1
|
Unselected Women's Experiences of Receiving Genetic Research Results for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2021; 25:741-748. [DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2021.0115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
2
|
From Probands to Relatives: Communication of Genetic Risk for Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer and Its Influence on Subsequent Testing. Cancer Nurs 2020; 45:E91-E98. [PMID: 32804756 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The genetic risk communication from proband to relatives varies from family to family, and patients often need support with the communication of genetic test results and making decisions to manage hereditary cancer risks. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to characterize the communication of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genetic risk from proband to first-degree relatives (FDRs) using a social network framework. METHODS We characterized network and nonnetwork factors to explore their association with which FDRs were told about the genetic risk and whether or not relatives underwent genetic testing. Ninety-two female probands with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who have confirmed BRCA1/2 mutations participated in the study. Communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk was assessed between 92 probands and their 417 FDRs. RESULTS Of 92 probands, 94.5% (n = 87) communicated their genetic test result to at least one of their FDRs. Of FDRs older than 18 years, 19.9% (n = 72) have genetic testing. Emotional closeness, educational level of the proband, and relative's age were significantly associated with communicating test results with FDRs. CONCLUSION Communication of genetic risk with the FDRs after having a BRCA1/2 gene-mutation-positive test result was high in this group of cancer patients. However, the rate of genetic testing among FDRs was low. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Probands' educational level and age of relatives for cascade genetic screening should be considered during counseling. Interventions to support women with BRCA1/2 mutations during the communication process and their family members' engagement in testing and risk-reducing strategies are needed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Srinivasan S, Hampel H, Leeman J, Patel A, Kulchak Rahm A, Reuland DS, Roberts MC. Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 13:1037-1046. [PMID: 32727822 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Cascade testing (i.e., genetic testing of family members of individuals with disease) among families affected by hereditary cancer disorders, such as Lynch syndrome, is suboptimal and thus represents a missed opportunity in cancer prevention. We aimed to fill a gap in the literature by exploring multilevel barriers and facilitators to the implementation of cascade testing for Lynch syndrome. We conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Integrated Behavioral Model among key stakeholders (n = 60): Patients with Lynch syndrome and relatives (n = 20), providers (n = 20), and administrators (n = 20). Transcripts were double-coded (20% sample) using template analysis in ATLAS.ti. Barriers identified included (i) low awareness about Lynch syndrome, (ii) psychosocial barriers, (iii) lack of provider follow-up, (iv) accessibility to genetic counseling, and (v) fear of discrimination. Facilitators included (i) motivation to engage in cascade testing and (ii) free genetic testing offered to relatives. Stakeholders also recommended strategies to overcome implementation barriers in the short-term (increasing education, preparing patients for communicating with relatives), medium-term (optimizing clinical workflow and staffing resources), and long-term (nationwide standardization). These findings indicate that modifiable, multilevel barriers to the implementation of cascade testing in Lynch syndrome are experienced across stakeholders. Understanding and targeting implementation barriers is imperative to achieving public health impact of precision health interventions such as cascade testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swetha Srinivasan
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Heather Hampel
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Amit Patel
- Medical Marketing Economics, Oxford, Mississippi
| | | | - Daniel S Reuland
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Megan C Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Egleston BL, Maxwell KN, DiGiovanni L, Brower J, Fetzer D, Bennett Gaieski J, Brandt A, McKenna D, Long J, Powers J, Stopfer JE, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM. Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2. [PMID: 32095738 DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Understanding the outcomes of returning individual genetic research results to participants is critical because some genetic variants are found to be associated with health outcomes and have become available for clinical testing. Materials and Methods BRCA1/2-negative women with early-onset breast cancer, multiple primary cancers, or a family history of breast cancer who participated in a gene discovery cancer registry were offered the opportunity to learn their individual genetic research results of 24 breast cancer susceptibility genes with a genetic counselor after predisclosure genetic counseling. Outcomes included uptake of research results, knowledge, informed choice, psychosocial adjustment, uncertainty, satisfaction, and uptake of clinical confirmation testing. Results Four hundred two potential participants were contacted. One hundred ninety-four participants (48%) did not respond despite multiple attempts, and 85 participants (21%) actively or passively declined. One hundred seven participants (27%) elected for predisclosure counseling and were more likely to be younger, married, and white. Ninety percent of participants who had predisclosure counseling elected to receive their genetic research results, and 89% made an informed choice. Knowledge increased significantly after predisclosure counseling, and anxiety, intrusive cancer-specific distress, uncertainty, and depression declined significantly after receipt of results. General anxiety and intrusive cancer-specific distress declined significantly for both participants with a positive result and those with a negative result. Sixty-four percent of participants had clinical confirmation testing when recommended, including all participants with a mutation in a high-penetrance gene. Conclusion Uptake of genetic research results may be lower than anticipated by hypothetical reports and small select studies. Participants who elected to receive research results with genetic providers did not experience increases in distress or uncertainty, but not all patients return for confirmation testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela R Bradbury
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Linda Patrick-Miller
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Brian L Egleston
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Kara N Maxwell
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Laura DiGiovanni
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jamie Brower
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Dominique Fetzer
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jill Bennett Gaieski
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Amanda Brandt
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Danielle McKenna
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jessica Long
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jacquelyn Powers
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jill E Stopfer
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1055-1066. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0223-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
6
|
Niendorf KB, Geller MA, Vogel RI, Church TR, Leininger A, Bakke A, Madoff RD. A model for patient-direct screening and referral for familial cancer risk. Fam Cancer 2017; 15:707-16. [PMID: 27350384 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9912-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Patients at increased familial risk of cancer are sub-optimally identified and referred for genetic counseling. We describe a systematic model for information collection, screening and referral for hereditary cancer risk. Individuals from three different clinical and research populations were screened for hereditary cancer risk using a two-tier process: a 7-item screener followed by review of family history by a genetic counselor and application of published criteria. A total of 869 subjects participated in the study; 769 in this high risk population had increased familial cancer risk based on the screening questionnaire. Of these eligible participants, 500 (65.0 %) provided family histories and 332 (66.4 %) of these were found to be at high risk of a hereditary cancer syndrome, 102 (20.4 %) at moderate familial cancer risk, and 66 (13.2 %) at average risk. Three months following receipt of the risk result letter, nearly all respondents found the process at least somewhat helpful (98.4 %). All participants identified as high-risk were mailed a letter recommending genetic counseling and were provided appointment tools. After 1 year, only 13 (7.3 %) of 179 high risk respondents reported pursuit of recommended genetic counseling. Participants were willing to provide family history information for the purposes of risk assessment; however, few patients pursued recommended genetic services. This suggests that cancer family history registries are feasible and viable but that further research is needed to increase the uptake of genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin B Niendorf
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 450, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. .,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Melissa A Geller
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Rachel Isaksson Vogel
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 450, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Timothy R Church
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Angela Bakke
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Center, Burnsville, MN, USA
| | - Robert D Madoff
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miao Z, Ali A, Hu L, Zhao F, Yin C, Chen C, Yang T, Qian A. Microtubule actin cross-linking factor 1, a novel potential target in cancer. Cancer Sci 2017; 108:1953-1958. [PMID: 28782898 PMCID: PMC5623738 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a polygenic disease characterized by uncontrolled growth of normal body cells, deregulation of the cell cycle as well as resistance to apoptosis. The spectraplakin protein microtubule actin cross-linking factor 1 (MACF1) plays an essential function in various cellular processes, including cell proliferation, migration, signaling transduction and embryo development. MACF1 is also involved in processes such as metastatic invasion in which cytoskeleton organization is a critical element that contributes to tumor progression in various human cancers. Aberrant expression of MACF1 initiates the tumor cell proliferation, and migration and metastasis in numerous cancers, such as breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer and glioblastoma. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge of MACF1 and its critical role in different human cancers. This will be helpful for researchers to investigate the novel functional role of MACF1 in human cancers and as a potential target to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiping Miao
- Laboratory for Bone Metabolism, Key Laboratory for Space Bioscience and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.,Shenzhen Research Institution of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Arshad Ali
- Laboratory for Bone Metabolism, Key Laboratory for Space Bioscience and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.,Shenzhen Research Institution of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lifang Hu
- Laboratory for Bone Metabolism, Key Laboratory for Space Bioscience and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.,Shenzhen Research Institution of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Fan Zhao
- Laboratory for Bone Metabolism, Key Laboratory for Space Bioscience and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.,Shenzhen Research Institution of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chong Yin
- Laboratory for Bone Metabolism, Key Laboratory for Space Bioscience and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.,Shenzhen Research Institution of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chu Chen
- Hong-Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Tuanmin Yang
- Hong-Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Airong Qian
- Laboratory for Bone Metabolism, Key Laboratory for Space Bioscience and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.,Shenzhen Research Institution of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral Letter. J Genet Couns 2016; 26:697-715. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0040-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
9
|
Willis A, Smith S, Meiser B, Ballinger M, Thomas D, Young MA. Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review. Clin Genet 2016; 92:121-133. [DOI: 10.1111/cge.12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A.M. Willis
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
| | - S.K. Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
| | - B. Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
| | - M.L. Ballinger
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Division; Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Darlinghurst Australia
| | - D.M. Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Division; Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Darlinghurst Australia
| | - M.-A. Young
- Familial Cancer Centre; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Forrest LE, Young MA. Clinically Significant Germline Mutations in Cancer-Causing Genes Identified Through Research Studies Should Be Offered to Research Participants by Genetic Counselors. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:898-901. [PMID: 26786918 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.60.9388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Forrest
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goldim JR, Gibbon S. Between personal and relational privacy: understanding the work of informed consent in cancer genetics in Brazil. J Community Genet 2015; 6:287-93. [PMID: 25998783 PMCID: PMC4524828 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-015-0234-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Drawing from perspectives of both bioethics and anthropology, this article explores how the boundaries between personal and relational privacy are negotiated by patients and practitioners in the context of an emerging domain of cancer genetics in Brazil. It reflects on the place of informed consent in the history of bioethics in North America in contrast to the development of bioethics in Brazil and the particular social cultural context in which consent is sought in Brazilian public health care. Making use of empirical research with families and individuals receiving genetic counselling related to increased genetic risk for cancer, in genetic clinics in southern Brazil, it examines how informed consent is linked to the necessary movement between personal and relational privacy. The paper illustrates the value of a particular tool known as a 'sociogram' to examine the complex interpersonal dynamics that arise in negotiating informed consent at the interface between the family and the individual in Brazil. The paper, therefore, points to the scope of further interdisciplinary exchanges between anthropology and bioethics, confronting the new challenges that arise in the context of medical genetics in developing country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Roberto Goldim
- Bioethics Research Laboratory, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil,
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
McBride KA, Hallowell N, Tattersall MHN, Kirk J, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Mitchell G, Young MA. Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants. J Community Genet 2015; 7:11-20. [PMID: 26004130 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-015-0231-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/07/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
General consensus exists that clinically significant germline genetic research results should be fed back to research participants. A body of literature is emerging about Australian research participants' experiences of feedback of genetic research results and factors that influence a participant's actions after receiving such information. This exploratory qualitative study conducted interviews with 11 participants from the International Sarcoma Kindred Study, four probands and seven of their relatives. They had been informed by letter of the availability of clinically significant germline TP53 mutations identified through research. We examined the participants' views about the feedback of these genetic test results. Thematic (inductive) analysis was used to analyse the data. A number of factors influenced participants' responses following notification. This included participants' understanding of the notification letter and their perception of the relevance of the information for them and/or their family. Most notably, timing of the letter in the context of an individual's current life experiences was important. Timing and context are novel factors identified that may impact on research participants' understanding or their ability to access clinically significant research results. We outline strategies for disseminating results to research participants and their next of kin that may reduce their uncertainty around the receipt of research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate A McBride
- School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,The Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
| | - Nina Hallowell
- Centre for Health and Society, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Martin H N Tattersall
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Sydney Medical School, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Judy Kirk
- The Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Armel SR, McCuaig J, Gojska N, Demsky R, Maganti M, Murphy J, Rosen B. All in the Family: Barriers and Motivators to the Use of Cancer Family History Questionnaires and the Impact on Attendance Rates. J Genet Couns 2015; 24:822-32. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9813-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Accepted: 12/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
14
|
Delikurt T, Williamson GR, Anastasiadou V, Skirton H. A systematic review of factors that act as barriers to patient referral to genetic services. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 23:739-45. [PMID: 25205405 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2014] [Revised: 07/23/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients who might benefit from genetic services may be denied access through failure to be referred. To investigate the evidence on barriers to referral to genetic services, we conducted a systematic review of empirical evidence on this topic. Nine studies were included in the review. Barriers related to non-genetic healthcare professionals were: lack of awareness of patient risk factors, failure to obtain adequate family history, lack of knowledge of genetics and genetic conditions, lack of awareness of genetic services, inadequate coordination of referral and lack of genetics workforce. Those related to individuals affected by or at risk of a genetic condition were: lack of awareness of personal risk, lack of knowledge and/or awareness of medical history of family members and lack of knowledge of genetic services. Research on access to genetic services is heterogeneous; stronger empirical evidence is needed on factors that are barriers, and further research is needed to develop 'targeted interventions' for equitable access to genetic services in a range of populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Türem Delikurt
- 1] Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK [2] Clinical Genetics Clinic, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - Violetta Anastasiadou
- Clinical Genetics Clinic, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Heather Skirton
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS). Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 23:152-8. [PMID: 24824132 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2013] [Revised: 03/04/2014] [Accepted: 04/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Population-based genetic research may produce information that has clinical implications for participants and their family. Researchers notify participants or their next of kin (NoK) about the availability of genetic information via a notification letter; however, many subsequently do not contact a family cancer centre (FCC) to clarify their genetic status. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine research participants' experience of receiving a notification letter and the factors that influenced contact with an FCC. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with research participants (n=10) or their NoK (n=15) who had received a notification letter following participation in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study. There were a number of factors which impacted participants' access to genetic counselling at an FCC. Some participants had unmet information and support needs, which were addressed by their participation in this psychosocial interview study. Recruitment and participation in this study therefore inadvertently increased a number of participants' intention to contact an FCC. For others, participation in this study facilitated access to an FCC. Recommendations are proposed regarding future notification as well as implications for clinical practice. An approach that also provides opportunity to address research participants' support and informational needs before contacting a clinical genetics service as well as practical guidance for accessing genetic services would facilitate timely and smooth access for research participants who are interested in following up clinically relevant genetic test results.
Collapse
|
16
|
Tan YY, Spurdle AB, Obermair A. Knowledge, attitudes and referral patterns of lynch syndrome: a survey of clinicians in australia. J Pers Med 2014; 4:218-44. [PMID: 25563224 PMCID: PMC4263974 DOI: 10.3390/jpm4020218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2013] [Revised: 04/24/2014] [Accepted: 04/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assessed Australian clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes and referral patterns of patients with suspected Lynch syndrome for genetic services. A total of 144 oncologists, surgeons, gynaecologists, general practitioners and gastroenterologists from the Australian Medical Association and Clinical Oncology Society responded to a web-based survey. Most respondents demonstrated suboptimal knowledge of Lynch syndrome. Male general practitioners who have been practicing for ≥10 years were less likely to offer genetic referral than specialists, and many clinicians did not recognize that immunohistochemistry testing is not a germline test. Half of all general practitioners did not actually refer patients in the past 12 months, and 30% of them did not feel that their role is to identify patients for genetic referral. The majority of clinicians considered everyone to be responsible for making the initial referral to genetic services, but a small preference was given to oncologists (15%) and general practitioners (13%). Patient information brochures, continuing genetic education programs and referral guidelines were favoured as support for practice. Targeted education interventions should be considered to improve referral. An online family history assessment tool with built-in decision support would be helpful in triaging high-risk individuals for pathology analysis and/or genetic assessment in general practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen Y Tan
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, Level 6 Ned Hanlon Building, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Andreas Obermair
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Issues of concern in risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing of younger breast cancer patients in Japan. Breast Cancer 2013; 21:656-63. [PMID: 23754181 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-013-0477-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2013] [Accepted: 05/20/2013] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
About 5-10 % of breast cancer cases are considered to be hereditary, and germ line mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been proven to contribute to the development of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Breast cancer diagnosed at a young age is an indication of a higher likelihood of HBOC. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing, especially for younger women with breast cancer, have started to be an integral element of practice due to advances in gene sequencing technologies and accumulating evidence for the clinical implications of BRCA mutation status for not only early breast cancer management, but also for the patient's own and their family's next cancer risk, and proactive steps toward a risk-reducing approach. As yet, the cancer genetic service system is immature in Japan. There are several problems to be solved to improve cancer genetic services in clinical practice for breast cancer.
Collapse
|
18
|
Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counseling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 2012:298745. [PMID: 23150731 PMCID: PMC3485517 DOI: 10.1155/2012/298745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2012] [Revised: 06/05/2012] [Accepted: 06/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age are more likely to carry a cancer predisposing genetic mutation. Per the current NCCN recommendations, women diagnosed under age 50 should be referred to cancer genetic counseling for further risk evaluation. This study seeks to assess patient-reported barriers and facilitators to receiving genetic counseling and risk assessment among a community-based population of young breast cancer survivors (YBCS). Methods. Through the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program, a state-based cancer registry, 488 women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 in 2006-2007 were identified. They received a mail survey regarding family history and facilitators and barriers to receiving genetic counseling and risk assessment. Results. Responses were received from 289 women (59.2%). One hundred twenty-two (42.2%) reported having received cancer genetic counseling. The most frequent reason identified for receiving services was to benefit their family's future. The top reasons for not attending were “no one recommended it” and “medical insurance coverage issues.” Discussion. This study is the first published report using a state cancer registry to determine facilitators and barriers to receiving genetic counseling and risk assessment among YBCS. These findings demonstrate the need for additional awareness and education about appropriate indications for genetic services.
Collapse
|
19
|
Improving mutation notification when new genetic information is identified in research: a trial of two strategies in familial breast cancer. Genet Med 2012; 15:187-94. [PMID: 22975758 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Aspects of Breast Cancer (kConFab) is a large-scale research study that notifies participants when new, personally relevant, information is discovered. In 2009, the (kConFab) instituted an intensive notification process to ensure at-risk individuals were effectively notified. This study (i) evaluated the impact of intensive notification on genetic testing uptake; (ii) identified those most likely to undergo testing postnotification; and (iii) identified those most likely to acknowledge that they had been notified. METHODS Clinical/demographic data were retrieved from the (kConFab) database. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify potential predictors of testing uptake and notification acknowledgment using IBM SPSS. RESULTS A total of 155 of 1,812 individuals underwent testing after standard notification (8.6%). In comparison, 23/291 individuals (7.9%) notified using the "intensive" approach underwent testing (χ(2) = 0.14; P = 0.71). After controlling for notification process, females and participants with a previous cancer were most likely to have undergone testing (P < 0.006). Older individuals (50+ years) were most likely to acknowledge they had been notified (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION Increasing the intensity of participant follow-up did not increase genetic testing uptake. The challenge to effectively notify participants, and increase the proportion whose risk is managed clinically, remains, particularly for males and individuals unaffected by cancer.Genet Med 2013:15(3):187-194.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hiss D. Optimizing molecular-targeted therapies in ovarian cancer: the renewed surge of interest in ovarian cancer biomarkers and cell signaling pathways. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2012; 2012:737981. [PMID: 22481932 PMCID: PMC3306947 DOI: 10.1155/2012/737981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2011] [Accepted: 11/24/2011] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The hallmarks of ovarian cancer encompass the development of resistance, disease recurrence and poor prognosis. Ovarian cancer cells express gene signatures which pose significant challenges for cancer drug development, therapeutics, prevention and management. Despite enhancements in contemporary tumor debulking surgery, tentative combination regimens and abdominal radiation which can achieve beneficial response rates, the majority of ovarian cancer patients not only experience adverse effects, but also eventually relapse. Therefore, additional therapeutic possibilities need to be explored to minimize adverse events and prolong progression-free and overall response rates in ovarian cancer patients. Currently, a revival in cancer drug discovery is devoted to identifying diagnostic and prognostic ovarian cancer biomarkers. However, the sensitivity and reliability of such biomarkers may be complicated by mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, diverse genetic risk factors, unidentified initiation and progression elements, molecular tumor heterogeneity and disease staging. There is thus a dire need to expand existing ovarian cancer therapies with broad-spectrum and individualized molecular targeted approaches. The aim of this review is to profile recent developments in our understanding of the interrelationships among selected ovarian tumor biomarkers, heterogeneous expression signatures and related molecular signal transduction pathways, and their translation into more efficacious targeted treatment rationales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donavon Hiss
- Molecular Oncology Research Laboratory, Department of Medical BioSciences, University of the Western Cape, Bellville 7535, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|