1
|
Li Z, Huang Y, Wang X, Zhang M, Fan S, Liu F, Xiong S, Yang K, Guan H, Li X, Zhou L. Comparison of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with KangDuo surgical system vs. the da Vinci Si system: Quality of life and medium-term oncological outcomes. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024:00029330-990000000-01254. [PMID: 39329291 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000003265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Yiwei Huang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Shubo Fan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Fan Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Shengwei Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Hua Guan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
- Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miyake H, Fujisawa M. Early experience and future prospects regarding use of newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, in the field of urologic cancer surgery. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:640-646. [PMID: 38625439 PMCID: PMC11130061 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02503-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
In the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical approach in the majority of major surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. Of these, hinotori, the first made-in-Japan robotic system, is characterized by various unique and attractive features different from the existing system, and the use of this system has gradually increased mainly in urologic cancer surgeries, including radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and radical nephroureterectomy. This review initially describes detailed characteristics of hinotori, then summarizes the early experience with urologic cancer surgeries using hinotori at our institution, and finally discusses the future prospects of robotic surgery using hinotori, considering problems associated with the use of this robotic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Miyake
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Junker T, Duus L, Rasmussen BS, Azawi N, Lund L, Nørgaard B, Graumann O. Impact of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Cryoablation on Short-term Health-related Quality of Life—A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 45:99-107. [PMID: 36353658 PMCID: PMC9637566 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard for the treatment of stage cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the increasing incidence of RCC in the elderly population calls for alternative minimally invasive treatments to reduce the negative effects on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and subsequent healthy life expectancy. Objective To assess and compare short-term HRQoL and self-reported health status after PN and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) of patients treated for RCC stage cT1. Design, setting, and participants Patients who underwent PN or PCA between 2019 and 2021 for RCC stage cT1 at two university hospitals in Denmark were assessed. The exclusion criteria included insufficient understanding of the Danish language, dementia, metastatic RCC, conversion to nephrectomy, and salvage procedures. Intervention PN and PCA. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire was distributed before treatment, and 14 and 90 d postoperatively. A linear mixed-effect model was used to analyze the changes from baseline to follow-up between PN and PCA treatment. Results and limitations The cohort included 165 patients (PN: 79; PCA: 86). The completion rate was 96–98%. Patients receiving PCA were significantly older (median 69.1 vs 62.1 yr) and had lower scores on physical (p < 0.001) and role functioning (p = 0.009) than PN. A statistically significant change from baseline to 14 d was found for several HRQoL scales, which favored PCA over PN. However, the observed change was no longer significant at 90-d follow-up. Limitations include sample size and confounding by indication. Conclusions This study found a significant difference between baseline and 14-d follow-up in several HRQoL and symptoms scales, favoring PCA over PN. However, no significant differences were observed in any HRQoL scales between PN and PCA of RCC stage cT1 from baseline to 90-d follow-up. Patient summary Surgical removal and percutaneous cryoablation (freezing) of small tumors in the kidney had a similar impact on quality of life after 90 d.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Junker
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Corresponding author at: Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, UNIFY. Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000 Odense, Denmark. Tel.: +45 2984 2169.
| | - Louise Duus
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
| | - Benjamin S.B. Rasmussen
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
| | - Nessn Azawi
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Lund
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Nørgaard
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ole Graumann
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quality of Life and Psychological Distress among Patients with Small Renal Masses. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11143944. [PMID: 35887708 PMCID: PMC9324284 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11143944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Quality of life (QoL) and psychological distress represent an important aspect of the daily life of cancer patients. The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze available literature regarding QoL and psychological distress in patients with small renal masses (SRMs). (2) Methods: A systematic search of EMBASE, PUBMED and American Psychological Association (APA-net) was performed on 30 April 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they included patients with SRMs, had a prospective or retrospective design, included at least 10 patients, were published in the last 20 years, and assessed the QoL or psychological distress in patients that underwent active surveillance (AS) in comparison to those that underwent ablation/surgery treatments. (3) Results: The patients that underwent AS were statistically significantly older, with smaller renal masses than those that underwent surgery/ablation. A study showed a significant reduction in total scores of Short Form-12 (SF-12) among AS patients when compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) patients at enrollment (95.0 ± 15.8 vs. 99.1 ± 13.9), 2 years (91.0 ± 16.4 vs. 100.3 ± 14.3), and at 3 years (92.9 ± 15.9 vs. 100.3 ± 14.3), p < 0.05, respectively. That was mainly due to lower physical health scores. On the other hand, another study showed that AS patients with a biopsy-proven malignant tumor had a worse psychological distress sub-score (PDSS) compared to patients treated with surgery/ablation after biopsy. (4) Conclusions: It seems that there is an influence on QoL and psychological distress while on AS of SMRs. However, due to the low amount of available data, the impact of AS or active treatment on QoL or psychological distress of patients with small renal masses warrants further investigation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Furukawa J, Hinata N, Teisima J, Takenaka A, Shiroki R, Kobayashi Y, Kanayama HO, Hattori K, Horie S, Tozawa K, Kato M, Ohyama C, Habuchi T, Kawamorita N, Eto M, Fujisawa M. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with minimum follow-up of 5 years: A multi-center prospective study in Japan. Int J Urol 2022; 29:1038-1045. [PMID: 35707848 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is widely performed for small renal masses, achieving excellent perioperative and intermediate oncological outcomes. However, long-term oncological, functional, and quality of life outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate quality of life at 1 year and oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. METHODS Personal, perioperative, postoperative, functional, oncological, and quality of life data were evaluated. The EQ-5D-5L tool, which incorporates health profiles and a EuroQol Visual Analog Scale, was used to assess quality of life preoperatively and 365 days postoperatively. Regarding oncological and functional outcomes, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate were calculated. RESULTS There were few changes in levels between the two time points for all EQ-5D dimensions. The mean change in EQ-5D-5L was 0.020 (95% confidence interval 0.006-0.033, P = 0.006), and in EuroQol Visual Analog Scale score 4.60 (95% confidence interval 2.17-7.02, P = 0.0003). Overall and recurrence-free survival 5 years after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy were 97.9% and 92.8%, respectively. After an early postoperative decrease, the estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with a T1 renal tumor is safe, feasible, and effective from the perspective of quality of life and survival, even after 5 years. When making treatment decisions, perioperative and quality of life outcomes should be considered together with long-term oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junya Furukawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Hinata
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Jun Teisima
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Shiroki
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiro-Omi Kanayama
- Department of Urology, Institute of Biochemical Sciences, Tokushima University, Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kazunori Hattori
- Department of Urology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeo Horie
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Tozawa
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masashi Kato
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Naoki Kawamorita
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Junker T, Duus L, Rasmussen BSB, Azawi N, Lund L, Graumann O, Nørgaard B. Quality of life and complications after nephron-sparing treatment of renal cell carcinoma stage T1-a systematic review. Syst Rev 2022; 11:4. [PMID: 34983648 PMCID: PMC8725354 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01868-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the fact that nephron-sparing treatment is considered preferable from a surgical perspective patients' quality of life (QoL) following different types of nephron-sparing treatments remains unclear. PURPOSE To investigate the quality of life and complications after nephron-sparing treatment of renal cell carcinomas of stage T1. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search of six databases was carried out. We included studies that reported the quality of life and complications in patients aged 18 years or older following nephron-sparing treatment of renal cell carcinoma stage T1. The quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for cohort studies and the CASP Randomized Controlled Trial Checklist. Data were analyzed using a narrative approach. RESULTS Eight studies were included, six of which investigated QoL after partial nephrectomy and two after ablation therapies. Seven studies reported complications. Three studies reported higher QoL scores after partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy. Two studies showed that QoL increased or returned to baseline levels up to 12 months following partial nephrectomy. One study reported a gradual increase in QoL after radiofrequency ablation, and one study reported that all patients recovered to baseline QoL following cryoablation. Across studies, we found a complication rate up to 20% after partial nephrectomy and up to 12.5% after ablation therapy. CONCLUSIONS The results of this systematic review suggest that nephron-sparing treatment appears to be superior or comparable to other treatment alternatives with regard to QoL outcomes. Additionally, based on the studies included in this review, partial nephrectomy appears to have a higher complication rate compared with ablation therapies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020155594.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Junker
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Louise Duus
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Benjamin S B Rasmussen
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Nessn Azawi
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Sygehusvej 10, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Sygehusvej 10, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Lars Lund
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense C, 5000, Denmark
| | - Ole Graumann
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 10, Indgang 112, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Nørgaard
- Department of Public Health, User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|