Recall of Fertility Discussion by Adolescent Female Cancer Patients: A Survey-Based Pilot Study

Triadic communication with teenagers and young adults with cancer: a systematic literature review - 'make me feel like I'm not the third person'

OBJECTIVES

Clinical communication needs of teenagers and young adults with cancer (TYACs) are increasingly recognised to differ significantly from younger children and older adults. We sought to understand who is present with TYACs, TYACs' experiences of triadic communication and its impact. We generated three research questions to focus this review: (1) Who is present with TYACs in healthcare consultations/communication?, (2) What are TYACs' experiences of communication with the supporter present? and (3) What is the impact of a TYAC's supporter being present in the communication?

DESIGN

Systematic review with narrative synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

The search was conducted across six databases: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and AMED for all publications up to December 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Included papers were empirical research published after 2005; participants had malignant disease, diagnosed aged 13-24 years (for over 50% of participants); the research addressed any area of clinical communication.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Three independent reviewers undertook full-text screening. A review-specific data extraction form was used to record participant characteristics and methods from each included paper and results relevant to the three review questions.

RESULTS

A total of 8480 studies were identified in the search, of which 36 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that mothers were the most common supporter present in clinical communication encounters. TYACs' experiences of triadic communication are paradoxical in nature-the supporter can help or hinder the involvement of the young person in care-related communication. Overall, young people are not included in clinical communication and decisions at their preferred level.

CONCLUSION

Triadic communication in TYACs' care is common, complex and dynamic. Due to the degree of challenge and nuances raised, healthcare professionals need further training on effective triadic communication.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022374528.

Challenges to Widespread Use of Fertility Preservation Facilities for Pediatric Cancer Patients in Japan

Purpose: Although fertility preservation for pediatric cancer patients is becoming more widespread in Japan, some facilities do not provide sufficient information regarding fertility. This study aimed to elucidate the problems pertaining to the lack of information about fertility among patients. Methods: Based on a 2020 survey, seminars addressing fertility preservation were held from the Designated Pediatric Cancer Care Hospitals in each of the seven blocks in Japan to their partner hospital (pediatric cancer hospitals). The seminar consisted of lectures and group discussions, and a questionnaire was also administered after each seminar. Results: In the group discussions, a lack of explanations to patients and explanatory materials for children were cited as issues by many facilities. The survey results revealed a lack of material explaining fertility preservation and a lack of knowledge among health care providers. There were also many requests to use the patient explanation videos presented at the seminar. Conclusion: The results indicate that further education for health care providers by seminar and other sources and enhancement of explanatory materials are important for fertility preservation in pediatric cancer hospitals in Japan.

Investigation of Fertility Preservation Education Videos for Pediatric Patients Based on International and Historical Survey

Purpose: Recently, direct communication with children about cancer seems to have shifted, but little is known about communication regarding discussions of future infertility risk due to cancer therapy. This study conducted cross-cultural comparisons between Japan and the United States to clarify communication patterns about cancer notification and develop appropriate information about fertility issues. Methods: An online survey was distributed to members of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology in July 2019 and the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology in July 2020. Based on the results from the survey, we developed three types of educational videos: a prepubertal version A, B, and a pubertal version. Next, we conducted a survey to assess whether these were appropriate for clinical practice. Results: We analyzed 325 physicians in Japan and 46 in the United States. In Japan, 80.5%, 91.7%, and 92.1% of the physicians notified patients aged 7-9, 10-14, and 15-17 years of their cancer diagnosis directly, respectively, compared within the United States, where the rate was 100%, regardless of age. Further, 9% and 45% of physicians in Japan and the United States, respectively, discuss fertility issues directly with patients aged 7-9 years. In the survey to assess the educational videos, 85% of the physicians preferred to use the educational videos in clinical practice. Conclusion: This is the first step in bringing concordance to communication patters for emerging cancer care around the globe and that this study and its intervention arm provide guidance in ways that ensure global equity in care.

Experiences of Female Childhood Cancer Patients and Survivors Regarding Information and Counselling on Gonadotoxicity Risk and Fertility Preservation at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Background: Childhood cancer patients and their families are increasingly offered oncofertility care including information regarding their risk of gonadal damage by paediatric oncologists, fertility counselling by fertility specialists and fertility preservation options. However, experiences regarding oncofertility care are underreported. We aimed to summarize the available evidence of experiences of female childhood cancer patients and survivors regarding oncofertility care. Methods: Manuscripts were systematically identified using the PubMed and Embase database. From, respectively, 1256 and 3857 manuscripts, 7 articles were included and assessed, including risk of bias assessment. Outcome measures included data describing experiences of female childhood cancer patients and survivors, regarding fertility information, counselling and/or preservation. Results: Female patients and survivors are variably satisfied with fertility information, report challenges in communication with healthcare professionals and prefer to receive general information at diagnosis and detailed fertility information later. Regrets after fertility counselling are underreported, but are associated with refusing fertility preservation. Lastly, regardless of counselling, female patients and survivors report fertility concerns about their future children’s health and effect on relationships. Conclusion: Currently, the satisfaction with oncofertility care varies and female patients or survivors report regrets and concerns regardless of receiving fertility information or counselling. These results may help to improve the content of fertility information, communication skills of healthcare professionals and timing of counselling.

A multidisciplinary pediatric oncofertility team improves fertility preservation and counseling across 7 years

BACKGROUND

Oncofertility is a developing field of increasing importance, particularly in pediatric oncology, where most patients are likely to survive long-term and have not yet had the opportunity to have children.

AIMS

We performed a quality improvement initiative to increase our rates of fertility preservation counseling and referral through the implementation of a pediatric oncofertility team, and we report outcomes 7 years following implementation of our initiative.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compare our baseline oncofertility survey to 44 post-intervention survey respondents and electronic medical record documentation for 149 patients treated in 2019. Ninety-five percent of post-intervention survey respondents recalled fertility counseling (baseline 70%, p = .004) and 89.3% were appropriately referred for fertility preservation (baseline 50%, p = .017). Counseling was documented in 60.4% of charts; 81% of patients analyzed by chart review were appropriately referred for fertility preservation. Fertility preservation outcomes differed by sex assigned at birth.

CONCLUSION

Creation of an oncofertility team produced improvements in fertility counseling and fertility preservation referral across an extended period of time.

Quality of integrated female oncofertility care is suboptimal: A patient-reported measurement

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend to inform female cancer patients about their infertility risks due to cancer treatment. Unfortunately, it seems that guideline adherence is suboptimal. In order to improve quality of integrated female oncofertility care, a systematic assessment of current practice is necessary.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional survey study in which a set of systematically developed quality indicators was processed, was conducted among female cancer patients (diagnosed in 2016/2017). These indicators represented all domains in oncofertility care; risk communication, referral, counseling, and decision-making. Indicator scores were calculated, and determinants were assessed by multilevel multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one out of 344 female cancer patients participated. Eight out of 11 indicators scored below 90% adherence. Of all patients, 72.7% was informed about their infertility, 51.2% was offered a referral, with 18.8% all aspects were discussed in counseling, and 35.5% received written and/or digital information. Patient's age, strength of wish to conceive, time before cancer treatment, and type of healthcare provider significantly influenced the scores of three indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Current quality of female oncofertility care is far from optimal. Therefore, improvement is needed. To achieve this, improvement strategies that are tailored to the identified determinants and to guideline-specific barriers should be developed.