How Can Lymphocele Development Be Prevented After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy?

Comparison of peritoneal interposition flaps and sealants for prevention of lymphocele after robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a systematic review, meta-analysis, Bayesian network meta-analysis, and meta-regression

Lymphocele is one of the most common complications after radical prostatectomy. Multiple authors have proposed the use of vessel sealants or peritoneal interposition techniques as preventive interventions. This study aimed to aggregate and analyze the available literature on different interventions which seek to prevent lymphocele through a Bayesian Network. A systematic review was performed to identify prospective studies evaluating strategies for lymphocele prevention after robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Meta-regression was used to determine coefficient of change and adjust for pelvic lymph node dissection extent. Ten studies providing data from 2211 patients were included. 1097 patients received an intervention and 1114 patients served as controls. Interposition with fenestration had the lowest risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.14 [0.04, 0.50], p = 0.003). All interventions, except sealants or patches, had significant decreased odds of lymphocele rates. Meta-analysis of all the included studies showed a decreased risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.42 [0.33, 0.53], p < 0.00001) for the intervention group. Perivesical fixation and interposition with fenestration appear to be effective interventions for reducing the overall incidence of lymphocele.

Peritoneal Flap for Lymphocele Prophylaxis Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Lymph Node Dissection: The Randomised Controlled Phase 3 PELYCAN Trial

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic lymphoceles (SLCs) after transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are common. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the impact of peritoneal flaps (PFs) on lymphocele (LC) reduction is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

To show that addition of PFs leads to a reduction of postoperative SLCs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

An investigator-initiated, prospective, parallel, double-blinded, adaptive, phase 3 RCT was conducted. Recruitment took place from September 2019 until December 2021; 6-month written survey-based follow-up was recorded. Stratification was carried out according to potential LC risk factors (extended PLND, diabetes mellitus, and anticoagulation) and surgeons; 1:1 block randomisation was used. Surgeons were informed about allocation after completion of the last surgical step.

INTERVENTION

To create PFs, the ventral peritoneum was incised bilaterally and fixated to the pelvic floor.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was SLCs. Secondary endpoints included asymptomatic lymphoceles (ALCs), perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In total, 860 men were screened and 551 randomised. Significant reductions of SLCs (from 9.1% to 3.7%, p = 0.005) and ALCs (27.2% to 10.3%, p < 0.001) over the follow-up period of 6 mo were observed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Operating time was 11 min longer (p < 0.001) in the intervention group; no significant differences in amount (80 vs 103, p = 0.879) and severity (p = 0.182) of postoperative complications (excluding LCs) were observed. The survey-based follow-up might be a limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest RCT evaluating PF creation for LC prevention and met its primary endpoint, the reduction of SLCs. The results were consistent among all subgroup analyses including ALCs. Owing to the subsequent reduction of burden for patients and the healthcare system, establishing PFs should become the new standard of care.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A new technique-creation of bilateral peritoneal flaps-was added to the standard procedure of robotic-assisted prostatectomy for lymph node removal. It was safe and decreased lymphocele development, a common postoperative complication and morbidity. Hence, it should become a standard procedure.

A Peritoneal Purse-String Suture Prevents Symptomatic Lymphoceles in Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

The retzius-sparing approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been increasingly adopted. Symptomatic lymphoceles are a widespread complication of RARP with pelvic lymph node dissection. Here, we present a new technique, the peritoneal purse-string suture (PPSS), that seems to reduce the rate of symptomatic lymphoceles following retzius-sparing RARP with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND).

METHODS

The radical prostatectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy are performed through three separate peritoneal openings. The PPSS uses a single suture in a way similar to a purse-string suture; the openings of both lymphadenectomy fields are widened, and the rectovesical opening from the prostatectomy is simultaneously closed. This report retrospectively evaluates the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of two consecutive patient cohorts undergoing RARP with ePLND by a single surgeon between May 2015 and June 2019, one cohort prior to introducing PPSS as control (n = 145) and the other after introducing PPSS (n = 91).

RESULTS

The two study groups were comparable on baseline characteristics, except ASA. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade IV-V complications, and comparable rates of grade I-III complications. The difference in postoperative lymphocele formation was 22% in PPSS versus 27% in the control group (p = 0.33). The rate of symptomatic lymphoceles was significantly lower in the PPSS group (3% vs. 10%, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The PPSS is a feasible procedure that reduces symptomatic lymphoceles in patients undergoing RARP with a retzius-sparing approach.

Robotic Vessel Sealer Device for Lymphocele Prevention After Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial

Introduction: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during robotic prostatectomy is associated with potential complications. The most common complication of PLND is lymphoceles, occurring in up to 50% of patients in studies with screening imaging but usually asymptomatic. We performed a prospective randomized trial to evaluate whether using advanced bipolar energy for PLND via the robotic vessel sealer can prevent lymphoceles. Methods: A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the trial with each patient serving as their own control. Robotic PLND was randomly performed using the vessel sealer on one side and standard PLND using clips on the other side. All patients underwent screening computed tomography scan 3 months postoperatively with radiologists blinded to the assigned technique. Significant lymphoceles were defined as fluid collections ≥3 cm in any plane. Results: Of those enrolled, 114 completed the study. The mean nodal yield was 6.5 nodes, with 3.1 versus 3.4 nodes for vessel sealer side versus standard technique (P = .35), respectively. The mean operative time for PLND was 11.3 versus 11.1 minutes (P = .62), respectively. Twenty-two lymphoceles were identified. Ten occurred on the vessel sealer side versus 12 on the standard side (8.8% versus 10.5%, P = .412). All lymphoceles were asymptomatic. Conclusions: While the robotic advanced bipolar device did not appear to prevent lymphoceles, the vessel sealer also did not increase the rate of lymphoceles compared with a standard technique using clips. Both techniques were equally efficacious, efficient, and safe for PLND such that surgeons who prefer to avoid clips can reasonably use the vessel sealer, although at increased cost. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02035475.

Peritoneal flap for lymphocele prophylaxis following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection: study protocol and trial update for the randomized controlled PELYCAN study

Background

Data from interventional studies suggest that a peritoneal flap after pelvic lymph node dissection (LND) during laparoscopic, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may reduce the rate of symptomatic lymphoceles in transperitoneal approach. However, most of these studies are not conducted in a randomized controlled fashion, thus limiting their scientific value. A recent prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) did not show superiority of a peritoneal flap while further trials are lacking. Therefore, the aim of the presented RCT will be to show that creating a peritoneal flap decreases the rate of symptomatic lymphoceles compared to the current standard procedure without creation of a flap.

Methods/design

PELYCAN is a parallel-group, patient- and assessor-blinded, phase III, adaptive randomized controlled superiority trial. Men with histologically confirmed prostate cancer who undergo transperitoneal RARP with pelvic LND will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups—either with creating a peritoneal flap (PELYCAN) or without creating a peritoneal flap (control). Sample size calculation yielded a sample size of 300 with a planned interim analysis after 120 patients, which will be performed by an independent statistician. This provides a possibility for early stopping or sample size recalculation.

Patients will be stratified for contributing factors for the development of postoperative lymphoceles. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of symptomatic lymphoceles in both groups within 6 months postoperatively. Patients and assessors will be blinded for the intervention until the end of the follow-up period of 6 months. The surgeon will be informed about the randomization result after performance of vesicourethral anastomosis. Secondary outcome measures include asymptomatic lymphoceles at the time of discharge and within 6 months of follow-up, postoperative complications, mortality, re-admission rate, and quality of life assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

Discussion

The PELYCAN study is designed to assess whether the application of a peritoneal flap during RARP reduces the rate of symptomatic lymphoceles, as compared with the standard operation technique. In case of superiority of the intervention, this peritoneal flap may be suggested as a new standard of care.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00016794. Registered on 14 May 2019.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05168-x.

Surgical Strategies for Lymphocele Prevention in Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review

Purpose: Pelvic lymph node dissection is an important step during robotic radical prostatectomy. The collection of lymphatic fluid (lymphocele) is the most common complication with potentially severe impact; therefore, different strategies have been proposed to reduce its incidence. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and NIH Registry of Clinical Trials were searched for articles including the following interventions: transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach, any reconfiguration of the peritoneum, the use of pelvic drains, and the use of different sealing techniques and sealing agents. The outcome evaluated was the incidence of symptomatic lymphocele. Randomized, nonrandomized, and/or retrospective studies were included. Results: Twelve studies were included (including one ongoing randomized clinical trial). Because of heterogeneity of included studies, no meta-analysis was performed. No significant impact was reported by different sealing techniques and agents or by surgical approach. Three retrospective, nonrandomized studies showed a potential benefit of peritoneal reconfiguration to maximize the peritoneal surface of reabsorption. Conclusion: Lymphocele formation is a multistep and multifactorial event; high-quality literature analyzing risk factors and preventive measures is rather scarce. Peritoneal reconfiguration could represent a reasonable option that deserves further evaluation; no other preventive measure is supported by current evidence.