Acetazolamide Improves Cerebral Oxygenation During Exercise at High Altitude

High Altitude Dynamics in Cerebral Oxygenation of Mountain Rescue Personnel: A Prospective Alpine Proof-of-Concept Field Study

BACKGROUND

Mountain Rescue Services (MRS) are a vital link in the chain of survival when it comes to emergencies at high altitudes. Cognitive impairment in hypobaric hypoxic conditions is known, and previous studies have shown suboptimal performance of MRS members after a steep ascent. These impairments may be linked to regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether there are dynamics in rSO2 between "baseline" and "working" altitudes after climbing up to a potential patient.

METHODS

In this alpine proof-of-concept field study, experienced mountaineers of the Austrian MRS had to perform an active rapid ascent of 1,200 meters on foot to 3,454 meters above sea level. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was used to measure rSO2 before and after the climb. Continuous data were compared among subgroups using Mann-Whitney-U tests, and categorical data were compared with χ2-square tests. Statistical significance was defined by two-tailed P values of <.05.

RESULTS

Twenty MRS members were assessed. Their rSO2 values at baseline altitude were significantly higher than at working altitude (70 [SD = 1]% versus 60 [SD = 1]%; absolute difference 10 [95% CI, 6-15]; P <.001). When assessing the single dynamics of each mountain rescuer, there was a wide variability in delta rSO2, ranging from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 32% (mean 10 [SD = 8]%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, low rSO2 values were found in mountain rescuers at high altitudes, and there were considerable interpersonal differences of changes in cerebral oxygenation after an ascent. Using rSO2 to assess performance-readiness in mountain rescuers and individual proneness to potential cognitive dysfunction or acute mountain sickness (AMS) could be further research goals.

Effects of acetazolamide on exercise performance in patients with COPD going to high altitude: randomised controlled trial

Background

In patients with COPD, preventive treatment with acetazolamide reduces adverse health effects during altitude travel. We investigated whether preventive acetazolamide treatment modifies exercise performance in COPD patients going to high altitude.

Methods

In this randomised, double-blind trial, lowlanders with COPD, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 40-80% predicted, were assigned to acetazolamide (375 mg per 24 h) or placebo treatment starting 24 h before ascent and while staying at 3100 m. Patients performed progressive cycling exercise to exhaustion at 760 m, before taking the study drug, and within 4 h after arrival at 3100 m. The primary outcome was the maximal power output (Wmax).

Results

103 patients (32 women), mean±sd age 57.2±8.1 years, FEV1 66±11% predicted, were included in per-protocol analyses. In 53 patients receiving acetazolamide, Wmax and oxygen uptake (V'O2 max) at 760 m and 3100 m were 105±27 and 91±25 W, and 18.0±4.8 and 15.5±3.7 mL·min-1·kg-1 (p<0.001, both changes). Corresponding Wmax and V'O2 max in 50 patients receiving placebo were 107±34 and 97±28 W, and 18.9±6.0 and 17.2±5.0 mL·min-1·kg-1 (p<0.001, both changes). Between-group differences (95% CI) in altitude-induced Wmax changes were -3.0 W (-8.7 to +2.7, p=0.305) and in V'O2 max changes were -0.8 mL·min-1·kg-1 (-2.1 to +0.5, p=0.213). Acetazolamide mitigated the altitude-induced reduction of P aO2 by 0.7 kPa (0.1 to 1.3, p=0.016). At 3100 m, maximal work rate with respiratory exchange ratio ≤1 was greater with acetazolamide than with placebo by 10.1 W (4.0 to 16.2, p=0.022).

Conclusions

In lowlanders with COPD, preventive treatment with acetazolamide did not modify the altitude-induced reduction in maximal work rate. However, acetazolamide enhanced arterial oxygenation and submaximal, moderate-intensity work capacity compared with placebo.

Influence of Acetazolamide on Hand Strength and Manual Dexterity During a 30-h Simulated High Altitude Exposure

INTRODUCTION

High altitude missions pose significant challenges to Warfighter medical readiness and performance. Decreased circulating oxygen levels cause a decrease in exercise performance and can cause debilitating symptoms associated with acute mountain sickness, especially with rapid ascent. Acetazolamide (AZ) is known to minimize symptoms of acute mountain sickness, but it is unknown whether this medication alters hand strength and manual dexterity during altitude exposure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten male volunteers (22 ± 4 yr, 75.9 ± 13.7 kg, 174.9 ± 9.3 cm) participated in two separate 30 h simulated altitude exposures (496 mmHg, equivalent to 3,500 m, 20°C, 20% RH) in a hypobaric chamber. Participants were given either a placebo or 250 mg of AZ twice daily for 3.5 d (2 sea-level [SL] days + the 30 h altitude exposure) in a randomized, single-blind, crossover design. During SL and both altitude (ALT) exposures, hand function tests were performed, including hand grip and finger pinch strength tests, as well as the Purdue Pegboard (PP) and magazine loading tests to assess manual dexterity. Paired T tests and two-way repeated measure analysis of variance were used as appropriate to evaluate the effects of AZ and ALT. The value of p < 0.05 was accepted for statistical significance.

RESULTS

There were no influences of acute ALT exposure or AZ treatment on hand strength (eg, grip strength; SL: 39.2 ± 5.5 kg vs. ALT: 41.5 ± 6.9 kg, p > 0.05) or dexterity (eg, PPassembly; placebo: 35.5 ± 5.3 vs. AZ: 34.3 ± 4.6, p > 0.05) in our volunteers. Two dexterity tests (PPsum and magazine loading) showed improvements over time at ALT, regardless of treatment, where scores were improved after 10 h of exposure compared to at 1 h (eg, magazine loading: 56 ± 12 vs. 48 ± 10, p < 0.001). This pattern was not seen in the PPassembly test or any strength measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that 500 mg/d of AZ does not influence hand strength or manual dexterity during a 30 h exposure to 3,500 m simulated ALT. Acute ALT exposure (1 h) did not influence dexterity or strength, although some measures of dexterity showed improvements as exposure time increased. We conclude that use of AZ to optimize medical readiness at ALT is unlikely to impair the Warfighter's ability to complete mission tasks that depend on hand function.

Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions

BACKGROUND

High altitude illness (HAI) is a term used to describe a group of mainly cerebral and pulmonary syndromes that can occur during travel to elevations above 2500 metres (˜ 8200 feet). Acute mountain sickness (AMS), high altitude cerebral oedema (HACE), and high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE) are reported as potential medical problems associated with high altitude ascent. In this, the third of a series of three reviews about preventive strategies for HAI, we assessed the effectiveness of miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and adverse events of miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing acute HAI in people who are at risk of developing high altitude illness in any setting.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) in January 2019. We adapted the MEDLINE strategy for searching the other databases. We used a combination of thesaurus-based and free-text search terms. We scanned the reference lists and citations of included trials and any relevant systematic reviews that we identified for further references to additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials conducted in any setting where non-pharmacological and miscellaneous interventions were employed to prevent acute HAI, including preacclimatization measures and the administration of non-pharmacological supplements. We included trials involving participants who are at risk of developing high altitude illness (AMS or HACE, or HAPE, or both). We included participants with, and without, a history of high altitude illness. We applied no age or gender restrictions. We included trials where the relevant intervention was administered before the beginning of ascent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures employed by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 studies (1406 participants, 21 references) in this review. Thirty studies (14 ongoing, and 16 pending classification (awaiting)) will be considered in future versions of this suite of three reviews as appropriate. We report the results for the primary outcome of this review (risk of AMS) by each group of assessed interventions.Group 1. Preacclimatization and other measures based on pressureUse of simulated altitude or remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) might not improve the risk of AMS on subsequent exposure to altitude, but this effect is uncertain (simulated altitude: risk ratio (RR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.71; I² = 0%; 3 trials, 140 participants; low-quality evidence. RIPC: RR 3.0, 95% CI 0.69 to 13.12; 1 trial, 40 participants; low-quality evidence). We found evidence of improvement of this risk using positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), but this information was derived from a cross-over trial with a limited number of participants (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.38 to 9.76; 1 trial, 8 participants; low-quality evidence). We found scarcity of evidence about the risk of adverse events for these interventions.Group 2. Supplements and vitaminsSupplementation of antioxidants, medroxyprogesterone, iron or Rhodiola crenulata might not improve the risk of AMS on exposure to high altitude, but this effect is uncertain (antioxidants: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.03; 1 trial, 18 participants; low-quality evidence. Medroxyprogesterone: RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.05; I² = 0%; 2 trials, 32 participants; low-quality evidence. Iron: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.11; I² = 0%; 2 trials, 65 participants; low-quality evidence. R crenulata: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.29; 1 trial, 125 participants; low-quality evidence). We found evidence of improvement of this risk with the administration of erythropoietin, but this information was extracted from a trial with issues related to risk of bias and imprecision (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84; 1 trial, 39 participants; very low-quality evidence). Regarding administration of ginkgo biloba, we did not perform a pooled estimation of RR for AMS due to considerable heterogeneity between the included studies (I² = 65%). RR estimates from the individual studies were conflicting (from 0.05 to 1.03; low-quality evidence). We found scarcity of evidence about the risk of adverse events for these interventions.Group 3. Other comparisonsWe found heterogeneous evidence regarding the risk of AMS when ginkgo biloba was compared with acetazolamide (I² = 63%). RR estimates from the individual studies were conflicting (estimations from 0.11 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.86) to 2.97 (95% CI 1.70 to 5.21); low-quality evidence). We found evidence of improvement when ginkgo biloba was administered along with acetazolamide, but this information was derived from a single trial with issues associated to risk of bias (compared to ginkgo biloba alone: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.71; 1 trial, 311 participants; low-quality evidence). Administration of medroxyprogesterone plus acetazolamide did not improve the risk of AMS when compared to administration of medroxyprogesterone or acetazolamide alone (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.50 to 3.55; 1 trial, 12 participants; low-quality evidence). We found scarcity of evidence about the risk of adverse events for these interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This Cochrane Review is the final in a series of three providing relevant information to clinicians, and other interested parties, on how to prevent high altitude illness. The assessment of non-pharmacological and miscellaneous interventions suggests that there is heterogeneous and even contradictory evidence related to the effectiveness of these prophylactic strategies. Safety of these interventions remains as an unclear issue due to lack of assessment. Overall, the evidence is limited due to its quality (low to very low), the relative paucity of that evidence and the number of studies pending classification for the three reviews belonging to this series (30 studies either awaiting classification or ongoing). Additional studies, especially those comparing with pharmacological alternatives (such as acetazolamide) are required, in order to establish or refute the strategies evaluated in this review.

Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 2. Less commonly-used drugs

BACKGROUND

High altitude illness (HAI) is a term used to describe a group of mainly cerebral and pulmonary syndromes that can occur during travel to elevations above 2500 metres (˜ 8200 feet). Acute mountain sickness (AMS), high altitude cerebral oedema (HACE) and high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE) are reported as potential medical problems associated with high altitude ascent. In this second review, in a series of three about preventive strategies for HAI, we assessed the effectiveness of five of the less commonly used classes of pharmacological interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and adverse events of five of the less commonly used pharmacological interventions for preventing acute HAI in participants who are at risk of developing high altitude illness in any setting.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) in May 2017. We adapted the MEDLINE strategy for searching the other databases. We used a combination of thesaurus-based and free-text search terms. We scanned the reference lists and citations of included trials and any relevant systematic reviews that we identified for further references to additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials conducted in any setting where one of five classes of drugs was employed to prevent acute HAI: selective 5-hydroxytryptamine(1) receptor agonists; N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist; endothelin-1 antagonist; anticonvulsant drugs; and spironolactone. We included trials involving participants who are at risk of developing high altitude illness (AMS or HACE, or HAPE, or both). We included participants with and without a history of high altitude illness. We applied no age or gender restrictions. We included trials where the relevant medication was administered before the beginning of ascent. We excluded trials using these drugs during ascent or after ascent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures employed by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight studies (334 participants, 9 references) in this review. Twelve studies are ongoing and will be considered in future versions of this review as appropriate. We have been unable to obtain full-text versions of a further 12 studies and have designated them as 'awaiting classification'. Four studies were at a low risk of bias for randomization; two at a low risk of bias for allocation concealment. Four studies were at a low risk of bias for blinding of participants and personnel. We considered three studies at a low risk of bias for blinding of outcome assessors. We considered most studies at a high risk of selective reporting bias.We report results for the following four main comparisons.Sumatriptan versus placebo (1 parallel study; 102 participants)Data on sumatriptan showed a reduction of the risk of AMS when compared with a placebo (risk ratio (RR) = 0.43, CI 95% 0.21 to 0.84; 1 study, 102 participants; low quality of evidence). The one included study did not report events of HAPE, HACE or adverse events related to administrations of sumatriptan.Magnesium citrate versus placebo (1 parallel study; 70 participants)The estimated RR for AMS, comparing magnesium citrate tablets versus placebo, was 1.09 (95% CI 0.55 to 2.13; 1 study; 70 participants; low quality of evidence). In addition, the estimated RR for loose stools was 3.25 (95% CI 1.17 to 8.99; 1 study; 70 participants; low quality of evidence). The one included study did not report events of HAPE or HACE.Spironolactone versus placebo (2 parallel studies; 205 participants)Pooled estimation of RR for AMS was not performed due to considerable heterogeneity between the included studies (I² = 72%). RR from individual studies was 0.40 (95% CI 0.12 to 1.31) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.79 to 2.01; very low quality of evidence). No events of HAPE or HACE were reported. Adverse events were not evaluated.Acetazolamide versus spironolactone (1 parallel study; 232 participants)Data on acetazolamide compared with spironolactone showed a reduction of the risk of AMS with the administration of acetazolamide (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.70; 232 participants; low quality of evidence). No events of HAPE or HACE were reported. Adverse events were not evaluated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This Cochrane Review is the second in a series of three providing relevant information to clinicians and other interested parties on how to prevent high altitude illness. The assessment of five of the less commonly used classes of drugs suggests that there is a scarcity of evidence related to these interventions. Clinical benefits and harms related to potential interventions such as sumatriptan are still unclear. Overall, the evidence is limited due to the low number of studies identified (for most of the comparison only one study was identified); limitations in the quality of the evidence (moderate to low); and the number of studies pending classification (24 studies awaiting classification or ongoing). We lack the large and methodologically sound studies required to establish or refute the efficacy and safety of most of the pharmacological agents evaluated in this review.

Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 1. Commonly-used classes of drugs

BACKGROUND

High altitude illness (HAI) is a term used to describe a group of cerebral and pulmonary syndromes that can occur during travel to elevations above 2500 metres (8202 feet). Acute hypoxia, acute mountain sickness (AMS), high altitude cerebral oedema (HACE) and high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE) are reported as potential medical problems associated with high altitude. In this review, the first in a series of three about preventive strategies for HAI, we assess the effectiveness of six of the most recommended classes of pharmacological interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and adverse events of commonly-used pharmacological interventions for preventing acute HAI.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (OVID), LILACS and trial registries in January 2017. We adapted the MEDLINE strategy for searching the other databases. We used a combination of thesaurus-based and free-text terms to search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized-controlled and cross-over trials conducted in any setting where commonly-used classes of drugs were used to prevent acute HAI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 64 studies (78 references) and 4547 participants in this review, and classified 12 additional studies as ongoing. A further 12 studies await classification, as we were unable to obtain the full texts. Most of the studies were conducted in high altitude mountain areas, while the rest used low pressure (hypobaric) chambers to simulate altitude exposure. Twenty-four trials provided the intervention between three and five days prior to the ascent, and 23 trials, between one and two days beforehand. Most of the included studies reached a final altitude of between 4001 and 5000 metres above sea level. Risks of bias were unclear for several domains, and a considerable number of studies did not report adverse events of the evaluated interventions. We found 26 comparisons, 15 of them comparing commonly-used drugs versus placebo. We report results for the three most important comparisons: Acetazolamide versus placebo (28 parallel studies; 2345 participants)The risk of AMS was reduced with acetazolamide (risk ratio (RR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.56; I2 = 0%; 16 studies; 2301 participants; moderate quality of evidence). No events of HAPE were reported and only one event of HACE (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.48; 6 parallel studies; 1126 participants; moderate quality of evidence). Few studies reported side effects for this comparison, and they showed an increase in the risk of paraesthesia with the intake of acetazolamide (RR 5.53, 95% CI 2.81 to 10.88, I2 = 60%; 5 studies, 789 participants; low quality of evidence). Budenoside versus placebo (2 parallel studies; 132 participants)Data on budenoside showed a reduction in the incidence of AMS compared with placebo (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.61; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 132 participants; low quality of evidence). Studies included did not report events of HAPE or HACE, and they did not find side effects (low quality of evidence). Dexamethasone versus placebo (7 parallel studies; 205 participants)For dexamethasone, the data did not show benefits at any dosage (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.00; I2 = 39%; 4 trials, 176 participants; low quality of evidence). Included studies did not report events of HAPE or HACE, and we rated the evidence about adverse events as of very low quality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our assessment of the most commonly-used pharmacological interventions suggests that acetazolamide is an effective pharmacological agent to prevent acute HAI in dosages of 250 to 750 mg/day. This information is based on evidence of moderate quality. Acetazolamide is associated with an increased risk of paraesthesia, although there are few reports about other adverse events from the available evidence. The clinical benefits and harms of other pharmacological interventions such as ibuprofen, budenoside and dexamethasone are unclear. Large multicentre studies are needed for most of the pharmacological agents evaluated in this review, to evaluate their effectiveness and safety.

Acetazolamide during acute hypoxia improves tissue oxygenation in the human brain

Low doses of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide provides accelerated acclimatization to high-altitude hypoxia and prevention of cerebral and other symptoms of acute mountain sickness. We previously observed increases in cerebral O2 metabolism (CMRO2 ) during hypoxia. In this study, we investigate whether low-dose oral acetazolamide (250 mg) reduces this elevated CMRO2 and in turn might improve cerebral tissue oxygenation (PtiO2 ) during acute hypoxia. Six normal human subjects were exposed to 6 h of normobaric hypoxia with and without acetazolamide prophylaxis. We determined CMRO2 and cerebral PtiO2 from MRI measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral venous O2 saturation. During normoxia, low-dose acetazolamide resulted in no significant change in CBF, CMRO2 , or PtiO2 . During hypoxia, we observed increases in CBF [48.5 (SD 12.4) (normoxia) to 65.5 (20.4) ml·100 ml(-1)·min(-1) (hypoxia), P < 0.05] and CMRO2 [1.54 (0.19) to 1.79 (0.25) μmol·ml(-1)·min(-1), P < 0.05] and a dramatic decline in PtiO2 [25.0 to 11.4 (2.7) mmHg, P < 0.05]. Acetazolamide prophylaxis mitigated these rises in CBF [53.7 (20.7) ml·100 ml(-1)·min(-1) (hypoxia + acetazolamide)] and CMRO2 [1.41 (0.09) μmol·ml(-1)·min(-1) (hypoxia + acetazolamide)] associated with acute hypoxia but also reduced O2 delivery [6.92 (1.45) (hypoxia) to 5.60 (1.14) mmol/min (hypoxia + acetazolamide), P < 0.05]. The net effect was improved cerebral tissue PtiO2 during acute hypoxia [11.4 (2.7) (hypoxia) to 16.5 (3.0) mmHg (hypoxia + acetazolamide), P < 0.05]. In addition to its renal effect, low-dose acetazolamide is effective at the capillary endothelium, and we hypothesize that local interruption in cerebral CO2 excretion accounts for the improvements in CMRO2 and ultimately in cerebral tissue oxygenation during hypoxia. This study suggests a potentially pivotal role of cerebral CO2 and pH in modulating CMRO2 and PtiO2 during acute hypoxia.

Pharmacology of acute mountain sickness: old drugs and newer thinking

Pharmacotherapy in acute mountain sickness (AMS) for the past half century has largely rested on the use of carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitors, such as acetazolamide, and corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone. The benefits of CA inhibitors are thought to arise from their known ventilatory stimulation and resultant greater arterial oxygenation from inhibition of renal CA and generation of a mild metabolic acidosis. The benefits of corticosteroids include their broad-based anti-inflammatory and anti-edemagenic effects. What has emerged from more recent work is the strong likelihood that drugs in both classes act on other pathways and signaling beyond their classical actions to prevent and treat AMS. For the CA inhibitors, these include reduction in aquaporin-mediated transmembrane water transport, anti-oxidant actions, vasodilation, and anti-inflammatory effects. In the case of corticosteroids, these include protection against increases in vascular endothelial and blood-brain barrier permeability, suppression of inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species production, and sympatholysis. The loci of action of both classes of drug include the brain, but may also involve the lung as revealed by benefits that arise with selective administration to the lungs by inhalation. Greater understanding of their pluripotent actions and sites of action in AMS may help guide development of better drugs with more selective action and fewer side effects.

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and high altitude illnesses

Carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitors, particularly acetazolamide, have been used at high altitude for decades to prevent or reduce acute mountain sickness (AMS), a syndrome of symptomatic intolerance to altitude characterized by headache, nausea, fatigue, anorexia and poor sleep. Principally CA inhibitors act to further augment ventilation over and above that stimulated by the hypoxia of high altitude by virtue of renal and endothelial cell CA inhibition which oppose the hypocapnic alkalosis resulting from the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), which acts to limit the full expression of the HVR. The result is even greater arterial oxygenation than that driven by hypoxia alone and greater altitude tolerance. The severity of several additional diseases of high attitude may also be reduced by acetazolamide, including high altitude cerebral edema (HACE), high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) and chronic mountain sickness (CMS), both by its CA-inhibiting action as described above, but also by more recently discovered non-CA inhibiting actions, that seem almost unique to this prototypical CA inhibitor and are of most relevance to HAPE. This chapter will relate the history of CA inhibitor use at high altitude, discuss what tissues and organs containing carbonic anhydrase play a role in adaptation and maladaptation to high altitude, explore the role of the enzyme and its inhibition at those sites for the prevention and/or treatment of the four major forms of illness at high altitude.

Acetazolamide for the prevention of acute mountain sickness--a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acetazolamide has been reported to be effective in the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS). Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of acetazolamide in the prevention of AMS.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Primary end point was difference in incidence of AMS between acetazolamide and placebo groups.

RESULTS

Acetazolamide prophylaxis was associated with a 48% relative-risk reduction compared to placebo. There was no evidence of an association between efficacy and dose of acetazolamide. Adverse effects were often not systematically reported but appeared to be common but generally mild. One study found that adverse effects of acetazolamide were dose related.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetazolamide is effective prophylaxis for the prevention of symptoms of AMS in those going to high altitude. A dose of 250 mg/day has similar efficacy to higher doses and may have a favorable side-effect profile.

Effects of acetazolamide on cerebrovascular function and breathing stability at 5050 m

One of the many actions of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide (ACZ), is to accelerate acclimatisation and reduce periodic breathing during sleep. The mechanism(s) by which ACZ may improve breathing stability, especially at high altitude, remain unclear. We tested the hypothesis that acute I.V. ACZ would enhance cerebrovascular reactivity to CO₂ at altitude, and thereby lower ventilatory drive and improve breathing stability during wakefulness. We measured arterial blood gases, minute ventilation (˙VE) and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv) before and 30 min following ACZ administration (I.V. 10 mg kg⁻¹) in 12 healthy participants at sea level and following partial acclimatisation to altitude (5050 m).Measures were made at rest and during changes in end-tidal PCO₂ and PO₂ (isocapnic hypoxia). At sea level, ACZ increased resting MCAv and its reactivity to both hypocapnia and hypercapnia (P < 0.05), and lowered resting VE, arterial O₂ saturation (Sa,O₂ ) and arterial PO₂ (Pa,O₂) (P < 0.05); arterial PCO₂ (Pa,CO₂ ) was unaltered (P > 0.05). At altitude, ACZ also increased resting MCAv and its reactivity to both hypocapnia and hypercapnia (resting MCAv and hypocapnia reactivity to a greater extent than at sea level). Moreover, ACZ at altitude elevated Pa,CO₂ and again lowered resting Pa,O₂ and Sa,O₂ (P <0.05). Although the ˙VE sensitivity to hypercapnia or isocapnic hypoxia was unaltered following ACZ at both sea level and altitude (P > 0.05), breathing stability at altitude was improved (e.g. lower incidence of ventilatory oscillations and variability of tidal volume; P < 0.05). Our data indicate that I.V. ACZ elevates cerebrovascular reactivity and improves breathing stability at altitude, independent of changes in peripheral or central chemoreflex sensitivities. We speculate that Pa,CO₂-mediated elevations in cerebral perfusion and an enhanced cerebrovascular reactivity may partly account for the improved breathing stability following ACZ at high altitude.

The cerebral effects of ascent to high altitudes

Cellular hypoxia is the common final pathway of brain injury that occurs not just after asphyxia, but also when cerebral perfusion is impaired directly (eg, embolic stroke) or indirectly (eg, raised intracranial pressure after head injury). We Review recent advances in the understanding of neurological clinical syndromes that occur on exposure to high altitudes, including high altitude headache (HAH), acute mountain sickness (AMS), and high altitude cerebral oedema (HACE), and the genetics, molecular mechanisms, and physiology that underpin them. We also present the vasogenic and cytotoxic bases for HACE and explore venous hypertension as a possible contributory factor. Although the factors that control susceptibility to HACE are poorly understood, the effects of exposure to altitude (and thus hypobaric hypoxia) might provide a reproducible model for the study of cerebral cellular hypoxia in healthy individuals. The effects of hypobaric hypoxia might also provide new insights into the understanding of hypoxia in the clinical setting.