Prescription of activity restriction to treat high-risk pregnancies

The Compliance of Prescribed Activity Restriction in Women at High Risk for Preterm Birth

OBJECTIVE

Despite lack of evidence to support efficacy, activity restriction is one of the most commonly prescribed interventions used for the prevention of preterm birth. We have a departmental policy against the use of activity restriction but many practitioners still prescribe it in an effort to prevent preterm birth. We sought to evaluate the rate and compliance of women who are prescribed activity restriction during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-site retrospective questionnaire study at a tertiary care, academic affiliated medical center. Women with a history of preterm delivery or short cervix were included. Once patients were identified, each patient was contacted and administered a questionnaire. We assessed the rates of activity restriction prescription and compliance. Secondary outcomes included details regarding activity restriction and treatment in pregnancy. Continuous variables were compared with t-test and categorical variables with Chi-square test. The value p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Among the 52 women who responded to the questionnaire, 18 reported being placed on activity restriction by a physician, with 1 self-prescribing activity restriction, giving a rate of our primary outcome of 19 of 52 (36.5%). All women reported compliance with prescribed activity restriction (100%). Gestational age at delivery was not different in women placed on activity restriction.

CONCLUSION

This questionnaire suggests that approximately one in three high-risk women were placed on activity restriction during their pregnancy despite a departmental policy against its use. The 100% compliance rate in patients placed on activity restriction is a strong reminder of the impact prescribing patterns of physicians can have on patients.

KEY POINTS

· One in three women are placed on activity restriction in pregnancy.. · Women are compliant with prescribed activity restriction.. · Activity restriction does not reduce rates of preterm birth..

Physical Activity Behaviors and Barriers in Multifetal Pregnancy: What to Expect When You're Expecting More

The health benefits of prenatal physical activity (PA) are established for singleton pregnancies. In contrast, individuals with multifetal pregnancies (twins, triplets or more) are recommended to restrict or cease PA. The objectives of the current study were to determine behaviors and barriers to PA in multifetal pregnancies. Between 29 May and 24 July 2020, individuals with multifetal pregnancies participated in an online survey. Of the 415 respondents, there were 366 (88%) twin, 45 (11%) triplet and 4 (1%) quadruplet pregnancies. Twenty-seven percent (n = 104/388) of respondents completed no PA at all during pregnancy, 57% (n = 220/388) completed PA below current recommendations, and 16% (n = 64/388) achieved current recommendations (150-min per week of moderate-intensity activity). Most respondents (n = 314/363 [87%]) perceived barriers to PA during multifetal pregnancy. The most prominent were physical symptoms (n = 204/363 [56%]) and concerns about risks to fetal wellbeing (n = 128/363 [35%]). Sixty percent (n = 92/153) felt that these barriers could be overcome but expressed the need for evidence-based information regarding PA in multifetal pregnancy. Individuals with multifetal pregnancies have low engagement with current PA recommendations but remain physically active in some capacity. There are physical and psychosocial barriers to PA in multifetal pregnancy and future research should focus on how these can be removed.

Why can't I exercise during pregnancy? Time to revisit medical 'absolute' and 'relative' contraindications: systematic review of evidence of harm and a call to action

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend pregnant women without contraindication engage in regular physical activity. This is based on extensive evidence demonstrating the safety and benefits of prenatal exercise. However, certain medical conditions or contraindications warrant a reduction, modification or cessation of activity due to potential health risks.

AIM

To review and evaluate the evidence related to medical disorders which may warrant contraindication to prenatal exercise.

METHODS

Online databases were searched up to 5 April 2019. Forty-four unique studies that reported data on our Population (pregnant women with contraindication to exercise), Intervention (subjective/objective measures of acute or chronic exercise), Comparator (not essential) and Outcomes (adverse maternal or fetal outcomes) were included in the review.

KEY FINDINGS

We found that the majority of medical conditions listed as contraindications were based on expert opinion; there is minimal empirical evidence to demonstrate harm of exercise and benefit of activity restriction. We identified 11 complications (eg, gestational hypertension, twin pregnancy) previously classified as contraindications where women may in fact benefit from regular prenatal physical activity with or without modifications. However, the evidence suggests that severe cardiorespiratory disease, placental abruption, vasa previa, uncontrolled type 1 diabetes, intrauterine growth restriction, active preterm labour, severe pre-eclampsia and cervical insufficiency are associated with strong potential for maternal/fetal harm and warrant classification as absolute contraindications.

CONCLUSION

Based on empirical evidence, we provide a call to re-evaluate clinical guidelines related to medical disorders that have previously been considered contraindications to prenatal exercise. Removing barriers to physical activity during pregnancy for women with certain medical conditions may in fact be beneficial for maternal-fetal health outcomes.

Restricted physical activity in pregnancy reduces maternal vascular resistance and improves fetal growth

OBJECTIVES

To test the efficacy of maternal activity restriction for reducing peripheral vascular resistance in normotensive pregnant women with raised total vascular resistance (TVR) and to evaluate its effect on fetal growth.

METHODS

This was a prospective case-control study of 30 women enrolled between 27 and 29 weeks' gestation. All patients met the following criteria: normal blood pressure before and during pregnancy, TVR between 1300 and 1400 dynes × s/cm⁵ at enrolment, normal fetal Doppler parameters at enrolment and abdominal circumference between the 10^th and 25^th centiles. Patients were assigned to activity restriction (activity-restriction group; n = 15) or no treatment (control group; n = 15) and were assessed after 4 weeks for TVR and fetal growth.

RESULTS

TVR at enrolment and estimated fetal weight centile were similar in the activity-restriction group vs controls (1358 ± 26 vs 1353 ± 30 dynes × s/cm⁵ ; 18^th  ± 4 vs 19^th  ± 4 centile; P = NS). After 4 weeks, the activity-restriction group compared with controls showed significantly lower TVR (1165 ± 159 vs 1314 ± 190 dynes × s/cm⁵ ; P < 0.05), which was associated with higher estimated fetal weight centile (25^th  ± 5 vs 20^th  ± 5 centile; P < 0.05). TVR was lower and estimated fetal weight centile higher for the activity-restriction group after 4 weeks compared with at enrolment.

CONCLUSIONS

In normotensive pregnant women with raised TVR, maternal activity restriction appears to be effective in reducing TVR and therefore enhancing fetal growth. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

An exploratory analysis of the utility of adding cardiorespiratory biofeedback in the standard care of pregnancy-induced hypertension

This study examined the efficacy of a cardiorespiratory biofeedback intervention compared to bed rest in the treatment of 47 women diagnosed with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). The investigation consisted of a historical control group with 31 PIH subjects receiving treatment as usual (TAU), bed rest and antihypertensive medications, and an experimental group with 16 PIH subjects receiving TAU and instruction on using a portable respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) biofeedback device once daily until delivery. Results indicated that systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were unchanged for either group. Failing to find the intended main effects, a series of exploratory analyses were performed. Findings of associated hypotheses revealed that the RSA BF group had a 35 % higher birth weight than the TAU group. The gestational age at delivery was 10 % greater in the RSA BF group than in the TAU group. A significant relationship was found between the StressEraser Total and the 1-min Apgar score. Eighty-one percent of the subjects stated that the device was relaxing. Fifty percent of the subjects believed that the device helped them fall asleep. Overall, these results suggest that portable RSA biofeedback may be effective in reducing stress during pregnancy and improving perinatal outcomes.

Bed-rest exercise, activity restriction, and high-risk pregnancies: a feasibility study

This feasibility study investigated the response of maternal heart rate, blood pressure, and uterine contractions to a 30-min bed-rest exercise session (while listening to music) in hospitalized women with varying diagnoses of high-risk pregnancy. Eleven antenatal women who were hospitalized for activity restriction were assigned randomly to either a bed-rest exercise and music group (n = 6) or a bed-rest and music group (n = 5) that involved no exercise. The key findings were that there were no changes in maternal blood pressure or in the number of uterine contractions following the exercise intervention. A supervised bed-rest exercise intervention may, therefore, provide minimal risks and help alleviate the physiological effects of hospital activity restriction.

Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest

Antepartum bed-rest treatment is based on assumptions that it is both effective and safe for mother and fetus. However, research indicates, that bed-rest treatment is ineffective for preventing preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, and for increasing gestational age at birth and infant birthweight. Studies of women treated with pregnancy bed-rest identify numerous side effects, including muscle atrophy, bone loss, weight loss, decreased infant birthweight in singleton gestations and gestational age at birth, and psychosocial problems. Studies conducted by aerospace scientists who have used bed rest as a model for the study of weightlessness in space using nonpregnant individuals report similar results. Antepartum bed-rest treatment should be discontinued until evidence of effectiveness is found.

Antepartum bed rest for pregnancy complications: efficacy and safety for preventing preterm birth

Preterm birth is the major maternal-child health issue across developed nations and the leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Of all deaths of infants <1 year of age in the United States in 2005, 68.6% occurred in infants born prior to term. Although the preterm birth rate in European countries is 5-7%, the U.S. preterm birth rate is 12.7%, representing an increase of 9% since 2000. Antepartum bed rest/activity restriction (ABR/AR) has been a mainstay of treatment to prevent preterm birth for the past 30 years prescribed for nearly 1 million women in the United States annually, despite a lack of evidence for its effectiveness. In fact, there is increasing evidence that ABR causes several adverse physiologic and psychological side effects among women and their infants. Unfortunately, these findings have had little impact on clinical practice. This integrative review of literature provides a comprehensive analysis of the evidence for the practice of prescribing ABR and its physiologic, behavioral, and experiential side effects. It also presents a model to guide continuing research about the effects of maternal bed rest as well as evidence supporting the use of home care with bed rest, a different, safe, and feasible model of prenatal care for treating women with pregnancy complications used particularly in other countries. Finally, suggestions to improve the health of high-risk pregnant and postpartum women and their infants are provided.

Dietary intake, capillary blood glucose, and activity level of activity-restricted, hospitalized, pregnant women in the third trimester: a pilot study

Activity restriction in hospital is commonly prescribed by care providers to decrease the incidence of maternal or fetal morbidity in high-risk pregnancies. The purpose of this pilot descriptive study was to collect preliminary data on dietary intake, capillary blood glucose concentrations, and activity level in high-risk, activity-restricted, pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy. Dietary food intake records, capillary blood glucose, and daily pedometer step totals were investigated in 20 activity-restricted women over 7 consecutive days in hospital. Subjects were asked to collect hospital meal tickets, as well as record any additional items not provided by the hospital in a dietary log each day. Capillary blood glucose was collected every morning (fasting) as well as 1 h after breakfast (post-prandial) using a glucometer. Subjects wore a pedometer 24 h/d, and recorded step totals 4 times daily in a pedometer log. In the analysis, average energy and macronutrient intakes met dietary reference intake (DRI) recommendations, as did average intakes of all micronutrients, including maternal supplementation. Without supplementation, vitamin E and iron intakes were lower (p < 0.05) than the DRI recommendations. Average fasting (4.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L) and post-prandial (7.1 ± 1.0 mmol/L) blood glucose concentrations in subjects without gestational diabetes (GDM) did not exceed Canadian Diabetes Association cut-off values for screening of GDM. The mean daily step total of 1579 ± 936 was lower than ambulatory third-trimester women (6495 ± 2282 steps; p < 0.001). Results from this pilot study suggest that with maternal supplementation, these activity-restricted, hospitalized, pregnant women were meeting dietary recommendations, and did not have elevated capillary blood glucose. However, given the severity of activity restriction, these women may be at risk for consequences of extreme inactivity.

Spiritual well-being, anxiety, and depression in antepartal women on bedrest

This descriptive correlational study examined relationships among anxiety, depression, and spiritual well-being (SWB) in three groups of women (non-pregnant, normal pregnancy, high-risk pregnancy on bedrest). Women in each group completed a demographic survey, a Spiritual Well-Being Scale, and depression and anxiety subscales from the Abbreviated Scale for the Assessment of Psychosocial Status in Pregnancy. All groups (N = 180) demonstrated significant, inverse relationships among SWB, anxiety, and depression. Findings emphasize the importance of obstetrical nurses screening pregnant women to evaluate emotional health, especially in high risk pregnancies. Collaboration with mental health nurses may be useful in developing interventions to improve a woman's SWB, reduce anxiety and depression, and improve pregnancy outcomes.

Evidence-based case management in a high-risk pregnancy: a case study

This article examines the case management needs of a pregnant woman confined to bed after preterm premature rupture of membranes. Through the period when she is confined to bed, interventions and outcomes are determined on the basis of evidence-based guidelines. By examining this case study, it is anticipated that best practices can be determined for women in similar situations.

Exercise or other physical activity for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications

BACKGROUND

The association between an increase in regular physical activity and a reduction in the risk of hypertension is well documented for non-pregnant people. It has been suggested that exercise may help prevent pre-eclampsia and its complications. Possible adverse effects of increased physical activity during pregnancy, particularly on the risk of preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, are unclear. It is, therefore, important to assess whether exercise reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia and its complications and, if so, whether these benefits outweigh the risks.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of exercise, or increased physical activity, on prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1), and EMBASE (2002 to February 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if these were randomised trials evaluating the effects of exercise or increased physical activity during pregnancy for women at risk of pre-eclampsia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Data were entered on Review Manager software for analysis, and double checked for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

Two small, good quality trials (45 women) were included. Both compared moderate intensity regular aerobic exercise with maintenance of normal physical activity during pregnancy. The confidence intervals were wide and crossed the line of no effect for all reported outcomes including pre-eclampsia (relative risk 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 7.09).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence for reliable conclusions about the effects of exercise on prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications.

Rest during pregnancy for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications in women with normal blood pressure

BACKGROUND

Women at risk of pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension are sometimes advised to rest. Whether this, overall, does more good than harm is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of rest or advice to reduce physical activity during pregnancy for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications in women with normal blood pressure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005), and EMBASE (2002 to August 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised trials evaluating the effects of rest or advise to reduce physical activity for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications in women with normal blood pressure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Data were double checked for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

Two small trials (106 women) of uncertain quality were included. Both recruited women with a singleton pregnancy at moderate risk of pre-eclampsia from 28 to 32 weeks' gestation. There was a statistically significant reduction in the relative risk of pre-eclampsia with four to six hours rest per day (one trial, 32 women; relative risk (RR) 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.83), but not of gestational hypertension (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.00), compared to normal activity. Rest of 30 minutes per day plus nutritional supplementation was associated with a reduction in the risk of pre-eclampsia (one trial, 74 women; RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.51) and also of gestational hypertension (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.63). The effect on caesarean section was unclear (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.41). No other outcomes were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Daily rest, with or without nutrient supplementation, may reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia for women with normal blood pressure, although the reported effect may reflect bias and/or random error rather than a true effect. There is no information about outcomes such as perinatal mortality and morbidity, maternal morbidity, women's views, adverse effects, and costs. Current evidence is insufficient to support recommending rest or reduced activity to women for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Whether women rest during pregnancy should therefore be a matter of personal choice.

APN-physician collaboration in caring for women with high-risk pregnancies

PURPOSE

To examine: (a) frequency and focus of APN-physician collaborations in a clinical trial in which half of physician prenatal care for women with high-risk pregnancies was substituted with APN prenatal care delivered in women's homes; and (b) characteristics of women requiring greater numbers of collaborations.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Descriptive study with secondary analysis of data from 83 of the original trial's 85 intervention participants followed by APNs prenatally through 8 weeks postpartum. APN practices, recorded in logs, included APN interactions with the women and the physician, and type of APN contact (e.g., home visit, telephone call). Each APN-physician collaboration was coded for type, timing, and focus.

FINDINGS

Total number of APN-physician collaboration contacts was 351, with a mean of 4.5 and a range of 1 to 16 per woman. Focus of collaborations was: status updates (59%), new physical findings (21%), change in treatment (8%), patient concerns (7%) and medication adjustment (5%). No significant differences in numbers of collaborations were found according to age, primary diagnosis, marital status, type of health insurance, race, or income. Women with high school education received more collaborations than did those not completing high school or those with some postsecondary education. Prenatally, women with a first pregnancy required more collaborations than did multipara participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Most APN-physician collaborative contacts were focused on monitoring women's physical and emotional status and discussing new physical findings. These collaborations were important in the original trial's successful pregnancy and infant outcomes and savings in health care dollars.

A survey of Canadian practitioners regarding the management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

How Canadian practitioners are managing the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is not known, particularly in relation to the 1997 guidelines published by the Canadian Hypertension Society (CHS).

METHODS

A survey, with French and English versions (and covering diagnosis, evaluation, and management of pregnancy hypertension), was mailed to all members of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) (N = 1757, including obstetricians, family doctors practicing obstetrics, and midwives). Additionally, internists [i.e., all nephrologists (N = 191) and a random sample of 25% of general internists (N = 450)] registered with the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada were sampled. The survey was distributed in two mailings and one reminder card. Data were entered into Microsoft Access, and Graph Pad Prism used to summarize responses [N (%)]. Differences in practice between specialties were examined, with a Bonferroni correction used to calculate a significant p value based on the number of comparisons and alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Respondents numbered 1187 (49.5%), with 466 not informative for the purpose of the study (due to retirement, or practices that do not include pregnant women with hypertension). The final analysis included 721 completed surveys. For all types of HDP, most internists, family doctors, and midwives initiate nonpharmacological therapy (most common advice to quit work) at dBP 80-89 mmHg (i.e., primary prevention). Only for preeclampsia do obstetricians most frequently use this threshold; otherwise, dBP 90-99 mmHg is usually chosen. For nonsevere hypertension, antihypertensive drug therapy (most commonly methyldopa or labetalol) is started by most practitioners at dBP 90-99 mmHg, although obstetricians are more likely to choose a higher threshold (p < 0.0001). There is little agreement about dBP treatment goal; most internists and family doctors normalize dBP, whereas obstetricians appear to be divided on dBP goals of 80-89 (46-51%) vs. 90-99 mmHg (41-44%) for all HDP (p = 0.66). Severe hypertension is commonly treated with parenteral hydralazine, labetalol, or magnesium sulphate. Short-acting or sustained release nifedipine is used rarely/never by most practitioners. Approximately one-third of obstetricians and family doctors use diazepam to treat eclampsia. The vast majority use MgSO4 prophylactically in women with preeclampsia.

INTERPRETATION

This survey has clarified current stated management of women with HDP, and identified the need for both research into the dBP treatment goal that optimizes pregnancy outcomes among women with HDP, and translation of definitive studies into clinical practice.

The Evolution of Bed Rest as a Clinical Intervention

Bed rest as a therapy can be traced back to Hippocrates and has been used for many types of illnesses since then. It is still commonly used as an intervention in pregnancy despite known physiological and psychological side effects. Some historical and social reasons why nurses and other health care providers are slow to change practice are provided. Evidence from randomized trials is urgently needed to support or refute the use of bed rest in pregnancy.

Inactivity: symptoms associated with gastrocnemius muscle disuse during pregnancy

This longitudinal study assessed change in gastrocnemius muscle metabolism across antepartum bed rest and recovery during the first 6 weeks postpartum as well as symptoms during recovery. The convenience sample consisted of 65 pregnant women, hospitalized on bed rest for a mean of 24.8 days (range 5-70 days). A dual wavelength hemoglobin/ myoglobin spectrophotometer and ergometer assessed muscle reoxygenation times after plantar flexion exercise from hospital admission through 6 weeks postpartum. The Postpartum Symptom Checklist assessed symptoms of muscle deconditioning. The time for gastrocnemius muscle reoxygenation after exercise significantly increased across antepartum bed rest (t = -2.1, P <.05) and significantly decreased during the 6-week postpartum period (t = 1.83, P <.05). Women who were on bed rest prior to hospital admission had significantly higher reoxygenation scores upon enrollment (t = -8.6, P <.05). Symptoms of postpartum muscle soreness, deconditioning, and difficulty with mobility were reported. Postpartum assessment and rehabilitation are needed to facilitate recovery and prevent long-term injury.

Dysphoria among high-risk pregnant hospitalized women on bed rest: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

While approximately 700,000 women experience pregnancy complications and are treated with bed rest in the hospital each year, little is known about negative affect in these women.

OBJECTIVES

The study purpose was to describe dysphoria, a composite of symptoms of negative affect across the antepartum and postpartum and to identify the relationship between dysphoria and the length of pre-admission home bed rest, hospital bed rest, and maternal and fetal/neonatal indices of risk.

METHODS

The convenience sample for this longitudinal repeated measures study consisted of 63 high-risk pregnant women admitted on antepartum bed rest to one of three university-affiliated hospitals. Women were included if they were diagnosed with (a) preterm labor, (b) premature rupture of membranes, (c) incompetent cervix, (d) placenta previa, (e) placental abruption or multiple gestation, and (f) did not have a psychiatric disorder. The Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised (MAACL-R) was used to assess dysphoria. Obstetric risk status was assessed by both the Hobel and Creasy Risk Assessment tools.

RESULTS

Dysphoria was highest upon hospital admission and decreased significantly across time (F (5) = 23.58, p <.001). Positive Affect-Sensation Seeking significantly increased across time (F (5) = 53.16, p <.001). Dysphoria scores were significantly greater for those with highest Hobel obstetric risk scores (F (1, 60) = 4.53, p =.037). Antepartum dysphoria was not correlated with gestational age upon hospital admission, length of bed rest, or Creasy risk status. However, gestational age at birth was significantly correlated with postpartum dysphoria.

DISCUSSION

The stimulus for antepartum dysphoria is unclear. However, postpartum dysphoria appears to be related to indicators of the infant's state of health at birth.

Variability in physician management of employment during pregnancy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Successful employment outcomes for pregnant women result from a complex interplay between the woman, her employer, her prenatal care provider, laws and other influences.

METHODS

A mail survey about management of employment during pregnancy was sent to directors of US residency programs that train prenatal care providers. Each physician was randomly assigned one of 4 vignette patients whose job involved prolonged standing, rotating shifts and lifting 40 lbs. Half the vignette patients had risk factors for preterm birth and half would have financial difficulty if placed on an unpaid antenatal leave.

RESULTS

The 301 respondents estimated that they provide a written job restriction for 20% of their employed pregnant patients, although in 6 clinics the job restriction rate was 100%. For vignettes with preterm birth risk factors, 62.5% of physicians would always recommend a job restriction, 35.6% would do so sometimes, and 2.2% would rarely do so. When the vignette did not have risk factors for preterm birth, 21.5% of the physicians would always recommend a job restriction, 51.3% would do so sometimes, 25.9% would do so rarely and 1.3% would never do so. Economic factors were not associated with prescribing job restrictions. One in 5 of the residency programs provides no teaching on occupational health issues in pregnancy, and 65.1% provide 2 hours or less.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in employment recommendations suggests that some women may not obtain the job modifications that they need, whereas others may be restricted unnecessarily. The limited curriculum time devoted to this topic may make it difficult to train physicians about complex employment issues during pregnancy.

Antepartum bed rest: effect upon the family

OBJECTIVE

To identify the effects of antepartum bed rest upon the family.

DESIGN

Descriptive, retrospective survey.

PARTICIPANTS

A national random selection of 89 women who had been prescribed antepartum bed rest in the hospital or at home and who contacted a high-risk pregnancy support group for information.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

An open-ended questionnaire.

RESULTS

Families experienced difficulty assuming maternal responsibilities, anxiety about maternalfetal outcomes, and adverse emotional effects on the children. Child care was managed by various people across time. Child care problems included negative reactions from the children, concern about the quality of the provider, and maternal worry about care. Families also experienced financial difficulties, the majority of which were not compensated by insurance or work benefits. Almost all, 96.6%, families received some type of support during bed rest. Instrumental support was the most commonly received; however, emotional support was considered the most helpful. The least helpful type of support was that which was unreliable. The primary providers of support to the family were parents and family, followed by friends. The women reported that health care providers offered minimal support to the family.

CONCLUSION

Despite support, antepartum bed rest creates difficulties that affect the entire family and its finances.

Perceptions of bed rest by women with high-risk pregnancies: A comparison between home and hospital

BACKGROUND

Bed rest at home or in the hospital is a commonly prescribed treatment for women experiencing complications of pregnancy. This focused ethnographic study examined bed rest from the high-risk pregnant woman's perspective and compared perceptions of women cared for in the home with those in hospital.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 24 pregnant women who had been on bed rest for at least seven days was recruited from the antepartum unit of a tertiary care hospital and from an antepartum home care program in western Canada. Data were collected in 1994 through interviews and participant diaries. Content analysis was used to identify themes.

RESULTS

Bed rest had a significant emotional and social impact on pregnant women and their families in both settings. Overall, bed rest in hospital seemed to be associated with more sources of stress than at home. In hospital, women had to cope with separation from home and family, lack of privacy, hospital discomforts, and incompatible roommates, whereas women at home struggled with role reversal and the temptation to do more activity than was recommended. Stressors not unique to but exacerbated by hospitalization included concerns about the children, a sense of missing out, a sense of confinement and being a prisoner, boredom, feelings of depression and loneliness, and negative impact on the relationship with their partner.

CONCLUSION

Study findings raise questions about the appropriateness of routine prescription of bed rest. Health care professionals should propose and develop home care programs as an alternative to antepartum hospitalization.

Antepartum home care for high-risk pregnant women

Home care for women experiencing complications of pregnancy is a rapidly growing specialty. A variety of models of antepartum home care have emerged. Provision of effective antepartum home care requires knowledge and clinical skills in perinatal and home health nursing and an understanding of the structure and function of the home health care system. Nursing care in the home encompasses case coordination, maternal and fetal assessment, maternal education regarding the woman's risk situation and self-monitoring requirements, and provision of support. Antepartum home care for conditions such as hypertension in pregnancy, preterm labor, and hyperemesis gravidarum is discussed.