1
|
The impact of depression on adherence to organized and opportunistic breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer Prev 2019; 29:53-59. [PMID: 30998527 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
One in five women will experience depression over her lifetime, and one out of eight will develop breast cancer. We evaluated the effect of depression on adherence to mammography in Switzerland, where opportunistic and organized screening programs coexist. We analyzed data from 3206 women aged 50-69 who participated in the Swiss Health Survey 2012. We compared mammographic rates among women with no to mild versus moderate to severe depressive symptoms. The effect of the type of screening on the odds of undertaking a mammography was calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Women with moderate to severe major depressive symptoms were more likely to have had a mammography in the previous 2 years than their nondepressed or less-depressed counterparts (51 vs. 39.2%, respectively, P = 0.005). In the multivariable analysis, women with no to mild major depression living in cantons with an organized screening program had an adjusted odds ratio of 2.7 (95% confidence interval: 2.30-3.17, P < 0.001) of having had a mammography within the past 24 months compared with those living in the regions with an opportunistic screening. The adjusted odds ratio for women with moderate to severe major depression was 4.21 (95% confidence interval: 2.13-8.33, P < 0.001). In Switzerland. adherence to mammographic screening among women with moderate to severe major depression is higher than among women with no or minimal major depressive symptoms. This increased adherence is even more pronounced in regions with organized screening.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hategekimana C, Karamouzian M. Self-perceived Mental Health Status and Uptake of Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Health Policy Manag 2016; 5:365-71. [PMID: 27285514 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most preventable causes of cancer mortality, it is one of the leading causes of cancer death in Canada where CRC screening uptake is suboptimal. Given the increased rate of mortality and morbidity among mental health patients, their condition could be a potential barrier to CRC screening due to greater difficulties in adhering to behaviours related to long-term health goals. Using a population-based study among Canadians, we hypothesize that self-perceived mental health (SPMH) status and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) uptake for the screening of CRC are associated. METHODS The current study is cross-sectional and utilised data from the Canadian Community Health Survey 2011-2012. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was undertaken to assess whether SPMH is independently associated with FOBT uptake among a representative sample of 11 386 respondents aged 50-74 years. RESULTS Nearly half of the respondents reported having ever had FOBT for CRC screening, including 37.28% who have been screened within two years of the survey and 12.41% who had been screened more than two years preceding the survey. Respondents who reported excellent mental health were more likely to have ever been screened two years or more before the survey (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.00-4.43) and to have been screened in the last two years preceding the survey (AOR = 1.53; 95% CI, 0.86-2.71) than those reported poor mental health status. CONCLUSION This study supports the association between SPMH status and FOBT uptake for CRC screening. While the efforts to maximize CRC screening uptake should be deployed to all eligible people, those with poor mental health may need more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celestin Hategekimana
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mohammad Karamouzian
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Regional Knowledge Hub, and WHO Collaborating Centre for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mitchell AJ, Pereira IES, Yadegarfar M, Pepereke S, Mugadza V, Stubbs B. Breast cancer screening in women with mental illness: comparative meta-analysis of mammography uptake. Br J Psychiatry 2014; 205:428-35. [PMID: 25452600 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a higher mortality rate due to cancer in people with mental illness and previous work suggests suboptimal medical care in this population. It remains unclear if this extends to breast cancer population screening. AIMS To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish if women with a mental health condition are less likely to receive mammography screening compared with those without mental ill health. METHOD Major electronic databases were searched from inception until February 2014. We calculated odds ratios (OR) with a random effects meta-analysis comparing mammography screening rates among women with and without a mental illness. Results were stratified according to primary diagnosis including any mental illness, mood disorders, depression, severe mental illness (SMI), distress and anxiety. RESULTS We identified 24 publications reporting breast cancer screening practices in women with mental illness (n = 715,705). An additional 5 studies investigating screening for those with distress (n = 21,491) but no diagnosis of mental disorder were identified. The pooled meta-analysis showed significantly reduced rates of mammography screening in women with mental illness (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.77), mood disorders (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.90) and particularly SMI (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.65). No disparity was evident among women with distress alone. CONCLUSIONS Rates of mammography screening are lower in women with mental illness, particularly women with SMI, and this is not explained by the presence of emotional distress. Disparities in medical care due to mental illness clearly extend into preventive population screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex J Mitchell
- Alex J. Mitchell, MD, Department of Psycho-oncology, Cancer and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester; Isabel Espirito Santo Pereira, Motahare Yadegarfar, Shingai Pepereke, Vongai Mugadza, University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester; Brendon Stubbs, MSc, MCSP, Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Isabel Espirito Santo Pereira
- Alex J. Mitchell, MD, Department of Psycho-oncology, Cancer and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester; Isabel Espirito Santo Pereira, Motahare Yadegarfar, Shingai Pepereke, Vongai Mugadza, University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester; Brendon Stubbs, MSc, MCSP, Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Motahare Yadegarfar
- Alex J. Mitchell, MD, Department of Psycho-oncology, Cancer and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester; Isabel Espirito Santo Pereira, Motahare Yadegarfar, Shingai Pepereke, Vongai Mugadza, University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester; Brendon Stubbs, MSc, MCSP, Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Shingai Pepereke
- Alex J. Mitchell, MD, Department of Psycho-oncology, Cancer and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester; Isabel Espirito Santo Pereira, Motahare Yadegarfar, Shingai Pepereke, Vongai Mugadza, University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester; Brendon Stubbs, MSc, MCSP, Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Vongai Mugadza
- Alex J. Mitchell, MD, Department of Psycho-oncology, Cancer and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester; Isabel Espirito Santo Pereira, Motahare Yadegarfar, Shingai Pepereke, Vongai Mugadza, University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester; Brendon Stubbs, MSc, MCSP, Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Alex J. Mitchell, MD, Department of Psycho-oncology, Cancer and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester; Isabel Espirito Santo Pereira, Motahare Yadegarfar, Shingai Pepereke, Vongai Mugadza, University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester; Brendon Stubbs, MSc, MCSP, Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vigod SN, Kurdyak PA, Stewart DE, Gnam WH, Goering PN. Depressive symptoms as a determinant of breast and cervical cancer screening in women: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. Arch Womens Ment Health 2011; 14:159-68. [PMID: 21311925 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-011-0210-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2010] [Accepted: 01/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between depression and screening for breast and cervical cancer. The study sample included Ontario female respondents to the Canadian Community Health Survey Cycle 1.2, Mental Health and Well Being component (2002). Women with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) were identified based on the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview and women with clinically significant depressive symptoms were identified using the Kessler 6-item Distress Scale (K6 ≥ 8). Respondents eligible for screening (N = 4,042 for cervical cancer and N = 1,403 for breast cancer) were linked to Ontario administrative data to prospectively ascertain screening outcomes. Both women with MDD and K6 ≥ 8 were less likely to receive breast cancer screening than their non-depressed counterparts (46.1% vs. 61.5% for MDD, Χ(2) = 5.47, p = 0.02; 49.9% vs. 61.9% for K6, Χ(2) = 6.61, p = 0.01). Adjusted analyses revealed persistence of the association between K6 ≥ 8 and breast cancer screening (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.97). Neither MDD nor K6 ≥ 8 were found to be associated with cervical cancer screening in the full sample. A sub-group analysis by age revealed that women over age 40 years with K6 ≥ 8 were less likely to receive cervical cancer screening than their non-depressed counterparts (49.9% vs. 64.5%, X(2) = 6.47, p = 0.01). This association approached statistical significance in adjusted analysis (AOR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.04). This study's findings suggest that attention to the uptake of preventive services in women with depressive symptoms is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone N Vigod
- Women's College Hospital, Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Receipt of preventive medical care and medical screening for patients with mental illness: a comparative analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010; 32:519-43. [PMID: 20851274 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2009] [Revised: 04/18/2010] [Accepted: 04/21/2010] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been long-standing concern about the delivery of preventive and screening services to patients with mental illness. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine whether the quality of preventive care received by patients with mental health conditions differs from that received by individuals who have no comparable mental disorder. Our hypothesis was that patients with mental illness would be in receipt of lower quality or lower frequency of preventive care. METHOD Studies that examined the quality of care in those with and without comorbid mental illness were reviewed and comparative data extracted. By using only comparative studies we hope to ascertain whether inequalities in care existed by virtue of psychiatric diagnoses (or closely affiliated factors). RESULTS We identified 26 studies that examined preventive care in individuals with vs. without psychiatric illness. From these eligible studies, 61 comparisons were documented across 13 health care domains. These included mammography, cervical smears, vaccinations, cholesterol screening, lifestyle counseling, colonoscopy. Twenty-seven comparisons revealed inferior preventive health care in those with mental illness, but 10 suggested superior preventive health care and 24 reached inconclusive findings. Inferior preventive care was most apparent in those with schizophrenia and in relation to osteoporosis screening, blood pressure monitoring, vaccinations, mammography and cholesterol monitoring. CONCLUSIONS We conclude there is strong evidence to suggest that the quality of preventive and screening services received by patients with mental illness is often lower, but occasionally superior to that received by individuals who have no comparable mental disorder. More work must be done to improve the quality of medical and preventive care for individuals with mental illness.
Collapse
|
9
|
Masterson EA, Hopenhayn C, Christian W. Self-Reported Mental Health Status and Recent Mammography Screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19:1569-76. [DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia Hopenhayn
- College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
- Markey Cancer Control Program, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - W.J. Christian
- Markey Cancer Control Program, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nelson W, Moser RP, Gaffey A, Waldron W. Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 18:1759-68. [PMID: 19951209 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it is widely accepted that Papanicolaou (Pap) screening can reduce cervical cancer mortality, many women still do not maintain regular cervical cancer screenings. OBJECTIVE To describe the prevalence of cervical cancer screening and the demographic, behavioral, psychological, and cancer-related knowledge factors associated with adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) cervical cancer screening guidelines among women in the United States. METHODS Data for women aged 25-64 were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Women were considered adherent to screening guidelines if they had two consecutive, on-schedule screenings and planned to have another within the next 3 years. The sample comprised 2070 women. RESULTS Ninety-eight percent of women reported ever having a Pap smear, 90% reported having had a recent Pap smear (within 3 years), and 84% were adherent to USPSTF screening guidelines. Maintaining regular cervical cancer screening was significantly associated with having health insurance, normal body mass index (BMI), smoking status (nonsmoker), mood (absence of a mood disturbance), and being knowledgeable about cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. CONCLUSIONS Based on the observation that women who were current smokers, obese, or experiencing a substantial degree of psychological distress were significantly less likely to adhere to recommended screening guidelines, we suggest that healthcare providers pay particular attention to the screening needs of these more vulnerable women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Nelson
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patten SB, Williams JVA, Lavorato DH, Eliasziw M. The effect of major depression on participation in preventive health care activities. BMC Public Health 2009; 9:87. [PMID: 19320983 PMCID: PMC2667419 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2008] [Accepted: 03/25/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to determine whether major depressive episodes (MDE) contribute to a lower rate of participation in three prevention activities: blood pressure checks, mammograms and Pap tests. METHODS The data source for this study was the Canadian National Population Health Survey (NPHS), a longitudinal study that started in 1994 and has subsequently re-interviewed its participants every two years. The NPHS included a short form version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-SF) to assess past year MDE and also collected data on participation in preventive activities. Initially, we examined whether respondents with MDE in a particular year were less likely to participate in screening during that same year. In order to assess whether MDE negatively altered the pattern of participation, those successfully screened at the baseline interview in 1994 were identified and divided into cohorts depending on their MDE status. Proportional hazard models were used to quantify the effect of MDE on subsequent participation in screening. RESULTS No effect of MDE on participation in the three preventive activities was identified either in the cross-sectional or longitudinal analysis. Adjustment for a set of relevant covariates did not alter this result. CONCLUSION Whereas MDE might be expected to reduce the frequency of participation in screening activities, no evidence for this was found in the current analysis. Since people with MDE may contact the health system more frequently, this may offset any tendency of the illness itself to reduce participation in screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott B Patten
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|