High-energy microwave thermotherapy in patients in urinary retention

Mid-term functional outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a single centre experience

For large prostate volume, open simple prostatectomy (OSP) or holmium laser enucleation are the gold standard surgical treatment medical therapy failure. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has recently been proposed as an alternative to OSP and endoscopic techniques. Our objective was to describe our extraperitoneal RASP technique for patients with benign prostate obstruction (BPO), and to report on perioperative and mid-term functional outcomes. Data were collected prospectively for all consecutive patients who underwent RASP in our high-volume tertiary hospital over a 6-year period. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and uroflow findings were compared before and after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were also assessed. Forty-seven patients were included in the study. There was no intraoperative incident and no blood transfusion was needed after surgery. Median time to bladder catheter removal was 4 days and patients were discharged the day after. Within 90 postoperative days, 6 patients (12%) experienced at least one complication, all low-grade except one (2.1%) which was Clavien IIIa grade. By univariate analysis, the only risk factor for postoperative complications was the Charlson comorbidity index (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = [1.1-4.7], p = 0.04). At 12 months, a significant improvement IPSS and uroflow rate was observed. No patient reported stress urinary incontinence. Extraperitoneal RASP appears to be a safe and effective technique for men with LUTS related to large BPO. RASP is less invasive than OSP and wide diffusion of the robot-system could lead to the rapid implementation of RASP as a treatment for large prostate.

Is Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate a Good Surgical Alternative in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management? A Review Article

Several therapeutic approaches such as holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) have been introduced to relieve bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Compared with other techniques including the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and simple open prostatectomy, HoLEP results in a shorter hospital stay and catheterization time and fewer blood loss and transfusions. HoLEP is a size-independent treatment option for BPH with average gland size from 36 g to 170 g. HoLEP is a safe procedure in patients receiving an anticoagulant and has no significant influence on the hemoglobin level. Also, HoLEP is an easy and safe technique in patients with a prior history of prostate surgery and a need for retreatment because of adenoma regrowth. The postoperative erectile dysfunction rate of patients treated with HoLEP is similar to TURP or open prostatectomy and about 77% of these patients experience loss of ejaculation. Patients with transitional zone volume less than 30 mL may suffer from persistent stress urinary incontinence following HoLEP so other surgical techniques like bipolar TURP are a good choice for these patients. In young patients, considering HoLEP with high prostate-specific antigen density and a negative standard template prostate biopsy, multiparametric MRI needs to be considered to exclude prostate cancer.

Water vapor thermal therapy to alleviate catheter-dependent urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia

Background

Water vapor thermal therapy utilizes convectively delivered thermal energy to target ablation of obstructive prostatic tissue. We report results of this thermal therapy for relief of nonneurogenic complete urinary retention associated with BPH.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 38 catheter-dependent men with complete urinary retention consecutively enrolled in a registry in two centers: median age 75.5 years and multiple comorbidities, median prostate volume 58.5 cc (23–153), median 2 failed trials without catheter (TWOCs), and median catheter dependency 3 months (0.3–35). The Rezūm™ System thermal therapy procedure was performed in an ambulatory surgery center with conscious sedation or an office procedure room with a modified periprostatic block. Water vapor injections were customized to the configuration of the hyperplastic gland, including median lobe and/or enlarged central zone.

Results

Of the 38 treated patients, one was lost to follow-up and 26 of 37 (70.3%) voided spontaneously (mean of 1.6 ± 0.8 TWOCs) and were catheter free a median of 26 days (range 4–65) after the procedure; 18 of these 26 (69%) patients discontinued BPH medications. No significant differences in age, prostate volume, number of water vapor injections, or presence of the median lobe were associated with predicting a successful treatment outcome. Duration of follow-up for 20 catheter-free patients was a median of 475 days or 15.8 months (140–804 days); six patients were followed a median of 31.5 days (0–60). Adverse events were infrequent, mild, and resolved quickly including dysuria in five patients (13%), gross hematuria in four (10.5%), and UTIs in two (2.6%) with indwelling catheters.

Conclusions

Water vapor thermal therapy may provide an effective and safe alternative to surgical treatment in this group of catheter-dependent patients in complete urinary retention.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy treatment of chronic urinary retention in patients unsuitable for surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of chronic urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients unsuitable for surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study enrolled 124 patients with chronic urinary retention due to BPH. The median age was 80 years (61-92 years). Of the enrolled patients, 77 (62%) were assessed by an anaesthesiologist as being unsuitable for surgery owing to cardiac, pulmonary, neurological or other diseases. Overall, 115 patients (93%) had an indwelling catheter. The remaining nine patients (7%) performed clean intermittent self-catheterization. The treatment was performed under local anaesthesia in the outpatient department using the ProstaLund Coretherm Device. At the 6-month follow-up, the Danish version of the International Prostate Symptom Score (DAN-PSS), postvoiding residual volume and urinary peak flow were measured. Improvement in quality of life was also registered.

RESULTS

The success of TUMT was assessed by looking at the percentage of patients relieved of their catheter and by the improvement in quality of life. Overall, 77% of patients were relieved of their catheter and 79% reported an improvement in their quality of life.

CONCLUSION

In this study, both the median age and the percentage of patients unsuitable for surgery were larger than in previous studies. Despite this, TUMT relieved 77% of their catheter and 79% reported an improvement in their quality of life. This study shows that TUMT is an effective treatment for patients unsuitable for surgery and with chronic urinary retention.

Durability of 30-minute high-energy transurethral microwave therapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a study of 213 patients with and without urinary retention

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the durability of transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) Prostasoft 3.5 for the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with the 30-minute protocol.

METHODS

A total of 213 patients (45 with urinary retention) were treated with TUMT Prostasoft 3.5. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) score, and maximal flow rate (Qmax) were assessed at baseline and at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The overall mean follow-up period was 33.9 months, with a maximum of 65 months. Patients without retention had significant improvement (P <0.0001) in the Qmax for up to 4 years (from 8.5 to 13.2 mL/s). The mean IPSS had decreased significantly from 20.3 to 12.2 at 5 years (P <0.0001). Similarly, the mean QOL score improved significantly during follow-up (P <0.0001). In the retention group, analysis showed that the clinical outcomes in terms of Qmax, IPSS, and QOL score remained stable during the follow-up period. Retreatment was required for 48 patients without urinary retention (28.6%) and 17 patients with retention (37.8%). The corresponding Kaplan-Meier cumulative retreatment risk at 5 years was estimated to be 42.3% and 58.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our long-term data have indicated that the IPSS and QOL score remained improved in responders compared with their pretreatment scores 5 years after the 30-minute TUMT protocol and the Qmax remained significantly increased for up to 4 years. However, a significant number of patients required additional treatment, with those in retention before TUMT at a greater risk.

Efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in alleviating medically refractory urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) in treating patients with medically refractory complete urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Between April 2000 and July 2003, 39 patients in urinary retention due to BPH were treated with HE-TUMT. A Foley catheter was reinserted after HE-TUMT and removed at 3 weeks for a voiding trial. Patients unable to void were recatheterized, and voiding trials were repeated at 2-week intervals. Patients were evaluated according to history and physical examination, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, cystourethroscopy, International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, peak uroflow, and postvoid residual. Success was defined as the ability to urinate after HE-TUMT without the need for further intervention.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SD) patient age was 72 +/- 9.3 years. Mean follow-up period was 18 +/- 10.2 months. Twenty patients (51%) were characterized as American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or higher. The mean prostate volume was 75.2 +/- 57.6 cm3. The mean length of time that patients were dependent on indwelling Foley catheters before HE-TUMT was 9.6 +/- 14.2 weeks. Thirty-two patients were able to void after HE-TUMT, for an overall success rate of 82%. Patients voiding successfully after HE-TUMT had a mean of 1.6 +/- 0.8 voiding trials and required catheters after HE-TUMT for a mean period of 4.1 +/- 2 weeks. Only 6 (15%) of the patients who were voiding were able to stop their medication for BPH.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an encouraging success rate with HE-TUMT in relieving urinary retention in patients with BPH, including those with large prostate volumes. It is an acceptable option for patients who are considered high risk for surgery. Several patients required multiple voiding trials before spontaneous urination, which suggests that improvements in bladder outlet obstruction might require a prolonged period after HE-TUMT. Finally, many patients might require continued use of medications after HE-TUMT.

Histological changes of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: clinical implications

PURPOSE

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is near universal in aging men, creating tremendous costs in morbidity and surgical treatment. In the last decade numerous nonsurgical minimally invasive methods have emerged for ablation of prostatic tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the recently published English language literature on minimally invasive techniques for treating BPH and cancer with an emphasis on histopathological findings.

RESULTS

We compared the spectrum of contemporary minimally invasive treatments for BPH and cancer, with an emphasis on histopathological results. Clinical results were summarized briefly for each treatment method. These procedures ablate tissue by thermal, cryogenic, chemical or enzymatic injury. The 5-year results for some techniques were promising, although long-term durability is still uncertain, and other methods were in preclinical or early clinical stages. Invariably the treated tissue was devitalized with a thin border of granulation tissue and fibrosis. These procedures have applications for BPH and prostate cancer, although some studies are limited to only 1 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive procedures show promise of a durable replacement for surgical resection.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with the Targis System: a single-centre study on 78 patients with acute urinary retention and poor general health

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the Targis System in men presenting with acute urinary retention, high prostate volume and high operative risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 1997 and March 2001, a total of 78 patients in poor general health status presenting with large prostate glands and acute urinary retention secondary to BPH were treated with the Targis TUMT device. Mean age, mean prostate volume, and the percentage of patients who were able to urinate spontaneously after the procedure as well as mean peak and average flow rates and mean residual urine volume were evaluated.

RESULTS

68 (87.1%) of the 78 patients were able to urinate spontaneously three months after the procedure. In 5 (7.3%) of the 68 patients urinary retention recurred within two years. Following treatment, the mean peak flow rate in the 68 successfully treated patients was 11.1 ml/s, while the mean postvoid residual volume was 46 ml.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data we recommend transurethral thermotherapy using the Targis System for patients in poor general health presenting with urinary retention and prostate volumes of more than 35 cc in whom TURP is not possible.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: first experiences in Poland

OBJECTIVE

To present early experiences in Poland with high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HeTUMT), considered as a serious alternative to surgery in managing benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients were treated in two centres using a commercial TUMT system. The patients were assessed at 5-6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment, evaluating subjective complaints, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary flow rate and postvoid residual volume.

RESULTS

A complete follow-up was available in 44 patients; most had symptomatic improvement 3 months after HeTUMT but it was slightly less pronounced after 6 months. The improvement in objective variables increased up to 6 months after HeTUMT. There was > or = 50% improvement in subjective complaints in 43% of the patients, in urinary flow rate in 25% and in residual urine in half. Two patients required re-treatment for a urethral stricture and ineffective HeTUMT.

CONCLUSIONS

HeTUMT may be a useful treatment for BPH but the outcome for an individual patient seems to be unpredictable. The indications for TUMT should be reviewed individually for each patient.

Mediating transurethral microwave thermotherapy by intraprostatic and periprostatic injections of mepivacaine epinephrine: effects on treatment time, energy consumption, and patient comfort

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Profound intraprostatic blood flow may complicate reaching a therapeutic temperature in the prostate during transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A retrospective survey is presented describing the effect of intraprostatic and periprostatic administration of mepivacaine epinephrine on treatment time, intraprostatic blood flow, energy delivery, and patient comfort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen consecutive obstructed patients with lower urinary tract symptoms attributable to BPH received TUMT (ProstaLund Feedback Treatment). In order to improve patient comfort, injections of 10 mL of 0.5% mepivacaine epinephrine were administered in three locations into the prostate prior to treatment. The results were compared with those of a reference group consisting of 35 consecutive patients who had received ProstaLund Feedback Treatment without administration of mepivacaine epinephrine.

RESULTS

Patients who received intraprostatic mepivacaine epinephrine had a shorter treatment time (32+/-9 minutes v 61+/-6 minutes), required less energy (65+/-27 kJ v 172+/-32 kJ), and had a lower calculated intraprostatic blood flow (13+/-5 units/minute v 26+/-12 units/minute) than the reference group. Patients receiving mepivacaine epinephrine also required less analgesic medication during the treatment. The clinical outcome in terms of symptom scores and peak uroflow rates appeared to be similar for the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Intraprostatic injection of mepivacaine epinephrine prior to TUMT seems to have beneficial effects. It may represent an important improvement of thermotherapy and enable successful treatment of those patients who previously failed secondary to a profound intraprostatic blood flow.

Morphological and biological predictors for treatment outcome of transurethral microwave thermotherapy

The proliferation of prostatic tissue as a result of ageing typically leads to prostatic enlargement, which often causes obstruction of urine outflow from the bladder, clinically lower urinary tract symptoms, detrusor instability, incomplete bladder emptying, urinary infection, and finally acute urinary retention. The first approach to therapy depending on the severity of the symptoms is usually medical management (phytotherapy, alpha-blockers, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors) before surgical procedures are performed. The reference standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia is transurethral resection of the prostate, although the introduction of minimally invasive alternatives such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy has led to a new era in surgical management. Suitable patients must be selected carefully on the basis of individual parameters that predict a favourable result.