4.2 at baseline to a mean of 1.4 after 12 months (P<0.001). The mean Qmax improved from 8.4 mL/sec at baseline to 15.9 mL/sec, 19.2 mL/sec, and 17.8 mL/sec at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (P<0.001). The mean change in prostate volume, as determined by TRUS, was 16 mL at 6 months and 19 mL at 12 months (P<0.001). The procedure was well tolerated. The mean post-treatment catheterization time was 17.90 days. Bladder spasms and urinary tract infection were the most common adverse events. Coitus ability remained practically unchanged after treatment (from 71% to 74.3%), but the number of patients with ejaculation decreased (from 78% to 51.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that PLFT is an effective and safe treatment for most patients with BPH.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: morbidity in a series of 206 patients

OBJECTIVES

To review the complications associated with 206 holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) procedures. HoLEP is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of HoLEPs performed from April 1, 1999 to October 1, 2001. Patients with previous diagnoses of prostate carcinoma or who had undergone HoLEP after admission for unrelated problems were excluded. Demographic, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative data were recorded to determine the incidence of complications. Patients were also contacted by telephone or mailed surveys for documentation of longer term complications.

RESULTS

The mean age and procedure time was 70.5 years (range 45 to 91) and 133.6 minutes (range 25 to 473), respectively. The mean specimen weight was 68.2 g (range 3 to 376), with 20 (9.7%) of 206 patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. The mean hospital stay was 1.1 days, with 86.9% of patients discharged after an overnight stay without a catheter. Two patients required postoperative transfusions (1.0%). No deaths, major complications (myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism), or transurethral resection syndrome episodes occurred. Intraoperative complications consisted of three capsular perforations (1.5%), one bladder neck false passage (0.5%), four incomplete morcellations (1.9%), and four minor bladder mucosal morcellation injuries (1.9%). Of 206 patients, 173 (84.0%) provided follow-up data (mean 19.0 +/- 8.4 months), allowing documentation of longer term complications, including five clot retention episodes (2.4%), five urethral strictures (2.4%), eight bladder neck contractures (3.9%), and 16 patients requiring re-catheterization (7.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP can be performed with minimal complication risks and blood loss. Patients can expect an overnight hospital stay and discharge without an indwelling catheter.

Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral prostate resection for treating benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized trial with 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) is as effective and as safe as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The treatment of choice for bladder outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia is TURP. However, ILC is a less invasive outpatient procedure that may be as effective and safe as TURP.

METHODS

In a multicenter randomized trial at six U.S. tertiary care hospitals, we treated 72 men with bladder outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia with either TURP (n = 35) or ILC (n = 37). The outcome measures were peak flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen levels, symptom and quality-of-life indexes, sexual function, and adverse event rates. Measurements were taken at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

At 2 years, the TURP patients had better median peak flow rates, but not significantly so (range 16.5 to 13.9 mL/s, 95% confidence interval for the 2.6 mL/s difference of -0.4 to 7.6). The median scores on the symptom indexes and quality-of-life measures were similarly improved in both groups. Of 37 ILC patients, 6 (16%) were retreated with TURP in the first year. Sexual function declined in the TURP group but remained stable in the ILC group. The adverse event rates were similar, although the events were more serious in the TURP group.

CONCLUSIONS

ILC compares respectably with TURP. Given the advantages of an outpatient procedure, similar results in symptom reduction and quality-of-life measures, and less severe adverse effects, ILC can be an acceptable alternative to TURP.

High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy: symptomatic vs urodynamic success

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the subjective and objective treatment results of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and investigate the possible variables for predicting symptomatic and/or urodynamic success.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1998 and October 2000, 40 men with BPH underwent high-energy TUMT using the Targis device (Urologix, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Evaluation after treatment included a clinical determination of the symptom score, a urodynamic assessment by peak flow rate and pressure-flow, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transrectal ultrasonography and endoscopy. The objective and subjective success was correlated with several variables before, during and after treatment.

RESULTS

All patients completed at least 1 year of follow-up after TUMT as monotherapy. The symptom score improved from a median (range) of 20.5 (11-28) initially to 9 (0-28) (P < 0.001). Twenty-two patients (55%) had a marked and 11 (28%) a moderate response, giving an overall subjective success rate of 83%. Similarly, there was a significant improvement in peak flow rate, from 9.2 (4.4-13.4) to 15 (3.3-22.9) mL/s (P < 0.001). Twenty-one patients (53%) had a maximum flow rate of > 15 mL/s while in eight (20%) it was 10-15 mL/s. Only 20 patients changed from unobstructed on the pressure-flow nomogram, i.e. an overall objective success rate of 50%. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI 1 week after treatment showed a median (range) perfusion defect of 20.7 (5.5-76.6)% of the total gland volume. Despite this persisting in all patients, a well-defined cavity was apparent in only in seven (18%) at the final evaluation. Cystoscopy 1 month after therapy showed evidence of necrotic tissue occupying the prostatic fossa in all patients. Younger patients were more likely to be urodynamically successful, and a higher grade of obstruction predicted symptomatic success.

CONCLUSION

High-energy TUMT can induce considerable necrosis of the prostate, as shown by MRI and cystoscopy. Although there was an adequate improvement in most patients' symptoms, there was a successful urodynamic change to unobstructed in only half the patients. Younger patients and those with a higher grade of obstruction were more likely to have urodynamic and symptomatic success, respectively.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with the Targis System: a single-centre study on 78 patients with acute urinary retention and poor general health

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the Targis System in men presenting with acute urinary retention, high prostate volume and high operative risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 1997 and March 2001, a total of 78 patients in poor general health status presenting with large prostate glands and acute urinary retention secondary to BPH were treated with the Targis TUMT device. Mean age, mean prostate volume, and the percentage of patients who were able to urinate spontaneously after the procedure as well as mean peak and average flow rates and mean residual urine volume were evaluated.

RESULTS

68 (87.1%) of the 78 patients were able to urinate spontaneously three months after the procedure. In 5 (7.3%) of the 68 patients urinary retention recurred within two years. Following treatment, the mean peak flow rate in the 68 successfully treated patients was 11.1 ml/s, while the mean postvoid residual volume was 46 ml.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data we recommend transurethral thermotherapy using the Targis System for patients in poor general health presenting with urinary retention and prostate volumes of more than 35 cc in whom TURP is not possible.

Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: is it any better than conventional transurethral resection of the prostate?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate (TUVP), compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), as a treatment for men with symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 235 men with symptomatic BPE in four hospitals in the South-East of England were randomized to TUVP (115) and TURP (120). Patients were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), EuroQol and sexual function questionnaire, uroflowmetry, ultrasonographic measurement of residual urine volume, pressure-flow urodynamics and transrectal ultrasonography.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the objective and subjective outcome after TURP and TUVP. The latter was associated with a lower transfusion rate than TURP but this did not result in an overall reduction in complications. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay. Overall, the two operations produced equivalent results and equivalent complication rates.

CONCLUSION

TUVP is an effective treatment for symptomatic BPE, with results equivalent to TURP. TUVP has not led to the expected reduction in early postoperative morbidity or shorter hospital stays.

Thermotherapy and thermoablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

From all the available thermoablative methods for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, transurethral microwave thermotherapy is considered as standard in minimally invasive management. The literature is enriched by several new studies on transurethral microwave thermotherapy, and thus this review presents up-to-date information about thermotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

New studies have provided significant information regarding differences in outcome for devices with different protocols and selection criteria, confirming the superiority of high-energy programmes. Furthermore, monitoring of the intraprostatic temperature promises better clinical results by means of individualization of the treatment. Long-term results have been available and allow the evaluation of the fundamental issue of treatment durability. Improvement after high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy remains durable for more than 2.5 years. Randomized studies comparing this treatment with other established therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia, including medical treatment and transurethral resection of the prostate, have also contributed to an evaluation of the morbidity, and costs of treatment. Clinical outcomes with transurethral microwave thermotherapy are in the range of those obtained with transurethral resection of the prostate and are superior to those of medical management. Retreatment after transurethral resection of the prostate emerges because of complications following the procedure, whereas retreatment after transurethral microwave thermotherapy is as a result of treatment failure. In addition, the rate of failure of medical management is almost seven times higher than that for transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Thus, the latter seems to play a dominant role in the economic models used to assess the cost-efficiency of different treatment modalities for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

SUMMARY

The recent innovations in high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy provide better and more durable clinical outcomes and lower morbidity, and strengthen its position as an established treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, there is always room for improvement, so further research on therapeutic protocols, treatment monitoring and selection criteria are to be welcomed.

Finasteride in the treatment of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia affects older men. This systematic review determined efficacy and adverse effects of finasteride.

REVIEW METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, reference lists of reports, and reviews were searched for randomised, double-blind trials of finasteride in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Outcomes included symptom score, urinary flow rate, prostate volume, discontinuation, and adverse effects. Relative risk and NNT or NNH were calculated for dichotomous data. Sensitivity analyses assessed influences of baseline symptom severity, initial prostate volume, a dominating trial, and previous interventions.

RESULTS

Three trials had active controls and 19 had placebo. In placebo-controlled trials, 8820 patients received finasteride 5 mg and 5909 placebo over 3-48 months. Over 48 months finasteride produced greater improvements in total symptom score, maximum urinary flow rate, and prostate volume. Significantly more sexual dysfunction, impotence, ejaculation disorder and decreased libido occurred with finasteride at 12 months; the NNH for any sexual dysfunction at 12 months was 14. Significantly fewer men treated with finasteride experienced acute retention or had surgery at 24 or 48 months than with placebo; at 12 months the NNT was 49 (31 to 112) to avoid one acute urinary retention and 31 (21 to 61) to avoid one surgery. Sensitivity analyses showed benefit with finasteride 5 mg to be constant irrespective of the initial prostate volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Information from many patients in studies of high quality showed beneficial effects of finasteride in terms of symptoms, flow rate and prostate volume. More utility would result if patient centred outcomes were reported in dichotomous form.

Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the new millennium: long-term data

Over the last decade, a number of minimally invasive therapies have been investigated for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Most of these therapies use thermal energy to ablate prostatic tissue. The major common problem with all these new minimally invasive therapies has been the lack of long-term data concerning efficacy, re-intervention rates and side-effects. We present here the available long-term data on these alternative minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia and their current place in the urologist's armamentarium.