Incidence and Timing of the First Recurrence in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison Between Ranibizumab and Aflibercept

Inhibition of AIF-1 alleviates laser-induced macular neovascularization by inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation via restrained p44/42 MAPK signaling pathway

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading blinding disease worldwide, and macular neovascularization (MNV) is a common complication encountered in the advanced stages of AMD. While the underlying causes of MNV remain elusive, aberrant multiplication of choroidal endothelial cells (CECs) and increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are thought to play significant roles in the occurrence and development of MNV. Allograft inflammatory factor-1(AIF-1) is a crucial regulatory factor of vascular tubular structure formation and growth, involving the proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells and various tumor cells. This study aimed to understand how AIF-1 effects the proliferation of CECs and the subsequent progression of MNV. To study this, a mouse MNV model was established through laser injury, and the AIF-1 expression levels were then measured using western blot and immunohistochemistry. AIF-1 siRNA was intravitreally injected to silence AIF-1 gene expression. Western blot and choroidal flat mount were performed to measure the progression of MNV and proliferation of the CECs. These results showed that the protein expression of AIF-1 was significantly elevated in the laser-induced mouse MNV model, and the expression trend was consistent with VEGF. The protein level of AIF-1 was significantly decreased after the intravitreal injection of AIF-1 siRNA, the damage range of laser lesions was significantly reduced, and the proliferation of endothelial cells was inhibited. Knockdown of the AIF-1 gene significantly inhibited the expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase p44/42 in MNV lesions. In summary, this research demonstrates that AIF-1 promoted MNV progression by promoting the proliferation of CECs and that silencing AIF-1 significantly ameliorates MNV progression in mouse models, which may act through the p44/42 MAPK signaling pathway. AIF-1 could be a new potential molecular target for MNV.

Five-Year Reactivation After Ranibizumab or Aflibercept Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Purpose: To evaluate 5-year reactivation after ranibizumab or aflibercept treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This retrospective study included 192 patients (192 eyes) who had been diagnosed with neovascular AMD or PCV and treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept. The incidence and timing of lesion reactivation during the 5-year follow-up period were evaluated, and the factors associated with reactivation were also investigated. Results: During the follow-up period, lesion reactivation was noted in 156 patients (81.3%) at a mean of 9.5 ± 10.5 months after the third antivascular endothelial growth factor injection. The incidence of reactivation was 59.9% during the first 12 months, 33.7% during ≥12 and <24 months, 11.8% during >24 and ≤36 months, 15.5% during >36 and ≤48 months, and 5.3% during >48 and ≤60 months. There was a significant difference in the incidence among the 5 periods (P < 0.001). The proportion of PCV was significantly higher in patients experiencing reactivation (51.9%) than in those who did not (30.6%) (P = 0.021). Conclusions: During the 5-year follow-up, lesion reactivation was noted in approximately four-fifths of the patients. The incidence of lesion reactivation was highest during the first 12 months and decreased thereafter. The incidence was higher in patients with PCV than in those with neovascular AMD, especially after 12 months.

Inflammatory Choroidal Neovascular Membranes: Clinical Profile, Treatment Effectiveness, and Visual Prognosis

Purpose

To characterise a sample of patients with inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (I-CNV), including clinical profile, underlying aetiology and its course, treatments performed, associated clinical response, and visual prognosis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of I-CNV followed at the Ophthalmology Department of Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ). Clinical and visual outcomes were classified according to the difference in visual acuity after treatment.

Results

Twenty eyes from 17 patients were analysed (11 female and 6 male patients, mean age 41.90 ± 16.457 years at CNV diagnosis). Punctate inner choroidopathy/multifocal choroiditis was the predominant inflammatory aetiology (10 patients, 58.82%). Median follow-up time was 46 months (range 10 to 188 months). Neovascularization was treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (bevacizumab, aflibercept, and ranibizumab), and inflammation with anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive therapy (oral, intravenous, and/or intravitreal corticosteroids; oral cyclosporine or methotrexate). Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents had a median number of 7.00 injections (IQR, 4.25 to 29.00). Visual acuity among 20 eyes had a mean gain of 15.10 ± 12.998 ETDRS letters after anti-VEGF treatment (p=0.000051). According to our classification, 16 had an improved outcome (80.00%), 3 had a stable outcome (15.00%), and 1 had a worsened visual outcome (5.00%). In addition, 13 eyes (65.00%) had a final VA equal to or greater than 65 letters. Recurrence was seen in 3 eyes (15.00%). Complications included cataract (6 patients) and ocular hypertension (4 patients).

Conclusion

A combined approach with anti-VEGF agents and anti-inflammatory therapy was effective in I-CNV treatment, and an overall good visual prognosis was attainable. Intensive follow-up was fundamental in the management of both the primary inflammatory and secondary neovascular conditions.

Fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment in eyes with subretinal hemorrhage secondary to neovascular AMD or PCV: a morphologic predictor associated with poor treatment outcomes

To evaluate the influence of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (FVPED) on treatment outcomes in eyes with subretinal hemorrhage secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). This retrospective study included 83 eyes diagnosed with fovea-involving submacular hemorrhage secondary to neovascular AMD or PCV. All the patients were treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Eyes showing definite FVPED, which involves the subfoveal region, were included in the FVPED group. Eyes without subfoveal PED, shallow irregular PEDs, or serous/hemorrhagic PED were stratified to the non-FVPED group. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at diagnosis, at 3 months, at 12 months, and lesion re-activation after initial treatment were compared between the two groups. The mean size of hemorrhage was 8.6 ± 7.6 disc diameter areas. In the FVPED group, the mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution BCVA was 1.11 ± 0.49 at diagnosis, 0.89 ± 0.58 at 3 months, and 1.05 ± 0.63 at 12 months. In the non-FVPED group, the values were 0.97 ± 0.56, 0.56 ± 0.55, and 0.45 ± 0.50, respectively. The BCVA at 3 months (P = 0.036) and at 12 months (P < 0.001) was significantly worse in the FVPED group than in the non-FVPED group. In addition, the incidence of lesion reactivation was greater in the FVPED group (83.3%) than in the non-FVPED group (38.5%) (P < 0.001). The presence of subfoveal FVPED was associated with a high incidence of lesion re-activation and poor treatment outcomes in eyes with subretinal hemorrhage. This result suggests that different treatment strategies are needed between eyes with and without FVPED.

Long-Term Outcomes of Switching from Fixed-Dose to As-Needed Regimen for Treating Submacular Hemorrhage Secondary to Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with submacular hemorrhage secondary to polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) after switching treatment from a fixed-dose to an as-needed regimen. Methods: This retrospective study included 19 patients with submacular hemorrhage secondary to PCV who were treated with fixed-dose intravitreal aflibercept during the first 56 weeks. After 56 weeks, the treatment regimen was switched to an as-needed regimen. The incidence and timing of lesion reactivation during the as-needed phase were evaluated. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline (beginning of the regimen) and the final follow-up were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with lesion reactivation. Results: During the mean follow-up period of 27 ± 7.3 months, lesion reactivation was noted in 10 patients (52.6%; mean time period: 12.2 ± 9.1 months) in the as-needed phase. Reactivations were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (mean, 4.1 ± 2.6). The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA was 0.26 ± 0.34 at baseline and 0.31 ± 0.38 at final follow-up (p = 0.212). Deterioration of ≥0.2 logMAR BCVA was noted in two patients (10.5%). In multivariate analysis, large lesion size was closely associated with a high risk of lesion reactivation (p = 0.009). Conclusion: Visual acuity was relatively stable after switching from a fixed-dose to an as-needed regimen, with no definite visual deterioration in the majority of patients. We conclude that patients with large lesions should be carefully monitored when switching to an as-needed regimen.

Decreased Periodicity of Reactivation Interval in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Patients with a Late First Reactivation After Initial Treatment

Purpose: To evaluate the periodicity of the intervals of lesion reactivation in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: This retrospective study included 139 eyes diagnosed with treatment-naive neovascular AMD and treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. Patients were initially treated with 3 loading anti-VEGF injections using either ranibizumab or aflibercept. Additional treatment was administered only when lesion reactivation was noted. The difference between the time intervals to the first and the second reactivations was evaluated. The included eyes were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval to the first reactivation: the early reactivation group (≤6 months, n = 86) and the late reactivation group (>6 months, n = 53). The association between the time intervals to the first and the second reactivations was evaluated within each group. Results: The mean follow-up period was 52.7 ± 8.9 months. The first reactivation was noted at mean 9.4 ± 10.4 months after the loading injections. The second reactivation was noted at mean 6.2 ± 4.9 months after the treatment for the first reactivation. The time interval to the second reactivation was significantly shorter compared with the first reactivation (P = 0.018). The association between the time interval to the first and the second reactivations was significant only in the early reactivation group (P = 0.002). Conclusions: A short first reactivation interval suggests that there is a high likelihood that the second reactivation will also be short. However, a long first reactivation interval does not suggest that the second reactivation interval will be similarly long.

Long-term incidence and timing of reactivation in patients with type 3 neovascularization after initial treatment

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term incidence and timing of reactivation in patients with type 3 neovascularization who were treated with three monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

METHODS

A total of 179 patients (179 eyes) diagnosed with type 3 neovascularization with dry macula after three monthly anti-VEGF loading injections were included in this retrospective study. After the initial treatment, patients were followed up without further injection until the first reactivation. The incidence and timing of the first reactivation after the initial treatment were recorded, and factors predictive of early reactivation (≤ 6 months after the third anti-VEGF injection) were investigated.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 37.5 ± 18.8 months, the first reactivation was noted in 145 patients (81.0%) at a mean of 6.6 ± 4.1 months after the third injection. In 94 eyes (64.8%), reactivation was noted 2-6 months after the third injection, while in 37 eyes (25.5%) it was noted 7-12 months after the third injection. In the remaining 14 eyes (9.7%), the reactivation was noted after this period. The incidence of early reactivation was higher in women (P = 0.014) and patients with thicker choroid (P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 3 neovascularization, almost all reactivation was noted within 15 months of the third anti-VEGF injection, suggesting the need for close follow-up and detailed examination during this period. Female patients with thick choroid should be monitored more frequently during this early period.