Toward Optimal Health: Managing Arthritis in Women

‘My opinion is that doctors prefer younger people’: older women, physicians and ageism

This study examines older women's views about and subjective experience of ageism during interactions with physicians. Views about and experience of sexism are also examined. Data were obtained from in-depth, face-to-face interviews conducted with 36 Canadian women 55 years and older. The findings indicate that older women believe ageism is likely to occur during medical encounters and are concerned about it. Few, however, claim to have personally experienced it. Contradicting the stereotype of the passive older patient, many participants were employing strategies to avoid becoming targets of ageism. Although there was some concern about sexism during medical encounters, in general, the women appeared to be less conscious of sexism than ageism.

Not Too Old, Not Too Young: Older Women's Perceptions of Physicians

RÉSUMÉ Les femmes plus âgées interagissent avec les médecins plus souvent que les hommes âgés et les personnes plus jeunes; pourtant, la connaissance et la compréhension de leurs expériences avec les médecins sont limitées. Le but de cette étude était d'étudier les perceptions des femmes âgées de leurs interactions avec les médecins et d'identifier ce que les femmes veulent de leurs médecins. Les entrevues en profondeur avec 30 femmes âgées montrent que la majorité veulent être impliquée activement dans leurs propres soins de santé. Dans la relation patient-médecin, les femmes donnent généralement la priorité aux qualités personnelles de médecins et leur comportement à l'égard du patient. Pour de nombreuses femmes, l'âge et le sexe du médecin ont aussi leur importance.

The effects of arthritis, mobility, and farm task on injury among older farmers

The current study was conducted by performing secondary analysis of data drawn from a study of sustained work indicators of older farmers. The primary outcome variable was the reported occurrence or non-occurrence of injuries because of farm work in the past year. There were three explanatory variables of interest: (1) whether respondents reported ever having been diagnosed with arthritis/rheumatism by a medical doctor; (2) whether participants reported having mobility problems; and (3) a farm task injury risk index. Additional explanatory variables included the estimated number of days spent on farming activities in the past year, as well as demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and race. Institutional review board approvals were obtained for the original study prior to data collection, and for the current study prior to secondary analysis of data. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the outcome and explanatory variables. Initial multivariable longitudinal models for the occurrence of injuries were fitted with the explanatory variables. Odds ratios for the effects of interest were calculated using the final models. A longitudinal model was fitted using data in waves 1, 3, and 5, with a farm task injury risk index as outcome variable and wave, sex, age, race, and estimated number of days spent on farming activities in the past year as explanatory variables for exploration of the relationship between the farm task injury risk index and these variables. In this group of older farmers, aging was protective for injury, and was associated with decreased farm task injury risk index. Arthritis/rheumatism was associated in our study with occurrence of injury because of farm work across all four waves. Our results indicated that farmers with mobility problems were twice as likely to experience injuries because of farm work compared to farmers with no mobility problems. Increased farm task injury risk index was associated with a 40% increase in odds for the occurrence of injury due to farm work. In this study of older farmers, the type of work, and not the amount of work was significantly associated with injury risk. Implications for future studies of farm injury include the need for nurse researchers and others to incorporate objective validated measures of mobility and health care provider diagnoses of arthritis, and arthritis type. Nurse researchers should proceed with ongoing evaluation of the farm task injury risk index to determine its validity, reliability, and usefulness as a predictor of farm injuries. In the practice setting, nurses may apply findings from this study to provide injury prevention teaching to older farmers and their families. For example, discussions of the more risky farm tasks, injury prevention strategies, and treatment modalities including those that promote improved mobility should be targeted to older farmers with arthritis and actual or potential mobility issues. Ultimately, these nursing research and practice efforts may lead to preservation of function, and decreased injury risk and severity among older farmers.

MR T2 values of the knee menisci in the healthy young population: zonal and sex differences

OBJECTIVE

The magnetic resonance (MR) T2 value of the cartilage, which has been shown in the articular cartilage to correlate with collagen fiber orientation and water content, may be helpful for early detection of chondropathy. However, the measurement and significance of MR T2 value for knee meniscus have not been well established. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the MR T2 values in the diverse zones of the posterior horn of the knee meniscus differ between sexes in a young healthy population.

METHOD

Twenty healthy volunteers, 10 men and 10 women (aged from 22 to 32 years), were enrolled for MR imaging of the right knee menisci. The T2 values of the posterior horns of the medial and lateral knee menisci were measured for the white zone, red/white zone, and red zone on images acquired with fat-suppressed multislice turbo spin-echo sequence at 3.0 T.

RESULTS

The T2 value, with medial and lateral menisci considered together, increased significantly from the inner white zone (T2=8.02+/-0.60 ms), to the red/white zone (T2=8.78+/-0.99 ms), and to the outer red zone (T2=12.22+/-0.92 ms) of the posterior horns of the menisci (P<0.001). A generalized estimating equation method and multiple linear regression model showed that the T2 values averaged for the medial and lateral menisci together in the red and red/white zones were significantly lower in men than in women by 1.320 ms (P=0.002) and 0.865 ms (P<0.001), respectively, while the white zone showed no significant difference (P=0.694) between men (8.08+/-0.63 ms) and women (7.98+/-0.60 ms).

CONCLUSION

Zonal and sex differences in the MR T2 values in the posterior horns of the knee menisci exist in the young healthy population. These differences may be associated with sex differences in the occurrence of knee osteoarthritis.