A one-week comfort study of BID-dosed brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic suspension fixed combination compared to BID-dosed dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

[Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination drug Brinzolol Duo in the treatment of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new fixed combination of brinzolamide and timolol in patients with stages I and II of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study patients were divided into 2 groups. The patients of the first group were prescribed Brinzolol Duo, the second group received an original drug Azarga. Regimen for both drugs was 1 drop 2 times per day for 84 days. The study included 7 monitoring visits: visit 0 (screening - 124 patients), visit 1 (randomization and treatment initiation - 120 patients), visits 2-4 (therapy), visit 5 (end of therapy - 117 patients), visit 6 (follow-up, study completion).

RESULTS

Out of 120 patients included in the study, 117 subjects had completed all study procedures. It was shown that both compared drugs significantly reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). After 3 months, 46.5% of patients in the Brinzolol Duo group and 46.9% of patients in the Azarga group had IOP lowered by more than 30% compared to baseline, with IOP amounting to ≤18 mm Hg in 36.6% and 30.2% of patients, respectively. Hypotensive efficacy and safety of the drugs were comparable between the groups (p>0.05). The drugs were well tolerated, all adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

The new drug Brinzolol Duo (brinzolamide + timolol) significantly reduces IOP in POAG patients with efficacy comparable to Azarga.

Additive effects and safety of fixed combination therapy with 1% brinzolamide and 0.5% timolol versus 1% dorzolamide and 0.5% timolol in prostaglandin-treated glaucoma patients

Purpose

To compare the additive effects and safety of 1% brinzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versus the low‐dose regimen of 1% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (DTFC) in patients with open‐angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OAG/OH) following treatment with prostaglandin analogues (PGAs).

Methods

A prospective, randomized, double‐masked, multicentre, parallel‐group and active‐controlled study included 201 Japanese OAG/OH patients who had been treated with PGA. Efficacy was assessed as the change in intra‐ocular pressure (IOP) from baseline after weeks 4 and 8. Safety was assessed with adverse event rates, ocular discomfort score, blur scale, blood pressure and heart rates, best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and slit lamp examinations.

Results

Intra‐ocular pressure (IOP) change from baseline at 9 AM/11 AM pooled over the 8 weeks was −3.3/−3.3 mmHg in the BTFC group and −2.9/−3.4 mmHg in the DTFC group, demonstrating non‐inferiority of BTFC to DTFC. Ocular irritation was frequently seen in DTFC group. Although blurred vision was frequently seen in BTFC group, it was transient and blurring became the equivalent 3 min after instillation between two groups. No noteworthy issue was observed in other safety outcome.

Conclusion

Non‐inferiority of BTFC to DTFC in IOP reduction was demonstrated after adding onto PGA therapy in Japanese OAG/OH patients. Although the score of blurred vision was transiently higher in BTFC than DTFC, treatment difference decreased and disappeared with time. Thus, BTFC can be considered as a safe and effective agent for glaucoma treatment.

Brinzolamide/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol fixed combinations: A hospital-based, prospective, randomized study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of brinzolamide/timolol (BT) and dorzolamide/timolol (DT) fixed combinations on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction.

METHODS

Patients with primary open angle glaucoma or normal tension glaucoma were randomized to receive either BT or DT. IOPs were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 2, and 3 months. The primary outcome measures were the mean change in IOP from baseline at each visit. Secondary outcome measures included the tolerability of each fixed combination.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (73 eyes) were included; 37 eyes in BT group and 36 eyes in DT group. Baseline mean IOP were 24.14 ± 4.5 and 29.53 ± 6 mmHg for BT and DT, respectively (P < 0.001). Both BT and DT provided statistically significant mean IOP reductions from baseline values within each group at all study visits (P < 0.001). DT provided greater mean IOP reductions from baseline than BT at each visit which was statistically significant at 2 weeks (P = 0.037). Mean percentage of IOP reduction was 24.35% and 46.33% at 2 weeks (P < 0.001), and 24.65% and 47% at 3 months (P < 0.001) for BT and DT, respectively. Patients' tolerability appeared to be better for DT than for BT with complete ocular comfort without any ocular adverse effects in 31 patients (81.1%) in DT group and 11 patients (29.7%) in BT group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both drops provide effective IOP reduction which was greater, and patients were more likely to achieve lower target pressures with DT than with BT.

Brinzolamide 1%/timolol versus dorzolamide 2%/timolol in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: prospective randomized patient-preference study

Purpose

The objective of this study was to assess preference for fixed-combination brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% (BTFC) versus fixed-combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% (DTFC) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Methods

In this prospective, single-masked crossover study, patients were randomized 1:1 to BTFC-DTFC or DTFC-BTFC treatment sequences. Patients self-administered each medication for 7 days, with a 48-hour washout period between treatments, and rated ocular discomfort after each treatment period. Medication preferences based on ocular comfort (primary endpoint) and anticipated adherence were assessed. Safety outcomes included adverse events and intraocular pressure. Between-group differences in treatment preference and ocular discomfort scores were analyzed using chi-square and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests, respectively. Adherence, intraocular pressure, and adverse events were summarized descriptively.

Results

In total, 112 patients were enrolled (mean ± SD age, 66±11 years), and 109 patients completed the study. Numerically, more patients in the intent-to-treat dataset preferred BTFC versus DTFC (59.3% versus 40.7%); however, this result was not statistically significant (treatment difference, 18.6%; P=0.0670). Mean ocular discomfort scores (range, 0–9) were statistically significantly lower with BTFC versus DTFC (2.6 versus 3.7; P=0.0002, Wilcoxon– Mann–Whitney test). More patients who preferred BTFC over DTFC were confident that they would adhere to their preferred medication. Treatment-related adverse events included blurred vision with BTFC and eye irritation or eye pain with DTFC.

Conclusion

BTFC and DTFC were preferred by approximately 60% and 40% of patients, respectively, and BTFC was associated with less patient-reported ocular discomfort. Greater ocular comfort of glaucoma medications may improve treatment adherence.

Short-term effect of topical brinzolamide 1%-timolol 0.5% fixed combination on human central corneal thickness

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term effect of fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5% (FCBT) application on human central corneal thickness (CCT).

METHODS

This prospective clinical study included 97 patients having Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification. Patients were randomized to receive apraclonidine hydrochloride 0.5% (APRA) (n=48) or FCBT (n=49) at 1 h before laser surgery. The baseline CCT was evaluated by ultrasonographic pachymetry from the central region ∼1 h before the laser procedure. CCT measurements were applied just before the laser application and then the first, second, and third hour, and the first, third, and seventh day after the Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the baseline intraocular pressures, CCTs, and demographic and clinical data (age, sex, surgery laser interval, total laser energy) of the APRA and the FCBT groups. The mean CCT values of the APRA group at the first, second, and third hour, and the first, third, and seventh day were 553.8±28.0, 551.4±35.3, 556.8±28.7, 552.6±27.5, 548.2±26.2, and 546.2±25.5 μm, respectively. The mean CCT values of the FCBT group at the first, second, and third hour, and the first, third, and seventh day were 544.21±34.4, 549.4±27.6, 555.94±33.1, 550.8±33.4, 547.2±33.6, and 544.9±33.4 μm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was detected between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The difference in CCT increase between both groups was not statistically significant at any follow-up visits. FCBT application does not have a short-term effect on CCT.

The safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination versus dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy and to determine patient preference based on ocular discomfort with fixed combination brinzolamide/timolol and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who required a change in therapy due to elevated IOP while receiving IOP-lowering medication.

METHODS

This was a 3-month, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients had open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, which could not be controlled with monotherapy and were randomized to twice daily therapy with either brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% or dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%. IOP assessments were taken at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM at week 2 as well as at months 1, 2, and 3. Patients completed ocular discomfort assessments (based on stinging, burning, feeling of heat or warmth, or sharp pain) on their current IOP lowering therapy at baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 114 patients enrolled, 57 received Brinz/Tim and 57 received Dorz/Tim twice daily. Both medications produced statistically relevant IOP reductions, which were similar in both groups at each visit. The IOP reductions with Brinz/Tim ranged from 6.42 to 9.74 mmHg (26.09%-37.46%), whereas Dorz/Tim produced mean IOP reductions ranging from 8.16 to 12.41 mmHg (31.19%-41.44%) (P>0.05). Brinz/Tim showed significantly less ocular irritation (0.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P=0.0004) than Dorz/Tim.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Brinz/Tim and Dorz/Tim showed similar significant and clinically relevant IOP-lowering efficacy, whereas Brinz/Tim provided superior outcomes in terms of ocular comfort.

Preference for a fixed combination of brinzolamide/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol among patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Objective

To assess ocular discomfort upon instillation and patient preference for brinzolamide/timolol relative to dorzolamide/timolol, in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, patient-masked, randomized, crossover study. On day 0, patients received one drop of brinzolamide/timolol in one eye and one drop of dorzolamide/timolol in the contralateral eye. On day 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive one drop of either brinzolamide/timolol or dorzolamide/timolol in both eyes; on day 2, patients received one drop of the alternate treatment in both eyes. Measures included a patient preference question on day 2 (primary) and mean ocular discomfort scale scores on days 1 and 2 (secondary). Safety assessments included adverse events, visual acuity, and slit-lamp examinations.

Results

Of 120 patients who enrolled, 115 completed the study. Of these, 112 patients instilled both medications and expressed a study medication preference on day 2. A significantly greater percentage preferred brinzolamide/timolol to dorzolamide/timolol (67.0% versus 30.4%; P < 0.001). The ocular discomfort (expressed as mean [standard deviation]) with brinzolamide/timolol was significantly lower than with dorzolamide/timolol (day 2:1.9 [2.3] versus 3.7 [2.8], respectively [P = 0.0003]; both days combined: 2.1 [2.5] versus 3.5 [2.9], respectively [P = 0.00014]). On day 1, five patients receiving brinzolamide/timolol reported five nonserious adverse events (AEs): flu (n = 1), bitter taste (n = 2), and headache (n = 2). Four events, bitter taste (two events) and headache (two events), were considered related to brinzolamide/timolol. Events were mild in intensity, except bitter taste of moderate intensity reported by one patient. No AEs were reported at day 2. All AEs resolved without additional treatment. No clinically relevant changes from baseline were observed in best-corrected visual acuity or slit-lamp examinations of ocular signs.

Conclusion

Patients had less discomfort with brinzolamide/timolol than with dorzolamide/timolol, and more expressed a preference for brinzolamide/timolol. Both treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.

Short-term effect of topical brinzolamide-timolol fixed combination on ocular surface of glaucoma patients

AIM

To evaluate the short-term effect of the fixed combination of brinzolamide-timolol on the ocular surface in glaucoma patients.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 23 eyes of 23 patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma. Schirmer I test, tear break-up time (BUT) measurement, conjunctival impression cytology and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements were performed in one of the eyes of each patients before and 4 weeks after brinzolamide-timolol fixed combination therapy. All patients were asked to answer the OSDI questionnaire form about the ocular surface symptoms at baseline and at 1 week and 4 weeks follow-up visits.

RESULTS

After brinzolamide-timolol fixed combination theraphy Schirmer I, BUT and CCT values decreased but the only statistically significant decrease was seen in BUT test (P=0.03). OSDI scores increased during the follow-up but this increase was not statistically significant (P=0.22, P=0.42 respectively). Impression cytology findings ranged from 0.78±0.42 to 0.95±0.36 according to the Nelson classification. There was no statistically significant difference between baseline and 4 weeks follow up in impression cytology grades (P=0.15).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that short-term use of brinzolamide-timolol fixed combination theraphy does not have a profound effect on ocular surface except BUT values.

Addition of a fixed combination of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% to prostaglandin monotherapy in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding a fixed combination of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% to prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, pigment dispersion glaucoma, or ocular hypertension who require additional intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter (n = 5), open-label, single-arm, Phase IV clinical trial in which patients currently being treated with a PGA but requiring additional IOP reduction were administered brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% twice daily as adjunctive therapy to their current PGA monotherapy regimen. The primary objective was to examine the IOP-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide-timolol when used as adjunctive therapy.

Results

Forty-seven patients enrolled in and completed the study. After 12 weeks of adjunctive brinzolamide-timolol therapy, the mean IOP of the total patient population decreased from 22.1 mmHg at baseline to 16.7 mmHg. The mean IOP reduction of 5.4 mmHg (24.4%) was both clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001). This significant decrease in mean IOP at week 12 was maintained across all PGA groups (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in symptom frequency between baseline and week 12 for any of the six solicited symptoms. A total of 17 adverse events from six patients was reported, of which ten were drug-related. Most (n = 7) of the drug-related adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. None of the adverse events required any treatment or resulted in treatment interruption or discontinuation. Of the 90 eligible eyes, 85.6% had a decrease in IOP of at least 3 mmHg from baseline and 98% of patients had a decrease in IOP of ≥1 mmHg.

Conclusion

This study suggests that a fixed combination of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% can provide additional IOP reduction effectively and safely when used as adjunctive therapy for patients receiving insufficient IOP reduction from PGA monotherapy.

Update and optimal use of a brinzolamide-timolol fixed combination in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Glaucoma encompasses a wide clinical spectrum of disease, with the common pathophysiology of progressive optic neuropathy leading to visual field loss. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is a key risk factor in disease progression. Treatment is aimed at reduction of IOP to minimize continued optic nerve head damage. Pharmacologic treatment with various classes of IOP-lowering medications is generally employed before more aggressive surgical interventions. Monotherapy is generally accepted as initial therapy for glaucoma, but at least half of patients may require more than one IOP-lowering medication. One option is the fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% and timolol maleate 0.5%, which is commercially available in some countries as Azarga^® for treatment of glaucoma not adequately responsive to monotherapy. These agents may also be used in an unfixed fashion, but fixed combination therapy is generally more convenient for patients, which may result in improved compliance, a reduction of the “washout effect” from instilling multiple drops, and a potential reduction in the side effects related to multiple doses of preservatives.

Role of fixed combinations in the management of open-angle glaucoma

The first-line option for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is a single hypotensive agent, but patients frequently require additional IOP-lowering agents to reach their target pressures. Disadvantages of this multi-therapy approach include washout effect, inconvenience and poor adherence. Fixed combinations (FCs) combine two or more hypotensive agents in a single bottle, providing a convenient once-daily therapy, which tends to improve adherence. FCs generally offer equivalent efficacy to concomitant use of the individual components, with equivalent or superior tolerability. Studies also show that FCs can be more cost effective than nonfixed combinations. In terms of optimizing IOP control, minimizing visual field deterioration, preventing visual disability and minimizing associated healthcare costs, FCs are an important component of glaucoma management.

Brinzolamide-timolol suspension: acceptability and side effect profile

Background:

This study aimed to determine the frequency, nature, and impact of side effects associated with the use of brinzolamide-timolol suspension, a topical ocular antihypertensive preparation.

Methods:

A questionnaire was distributed to 76 consecutive patients attending the Sunderland Eye Infirmary Glaucoma Service who were using the brinzolamide-timolol suspension. The questions related specifically to effects on daily life, blurring of vision, stinging, irritation, and acceptability compared with any drops previously used. Respondents were asked to grade their answers to these questions using a numerical scale from 0 to 10.

Results:

Seventy-six patients (100%) responded, comprising 58 females and 18 males, aged 68–95 years, treated for 3–7 months. Quality of life was not significantly affected, with the majority of patients recording a response between 0 and 2. Visual blurring was a more prominent feature, with the most common scores being 3 and 4. Stinging did not appear to be a prominent feature, with 0 as the most common response. Similarly, irritation was not a common finding, with most respondents scoring 0 and 1. Finally, the brinzolamide-timolol suspension compared favorably with previously used drops, with the vast majority of patients expressing a preference for this suspension over other topical medications.

Conclusion:

Brinzolamide-timolol suspension appears to be a well tolerated and acceptable medication, with minimal effect on patient quality of life.

Efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5% in daily practice

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to document the efficacy and tolerability of the new fixed-combination (FC) brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% as used in daily practice throughout Germany.

METHODS

An open-label, multicenter, observational study of patients was performed that evaluated the transition from prior medication to brinzolamide/timolol FC for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP). Ophthalmologists measured IOP at baseline and 4-6 weeks after transition and assessed their satisfaction with brinzolamide/timolol FC. Patients assessed the tolerability of both their previous and new regimens, judged their satisfaction with brinzolamide/timolol, and reported their preference between their previous and new regimens. Patients transitioning from other FC products to brinzolamide/timolol FC were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Data from 14,025 patients from 1161 centers were analyzed. Four to 6 weeks after transition to brinzolamide/timolol, patients experienced a mean IOP decrease of 3.9 ± 4.3 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). All of the predefined patient subgroups (grouped by previous therapy) demonstrated a significant mean IOP reduction following transition to brinzolamide/timolol (P < 0.0001). Patients judged brinzolamide/timolol tolerability more positively than they did their previous therapies (87.2% vs 53.7% favorable assessments) and reported a high satisfaction rating with brinzolamide/timolol (93.4%). Brinzolamide/timolol was preferred over previous therapy at a ratio of almost 9:1. Patients who transitioned from dorzolamide/timolol to brinzolamide/timolol (n = 2937) demonstrated a significant decrease in mean IOP (P < 0.0001), rated brinzolamide/timolol more tolerable than dorzolamide/timolol (88.9% vs 28.9%), and preferred brinzolamide/timolol at a ratio of more than 9:1. Patients who transitioned from brimonidine/timolol (n = 209) demonstrated a significant decrease in mean IOP (P < 0.0001), rated brinzolamide/timolol more tolerable (86.5% vs 32.1%), and preferred brinzolamide/timolol at a ratio of 11.5:1.

CONCLUSIONS

The FC brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% produced better IOP control than all previous therapies analyzed and demonstrated favorable tolerability and a high satisfaction rating, resulting in a strong patient preference for brinzolamide/timolol over previous therapies.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fixed combination therapy with dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% and timolol maleate 0.5% in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Glaucoma is a collection of diseases characterized by multifactorial progressive changes leading to visual field loss and optic neuropathy most frequently due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). The goal of treatment is the lowering of the IOP to prevent additional optic nerve damage. Treatment usually begins with topical pharmacological agents as monotherapy, progresses to combination therapy with agents from up to 4 different classes of IOP-lowering medications, and then proceeds to laser or incisional surgical modalities for refractory cases. The fixed combination therapy with the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% and the beta blocker timolol maleate 0.5% is now available in a generic formulation for the treatment of patients who have not responded sufficiently to monotherapy with beta adrenergic blockers. In pre- and postmarketing clinical studies, the fixed combination dorzolamide–timolol has been shown to be safe and efficacious, and well tolerated by patients. The fixed combination dorzolamide–timolol is convenient for patients, reduces their dosing regimen with the goal of increasing their compliance, reduces the effects of “washout” when instilling multiple drops, and reduces the preservative burden by reducing the number of drops administered per day.

Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5%: safety and efficacy of a new fixed-combination IOP-lowering product for glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

To provide a commentary on recent studies with the new IOP-lowering fixed-combination product brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5%.

METHODS

Medline was searched for brinzolamide/timolol fixed-combination clinical literature (up to May 18, 2010) and the current comprehensive brinzolamide/timolol literature was reviewed.

RESULTS

Compared with another carbonic anhydrase inhibitor-containing product, dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%, brinzolamide/timolol has similar IOP-lowering efficacy. Brinzolamide/timolol also produces superior comfort ratings as assessed by patients who have tried both drugs - this may be explained by the more physiologic pH of brinzolamide/timolol. A recent study reported that brinzolamide/timolol was preferred over dorzolamide/timolol at a ratio of nearly 4:1 among those expressing a preference.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that brinzolamide/timolol is equally effective and more comfortable than dorzolamide/timolol, a fact that may positively impact patient adherence, leading to an increased likelihood of reaching target IOP goals.

Role of fixed-combination brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% in the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% is a new fixed-combination for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Brinzolamide/timolol has a favorable safety profile, with an incidence of ocular burning and stinging <5%. Published data show that brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% and dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% have similar efficacies for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). There is some evidence that brinzolamide/timolol may be more comfortable. Although patients receiving brinzolamide/timolol may experience more blurred vision on instillation, some data show a preference for brinzolamide/timolol over dorzolamide/timolol. Although available data to assess the role of brinzolamide/timolol in daily clinical practice are still limited, these first results suggest the agent to be a reasonable alternative for patients who do not reach target IOP with monotherapy.

Brinzolamide/timolol: in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (brinzolamide/timolol) is a twice-daily eyedrops suspension comprising the carbonic anhydrase-II inhibitor brinzolamide and the beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist timolol. Brinzolamide/timolol produced clinically relevant reductions in mean intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline and was more effective than brinzolamide or timolol monotherapy in lowering IOP in a 6-month, randomized, phase III trial in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (n = 523). The proportion of patients achieving a mean IOP of <18 mmHg was significantly greater in recipients of brinzolamide/timolol than in recipients of brinzolamide or timolol monotherapy. The IOP-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide/timolol was maintained for up to 12 months, and was no less effective than dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% solution (dorzolamide/timolol) in a randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial (n = 437). Brinzolamide/timolol was generally well tolerated and was associated with significantly lower ocular discomfort scores than dorzolamide/timolol. Moreover, a significantly greater number of patients expressed a preference for brinzolamide/timolol over dorzolamide/timolol. The main ocular adverse event was blurred vision, and was not considered to be a safety issue.