Evaluation of the Lake Louise Score for Acute Mountain Sickness and Its 2018 Version in a Cohort of 484 Trekkers at High Altitude

Incidence and risk factors of acute mountain sickness during ascent to Hoh Xil and the physiological responses before and after acclimatization

OBJECTIVES

Ascending to altitudes >2500 m may lead to acute mountain sickness (AMS).

METHODS

The demographics, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol consumption of 104 healthy controls were collected in Chengdu (500 m). Heart rate (HR), saturation of pulse oxygen (SpO2), and AMS-related symptoms were collected in Hoh Xil (4200 m). A headache with Lake Louise score ≥3 was defined as AMS.

RESULTS

The incidence of AMS was 60.58%. AMS group had a lower SpO2 and higher HR than non-AMS group. Alcohol consumption seemed a risk factor for AMS. There was no difference in the BMI, age, height, weight, and smoking between AMS and non-AMS groups. The most common AMS symptom was headache, followed by dyspnea, insomnia, dizziness, lassitude, and anorexia. Women were prone to suffer from dizziness. The value of SpO2 and HR was improved both in AMS and non-AMS groups after hypoxia acclimatization, and the value showed greater improvement in AMS group. Oxygen therapy decreased the AMS-induced tachycardia, which had no any effect on SpO2 and symptom alleviating time.

CONCLUSION

Lower SpO2 and higher HR following exposure to high altitude were associated with AMS susceptibility. The anthropometric data changes were larger in AMS group than non-AMS group before and after hypoxia acclimatization.

Assessment of Acute Mountain Sickness: Comparing the Chinese AMS Score to the Lake Louise Score

Wu, Yu, Wenqi Zhao, Bao Liu, Jianyang Zhang, Zhifeng Zhong, Simin Zhou, Jiaxin Xie, Yuqi Gao, Peng Li, and Jian Chen. Assessment of Acute Mountain Sickness: Comparing the Chinese Ams Score to the Lake Louise Score. High Alt Med Biol 25:164-173, 2024. Objective: To compare the ability of the Chinese AMS Score (CAS) to detect acute mountain sickness (AMS) using the 2018 version of the Lake Louise Score (LLS) as reference. Methods: After flying from Chengdu (altitude: 500 m) to Lhasa (3,658 m), 2,486 young men completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire contained LLS and CAS items. An LLS ≥3 and/or a CAS ≥cutoff were used as the criteria for AMS. Hierarchical cluster analysis and two-step cluster analysis were used to investigate relationships between the symptoms. Results: AMS incidence rates were 33.8% (n = 840) with the LLS and 59.3% (n = 1,473) with the CAS (χ2 = 872.5, p < 0.001). The LLS and CAS had a linear relationship (orthogonal regression, Pearson r = 0.91, p < 0.001). With the LLS as the standard, the CAS had high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.96). However, with the CAS, 25.5% (n = 633) more participants were labeled as having AMS than with the LLS (false positives). Two clusters were identified: one with headache only (419 participants, 66.2%) and one without headache but with other symptoms (214 participants, 33.8%). Reducing the weight of headache in the CAS allowed to align CAS and LLS. Conclusion: In comparison to the LLS, the CAS has a sensitivity close to 100% but lacks specificity given the high rate of false positives. The different weight of headaches may be the main reason for the discrepancy.

Altitude illnesses

Millions of people visit high-altitude regions annually and more than 80 million live permanently above 2,500 m. Acute high-altitude exposure can trigger high-altitude illnesses (HAIs), including acute mountain sickness (AMS), high-altitude cerebral oedema (HACE) and high-altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE). Chronic mountain sickness (CMS) can affect high-altitude resident populations worldwide. The prevalence of acute HAIs varies according to acclimatization status, rate of ascent and individual susceptibility. AMS, characterized by headache, nausea, dizziness and fatigue, is usually benign and self-limiting, and has been linked to hypoxia-induced cerebral blood volume increases, inflammation and related trigeminovascular system activation. Disruption of the blood-brain barrier leads to HACE, characterized by altered mental status and ataxia, and increased pulmonary capillary pressure, and related stress failure induces HAPE, characterized by dyspnoea, cough and exercise intolerance. Both conditions are progressive and life-threatening, requiring immediate medical intervention. Treatment includes supplemental oxygen and descent with appropriate pharmacological therapy. Preventive measures include slow ascent, pre-acclimatization and, in some instances, medications. CMS is characterized by excessive erythrocytosis and related clinical symptoms. In severe CMS, temporary or permanent relocation to low altitude is recommended. Future research should focus on more objective diagnostic tools to enable prompt treatment, improved identification of individual susceptibilities and effective acclimatization and prevention options.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Acute Altitude Illness: 2024 Update

To provide guidance to clinicians about best practices, the Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) convened an expert panel to develop evidence-based guidelines for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of acute mountain sickness, high altitude cerebral edema, and high altitude pulmonary edema. Recommendations are graded based on the quality of supporting evidence and the balance between the benefits and risks/burdens according to criteria put forth by the American College of Chest Physicians. The guidelines also provide suggested approaches for managing each form of acute altitude illness that incorporate these recommendations as well as recommendations on how to approach high altitude travel following COVID-19 infection. This is an updated version of the original WMS Consensus Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Acute Altitude Illness published in Wilderness & Environmental Medicine in 2010 and the subsequently updated WMS Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Acute Altitude Illness published in 2014 and 2019.

Active ascent accelerates the time course but not the overall incidence and severity of acute mountain sickness at 3,600 m

Acute mountain sickness (AMS) typically peaks following the first night at high altitude (HA) and resolves over the next 2-3 days, but the impact of active ascent on AMS is debated. To determine the impact of ascent conditions on AMS, 78 healthy Soldiers (means ± SD; age = 26 ± 5 yr) were tested at baseline residence, transported to Taos, NM (2,845 m), hiked (n = 39) or were driven (n = 39) to HA (3,600 m), and stayed for 4 days. AMS-cerebral (AMS-C) factor score was assessed at HA twice on day 1 (HA1), five times on days 2 and 3 (HA2 and HA3), and once on day 4 (HA4). If AMS-C was ≥0.7 at any assessment, individuals were AMS susceptible (AMS+; n = 33); others were nonsusceptible (AMS-; n = 45). Daily peak AMS-C scores were analyzed. Ascent conditions (active vs. passive) did not impact the overall incidence and severity of AMS at HA1-HA4. The AMS+ group, however, demonstrated a higher (P < 0.05) AMS incidence in the active vs. passive ascent cohort on HA1 (93% vs. 56%), similar incidence on HA2 (60% vs. 78%), lower incidence (P < 0.05) on HA3 (33% vs. 67%), and similar incidence on HA4 (13% vs. 28%). The AMS+ group also demonstrated a higher (P < 0.05) AMS severity in the active vs. passive ascent cohort on HA1 (1.35 ± 0.97 vs. 0.90 ± 0.70), similar score on HA2 (1.00 ± 0.97 vs. 1.34 ± 0.70), and lower (P < 0.05) score on HA3 (0.56 ± 0.55 vs. 1.02 ± 0.75) and HA4 (0.32 ± 0.41 vs. 0.60 ± 0.72). Active compared with passive ascent accelerated the time course of AMS with more individuals sick on HA1 and less individuals sick on HA3 and HA4.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This research demonstrated that active ascent accelerated the time course but not overall incidence and severity of acute mountain sickness (AMS) following rapid ascent to 3,600 m in unacclimatized lowlanders. Active ascenders became sicker faster and recovered quicker than passive ascenders, which may be due to differences in body fluid regulation. Findings from this well-controlled large sample-size study suggest that previously reported discrepancies in the literature regarding the impact of exercise on AMS may be related to differences in the timing of AMS measurements between studies.

AZU1 (HBP/CAP37) and PRKCG (PKC-gamma) may be candidate genes affecting the severity of acute mountain sickness

BACKGROUND

Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS) is one of the diseases that predispose to sudden ascent to high altitudes above 2500 m. Among the many studies on the occurrence and development of AMS, there are few studies on the severity of AMS. Some unidentified phenotypes or genes that determine the severity of AMS may be vital to elucidating the mechanisms of AMS. This study aims to explore the underlying genes or phenotypes associated with AMS severity and to provide evidence for a better understanding of the mechanisms of AMS.

METHODS

GSE103927 dataset was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and a total of 19 subjects were enrolled in the study. Subjects were divided into a moderate to severe AMS (MS-AMS, 9 subjects) group and a no or mild AMS (NM-AMS, 10 subjects) group based on the Lake Louise score (LLS). Various bioinformatics analyses were used to compare the differences between the two groups. Another dataset, Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and another grouping method were used to validate the analysis results.

RESULT

No statistically significant differences in phenotypic and clinical data existed between the MS-AMS and NM-AMS groups. Eight differential expression genes are associated with LLS, and their biological functions are related regulating of the apoptotic process and programmed cell death. The ROC curves showed that AZU1 and PRKCG had a better predictive performance for MS-AMS. AZU1 and PRKCG were significantly associated with the severity of AMS. The expression of AZU1 and PRKCG were significantly higher in the MS-AMS group compared to the NM-AMS group. The hypoxic environment promotes the expression of AZU1 and PRKCG. The results of these analyses were validated by an alternative grouping method and RT-qPCR results. AZU1 and PRKCG were enriched in the Neutrophil extracellular trap formation pathway, suggesting the importance of this pathway in influencing the severity of AMS.

CONCLUSION

AZU1 and PRKCG may be key genes influencing the severity of acute mountain sickness, and can be used as good diagnostic or predictive indicators of the severity of AMS. Our study provides a new perspective to explore the molecular mechanism of AMS.

Sleep loss effects on physiological and cognitive responses to systemic environmental hypoxia

In the course of their missions or training, alpinists, but also mountain combat forces and mountain security services, professional miners, aircrew, aircraft and glider pilots and helicopter crews are regularly exposed to altitude without oxygen supplementation. At altitude, humans are exposed to systemic environmental hypoxia induced by the decrease in barometric pressure (<1,013 hPa) which decreases the inspired partial pressure of oxygen (PIO₂), while the oxygen fraction is constant (equal to approximately 20.9%). Effects of altitude on humans occur gradually and depend on the duration of exposure and the altitude level. From 1,500 m altitude (response threshold), several adaptive responses offset the effects of hypoxia, involving the respiratory and the cardiovascular systems, and the oxygen transport capacity of the blood. Fatigue and cognitive and sensory disorders are usually observed from 2,500 m (threshold of prolonged hypoxia). Above 3,500 m (the threshold for disorders), the effects are not completely compensated and maladaptive responses occur and individuals develop altitude headache or acute altitude illness [Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS)]. The magnitude of effects varies considerably between different physiological systems and exhibits significant inter-individual variability. In addition to comorbidities, the factors of vulnerability are still little known. They can be constitutive (genetic) or circumstantial (sleep deprivation, fatigue, speed of ascent.). In particular, sleep loss, a condition that is often encountered in real-life settings, could have an impact on the physiological and cognitive responses to hypoxia. In this review, we report the current state of knowledge on the impact of sleep loss on responses to environmental hypoxia in humans, with the aim of identifying possible consequences for AMS risk and cognition, as well as the value of behavioral and non-pharmacological countermeasures.

Strengthening Altitude Knowledge: A Delphi Study to Define Minimum Knowledge of Altitude Illness for Laypersons Traveling to High Altitude

Berendsen, Remco R., Peter Bärtsch, Buddha Basnyat, Marc Moritz Berger, Peter Hackett, Andrew M. Luks, Jean-Paul Richalet, Ken Zafren, Bengt Kayser, and the STAK Plenary Group. Strengthening altitude knowledge: a Delphi study to define minimum knowledge of altitude illness for laypersons traveling to high altitude. High Alt Med Biol. 23:330-337, 2022. Introduction: A lack of knowledge among laypersons about the hazards of high-altitude exposure contributes to morbidity and mortality from acute mountain sickness (AMS), high-altitude cerebral edema (HACE), and high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) among high-altitude travelers. There are guidelines regarding the recognition, prevention, and treatment of acute-altitude illness for experts, but essential knowledge for laypersons traveling to high altitudes has not been defined. We sought expert consensus on the essential knowledge required for people planning to travel to high altitudes. Methods: The Delphi method was used. The panel consisted of two moderators, a core expert group and a plenary expert group. The moderators made a preliminary list of statements defining the desired minimum knowledge for laypersons traveling to high altitudes, based on the relevant literature. These preliminary statements were then reviewed, supplemented, and modified by a core expert group. A list of 33 statements was then presented to a plenary group of experts in successive rounds. Results: It took three rounds to reach a consensus. Of the 10 core experts invited, 7 completed all the rounds. Of the 76 plenary experts, 41 (54%) participated in Round 1, and of these 41 a total of 32 (78%) experts completed all three rounds. The final list contained 28 statements in 5 categories (altitude physiology, sleeping at altitude, AMS, HACE, and HAPE). This list represents an expert consensus on the desired minimum knowledge for laypersons planning high-altitude travel. Conclusion: Using the Delphi method, the STrengthening Altitude Knowledge initiative yielded a set of 28 statements representing essential learning objectives for laypersons who plan to travel to high altitudes. This list could be used to develop educational interventions.